No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Is undisciplined behavior antithetical to cooperation, or is it part and parcel of it?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 October 2023
Abstract
This commentary raises three points in response to the target article. First, what appear to be victimless behaviors in highly individualistic, post-industrial societies might have a direct impact on group members in small-scale societies. Second, many societies show marked tolerance or ambivalence toward intemperate behavior. Third, undisciplined behavior is not antithetical to cooperation but can be used to cooperative ends.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Agey, E., Addison, M., Maya, C., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2021) Arranged marriage often subverts offspring mate choice: An HRAF-based study. American Anthropologist, 123 (4), 861–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balliet, D., Tybur, J. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2017). Functional interdependence theory: An evolutionary account of social situations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316657965CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cashdan, E. A. (1985). Coping with risk: Reciprocity among the Basarwa of northern Botswana. Man, 20, 454–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clasquin-Johnson, M. (2022). Fasting/asceticism/feasting. In Weyel, B., Gräb, B. W., Lartey, E., and Wepener, C. (Eds.), International handbook of practical theology (pp. 341–352). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110618150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronk, L., & Aktipis, A. (2021). Design principles for risk-pooling systems. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 825–833. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01121-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, A. (1950). The Role of the Trukese Mother and Its Effect on Child Training. A report to the Pacific Science Board of the National Research Council on research done under the program entitled scientific investigation of Micronesia, Contract N7-onr-291, Task Order IV, The Office of Naval Research & The National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gladwin, T., & Sarason, S. B. (1953). Truk: Man in paradise. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, No. 20. New York: Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.Google Scholar
Hezel, F., & Dobbin, J. (1995). Possession and trance in Chuuk. Isla (Mangilao, Guam), 3(1), 73–104.Google Scholar
Hollan, D. (1990). Indignant suicide in the pacific: An example from the Toraja Highlands of Indonesia. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 14(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117561CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, I. M. (2002). Ecstatic religion: A study of shamanism and spirit possession. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, C., & Macpherson, L. (1987). Towards an explanation of recent trends in suicide in Western Samoa. Man, 22(2), 305–330. http://doi.org/10.2307/2802867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, A. E., Thomas, M. G., Smith, D., Dyble, M., Viguier, S., Chaudhary, N., … Migliano, A. B. (2019). Testing adaptive hypotheses of alloparenting in Agta foragers. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(11), 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0679-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaver, J. H., Power, E. A., Purzycki, B. G., Watts, J., Sear, R., Shenk, M. K., … Bulbulia, J. A. (2020). Church attendance and alloparenting: An analysis of fertility, social support and child development among English mothers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1805), 20190428. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0428CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somer, E., & Saadon, M. (2000). Stambali: Dissociative possession and trance in a Tunisian healing dance. Transcultural Psychiatry, 37(4), 580–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, M. J. (1958). Sexuality and aggression on Romonum, Truk. American Anthropologist, 60(3), 467–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syme, K. L., & Hagen, E. H. (2023). Bargaining and interdependence: Common parent–offspring conflict resolution strategies among chon Chuuk and their implications for suicidal behavior. American Anthropologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. S., Hill, K. R., Flinn, M. V., & Ellsworth, R. M. (2011). Evolutionary history of hunter–gatherer marriage practices. PLoS ONE, 6(4), e19066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019066CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
Moral disciplining: The cognitive and evolutionary foundations of puritanical morality
Related commentaries (28)
A broader theory of cooperation can better explain “purity”
Are we all implicit puritans? New evidence that work and sex are intuitively moralized in both traditional and non-traditional cultures
Considering the role of self-interest in moral disciplining
Disciplining the disciplined: Making sense of the gender gap that lies at the core of puritanical morals
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: Indulging in harmless pleasures can support self-regulation and foster cooperation
Drinking and feasting are perceived as facilitating cooperation
Evolutionary research confirms that a need for collective action increases puritanism
Is undisciplined behavior antithetical to cooperation, or is it part and parcel of it?
Little puritans?
Moral artificial intelligence and machine puritanism
Moral disciplining provides a satisfying explanation for Chinese lay concepts of immorality
Moral emotions underlie puritanical morality
Moralistic punishment is not for cooperation
On cooperative libertines and wicked puritans
Puritanical moral rules as moral heuristics coping with uncertainties
Puritanical moralism may signal patience rather than cause self-control
Puritanical morality and the scaffolded evolution of self-control
Puritanical morality: Cooperation or coercion?
Puritanism as moral advertisement helps solve the puzzle of ineffective moralization
Puritanism needs purity, and moral psychology needs pluralism
Purity is linked to cooperation but not necessarily through self-control
Purity is not a distinct moral domain
Purity is still a problem
Signals of discipline and puritanical challenges to liberty
The evolution of puritanical morality has not always served to strengthen cooperation, but to reinforce male dominance and exclude women
The many faces of moralized self-control: Puritanical morality is not reducible to cooperation concerns
There are no beautiful surfaces without a terrible depth
“WEIRD” societies still value (even needless) self-control and self-sacrifice
Author response
The puritanical moral contract: Purity, cooperation, and the architecture of the moral mind