Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:07:19.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The tangled web of agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

Alain Pe-Curto ,
Julien A. Deonna  and
David Sander
Alain Pe-Curto
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, College of Arts and Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3125; [email protected]://philosophy.unc.edu/people/alain-pe-curto/
Julien A. Deonna
Affiliation:
Swiss Center for Affective Sciences and Department of Philosophy at the Faculty of Humanities, Université de Genève, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland. [email protected]@unige.chhttp://www.affective-sciences.org/en/home/cisa/members/julien-deonna/http://www.affective-sciences.org/en/home/cisa/members/david-sander/
David Sander
Affiliation:
Swiss Center for Affective Sciences and Department of Philosophy at the Faculty of Humanities, Université de Genève, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland. [email protected]@unige.chhttp://www.affective-sciences.org/en/home/cisa/members/julien-deonna/http://www.affective-sciences.org/en/home/cisa/members/david-sander/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We characterize Doris's anti-reflectivist, collaborativist, valuational theory along two dimensions. The first dimension is social entanglement, according to which cognition, agency, and selves are socially embedded. The second dimension is disentanglement, the valuational element of the theory that licenses the anchoring of agency and responsibility in distinct actors. We then present an issue for the account: the problem of bad company.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e57
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfano, M. (2013a) Character as moral fiction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, C. (2004) An apology for moral shame. Journal of Political Philosophy 12(2):127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, J. M. (2002) Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doris, J. M. (2009) Skepticism about persons. Philosophical Issues 19(1):57–91.Google Scholar
Doris, J. M. (2015b). Talking to our selves: Reflection, ignorance, and agency. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Isen, A. M. & Levin, P. F. (1972) Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21(3):384.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, D. (2015). Review of Talking to Our Selves: Reflection, Ignorance, and Agency, by Doris, John M.. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2015.11.17. Available at: http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/62138-talking-to-our-selves-reflection-ignorance-and-agency/.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1993) Shame and necessity. University of California Press.Google Scholar