Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:34:41.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a second-person neuroscience1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2013

Leonhard Schilbach ,
Bert Timmermans ,
Vasudevi Reddy ,
Alan Costall ,
Gary Bente ,
Tobias Schlicht  and
Kai Vogeley
Leonhard Schilbach
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany. [email protected]
Bert Timmermans
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, King's College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, Scotland, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.abdn.ac.uk/psychology/people/details/bert.timmermans
Vasudevi Reddy
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, King Henry Building, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2DY, United Kingdom. [email protected]
Alan Costall
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, King Henry Building, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2DY, United Kingdom. [email protected]
Gary Bente
Affiliation:
Department for Psychology, Social Psychology II – Communication and Media Psychology, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany. [email protected]
Tobias Schlicht
Affiliation:
Institute of Philosophy, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany. [email protected]
Kai Vogeley
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience & Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, 52428 Juelich, Germany; and Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In spite of the remarkable progress made in the burgeoning field of social neuroscience, the neural mechanisms that underlie social encounters are only beginning to be studied and could – paradoxically – be seen as representing the “dark matter” of social neuroscience. Recent conceptual and empirical developments consistently indicate the need for investigations that allow the study of real-time social encounters in a truly interactive manner. This suggestion is based on the premise that social cognition is fundamentally different when we are in interaction with others rather than merely observing them. In this article, we outline the theoretical conception of a second-person approach to other minds and review evidence from neuroimaging, psychophysiological studies, and related fields to argue for the development of a second-person neuroscience, which will help neuroscience to really “go social”; this may also be relevant for our understanding of psychiatric disorders construed as disorders of social cognition.

Keywords

interactor's point of viewmentalizing networkmirror neuron systemobserver's point of view“problem” of other mindssecond-person neurosciencesocial cognition
Type
Target Article
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , August 2013 , pp. 393 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

Authors Leonhard Schilbach and Bert Timmermans have contributed equally to this article.

References

Allen, M. & Williams, G. (2011) Consciousness, plasticity, and connectomics: The role of intersubjectivity in human cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 2:20. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allport, F. H. (1924) Social psychology. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. & Richeson, J. (2000) Towards a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 32:201–72. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80006-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amodio, D. M. & Frith, C. D. (2006) Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7(4):268–77. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anders, S., Heinzle, J., Weiskopf, N., Ethofer, T. & Haynes, J. D. (2011) Flow of affective information between communicating brains. NeuroImage 54(1):439–46. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, M. L. (2010) Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(4):245–66. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000853.Google Scholar
Asch, S. (1952) Social psychology. Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auvray, M., Lenay, C. & Stewart, J. (2009) Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment. New Ideas in Psychology 27:32–47. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacharach, M. (2006) Beyond individual choice. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baess, P., Zhdanov, A., Mandel, A., Parkkonen, L., Hirvenkari, L., Mäkelä, J. P., Jousmäki, V. & Hari, R. (2012) MEG dual scanning: A procedure to study real-time auditory interaction between two persons. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6:83. (Electronic Journal).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Latham, P. E., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G. & Frith, C. D. (2010) Optimally interacting minds. Science 329(5995):1081–85. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1185718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C. & Loomis, J. M. (2003) Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29(7):819–33. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029007002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar, M. (2007) The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(7):280–89. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barresi, J. & Moore, C. (1996) Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19(1):107–22. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041790.Google Scholar
Becchio, C., Pierno, A., Mari, M., Lusher, D. & Castiello, U. (2007) Motor contagion from gaze: The case of autism. Brain 130(9):2401–11. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becchio, C., Sartori, L. & Castiello, U. (2010) Toward you: The social side of actions. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(3):183–88. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721410370131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, T. E. J., Hunt, L. T. & Rushworth, M. F. (2009) The computation of social behavior. Science 324(5931):1160–64. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1169694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bente, G. (1989) Facilities for the graphical computer simulation of head and body movements. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 21(4):455–62. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03202817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bente, G., Eschenburg, F. & Aelker, L. (2007a) Effects of simulated gaze on social presence, person perception and personality attribution in avatar-mediated communication. In: Presence 2007: Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Workshop on Presence, October 25-27, 2007, Barcelona, Spain, ed. Moreno, L., pp. 207–14. Starlab Barcelona, S.L. Available at: http://www.temple.edu/ispr/prev_conferences/proceedings/2007/Bente, Eschenburg, and Aelker.pdf.Google Scholar
Bente, G., Feist, A. & Elder, S. (1996) Person perception effects of computer-simulated male and female head movement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 20(4):213–28. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02248674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bente, G., Krämer, N. C. & Eschenburg, F. (2008a) Is there anybody out there? Analyzing the effects of embodiment and nonverbal behavior in avatar-mediated communication. In: Mediated interpersonal communication, ed. Konijn, E., Utz, S., Tanis, M. & Barnes, S., pp. 131–57. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bente, G., Krämer, N. C., Petersen, A. & de Ruiter, J. P. (2001) Computer animated movement and person perception: Methodological advances in nonverbal behavior research. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 25(3):151–66. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010690525717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bente, G., Leuschner, H., Al Issa, A. & Blascovich, J. J. (2010) The others: Universals and cultural specificities in the perception of status and dominance from nonverbal behavior. Consciousness and Cognition 19(3):762–77. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bente, G., Rüggenberg, S., Krämer, N. C. & Eschenburg, F. (2008b) Avatar-mediated networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research 34(2):287–318. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00322.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigelow, A. & Rochat, P. (2006) Two-month-old infants' sensitivity to social contingency in mother-infant and stranger–infant interaction. Infancy 9(3):313–25. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327078in0903_3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biocca, F., Harms, C. & Burgoon, J. (2003) Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12(5):456–80. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A. C., Swinth, K. R., Hoyt, C. L. & Bailenson, J. N. (2002) Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry 13(2):103–24. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1302_01.Google Scholar
Bos, P. A., Panksepp, J., Bluthe, R. M. & Honk, J. V. (2012) Acute effects of steroid hormones and neuropeptides on human social-emotional behavior: A review of single administration studies. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 33(1):17–35. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.01.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brass, M., Schmitt, R. M., Spengler, S. & Gergely, G. (2007) Investigating action understanding: Inferential processes versus action simulation. Current Biology 17(24):2117–21. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.057.Google Scholar
Brazelton, T. B. (1986) The development of newborn behavior. In: Human growth: A comprehensive treatise, vol. 2, ed. Faulkner, F. & Tanner, J. M., pp. 519–40. Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, S. E. & Clark, H. H. (1996) Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22(6):1482–93. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1482.Google ScholarPubMed
Brennan, S. E. & Hanna, J. E. (2009) Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(2):274–91. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01019.x.Google Scholar
Bromberg-Martin, E. S., Hikosaka, O. & Nakamura, K. (2010) Coding of task reward value in the dorsal raphne nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience 30(18):6262–72. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0015-10.2010.Google Scholar
Brown, J., Aczel, B., Jimenez, L., Kaufman, S. B. & Plaisted-Grant, K. (2010) Intact implicit learning in autism spectrum conditions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63(9):1789–812. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210903536910.Google Scholar
Broz, F., Nourbakhsh, I. & Simmons, R. (2013) Planning for human–robot interaction in situated social tasks: The impact of representing time and intention. International Journal of Social Robotics 5(2):193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1983) Child's talk. Norton.Google Scholar
Buck, R., Losow, J. I., Murphy, M. M. & Constanzo, P. (1992) Social facilitation and inhibition of emotional expression and communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(6):962–68. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.962.Google Scholar
Buckner, R. L. & Carroll, D. C. (2007) Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(2):49–57. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004.Google Scholar
Burgess, P. W., Dumontheil, I. & Gilbert, S. J. (2007) The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(7):290–98. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caggiano, V., Fogassi, L., Rizzolatti, G., Thier, P. & Casile, A. (2009) Mirror neurons differentially encode the peripersonal and extrapersonal space of monkeys. Science 324(5925):403–406. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1166818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camara, E., Rodriguez-Fornells, A. & Munte, T. F. (2008) Functional connectivity of reward processing in the brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2:19. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.019.2008.Google Scholar
Carletta, J., Hill, R. L., Nicol, C., Taylor, T., de Ruiter, J. P. & Bard, E. G. (2010) Eyetracking for two-person tasks with manipulation of a virtual world. Behavior Research Methods 42(1):254–65. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpendale, J. E. M. & Lewis, C. (2004) Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(1):79–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catani, M., Jones, D. K., Daly, E., Embiricos, N., Deeley, Q., Pugliese, L., Curran, S., Robertson, D. & Murphy, D. G. (2008) Altered cerebellar feedback projections in Asperger syndrome. NeuroImage 41(4):1184–91. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catmur, C., Gillmeister, H., Bird, G., Liepelt, R., Brass, M. & Heyes, C. (2008) Through the looking glass: Counter-mirror activation following incompatible sensorimotor learning. European Journal of Neuroscience 28(6):1208–15. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06419.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catmur, C., Walsh, V. & Heyes, C. (2007) Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Current Biology 17(17):1527–31. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.006.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, B. & Baron-Cohen, S. (2011) Variation in the human Cannabinoid Receptor (CNR1) gene modulates gaze duration for happy faces. Molecular Autism 2(1):10. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-2-10.Google Scholar
Chartrand, T. L. & Bargh, J. A. (1999) The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(6):893–910. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893.Google Scholar
Chen, F. S. & Johnson, S. C. (2012) An oxytocin receptor gene variant predicts attachment anxiety in females and autism-spectrum traits in males. Social Psychological and Personality Science 3(1):93–99. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1948550611410325.Google Scholar
Choi, V. S., Gray, H. M. & Ambady, N. (2005) The glimpsed world: Unintended communication and unintended perception. In: The new unconscious, ed. Hassin, R. R., Uleman, J. S. & Bargh, J. A., pp. 309–33. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1979) Language and responsibility. Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Chura, L. R., Lombardo, M. V., Ashwin, E., Auyeung, B., Chakrabarti, B., Bullmore, E. T. & Baron-Cohen, S. (2010) Organizational effects of fetal testosterone on human corpus callosum size and asymmetry. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35(1):122–32. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.09.009.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleeremans, A. (2008) Consciousness: The radical plasticity thesis. Progress in Brain Research 168:19–33. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)68003-0.Google Scholar
Cleeremans, A. (2011) The radical plasticity thesis: How the brain learns to be conscious. Frontiers in Psychology 2:86. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleeremans, A., Timmermans, B. & Pasquali, A. (2007) Consciousness and metarepresentation: A computational sketch. Neural Networks 20(9):1032–39. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2007.09.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coan, J. A. (2008) Toward a neuroscience of attachment. In: Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, 2nd edition, ed. Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R., pp. 241–65. Guilford.Google Scholar
Cohn, J. F. & Tronick, E. Z. (1989) Specificity of infants' response to mothers' affective behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 28:242–8. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-198903000-00016.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. C., Dunne, S., Furey, T. & O'Doherty, J. P. (2012) Human dorsal striatum encodes prediction errors during observational learning of instrumental actions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24(1):106–18. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00114.Google Scholar
Corbetta, M., Patel, G. H. & Shulman, G. L. (2008) The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron 58:306–24. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (1995) Socializing affordances. Theory and Psychology 5(4):467–81.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (2006) Introspectionism and the mythical origins of modern scientific psychology. Consciousness and Cognition 15(4):634–54. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.008.Google Scholar
Costall, A., Leudar, I. & Reddy, V. (2006) Failing to see the irony in “mind-reading.” Theory and Psychology 16(2):163–67. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354306062533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespi, B. & Badcock, C. (2008) Psychosis and autism as diametrical disorders of the social brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(3):241–61. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08004214.Google Scholar
Csibra, G. & Gergely, G. (2009) Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(4):148–53. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasio, A. (2010) Self comes to mind. Pantheon.Google Scholar
Daunizeau, J., den Ouden, H. E., Pessiglione, M., Kiebel, S. J., Friston, K. J. & Stephan, K. E. (2010a) Observing the observer (II): Deciding when to decide. PLoS ONE 5(12):e15555. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daunizeau, J., den Ouden, H. E., Pessiglione, M., Kiebel, S. J., Stephan, K. E. & Friston, K. J. (2010b) Observing the observer (I): Meta-Bayesian models of learning and decision-making. PLoS ONE 5(12):e15554. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Jaegher, H. & Di Paolo, E. (2007) Participatory sensemaking. An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4):485–507. Available at: http://www.dx.doi/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9.Google Scholar
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E. & Gallagher, S. (2010) Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(10):441–47. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009.Google Scholar
de Lange, F. P., Spronk, M., Willems, R. M., Toni, I. & Bekkering, H. (2008) Complementary systems for understanding action intentions. Current Biology 18(6):454–47. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.057.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1950) Reconstruction in philosophy. The New American Library.Google Scholar
Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J. & Garnero, L. (2010) Inter-brain synchronization during social interaction. PLoS ONE 5(8):e12166. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engemann, D. A., Bzdok, D., Eickhoff, S. B., Vogeley, K. & Schilbach, L. (2012) Games people play – toward an enactive view of cooperation in social neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6:148. Epub June 1, 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairhurst, M. T., Janata, P. & Keller, P. E. (2012) Being and feeling in sync with an adaptive virtual partner: Brain mechanisms underlying dynamic cooperativity. Cereb Cortex 2012 Aug 28. [Epub ahead of print]Google ScholarPubMed
Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Johnson, M. & Simion, F. (2002) Eye contact detection at birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99(14):9602–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiebich, A. & Gallagher, S. (2012) Joint attention in joint action. Philosophical Psychology. DOI:10.1080/09515089.2012.690176. Published online May 28, 2012.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. & Depret, E. (1996) Control, interdependence, and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context. European Review of Social Psychology 7(1):31–61. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, A. (1993) Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self and culture. Harvester Weatsheaf.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H. (1986) The emotions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friston, K. (2008) Hierarchical models in the brain. PLoS Computational Biology 4(11): e1000211. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000211.Google Scholar
Frith, C. D. & Frith, U. (2006) The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50(4):531–34. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, C. D. & Frith, U. (2008) Implicit and explicit processes in social cognition. Neuron 60(3):503–10. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.032.Google Scholar
Frith, U. & Frith, C. D. (2010) The social brain: Allowing humans to boldly go where no other species has been. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 365(1537):165–76. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Froese, T. & Di Paolo, E. A. (2010) Modeling social interaction as perceptual crossing: An investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process. Connection Science 22(1):43–68. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540090903197928.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2009) Das Gehirn – ein Beziehungsorgan. Eine phänomenologisch-ökologische Konzeption. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. & De Jaegher, H. (2009) Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(4):465–86. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2001) The practice of mind: Theory, simulation, or interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(5–7):83–108. Available at: http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~gallaghr/practice01.htm.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2007) Simulation trouble. Social Neuroscience 2(3–4):353–65. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470910601183549.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2008) Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition 17(2):535–43. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamer, M. & Buchel, C. (2009) Amygdala activation predicts gaze toward fearful eyes. Journal of Neuroscience 29(28):9123–26. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1883-09.2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamer, M., Zurowski, B. & Buchel, C. (2010) Different amygdala subregions mediate valence-related and attentional effects of oxytocin in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(20):9400–405. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000985107.Google Scholar
Gangopadhyay, N. & Schilbach, L. (2012) Seeing minds: A neurophilosophical investigation of the role of perception-action coupling in social perception. Social Neuroscience 7(4):410–23. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2011.633754.Google Scholar
Garner, W. R. (1999) Reductionism reduced: Review of “Toward a new behaviorism: The case against perceptual reductionism” by William R. Uttal. Contemporary Psychology 44:20–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S. & Pickering, M. J. (2004) Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(1):8–11. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gergely, G. & Watson, J. S. (1996) The social biofeedback theory of parental affect-mirroring: The development of emotional self-awareness and self-control in infancy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 77(6):1181–212. Available at: http://www.pep-web.org/document.php?id=ijp.077.1181a.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Lifflin.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. J., Meuwese, J. D., Towgood, K. J., Frith, C. D. & Burgess, P. W. (2009) Abnormal functional specialization within medial prefrontal cortex in high-functioning autism: A multi-voxel similarity analysis. Brain 132(4):869–78. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giles, H., Coupland, N. & Coupland, J. (1992) Accommodation theory: Communication, context and consequences. In: Contexts of accommodation, ed. Giles, H., Coupland, J. & Coupland, N., pp. 1–68. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. (2006) Simulating minds. The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. H. & Schwade, J. A. (2008) Social feedback to infants' babblings facilitates rapid phonological learning. Psychological Science 19(5):515–23. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02117.x.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. H. & Schwade, J. (2010) From birds to words: Perception of structure in social interactions guides vocal development and language learning. In: The Oxford handbook of developmental behavioral neuroscience, ed. Blumberg, M. S., Freeman, J. H. & Robinson, S. R., pp. 708–29. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. H., Schwade, J., Briesch, J. & Syal, S. (2010a) Learning while babbling: Prelinguistic object-directed vocalizations indicate a readiness to learn. Infancy 15(4):362–91. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00020.x.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. H., Waterfall, H. R., Lotem, A., Halpern, J. Y., Schwade, J. A., Onnis, L. & Edelman, S. (2010b) General cognitive principles for learning structure in time and space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(6):249–58. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groen, W. B., Tesink, C., Petersson, K. M., van Berkum, J., van der Gaag, R. J., Hagoort, P. & Buitelaar, J. K. (2010) Semantic, factual, and social language comprehension in adolescents with autism: An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex 20(8):1937–45. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp264.Google Scholar
Grossmann, T. & Johnson, M. H. (2010) Selective prefrontal cortex responses to joint attention in early infancy. Biology Letters 6(4):540–43. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.1069 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossmann, T., Johnson, M., Farroni, T. & Csibra, G. (2007) Social perception in the infant brain: Gamma oscillatory activity in response to eye gaze. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2(4):284–91. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm025.Google Scholar
Haggard, P. (2009) The sources of human volition. Science 324(5928):731–33. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1173827.Google Scholar
Haggard, P. & Tsakiris, M. (2009) The experience of agency: Feelings, judgments, and responsibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18(4):242–24. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01644.x.Google Scholar
Hampton, A. N., Bossaerts, P. & O'Doherty, J. P. (2008) Neural correlates of mentalizing-related computations during strategic interactions in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105(18):6741–46. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711099105.Google Scholar
Hari, R. & Kujala, M. V. (2009) Brain basis of human social interaction: From concepts to brain imaging. Physiological Reviews 89(2):453–79.Google Scholar
Harrist, A. W. & Waugh, R. M. (2002) Dyadic synchrony: Its structure and function in children's development. Developmental Review 22(4):555–92. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-2297(02)00500-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., Keysers, C. (2012) Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Science 16(2):114–21.Google Scholar
Heider, F. (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.Google Scholar
Heider, F. & Simmel, M. (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology 57(2):243–59. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1416950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckens, M. J., Hermans, E. J., Pu, Z., Joels, M. & Fernandez, G. (2009) Stressed memories: How acute stress affects memory formation in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 29(32):10111–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1184-09.2009.Google Scholar
Hermans, E. J., Bos, P. A., Ossewaarde, L., Ramsey, N. F., Fernandez, G. & van Honk, J. (2010) Effects of exogenous testosterone on the ventral striatal BOLD response during reward anticipation in healthy women. NeuroImage 52(1):277–83. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertwig, R. & Erev, I. (2009) The description-experience gap in risky choice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(12):517–23. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2010) Where do mirror neurons come from? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 34(4):575–83. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.007.Google Scholar
Heyes, C., Bird, G., Johnson, H. & Haggard, P. (2005) Experience modulates automatic imitation. Cognitive Brain Research 22(2):233–40. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.009.Google Scholar
Hikosaka, O. & Isoda, M. (2010) Switching from automatic to controlled behavior: Cortico-basal ganglia mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(4):154–61. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.006.Google Scholar
Hobson, R. P. (1991) Against the theory of “Theory of Mind”. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 9(1):33–51.Google Scholar
Hobson, R. P. (1999) Intersubjective foundations for joint attention: Co-ordinating attitudes (rather than actions). Paper presented at the Joint Attention Conference, University of Warwick, June 11–13, 1999.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1943) Principles of behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D. (2008) Folk-psychological narratives. The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Izuma, K., Saito, D. N. & Sadato, N. (2008) Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. Neuron 58(2):284–94. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, C. L. & Jasnow, M. D. (2001) Rhythms of dialogue in infancy. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 66(2): Serial No. 265.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890/2007) The principles of psychology, vol. 1. Dover/Cosimo Classics. (Original work published in 1890; Cosimo Classics first edition, 2007).Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. J. (1986) Interview with James J. Jenkins. In: The cognitive revolution in psychology, ed. Baars, B. J., pp. 239–52. Guilford.Google Scholar
Jermann, P., Nüssli, M.-A. & Li, W. (2010) Using dual eye-tracking to unveil coordination and expertise in collaborative Tetris. In: BCS'10 Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference [British Computer Society Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, Dundee, United Kingdom, September 6–10, 2010], pp. 36–44. British Computer Society/ACM Digital Library.Google Scholar
Jones, E. E. & Gerard, H. B. (1967) Foundations of social psychology. Wiley.Google Scholar
Jones, E. E. & Nisbett, R. E. (1971) The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Kampe, K. K., Frith, C. D. & Frith, U. (2003) “Hey John”: Signals conveying communicative intention toward the self activate brain regions associated with “mentalizing,” regardless of modality. Journal of Neuroscience 23(12):5258–63. Available at: http://www.jneurosci.org/content/23/12/5258.full.pdf.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992) Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelso, J. A. S., de Guzman, G. C., Reveley, C. & Tognoli, E. (2009) Virtual Partner Interaction (VPI): Exploring novel behaviors via coordination dynamics. PLoS ONE 4(6):e5749. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keltner, D. & Haidt, J. (1999) Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion 13(5):505–21. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026999399379168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. P., Redcay, E. & Courchesne, E. (2006) Failing to deactivate: Resting functional abnormalities in autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103(21):8275–80. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600674103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keysers, C. & Gazzola, V. (2007) Integrating simulation and theory of mind: From self to social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(5):194–96. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, M. A., Lawrence, G., Fourkas, A., Franks, I. M., Elliott, D. & Pembroke, S. (2003) Online versus offline processing visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude. Acta Psychologica 113(1):83–97. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00156-7.Google Scholar
King-Casas, B., Sharp, C., Lomax-Bream, L., Lohrenz, T., Fonagy, P. & Montague, P. R. (2008) The rupture and repair of cooperation in borderline personality disorder. Science 321(5890):806–10. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1156902.Google Scholar
King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R. & Montague, P. R. (2005) Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science 308(5718):78–83. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1108062.Google Scholar
Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R. & Volkmar, F. (2003) The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: Lessons from autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 358(1430):345–60. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1202.Google Scholar
Klin, A., Lin, D. J., Gorrindo, P., Ramsay, G. & Jones, W. (2009) Two-year-olds with autism orient to non-social contingencies rather than biological motion. Nature 459(7244):257–61. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07868.Google Scholar
Knoblich, G. & Sebanz, N. (2008) Evolving intentions for social interaction: From entrainment to joint action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences 363(1499):2021–31. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0006.Google Scholar
Knops, A., Thirion, B., Hubbard, E. M., Michel, V. & Dehaene, S. (2009) Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science 19;324(5934):1583–85. doi: 10.1126/science.1171599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokal, I., Gazzola, V. & Keysers, C. (2009) Acting together in and beyond the mirror neuron system. NeuroImage 47(4):2046–56. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.010.Google Scholar
Konvalinka, I. & Roepstorff, A. (2012) The two-brain approach: How can mutually interacting brains teach us something about social interaction? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6:215. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00215.Google Scholar
Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., Roepstorff, A. & Frith, C. D. (2010) Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63(11):2220–30. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.497843.Google Scholar
Kourtis, D., Sebanz, N. & Knoblich, G. (2010) Favouritism in the motor system: Social interaction modulates action simulation. Biology Letters 6(6):758–61. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0478.Google Scholar
Krueger, J. (2010) Extended cognition and the space of social interaction. Consciousness and Cognition 20(3):643–57. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.022.Google Scholar
Kugiumutzakis, G. (1998) Neonatal imitation in the intersubjective companion space. In: Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny, ed. Braten, S., pp. 63–88. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (2007a) Cracking the speech code: How infants learn language. Acoustical Science and Technology 28(2):71–83. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1250/ast.28.71.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (2007b) Is speech learning “gated” by the social brain? Developmental Science 10(1):110–20. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00572.x.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M. & Liu, H.-M. (2003) Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short- term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100(15):9096–101.Google Scholar
Kuzmanovic, B., Schilbach, L., Lehnhardt, F. G., Bente, G. & Vogeley, K. (2011) A matter of words: Impact of verbal and nonverbal information on impression formation in high-functioning autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 5(1):604–13. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2010.07.005.Google Scholar
Lavelli, M. & Fogel, A. (2002) Developmental changes in mother-infant face-to-face communication: Birth to 3 months. Developmental Psychology 38(2):288–305. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.2.288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leahey, T. H. (1992) The mythical revolutions of American psychology. American Psychologist 47(2):308–18. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.47.2.308.Google Scholar
Leekam, S. & Ramsden, C. (2006) Dyadic orienting and joint attention in preschool children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 36(2):185–97. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-005-0054-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legerstee, M. & Varghese, J. (2001) The role of maternal affect mirroring on social expectancies in three-month-old infants. Child Development 72(5):1301–13. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00349.Google Scholar
Lenay, C., Stewart, J., Rohde, M., Ali Amar, A. (2011) “You never fail to surprise me”: The hallmark of the Other: Experimental study and simulations of perceptual crossing. Interaction Studies 12(3):373–96. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/is.12.3.01len.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leudar, I. & Costall, A. (2008) Against theory of mind. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Rao, S. B. & Vishton, P. M. (1999) Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science 283(5398):77–80. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5398.77.Google Scholar
Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J. & Schmidt, R. C. (2009) Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science 1:320–39. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.x.Google Scholar
Masayuki, M. & Okihide, H. (2008) Representation of negative motivational value in the primate lateral habenula. Nature Neuroscience 12:77–84. doi:10.1038/nn.2233.Google Scholar
Materna, S., Dicke, P. W. & Thier, P. (2008) Dissociable roles of the superior temporal sulcus and the intraparietal sulcus in joint attention: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(1):108–19. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20.1.108.Google Scholar
McQuaid, N., Bibok, J. & Carpendale, J. (2009) Relation between maternal contingent responsiveness and infant social expectations. Infancy 14(3):390–401. doi: 10.1080/15250000902839955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, K. (1977) Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198(4312):75–78. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.198.4312.75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milstein, D. M. & Dorris, M. C. (2007) The influence of expected value on saccadic preparation. Journal of Neuroscience 27(18):4810–18.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. P. (2009) Social psychology as a natural kind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(6):246–51. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.008.Google Scholar
Mojzisch, A., Schilbach, L., Helmert, J. R., Pannasch, S., Velichkovsky, B. M. & Vogeley, K. (2006) The effects of self-involvement on attention, arousal, and facial expression during social interaction with virtual others: A psychophysiological study. Social Neuroscience 1(3–4):184–95. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470910600985621.Google Scholar
Moll, H., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. (2007) Fourteen-month-olds know what others experience only in joint engagement. Developmental Science 10(6):826–35. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00615.x.Google Scholar
Montague, P. R., Berns, G. S., Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., Pagnoni, G., Dhamala, M., Wiest, M. C., Karpov, I., King, R. D., Apple, N. & Fischer, R. E. (2002) Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions. NeuroImage 16(4):1159–64. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1150.Google Scholar
Mundy, P. & Newell, L. (2007) Attention, joint attention, and social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(5):269–74. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00518.x.Google Scholar
Murray, L. & Trevarthen, C. (1985) Emotional regulation of interactions between two-month-olds and their mothers. In: Social perception in infants, ed. Field, T. M. & Fox, N. A., pp. 177–97. Ablex.Google Scholar
Muscatell, K. A., Addis, D. R. & Kensinger, E. A. (2010) Self-involvement modulates the effective connectivity of the autobiographical memory network. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 5(1):68–76. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp043.Google Scholar
Nadel, J. & Tremblay-Leveau, H. (1999) Early perception of social contingencies and interpersonal intentionality: Dyadic and triadic paradigms. In: Early social cognition, ed. Rochat, P., pp. 189–212. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nadig, A., Vivanti, G. & Ozonoff, S. (2009) Adaptation of object descriptions to a partner under increasing communicative demands: A comparison of children with and without autism. Autism Research 2(6):334–47. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagy, E. & Molnar, P. (2004) Homo imitans or homo provocans? Human imprinting model of neonatal imitation. Infant Behavior and Development 27(1):54–63. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2003.06.004 Google Scholar
N'Diaye, K., Sander, D. & Vuilleumier, P. (2009) Self-relevance processing in the human amygdala: Gaze direction, facial expression, and emotion intensity. Emotion 9(6):798–806. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017845.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1980) On “social knowing.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6(4):601–605. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616728064012.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1997) The future of cognitive science: An ecological analysis. In: The future of the cognitive revolution, ed. Johnson, D. M. & Erneling, C. E., pp. 247–60. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newen, A. & Schlicht, T. (2009) Understanding other minds: A criticism of Goldman's Simulation Theory and an outline of the Person Model Theory. Grazer Philosophische Studien 79(1):209–42.Google Scholar
Newman-Norlund, R. D., Bosga, J., Meulenbroek, R. G. & Bekkering, H. (2008) Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: Virtual lifting and balancing. NeuroImage 41(1):169–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.026 Google Scholar
Newman-Norlund, R. D., van Schie, H. T., van Zuijlen, A. M. J. & Bekkering, H. (2007) The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience 10(7):817–18. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1911.Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Mermillod, M., Maringer, M. & Hess, U. (2010) The Simulation of Smiles (SIMS) model: Embodied simulation and the meaning of facial expression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(6):417–33; discussion 433–80. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000865.Google Scholar
Noë, A. (2009) Out of our heads. Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Northoff, G. & Bermpohl, F. (2004) Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(3):102–107. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.004.Google Scholar
Oberman, L. M., Pineda, J. A. & Ramachandran, V. S. (2007) The human mirror neuron system: A link between action observation and social skills. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2(1):62–66. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsl022.Google Scholar
Ochsner, K. N. & Lieberman, M. D. (2001) The emergence of social cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist 56(9):717–34. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.9.717.Google Scholar
Oullier, O. & Basso, F. (2010) Embodied economics: How bodily information shapes the social coordination dynamics of decision-making. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365(1538):291–301. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0168.Google Scholar
Over, H. & Carpenter, M. (2009) Priming third-party ostracism increases affiliative imitation in children. Developmental Science 12(3):F1–8. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00820.x.Google Scholar
Pacherie, E. (2008) The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition 107(1):179–217. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J., Herman, B. H., Vilberg, T., Bishop, P. & DeEskinazi, F. G. (1980) Endogenous opioids and social behavior. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 4(4):473–87. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0149-7634(80)90036-6.Google Scholar
Parise, E., Palumbo, L., Handl, A. & Frederici, A. (2008) Gaze direction influences word processing in 4- to 5-month-old infants: An ERP investigation. Poster presented at the Developmental Section Conference of the British Psychological Society, Oxford, UK, September 1–3, 2008.Google Scholar
Pasley, B. N., Mayes, L. C. & Schultz, R. T. (2004) Subcortical discrimination of unperceived objects during binocular rivalry. Neuron 42:163–72.Google Scholar
Pelphrey, K. A., Singerman, J. D., Allison, T. & McCarthy, G. (2003) Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: The influence of context. Neuropsychologia 41(2):156–70. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00146-X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penn, D. C. & Povinelli, D. J. (2008) On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a “theory of mind.” In: Social intelligence: From brain to culture, ed. Emery, N., Clayton, N. & Frith, C., pp. 415–30. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pessoa, L. & Engelmann, J. B. (2010) Embedding reward signals into perception and cognition. Frontiers in Neuroscience 4:17. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00017.Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Rostad, K. R., McMorris, C. A., Climie, E. A., Stowkowy, J. & Glenwright, M. R. (2011) Processing of ironic language in children with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 41(8):1097–112. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1131-7.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, U. J., Timmermans, B., Bente, G., Vogeley, K. & Schilbach, L. (2011) The non-verbal Turing test: Differentiating mind from machine in gaze-based social interaction. PLoS ONE 6(11):e27591. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2):169–90; discussion 91–226.Google Scholar
Pierrot-Deseilligny, C., Milea, D. & Muri, R. M. (2004) Eye movement control by the cerebral cortex. Current Opinion in Neurology 17(1):17–25. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00019052-200402000-00005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pisella, L., Gréa, H., Tilikete, C., Vighetto, A., Desmurget, M., Rode, G., Boisson, D. & Rossetti, Y. (2000) An “automatic pilot” for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: Toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience 3(7):729–36. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/76694.Google Scholar
Port, R. F. & van Gelder, T. (1995) Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Press, C., Gillmeister, H. & Heyes, C. (2007) Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences 274(1625):2509–14. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0774.Google Scholar
Preston, S. D. & de Waal, F. B. (2002) Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25(1):1–20. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. (2003) Emotions embodied. In: Thinking about feeling, ed. Solomon, R... pp. 44–60. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A. & Shulman, G. L. (2001) A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98(2):676–82. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.676.Google Scholar
Redcay, E., Dodell-Feder, D., Pearrow, M. J., Mavros, P. L., Kleiner, M., Gabrieli, J. D. & Saxe, R. (2010) Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: A new tool for social cognitive neuroscience. NeuroImage 50(4):1639–47. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.052.Google Scholar
Reddy, V. (1996) Omitting the second-person in social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19(1):140–41. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041996.Google Scholar
Reddy, V. (2000) Coyness in early infancy. Developmental Science 3(2):186–92. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00112.Google Scholar
Reddy, V. (2003) On being the object of attention: Implications for self–other consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(9):397–402. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00191-8.Google Scholar
Reddy, V. (2005) Before the “third element”: Understanding attention to self. In: Joint attention: Communication and other minds, ed. Eilan, N., Hoerl, C., McCormack, T. & Roessler, J., pp. 85–109. Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, V. (2008) How infants know minds. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, V. (2012) A gaze at grips with me. In: Joint attention: New developments in psychology, philosophy of mind, and social neuroscience, ed. Seemann, A., pp. 137–59. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, V., Williams, E., Costantini, C. & Lang, B. (2010) Engaging with the self: Mirror behaviour in autism, Down syndrome and typical development. Autism 14(5):531–46. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361310370397.Google Scholar
Reid, V. M., Striano, T., Kaufman, J. & Johnson, M. H. (2004) Eye gaze cueing facilitates neural processing of objects in 4-month-old infants. NeuroReport 15(16):2553–55. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200411150-00025.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. C., Dale, R. & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007a) The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science 18(5):407–13. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01914.x.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L. & Baron, R. M. (2007b) Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33(4):845–59. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.845.Google Scholar
Rietveld, E. (2008) Situated normativity: The normative aspect of embodied cognition in unreflective action. Mind 117(468):973–1001. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzn050.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. & Sinigaglia, C. (2010) The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(4):264–74. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochat, P. & Striano, T. (2002) Who's in the mirror? Self–other discrimination in specular images by four- and nine-month-old infants. Child Development 73(1):35–46. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossetti, Y., Pisella, L. & Vighetto, A. (2003) Optic ataxia revisited: Visually guided action versus immediate visuomotor control. Experimental Brain Research 153(2):171–79. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1590-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runeson, S. & Frykholm, G. (1983) Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112(4):585–615. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.112.4.585.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., Aslin, R. N., Tunick, R. A. & Barrueco, S. (1997) Incidental language learning: Listening (and learning) out of the corner of your ear. Psychological Science 8(2):101–105. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00690.x.Google Scholar
Saito, D. N., Tanabe, H. C., Izuma, K., Hayashi, M. J., Morito, Y., Komeda, H., Uchiyama, H., Kosaka, H., Okazawa, H., Fujibayashi, Y. & Sadato, N. (2010) “Stay tuned”: Inter-individual neural synchronization during mutual gaze and joint attention. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 4:127. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2010.00127.Google Scholar
Santos, N. S., Kuzmanovic, B., David, N., Rotarska-Jagiela, A., Eickhoff, S. B., Shah, J. N., Fink, G. R., Bente, G. & Vogeley, K. (2010) Animated brain: A functional neuroimaging study on the parametric induction of animacy experience. NeuroImage 53(1):291–302. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.080.Google Scholar
Sarrazin, J.-C., Cleeremans, A. & Haggard, P. (2008) How do we know what we are doing? Time, intention, and awareness of action. Consciousness and Cognition 17(3):602–15. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.007.Google Scholar
Sartori, L., Becchio, C., Bulgheroni, M. & Castiello, U. (2009) Modulation of the action control system by social intention: Unexpected social requests override preplanned action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35(5):1490–1500. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015777.Google Scholar
Sato, A. & Yasuda, A. (2005) Illusion of sense of self-agency: Discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition 94(3):241–55. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.04.003.Google Scholar
Schilbach, L. (2010) A second-person approach to other minds. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(6):449.Google Scholar
Schilbach, L., Bzdok, D., Timmermans, B., Fox, P. T., Laird, A. R., Vogeley, K. & Eickhoff, S. B. (2012a) Minds at rest revisited: Using ALE meta-analyses to investigate commonalities in the neural correlates of socio-emotional processing and unconstrained cognition. PLoS One. 7(2):e30920.Google Scholar
Schilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Cieslik, E. C., Kuzmanovic, B. & Vogeley, K. (2012b) Shall we do this together? Social gaze influences action control in a comparison group, but not in individuals with high-functioning autism. Autism: International Journal of Research and Practice 16(2):151–62. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361311409258.Google Scholar
Schilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Cieslik, E., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R. & Vogeley, K. (2010a) Eyes on me: An fMRI study of the effects of social gaze on action control. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 6(4):393–403. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Mojzisch, A. & Vogeley, K. (2008a) What's in a smile? Neural correlates of facial embodiment during social interaction. Social Neuroscience 3(1):37–50. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470910701563228.Google Scholar
Schilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Rotarska-Jagiela, A., Fink, G. R. & Vogeley, K. (2008b) Minds at rest? Social cognition as the default mode of cognizing and its putative relationship to the “default system” of the brain. Consciousness and Cognition 17(2):457–67. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.013.Google Scholar
Schilbach, L., Wilms, M., Eickhoff, S. B., Romanzetti, S., Tepest, R., Bente, G., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R. & Vogeley, K. (2010b) Minds made for sharing: Initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(12):2702–15. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21401.Google Scholar
Schilbach, L., Wohlschlaeger, A. M., Kraemer, N. C., Newen, A., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R. & Vogeley, K. (2006) Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction. Neuropsychologia 44(5):718–30. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.017.Google Scholar
Schippers, M. B. & Keysers, C. (2011) Mapping the flow of information within the putative mirror neuron system during gesture observation. NeuroImage 57(1):37–44. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.018.Google Scholar
Schippers, M. B., Roebroeck, A., Renken, R., Nanetti, L. & Keysers, C. (2010) Mapping the information flow from one brain to another during gestural communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107(20):9388–93. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001791107.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. C., Carello, C. & Turvey, M. T. (1990) Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16(2):227–47. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.2.227.Google Scholar
Schnell, K., Bluschke, S., Konradt, B. & Walter, H. (2011) Functional relations of empathy and mentalizing: An fMRI study on the neural basis of cognitive empathy. NeuroImage 54(2):1743–54. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.024.Google Scholar
Schonberg, T., Fox, C. R. & Poldrack, R. A. (2011) Mind the gap: Bridging economic and naturalistic risk-taking with cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(1):11–19. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.10.002.Google Scholar
Schultz, R. T. (2005) Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: The role of the amygdala and fusiform face area. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 23:125.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. (1972) The phenomenology of the social world, trans. Walsh, G. & Lehnert, F.. Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H. & Knoblich, G. (2006) Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(2):70–76. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009.Google Scholar
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Stumpf, L. & Prinz, W. (2005) Far from action-blind: Representation of others' actions in individuals with autism. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22(3–4):433–54. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senju, A., Southgate, V., White, S. & Frith, U. (2009) Mindblind eyes: An absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Science 325(5942):883–85. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1176170.Google Scholar
Shockley, K., Santana, M. V. & Fowler, C. A. (2003) Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29(2):326–32. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.326.Google Scholar
Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B (1976) The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.Google Scholar
Southgate, V. & Hamilton, A. F. de C. (2008) Unbroken mirrors: Challenging a theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(6):225–29. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.005.Google Scholar
Sporns, O., Chialvo, D. R., Kaiser, M. & Hilgetag, C. C. (2004) Organization, development and function of complex brain networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(9):418–25. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.008.Google Scholar
Stel, M., van Dijk, E. & Olivier, E. (2009) You want to know the truth? Then don't mimic! Psychological Science 20(6):693–99. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02350.x.Google Scholar
Stern, D. (1985) The interpersonal world of the infant. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Striano, T., Kopp, C., Grossman, T. & Reid, V. (2006) Eye contact influences neural processing of emotional expressions in 4-month-old infants. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 1(2):87–94. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsl008.Google Scholar
Suda, M., Takei, Y., Aoyama, Y., Narita, K., Sakurai, N., Fukuda, M. & Mikuni, M. (2011) Autistic traits and brain activation during face-to-face conversations in typically developed adults. PLoS ONE 6(5):e20021. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020021.Google Scholar
Suda, M., Takei, Y., Aoyama, Y., Narita, K., Sato, T., Fukuda, M. & Mikuni, M. (2010) Frontopolar activation during face-to-face conversation: An in situ study using near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuropsychologia 48(2):441–47. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.036.Google Scholar
Tamietto, M. & de Gelder, B. (2010) Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(10):697–709. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teufel, C., Fletcher, P. C. & Davis, G. (2010) Seeing other minds: Attributed mental states influence perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(8):376–82. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.005.Google Scholar
Thelen, E. & Smith, L. B. (1994) A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thinès, G., Costall, A. & Butterworth, G. E. (1991) Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. (2007) Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Timmermans, B., Schilbach, L., Pasquali, A. & Cleeremans, A. (2012) Higher order thoughts in action: consciousness as an unconscious re-description process. Philosoptical Transactions of the Royal Society London B: Biological Science 19;367(1594):1412–23.Google Scholar
Tognoli, E., Lagarde, J., DeGuzman, G. C. & Kelso, J. A. (2007) The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104(19):8190–95. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611453104.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1995) Joint attention as social cognition. In: Joint attention: Its origins and role in development, ed. Moore, C. & Dunham, P., pp. 103–30. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2009) Why we cooperate. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Carpenter, M. (2007) Shared intentionality. Developmental Science 10(1):121–25. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.x.Google Scholar
Tost, H., Braus, D. F., Hakimi, S., Ruf, M., Vollmert, C., Hohn, F. & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2010) Acute D2 receptor blockade induces rapid, reversible remodeling in human cortical–striatal circuits. Nature Neuroscience 13(8):920–22. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2572.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1977) Descriptive analyses of infant communication behavior. In: Studies in mother-infant interaction: The Loch Lomond Symposium, ed. Schaffer, H. R., pp. 227–70. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1980) The foundations of intersubjectivity: Development of interpersonal and cooperative understanding in infants. In: The social foundations of language and thought: Essays in honor of J. S. Bruner, ed. Olson, D., pp. 316–42. Norton.Google Scholar
Triesch, J., Jasso, H. & Deak, G. O. (2007) Emergence of mirror neurons in a model of gaze following. Adaptive Behavior 15(2):149–65. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059712307078654.Google Scholar
Triesch, J., Teuscher, C., Deak, G. O. & Carlson, E. (2006) Gaze following: Why (not) learn it? Developmental Science 9(2):125–47. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00470.x.Google Scholar
Triplett, N. (1898) The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. The American Journal of Psychology 9(4):507–33. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1412188.Google Scholar
Tylén, K., Weed, E., Wallentin, M., Roepstorff, A. & Frith, C. (2010) Language as a tool for interacting minds. Mind and Language 25(1):3–29. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01379.x.Google Scholar
Uddin, L. Q., Iacoboni, M., Lange, C. & Keenan, J. P. (2007) The self and social cognition: The role of cortical midline structures and mirror neurons. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(4):153–57. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.01.001.Google Scholar
Van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Kawakami, K. & van Knippenberg, A. (2004) Mimicry and pro-social behavior. Psychological Science 15(1):71–77. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501012.x.Google Scholar
Van Baaren, R. B., Maddux, W. W., Chartrand, T. L., De Bouter, C. & Van Knippenberg, A. (2003) It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84(5):1093–102. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogeley, K. & Bente, G. (2010) “Artificial humans”: Psychology and neuroscience perspectives on embodiment and nonverbal communication. Neural Networks 23(8–9):1077–90. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.06.003.Google Scholar
Vogeley, K. & Newen, A. (2009) Consciousness of oneself and others in relation to mental disorders. In: The neuropsychology of mental illness, ed. Wood, S., Allen, N., Pantelis, C., pp. 408–13. Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/chapter.jsf?bid=CBO9780511642197&cid=CBO9780511642197A042.Google Scholar
Volman, I., Toni, I., Verhagen, L. & Roelofs, K. (2011) Endogenous testosterone modulates prefrontal-amygdala connectivity during social emotional behavior. Cerebral Cortex 21(10):2282–90. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr001.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Ramsey, R. & Hamilton, A. F. de C. (2011) The control of mimicry by eye contact is mediated by medial prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 31(33):12001–10. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0845-11.2011.Google Scholar
Westermann, G., Mareschal, D., Johnson, M. H., Sirois, S., Spratling, M. & Thomas, M. (2007) Neuroconstructivism. Developmental Science 10(1):75–83. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00567.x.Google Scholar
Wheatley, T., Milleville, S. C. & Martin, A. (2007) Understanding animate agents: Distinct roles for the social network and mirror system. Psychological Science 18(6):469–74. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01923.x.Google Scholar
Williams, J. H., Waiter, G. D., Perra, O., Perrett, D. I. & Whiten, A. (2005) An fMRI study of joint attention experience. NeuroImage 25(1):133–40. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.047.Google Scholar
Wilms, M., Schilbach, L., Pfeiffer, U., Bente, G., Fink, G. R. & Vogeley, K. (2010) It's in your eyes – using gaze-contingent stimuli to create truly interactive paradigms for social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 5(1):98–107. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq024.Google Scholar
Wolff, P. (1987) The development of behavioral states and the expression of the emotions in early infancy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Worringham, C. J. & Messick, D. M. (1983) Social facilitation of running: An unobtrusive study. The Journal of Social Psychology 121(1):23–29. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1983.9924462.Google Scholar
Yoshida, W., Dolan, R. J. & Friston, K. J. (2008) Game theory of mind. PLoS Computational Biology 4(12):e1000254. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000254.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2005) Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. & Parnas, J. (2003) Conceptual problems in infantile autism research: Why cognitive science needs phenomenology. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10(9–19):53–571(19). Available at: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/jcs/2003/00000010/F0020009/art00005.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1965) Social facilitation. Science 149(3681):269–74.Google Scholar
Zaki, J. & Ochsner, K. (2009) The need for a cognitive neuroscience of naturalistic social cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1167:16–30.Google Scholar
Zwickel, J. & Vo, M. L. (2010) How the presence of persons biases eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 17(2):257–62. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.257.Google Scholar