Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T09:19:42.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The polyphony principle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2022

Bree Beal Open the ORCID record for Bree Beal [Opens in a new window]
Bree Beal*
Affiliation:
Psychology and Interdisciplinary Sciences (PAIS) Building, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA [email protected]://www.bree-beal.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bermúdez's “rational framing effects” are consequences of a counterintuitive phenomenon that I call “normative polyphony”: the reality that a single action may, with logical consistency, sustain diverse positive and negative judgments. I show that normative polyphony emerges from “ontological polyphony” – that is, diverse possible framings of relevant details – and illustrate this “polyphony principle” through a reading of Dostoevsky's (1993) Crime and Punishment.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e222
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. (Caryl Emerson, Ed. & Trans.). University of Minnesota Press (Original work published 1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, B. (2020). What are the irreducible basic elements of morality? A critique of the debate over monism and pluralism in moral psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619867106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beal, B. (2021). The nonmoral conditions of moral cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 34(8), 1097–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2021.1942811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, B., & Gogia, G. (2021). Cognition in moral space: A minimal model. Consciousness and Cognition, 92, 103134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dostoevsky, F. (1993). Crime and punishment. (Richard Pevear & Larissa Volokhonsky Trans.) Vintage Classics (Original work published 1866).Google Scholar
Much, N. C., & Shweder, R. A. (1978). Speaking of rules: The analysis of culture in breach. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2, 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shweder, R. A. (1992). Ghostbusters in anthropology. In D'Andrade, R. G. & Strauss, C. (Eds.), Human motives and cultural models (pp. 45–58). Cambridge University Press (Reprinted in Kroeber Anthropological Society Paper nos. 69–70, 1989, pp. 100–108, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar