This paper proposes Pearson-type statistics based on implied probabilities to detect structural change. The class of generalized empirical likelihood estimators (see Smith 1997, The Economic Journal107, 503–519) assigns a set of implied probabilities to each observation such that moment conditions are satisfied. The proposed test statistics for structural change are based on the information content in these implied probabilities. We consider cases of structural change with unknown breakpoint that can occur in the parameters of interest or in the overidentifying restrictions used to estimate these parameters. We also propose a structural change test based on implied probabilities that is robust to weak identification or cases in which parameters are completely unidentified. The test statistics considered here have competitive size and power properties. Moreover, they are computed in a single step, which eliminates the need to compute the weighting matrix required for generalized method of moments estimation.

We propose a novel conditional quantile prediction method based on complete subset averaging (CSA) for quantile regressions. All models under consideration are potentially misspecified, and the dimension of regressors goes to infinity as the sample size increases. Since we average over the complete subsets, the number of models is much larger than the usual model averaging method which adopts sophisticated weighting schemes. We propose to use an equal weight but select the proper size of the complete subset based on the leave-one-out cross-validation method. Building upon the theory of Lu and Su (2015, Journal of Econometrics 188, 40–58), we investigate the large sample properties of CSA and show the asymptotic optimality in the sense of Li (1987, Annals of Statistics 15, 958–975) We check the finite sample performance via Monte Carlo simulations and empirical applications.

We derive conditions for the identification of the structural parameters in Markov decision model under the assumptions of Rust (1987, Econometrica 55, 999–1033) when the payoff function is parametrically specified. Identification in this class of dynamic problems is difficult to establish since the parameters of interest enter the value function nonlinearly, and the value function is only defined implicitly as a fixed point of some functional equation. We show it is sufficient to verify identification in the pseudomodel, which is more tractable as it is originally designed to reduce the computational burden in the estimation problem, for the identification of the data generating parameter of the underling model. Our results extend naturally to a class of dynamic discrete action games commonly used in empirical industrial organizations.

This article proposes the use of spectral methods to pool cross-sectional replications (N) of time series data (T) for time series analysis. Spectral representations readily suggest a weighting scheme to pool the data. The asymptotically desirable properties of the resulting estimators seem to translate satisfactorily into samples as small as T = 25 with N = 5. Simulation results, Monte Carlo results, and an empirical example help confirm this finding. The article concludes that there are many empirical situations where spectral methods canbe used where they were previously eschewed.

This paper studies asymptotic properties of a posterior probability density and Bayesian estimators of spatial econometric models in the classical statistical framework. We focus on the high-order spatial autoregressive model with spatial autoregressive disturbance terms, due to a computational advantage of Bayesian estimation. We also study the asymptotic properties of Bayesian estimation of the spatial autoregressive Tobit model, as an example of nonlinear spatial models. Simulation studies show that even when the sample size is small or moderate, the posterior distribution of parameters is well approximated by a normal distribution, and Bayesian estimators have satisfactory performance, as classical large sample theory predicts.

In this paper, we complement joint time-series and cross-section convergence results derived in a companion paper Hahn, Kuersteiner, and Mazzocco (2016, Central Limit Theory for Combined Cross-Section and Time Series) by allowing for serial correlation in the time-series sample. The implications of our analysis are limiting distributions that have a well-known form of long-run variances for the time-series limit. We obtain these results at the cost of imposing strict stationarity for the time-series model and conditional independence between the time-series and cross-section samples. Our results can be applied to estimators that combine time-series and cross-section data in the presence of aggregate uncertainty in models with rationally forward-looking agents.

We develop the limit theory of the quantilogram and cross-quantilogram under long memory. We establish the sub-root-n central limit theorems for quantilograms that depend on nuisance parameters. We propose a moving block bootstrap (MBB) procedure for inference and establish its consistency, thereby enabling a consistent confidence interval construction for the quantilograms. The newly developed reduction principles for the quantilograms serve as the main technical devices used to derive the asymptotics and establish the validity of MBB. We report some simulation evidence that our methods work satisfactorily. We apply our method to quantile predictive relations between financial returns and long-memory predictors.

Long-run restrictions are a very popular method for identifying structural vector autoregressions, but they suffer from weak identification when the data is very persistent, i.e., when the highest autoregressive roots are near unity. Near unit roots introduce additional nuisance parameters and make standard weak-instrument-robust methods of inference inapplicable. We develop a method of inference that is robust to both weak identification and strong persistence. The method is based on a combination of the Anderson-Rubin test with instruments derived by filtering potentially nonstationary variables to make them near stationary using the IVX instrumentation method of Magdalinos and Phillips (2009). We apply our method to obtain robust confidence bands on impulse responses in two leading applications in the literature.

It is well known that when investors evaluate risk or opportunity, they often depart from predictions of expected utility. In addition, for both academic and financial communities it is a familiar stylized fact that stock return distributions are not normal. Both empirical evidence and experimental evidence indicate that distributional information of asset returns has an important impact on investors. In this paper, we argue that the right-tail distributional information of returns can provide very valuable information to investors and portfolio managers, and right-tail information should be used together with other (say, left-tail) information in analyzing financial markets. Here, we introduce measures for the right-tail distribution. Quantile regression estimators for the right-tail measures are proposed, and their asymptotic properties are developed. Statistical inference on testing for changes of right-tail distribution is also discussed. A Monte Carlo experiment is conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed estimator. The proposed estimation method may also be applied to estimation of other measures in finance.

We introduce a new approach for comparing the predictive accuracy of two nested models that bypasses the difficulties caused by the degeneracy of the asymptotic variance of forecast error loss differentials used in the construction of commonly used predictive comparison statistics. Our approach continues to rely on the out of sample mean squared error loss differentials between the two competing models, leads to nuisance parameter-free Gaussian asymptotics, and is shown to remain valid under flexible assumptions that can accommodate heteroskedasticity and the presence of mixed predictors (e.g., stationary and local to unit root). A local power analysis also establishes their ability to detect departures from the null in both stationary and persistent settings. Simulations calibrated to common economic and financial applications indicate that our methods have strong power with good size control across commonly encountered sample sizes.

On June 4, 1999 G.S. Maddala (popularly and affectionately known as GS) passed away in Columbus, Ohio at the age of 66. A leading figure in the econometrics profession for more than three decades, he held the University Eminent Scholar Professorship in the Department of Economics at Ohio State University at the time of his death. GS is survived by his wife Kameswari, “Kay,” and several members of his immediate family: his daughter, Tara, of Houston; his son, Vivek, of San Francisco; and two sisters who live in India.

A size correction to adjust the critical values of asymptotic χ2 tests in a SUR context has been developed by Rothenberg and verified by Phillips. The adjustment centers the distribution of the observed test statistic so that it coincides more closely with its hypothetical distribution. The correction itself is an approximation to O(T−1), and while the adjustment should be superior to the asymptotic test (no adjustment) in small-sample situations, its performance can be expected to deteriorate as the sample size decreases. The Edgeworth corrections, using formulas provided by Phillips, are calculated for the Wald, likelihood ratio, and Lagrange multiplier tests in the context of symmetry testing in demand analysis using the Laitinen–Meisner simulated data set. The sample consists of 31 observations and the corrections were “adequate to useful” in the context of 5, 8, and 11 equations. However, in the extreme case of 14 equations the corrections typically only took up 60% of the adjustment required. The computational cost of calculating the Edgeworth correction for large SUR systems with a large number of restrictions also turns out to be quite heavy. The conclusion reached is that while Edgeworth corrections are not totally satisfactory, they are easy to include in a program and provide a useful critical value correction.

A common test in econometrics is the Dickey–Fuller test, which is based on the test statistic . We investigate the behavior of the test statistic if the data yt are given by an exponential random walk exp(Zt) where Zt = Zt−1 + σεt and the εt are independent and identically distributed random variables. The test statistic DF(T) is a nonlinear transformation of the partial sums of εt process. Under certain moment conditions on the εt we show that tends to one as λ → 0. For the particular case that the εt define a simple random walk it is shown that plimT→∞DF(T)/T exists and the limit is evaluated. The theoretical results are illustrated by some simulation experiments.We gratefully acknowledge the help of an anonymous referee whose comments on the first two versions of this paper enabled us to reduce the number of mistakes and to increase the clarity of presentation. The authors' research was supported in part by Sonderforschungsbereich 475, University of Dortmund.

This paper extends the Andrews (2002, Econometrica 71, 1661–1694) and Andrews and Kim (2006, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 24, 379–394) ordinary least squares–based end-of-sample instability tests for linear regression models. The author proposes to quasi-difference the data first using a consistent estimate of the sum of the autoregressive coefficients of the error process and then test for the end-of-sample instability. For the cointegration model, the feasible quasi-generalized least squares (FQGLS) version of the Andrews and Kim (2006) P test is considered and is shown, by simulations, to be more robust to serial correlation in the error process and to have power no less than Andrews and Kim’s original test. For the linear time trend model, the FQGLS version of the Andrews (2002) S test is considered with the error process allowed to be nonstationary up to one unit root, and the new test is shown to be robust to potentially nonstationary serial correlation. A simulation study also shows that the finite-sample properties of the proposed test can be further improved when the Andrews (1993, Econometrica 61,139–165) or Andrews and Chen (1994, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 12, 187–204) median unbiased estimate of the sum of the autoregressive coefficients is used.

This paper studies the weak convergence of renorming volatilities in a family of GARCH(1,1) models from a functional point of view. After suitable renormalization, it is shown that the limiting distribution is a geometric Brownian motion when the associated top Lyapunov exponent γ > 0 and is an exponential functional of the maximum process of a Brownian motion when γ = 0. This indicates that the volatility of the GARCH(1,1)-type model has a completely different random structure according to the sign of γ. The obtained results further strengthen our understanding of volatilities in GARCH-type models. Simulation studies are carried out to assess our findings.

On Hadamard product of square roots of correlation matrices—solution.

We consider the method of moments estimation of a structural equation in a panel dynamic simultaneous equations model under different sample size combinations of cross-sectional dimension, N, and time series dimension, T. Two types of linear transformation to remove the individual-specific effects from the model, first difference and forward orthogonal demeaning, are considered. We show that the Alvarez and Arellano (2003) type GMM estimator under both transformations is consistent only if ${T \over N} \to 0$ as $\left( {N,T} \right) \to \infty $. However, it is asymptotically biased if ${{{T^3}} \over N} \to \kappa \ne 0 < \infty$ as $\left( {N,T} \right) \to \infty $. Since the validity of statistical inference depends critically on whether an estimator is asymptotically unbiased, we suggest a jackknife bias reduction method and derive its limiting distribution. Monte Carlo studies are conducted to demonstrate the importance of using an asymptotically unbiased estimator to obtain valid statistical inference.

The paper examines the effect of conditional heteroskedasticity on least squares inference in stochastic regression models of unknown integration order and proposes an inference procedure that is robust to models within the (near) I(0)–(near) I(1) range with GARCH innovations. We show that a regressor signal of exact order $O_{p}\left ( n\kappa _{n}\right ) $ for arbitrary $\,\kappa _{n}\rightarrow \infty $ is sufficient to eliminate stationary GARCH effects from the limit distributions of least squares based estimators and self-normalized test statistics. The above order dominates the $O_{p}\left ( n\right ) $ signal of stationary regressors but may be dominated by the $O_{p}\left ( n^{2}\right ) $ signal of I(1) regressors, thereby showing that least squares invariance to GARCH effects is not an exclusively I(1) phenomenon but extends to processes with persistence degree arbitrarily close to stationarity. The theory validates standard inference for self normalized test statistics based on the ordinary least squares estimator when $\kappa _{n}\rightarrow \infty $ and $\kappa _{n}/n\rightarrow 0$ and the IVX estimator (Phillips and Magdalinos (2009a), Econometric Inference in the Vicinity of Unity. Working paper, Singapore Management University; Kostakis, Magdalinos, and Stamatogiannis, 2015a, Review of Financial Studies 28(5), 1506–1553.) when $\kappa _{n}\rightarrow \infty $ and the innovation sequence of the system is a covariance stationary vec-GARCH process. An adjusted version of the IVX–Wald test is shown to also accommodate GARCH effects in purely stationary regressors, thereby extending the procedure’s validity over the entire (near) I(0)–(near) I(1) range of regressors under conditional heteroskedasticity in the innovations. It is hoped that the wide range of applicability of this adjusted IVX–Wald test, established in Theorem 4.4, presents an advantage for the procedure’s suitability as a tool for applied research.