Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:04:37.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cleansing and separation procedures reflect resource concerns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2021

Simone Schnall Open the ORCID record for Simone Schnall [Opens in a new window]  and
Robert K. Henderson
Simone Schnall
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 3EB, UK. [email protected]; [email protected]
Robert K. Henderson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 3EB, UK. [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We propose that procedures of separation have two functions, namely first, to establish the integrity of individual parts, and second, to make previously joint entities discreet and therefore countable. This allows taking stock of available resources, including evaluating the use of individual objects, a process that is especially adaptive under conditions of threat of contagious disease and resource scarcity.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 44 , 2021 , e22
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Obsessive compulsive and related disorders. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.dsm05.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concept of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duschinsky, R., Schnall, S., & Weiss, D. (Eds.). (2017). Purity and danger now: New perspectives. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315529738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (2000). Nonverbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancebo, M. C., Eisen, J. L., Grant, J. E., & Rasmussen, S. A. (2005). Obsessive compulsive personality disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder: Clinical characteristics, diagnostic difficulties, and treatment. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 17, 197–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moes, G. S., Lall, R., & Johnson, W. B. (1996). Personality characteristics of successful navy submarine personnel. Military Medicine, 161, 239–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto, A., Steinglass, J. E., Greene, A. L., Weber, E. U., & Simpson, H. B. (2014). Capacity to delay reward differentiates obsessive-compulsive disorder and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 75(8), 653–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.09.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnall, S. (2014). Are there basic metaphors?. In Landau, M. J., Robinson, M. D. & Meier, B. P. (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 225–247). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnall, S. (2017). Disgust as embodied loss aversion. European Review of Social Psychology, 28(1), 50–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1259844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skodol, A. E., Oldham, J. M., Bender, D. S., Dyck, I. R., Stout, R. L., Morey, L. C., & McGlashan, T. H. (2005). Dimensional representations of DSM-IV personality disorders: Relationships to functional impairment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1919–1925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullrich, S., Farrington, D. P., & Coid, J. W. (2007). Dimensions of DSM-IV personality disorders and life-success. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(6), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.6.657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellen, D., Samuels, J., Bienvenu, J., Grados, M., Cullen, B., Riddle, M., Liang, K.-Y., & Nestadt, G. (2007). Utility of the Leyton obsessional inventory to distinguish OCD and OCPD. Depression and Anxiety, 24, 301–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wynn, K. (1998). Psychological foundations of number: Numerical competence in human infant. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 296–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar