Spatial autoregressive (SAR) and related models offer flexible yet parsimonious ways to model spatial and network interactions. SAR specifications typically rely on a particular parametric functional form and an exogenous choice of the so-called spatial weight matrix with only limited guidance from theory in making these specifications. Also, the choice of a SAR model over other alternatives, such as spatial Durbin (SD) or spatial lagged X (SLX) models, is often arbitrary, raising issues of potential specification error. To address such issues, this paper develops a new specification test within the SAR framework that can detect general forms of misspecification including that of the spatial weight matrix, the functional form and the model itself. The test is robust to the presence of heteroskedasticity of unknown form in the disturbances and the approach relates to the conditional moment test framework of Bierens ([1982, Journal of Econometrics 20, 105–134], [1990, Econometrica 58, 1443–1458]). The Bierens test is shown to be inconsistent in general against spatial alternatives and the new test introduces modifications to achieve test consistency in the spatial setting. A central element is the infinite-dimensional endogeneity induced by spatial linkages. This complexity is addressed by introducing a new component to the omnibus test that captures the effects of potential spatial matrix misspecification. With this modification, the approach leads to a simple pivotal test procedure with standard critical values that is the first test in the literature to have power against misspecifications in the spatial linkages. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the test under the null hypothesis of correct SAR specification and prove consistency. A Monte Carlo study is conducted to study its finite sample performance. An empirical illustration on the performance of the test in modeling tax competition in Finland is included.

We demonstrate that a large class of discrete choice models of demand can be approximated by real analytic demand models. We obtain this result by combining (i) a novel real analytic property of the mixed logit and the mixed probit models with any distribution of random coefficients and (ii) an approximation property of finite mixtures of Gumbel and Gaussian distributions. To illustrate some of the implications of this result, we discuss how real analyticity facilitates nonparametric and semi-nonparametric identification, extrapolation to hypothetical counterfactuals, numerical implementation of demand inverses, and numerical implementation of the maximum likelihood estimator.

This paper considers testing for unit roots in Gaussian panels with cross-sectional dependence generated by common factors. Within our setup, we can analyze restricted versions of the two prevalent approaches in the literature, that of Moon and Perron (2004, Journal of Econometrics 122, 81–126), who specify a factor model for the innovations, and the PANIC setup proposed in Bai and Ng (2004, Econometrica 72, 1127–1177), who test common factors and idiosyncratic deviations separately for unit roots. We show that both frameworks lead to locally asymptotically normal experiments with the same central sequence and Fisher information. Using Le Cam’s theory of statistical experiments, we obtain the local asymptotic power envelope for unit-root tests. We show that the popular Moon and Perron (2004, Journal of Econometrics 122, 81–126) and Bai and Ng (2010, Econometric Theory 26, 1088–1114) tests only attain the power envelope in case there is no heterogeneity in the long-run variance of the idiosyncratic components. We develop a new test which is asymptotically uniformly most powerful irrespective of possible heterogeneity in the long-run variance of the idiosyncratic components. Monte Carlo simulations corroborate our asymptotic results and document significant gains in finite-sample power if the variances of the idiosyncratic shocks differ substantially among the cross-sectional units.

This paper presents an asymptotic theory for recurrent jump diffusion models with well-defined scale functions. The class of such models is broad, including general nonstationary as well as stationary jump diffusions with state-dependent jump sizes and intensities. The asymptotics for recurrent jump diffusion models with scale functions are largely comparable to the asymptotics for the corresponding diffusion models without jumps. For stationary jump diffusions, our asymptotics yield the usual law of large numbers and the standard central limit theory with normal limit distributions. The asymptotics for nonstationary jump diffusions, on the other hand, are nonstandard and the limit distributions are given as generalized diffusion processes.

We propose a new approach to the semiparametric analysis of panel data binary choice models with fixed effects and dynamics (lagged dependent variables). The model under consideration has the same random utility framework as in Honoré and Kyriazidou (2000, Econometrica 68, 839–874). We demonstrate that, with additional serial dependence conditions on the process of deterministic utility and tail restrictions on the error distribution, the (point) identification of the model can proceed in two steps, and requires matching only the value of an index function of explanatory variables over time, rather than the value of each explanatory variable. Our identification method motivates an easily implementable, two-step maximum score (2SMS) procedure – producing estimators whose rates of convergence, in contrast to Honoré and Kyriazidou’s (2000, Econometrica 68, 839–874) methods, are independent of the model dimension. We then analyze the asymptotic properties of the 2SMS procedure and propose bootstrap-based distributional approximations for inference. Evidence from Monte Carlo simulations indicates that our procedure performs satisfactorily in finite samples.

This paper proposes a nonparametric test to assess whether there exist heterogeneous quantile treatment effects (QTEs) of an intervention on the outcome of interest across different sub-populations defined by covariates of interest. Specifically, a consistent test statistic based on the Cramér–von Mises type criterion is developed to test if the treatment has a constant quantile effect for all sub-populations defined by covariates of interest. Under some regularity conditions, the asymptotic behaviors of the proposed test statistic are investigated under both the null and alternative hypotheses. Furthermore, a nonparametric Bootstrap procedure is suggested to approximate the finite-sample null distribution of the proposed test; then, the asymptotic validity of the proposed Bootstrap test is theoretically justified. Through Monte Carlo simulations, we demonstrate the power properties of the test in finite samples. Finally, the proposed testing approach is applied to investigate whether there exists heterogeneity for the QTE of maternal smoking during pregnancy on infant birth weight across different age groups of mothers.

Cointegrating polynomial regressions (CPRs) include deterministic variables, integrated variables, and their powers as explanatory variables. Based on a novel kernel-weighted limit result and a novel functional central limit theorem, this paper shows that the fully modified ordinary least squares (FM-OLS) estimator of Phillips and Hansen (1990, Review of Economic Studies 57, 99–125) is robust to being used in CPRs. Being used in CPRs refers to a widespread empirical practice that treats the integrated variables and their powers, incorrectly, as a vector of integrated variables and uses textbook FM-OLS. Robustness means that this “formal” FM-OLS practice leads to a zero mean Gaussian mixture limiting distribution that coincides with the limiting distribution of the Wagner and Hong (2016, Econometric Theory 32, 1289–1315) application of the FM estimation principle to the CPR case. The only restriction for this result to hold is that all integrated variables to power one are included as regressors. Even though simulation results indicate performance advantages of the Wagner and Hong (2016, Econometric Theory 32, 1289–1315) estimator, partly even in large samples, the results of the paper give an asymptotic foundation to “formal” FM-OLS and thus enlarge the usability of the Phillips and Hansen (1990, Review of Economic Studies 57, 99–125) estimator implemented in many software packages.

This paper introduces a new class of time-varying vector moving average processes of infinite order. These processes serve dual purposes: (1) they can be used to model time-varying dependence structures, and (2) they can be used to establish asymptotic theories for multivariate time series models. To illustrate these two points, we first establish some fundamental asymptotic properties and use them to infer the trending term of a vector moving average infinity process. We then investigate a class of time-varying VARX models. Finally, we demonstrate the empirical relevance of the theoretical results using extensive simulated and real data studies.

This paper establishes bounds on the performance of empirical risk minimization for large-dimensional linear regression. We generalize existing results by allowing the data to be dependent and heavy-tailed. The analysis covers both the cases of identically and heterogeneously distributed observations. Our analysis is nonparametric in the sense that the relationship between the regressand and the regressors is not specified. The main results of this paper show that the empirical risk minimizer achieves the optimal performance (up to a logarithmic factor) in a dependent data setting.

This paper proposes a subsampling inference method for extreme conditional quantiles based on a self-normalized version of a local estimator for conditional quantiles, such as the local linear quantile regression estimator. The proposed method circumvents difficulty of estimating nuisance parameters in the limiting distribution of the local estimator. A simulation study and empirical example illustrate usefulness of our subsampling inference to investigate extremal phenomena.

This paper analyses aspects of generalized method of moments (GMM) inference in moment equality models in settings where standard regularity conditions may break down. Explicit analytic formulations for the asymptotic distributions of estimable functions of the GMM estimator and statistics based on the GMM criterion function are derived under relatively mild assumptions. The moment Jacobian is allowed to be rank deficient, so first order identification may fail, the values of the Jacobian singular values are not constrained, thereby allowing for varying levels of identification strength, the long-run variance of the moment conditions can be singular, and the GMM criterion function weighting matrix may also be chosen sub-optimally. The large-sample properties are derived without imposing a specific structure on the functional form of the moment conditions. Closed-form expressions for the distributions are presented that can be evaluated using standard software without recourse to bootstrap or simulation methods. The practical operation of the results is illustrated via examples involving instrumental variables estimation of a structural equation with endogenous regressors and a common CH features model.

Tests based on heteroskedasticity robust standard errors are an important technique in econometric practice. Choosing the right critical value, however, is not simple at all: conventional critical values based on asymptotics often lead to severe size distortions, and so do existing adjustments including the bootstrap. To avoid these issues, we suggest to use smallest size-controlling critical values, the generic existence of which we prove in this article for the commonly used test statistics. Furthermore, sufficient and often also necessary conditions for their existence are given that are easy to check. Granted their existence, these critical values are the canonical choice: larger critical values result in unnecessary power loss, whereas smaller critical values lead to overrejections under the null hypothesis, make spurious discoveries more likely, and thus are invalid. We suggest algorithms to numerically determine the proposed critical values and provide implementations in accompanying software. Finally, we numerically study the behavior of the proposed testing procedures, including their power properties.

This paper considers a model with general regressors and unobservable common factors. An estimator based on iterated principal component analysis is proposed, which is shown to be not only asymptotically normal, but under certain conditions also free of the otherwise so common asymptotic incidental parameters bias. Interestingly, the conditions required to achieve unbiasedness become weaker the stronger the trends in the factors, and if the trending is strong enough, unbiasedness comes at no cost at all. The approach does not require any knowledge of how many factors there are, or whether they are deterministic or stochastic. The order of integration of the factors is also treated as unknown, as is the order of integration of the regressors, which means that there is no need to pre-test for unit roots, or to decide on which deterministic terms to include in the model.

Systemic risk measures have been shown to be predictive of financial crises and declines in real activity. Thus, forecasting them is of major importance in finance and economics. In this paper, we propose a new forecasting method for systemic risk as measured by the marginal expected shortfall (MES). It is based on first de-volatilizing the observations and, then, calculating systemic risk for the residuals using an estimator based on extreme value theory. We show the validity of the method by establishing the asymptotic normality of the MES forecasts. The good finite-sample coverage of the implied MES forecast intervals is confirmed in simulations. An empirical application to major U.S. banks illustrates the significant time variation in the precision of MES forecasts, and explores the implications of this fact from a regulatory perspective.

This paper proposes a novel method of algorithmic subsampling (data sketching) for multiway cluster-dependent data. We establish a new uniform weak law of large numbers and a new central limit theorem for multiway algorithmic subsample means. We show that algorithmic subsampling allows for robustness against potential degeneracy, and even non-Gaussian degeneracy, of the asymptotic distribution under multiway clustering at the cost of efficiency and power loss due to algorithmic subsampling. Simulation studies support this novel result, and demonstrate that inference with algorithmic subsampling entails more accuracy than that without algorithmic subsampling. We derive the consistency and the asymptotic normality for multiway algorithmic subsampling generalized method of moments estimator and for multiway algorithmic subsampling M-estimator. We illustrate with an application to scanner data for the analysis of differentiated products markets.

We introduce a new approach for comparing the predictive accuracy of two nested models that bypasses the difficulties caused by the degeneracy of the asymptotic variance of forecast error loss differentials used in the construction of commonly used predictive comparison statistics. Our approach continues to rely on the out of sample mean squared error loss differentials between the two competing models, leads to nuisance parameter-free Gaussian asymptotics, and is shown to remain valid under flexible assumptions that can accommodate heteroskedasticity and the presence of mixed predictors (e.g., stationary and local to unit root). A local power analysis also establishes their ability to detect departures from the null in both stationary and persistent settings. Simulations calibrated to common economic and financial applications indicate that our methods have strong power with good size control across commonly encountered sample sizes.

We propose various semiparametric estimators for nonlinear selection models, where slope and intercept can be separately identified. When the selection equation satisfies a monotonic index restriction, we suggest a local polynomial estimator, using only observations for which the marginal cumulative distribution function of the instrument index is close to one. Data-driven procedures such as cross-validation may be used to select the bandwidth for this estimator. We then consider the case in which the monotonic index restriction does not hold and/or the set of observations with a propensity score close to one is thin so that convergence occurs at a rate that is arbitrarily close to the cubic rate. We explore the finite sample behavior in a Monte Carlo study and illustrate the use of our estimator using a model for count data with multiplicative unobserved heterogeneity.

We introduce a new test for a two-sided hypothesis involving a subset of the structural parameter vector in the linear instrumental variables (IVs) model. Guggenberger, Kleibergen, and Mavroeidis (2019, Quantitative Economics, 10, 487–526; hereafter GKM19) introduce a subvector Anderson–Rubin (AR) test with data-dependent critical values that has asymptotic size equal to nominal size for a parameter space that allows for arbitrary strength or weakness of the IVs and has uniformly nonsmaller power than the projected AR test studied in Guggenberger et al. (2012, Econometrica, 80(6), 2649–2666). However, GKM19 imposes the restrictive assumption of conditional homoskedasticity (CHOM). The main contribution here is to robustify the procedure in GKM19 to arbitrary forms of conditional heteroskedasticity. We first adapt the method in GKM19 to a setup where a certain covariance matrix has an approximate Kronecker product (AKP) structure which nests CHOM. The new test equals this adaptation when the data are consistent with AKP structure as decided by a model selection procedure. Otherwise, the test equals the AR/AR test in Andrews (2017, Identification-Robust Subvector Inference, Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 3005, Yale University) that is fully robust to conditional heteroskedasticity but less powerful than the adapted method. We show theoretically that the new test has asymptotic size bounded by the nominal size and document improved power relative to the AR/AR test in a wide array of Monte Carlo simulations when the covariance matrix is not too far from AKP.

This paper proposes a test of the single equilibrium in the data assumption commonly maintained when estimating static discrete games of incomplete information. By allowing for discrete common knowledge payoff-relevant unobserved heterogeneity, the test generalizes existing methods attributing all correlation between players’ decisions to multiple equilibria. It does not require the estimation of payoffs and is therefore useful in empirical applications leveraging multiple equilibria to identify the model’s primitives. The procedure boils down to testing the emptiness of the set of data generating processes that can rationalize the sample through a single equilibrium and a finite mixture over unobserved heterogeneity. Under verifiable conditions, this testable implication is generically sufficient for degenerate equilibrium selection. The main identifying assumption is the existence of an observable variable that plays the role of a proxy for the unobservable heterogeneity. Examples of such proxies are provided based on empirical applications from the existing literature.