No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 September 2019
Abstract
May argues successfully that many claims about the causal influence of affect on moral judgment are overblown. But the findings he cites are compatible with many of the key arguments of philosophical sentimentalists. His account of rationalism, in turn, relies on an overly broad notion of inference, and leaves open crucial questions about how we reason to moral conclusions.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
References
Boehm, C. (2012) Moral origins. The evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kauppinen, A. (2013b) Moral sentimentalism. In: Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, winter 2018 edition, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/moral-sentimentalism.Google Scholar
Kauppinen, A. (2014) Empathy, emotion regulation, and moral judgment. In: Empathy and morality, ed. Maibom, H., pp. 97–121. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. (2004) Sentimental rules: On the natural foundations of moral judgment. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2002) The theory of moral sentiments, ed. Haakonssen, Knut. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. & Wilson, D. S. (1998) Unto others. The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Street, S. (2006) A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value. Philosophical Studies 127(1):109–66.Google Scholar
Target article
Précis of Regard for Reason in the Moral Mind
Related commentaries (21)
Analyzing debunking arguments in moral psychology: Beyond the counterfactual analysis of influence by irrelevant factors
Baselines for human morality should include species typicality, inheritances, culture, practice, and ecological attachment
Cautiously optimistic rationalism may not be cautious enough
Do framing effects debunk moral beliefs?
Emotions in the development of moral norms within cooperative relationships
Humean replies to Regard for Reason
Kantian indifference about moral reason
Moral foundations are not moral propositions
Moral judgment as reasoning by constraint satisfaction
Moral principles in May's Regard for Reason in the Moral Mind
Moral reasoning is the process of asking moral questions and answering them
Moral reasoning performance determines epistemic peerdom
Optimism in unconscious, intuitive morality
Rationalism, optimism, and the moral mind
Rationalization, controversy, and the entanglement of moral-social cognition: A “critical pessimist” take
The faces of pessimism
The social character of moral reasoning
The space between rationalism and sentimentalism: A perspective from moral development
Valuation mechanisms in moral cognition
What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?
What sentimentalists should say about emotion
Author response
Defending optimistic rationalism: A reply to commentators