Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:43:59.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grounding responsibility in something (more) solid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

William Hirstein  and
Katrina Sifferd
William Hirstein
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Elmhurst College, Elmhurst, IL 60126. [email protected]@elmhurst.edu
Katrina Sifferd
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Elmhurst College, Elmhurst, IL 60126. [email protected]@elmhurst.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The cases that Doris chronicles of confabulation are similar to perceptual illusions in that, while they show the interstices of our perceptual or cognitive system, they fail to establish that our everyday perception or cognition is not for the most part correct. Doris's account in general lacks the resources to make synchronic assessments of responsibility, partially because it fails to make use of knowledge now available to us about what is happening in the brains of agents.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e47
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Doris, J. M. (2015b). Talking to our selves: Reflection, ignorance, and agency. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirstein, W. (2005) Brain fiction: Self-deception and the riddle of confabulation. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hirstein, W., Sifferd, K. & Fagan, T. (2018) Responsible brains: Neuroscience and human culpability. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar