Given $\beta \in (1,2]$ , let $T_{\beta }$ be the $\beta $ -transformation on the unit circle $[0,1)$ such that $T_{\beta }(x)=\beta x\pmod 1$ . For each $t\in [0,1)$ , let $K_{\beta }(t)$ be the survivor set consisting of all $x\in [0,1)$ whose orbit $\{T^{n}_{\beta }(x): n\ge 0\}$ never hits the open interval $(0,t)$ . Kalle et al [Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 40(9) (2020) 2482–2514] proved that the Hausdorff dimension function $t\mapsto \dim _{H} K_{\beta }(t)$ is a non-increasing Devil’s staircase. So there exists a critical value $\tau (\beta )$ such that $\dim _{H} K_{\beta }(t)>0$ if and only if $t<\tau (\beta )$ . In this paper, we determine the critical value $\tau (\beta )$ for all $\beta \in (1,2]$ , answering a question of Kalle et al (2020). For example, we find that for the Komornik–Loreti constant $\beta \approx 1.78723$ , we have $\tau (\beta )=(2-\beta )/(\beta -1)$ . Furthermore, we show that (i) the function $\tau : \beta \mapsto \tau (\beta )$ is left continuous on $(1,2]$ with right-hand limits everywhere, but has countably infinitely many discontinuities; (ii) $\tau $ has no downward jumps, with $\tau (1+)=0$ and $\tau (2)=1/2$ ; and (iii) there exists an open set $O\subset (1,2]$ , whose complement $(1,2]\setminus O$ has zero Hausdorff dimension, such that $\tau $ is real-analytic, convex, and strictly decreasing on each connected component of O. Consequently, the dimension $\dim _{H} K_{\beta }(t)$ is not jointly continuous in $\beta $ and t. Our strategy to find the critical value $\tau (\beta )$ depends on certain substitutions of Farey words and a renormalization scheme from dynamical systems.

We give a new approach to characterising and computing the set of global maximisers and minimisers of the functions in the Takagi class and, in particular, of the Takagi–Landsberg functions. The latter form a family of fractal functions $f_\alpha:[0,1]\to{\mathbb R}$ parameterised by $\alpha\in(-2,2)$ . We show that $f_\alpha$ has a unique maximiser in $[0,1/2]$ if and only if there does not exist a Littlewood polynomial that has $\alpha$ as a certain type of root, called step root. Our general results lead to explicit and closed-form expressions for the maxima of the Takagi–Landsberg functions with $\alpha\in(-2,1/2]\cup(1,2)$ . For $(1/2,1]$ , we show that the step roots are dense in that interval. If $\alpha\in (1/2,1]$ is a step root, then the set of maximisers of $f_\alpha$ is an explicitly given perfect set with Hausdorff dimension $1/(n+1)$ , where n is the degree of the minimal Littlewood polynomial that has $\alpha$ as its step root. In the same way, we determine explicitly the minima of all Takagi–Landsberg functions. As a corollary, we show that the closure of the set of all real roots of all Littlewood polynomials is equal to $[-2,-1/2]\cup[1/2,2]$ .

We show that a computable function $f:\mathbb R\rightarrow \mathbb R$ has Luzin’s property (N) if and only if it reflects $\Pi ^1_1$ -randomness, if and only if it reflects $\Delta ^1_1({\mathcal {O}})$ -randomness, and if and only if it reflects ${\mathcal {O}}$ -Kurtz randomness, but reflecting Martin–Löf randomness or weak-2-randomness does not suffice. Here a function f is said to reflect a randomness notion R if whenever $f(x)$ is R-random, then x is R-random as well. If additionally f is known to have bounded variation, then we show f has Luzin’s (N) if and only if it reflects weak-2-randomness, and if and only if it reflects $\emptyset '$ -Kurtz randomness. This links classical real analysis with algorithmic randomness.

We prove that the continuous function${\rm{\hat \Omega }}:2^\omega \to $ that is defined via$X \mapsto \mathop \sum \limits_n 2^{ - K\left( {Xn} \right)} $ for all $X \in {2^\omega }$ is differentiable exactly at the Martin-Löf random reals with the derivative having value 0; that it is nowhere monotonic; and that $\mathop \smallint \nolimits _0^1{\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}\left( X \right)\,{\rm{d}}X$ is a left-c.e. $wtt$-complete real having effective Hausdorff dimension ${1 / 2}$.

We further investigate the algorithmic properties of ${\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}$. For example, we show that the maximal value of ${\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}$ must be random, the minimal value must be Turing complete, and that ${\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}\left( X \right) \oplus X{ \ge _T}\emptyset \prime$ for every X. We also obtain some machine-dependent results, including that for every $\varepsilon > 0$, there is a universal machine V such that ${{\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}_V}$ maps every real X having effective Hausdorff dimension greater than ε to a real of effective Hausdorff dimension 0 with the property that $X{ \le _{tt}}{{\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}_V}\left( X \right)$; and that there is a real X and a universal machine V such that ${{\rm{\Omega }}_V}\left( X \right)$ is rational.

For $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\in (1,2]$ the $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$-transformation $T_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}:[0,1)\rightarrow [0,1)$ is defined by $T_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}(x)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}x\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}1)$. For $t\in [0,1)$ let $K_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}(t)$ be the survivor set of $T_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}$ with hole $(0,t)$ given by

$$\begin{eqnarray}K_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}(t):=\{x\in [0,1):T_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}^{n}(x)\not \in (0,t)\text{ for all }n\geq 0\}.\end{eqnarray}$$

$E_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}$

$t\in [0,1)$

$t\mapsto K_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}(t)$

$E_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}$

$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\in (1,2)$

$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\in (1,2)$

$E_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}$

$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\in (1,2)$

$E_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}$

$E_{2}$

$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\in (1,2)$

$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}$

$K_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}(t)$

$t<\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}$

$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}\leq 1-(1/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})$

$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\in (1,2)$

We investigate island systems with continuous height functions and strongly laminar systems which are laminar systems containing sets with disjoint boundaries. In the discrete case, we show that for a maximal rectangular system of islands $ \mathcal{H} $ on an $m$ by $n$ rectangular grid we have $\lceil \min (m, n)/ 4\rceil \leq \vert \mathcal{H} \vert \leq \lceil m/ 2\rceil \lceil n/ 2\rceil $. In the continuous case we show that under some conditions maximal strongly laminar systems $ \mathcal{H} $ have cardinality ${\aleph }_{0} $ or ${2}^{{\aleph }_{0} } $ and present examples with $\vert \mathcal{H} \vert = {\aleph }_{0} $.

The Minkowski question mark function ?(x) arises as a real distribution of rationals in the Farey tree. We examine the generating function of moments of ?(x). It appears that the generating function is a direct dyadic analogue of period functions for Maass wave forms and it is defined in the cut plane \ (1, ∞). The exponential generating function satisfies an integral equation with kernel being the Bessel function. The solution of this integral equation leads to the definition of dyadic eigenfunctions, arising from a certain Hilbert–Schmidt operator. Finally, we describe p-adic distribution of rationals in the Stern–Brocot tree. Surprisingly, the Eisenstein series G2(z) does manifest in both real and p-adic cases.

A formula for the interior $\varepsilon$-neighborhood of the classical von Koch snowflake curve is computed in detail. This function of $\varepsilon$ is shown to match quite closely with earlier predictions of what it should be, but is also much more precise. The resulting ‘tube formula’ is expressed in terms of the Fourier coefficients of a suitable nonlinear and periodic analog of the standard Cantor staircase function and reflects the self-similarity of the Koch curve. As a consequence, the possible complex dimensions of the Koch snowflake are computed explicitly.

In this paper we prove that if a Cantor set has ratios of dissection bounded away from zero, then there is a natural number N, such that its N-fold sum is an interval. Moreover, for each element z of this interval, we explicitly construct the N elements of C whose sum yields z. We also extend a result of Mendes and Oliveria showing that when s is irrational is an interval if and only if a /(1−2a) as/(1−2as) ≥ 1.

We study sets on which measurable real-valued functions on a measurable space with negligibles are determined by their range.