Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:13:28.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral principles in May's Regard for Reason in the Moral Mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2019

Colin Marshall Open the ORCID record for Colin Marshall [Opens in a new window]
Colin Marshall*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195. [email protected]://sites.google.com/site/colinmarshallphilosophy/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Joshua May offers four principles that might serve as the rational foundations of moral judgments. I argue that these principles, if they are independent of affect, are too weak to be the basis of any substantive moral judgment and do not fit with the idea that morality is categorical.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e160
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Greene, J. (2008) The secret joke of Kant's Soul. In: Moral psychology, vol. 3, ed. Sinnott-Armstrong, W., pp. 35–117. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Herman, B. (1993) The practice of moral judgement. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996) Practical philosophy, trans. Gregor, M.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998) Critique of pure reason, trans. Guyer, P & Wood, A.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
May, J. (2018) Regard for reason in the moral mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (1988) Collected works, vol. 1, trans. Curley, E.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar