Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:45:05.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grounded procedures: A proximate mechanism for the psychology of cleansing and other physical actions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2020

Spike W. S. Lee Open the ORCID record for Spike W. S. Lee [Opens in a new window]  and
Norbert Schwarz Open the ORCID record for Norbert Schwarz [Opens in a new window]
Spike W. S. Lee
Affiliation:
Rotman School of Management and Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, ONM5S 3E6, [email protected]; https://mindandbodylab.wixsite.com/mindandbodylab
Norbert Schwarz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Mind & Society Center, and Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA90089. [email protected]; https://dornsife.usc.edu/norbert-schwarz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experimental work has revealed causal links between physical cleansing and various psychological variables. Empirically, how robust are they? Theoretically, how do they operate? Major prevailing accounts focus on morality or disgust, capturing a subset of cleansing effects, but cannot easily handle cleansing effects in non-moral, non-disgusting contexts. Building on grounded views on cognitive processes and known properties of mental procedures, we propose grounded procedures of separation as a proximate mechanism underlying cleansing effects. This account differs from prevailing accounts in terms of explanatory kind, interpretive parsimony, and predictive scope. Its unique and falsifiable predictions have received empirical support: Cleansing attenuates or eliminates otherwise observed influences of prior events (1) across domains and (2) across valences. (3) Cleansing manipulations produce stronger effects the more strongly they engage sensorimotor capacities. (4) Reversing the causal arrow, motivation for cleansing is triggered more readily by negative than positive entities. (5) Conceptually similar effects extend to other physical actions of separation. On the flipside, grounded procedures of connection are also observed. Together, separation and connection organize prior findings relevant to multiple perspectives (e.g., conceptual metaphor, sympathetic magic) and open up new questions. Their predictions are more generalizable than the specific mappings in conceptual metaphors, but more fine-grained than the broad assumptions of grounded cognition. This intermediate level of analysis sheds light on the interplay between mental and physical processes.

Keywords

attitudecleansingconceptual metaphorconnectiondisgustgroundingmoralityproceduresseparationsympathetic magic
Type
Target Article
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 44 , 2021 , e1
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00054-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(4), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbesfeld, J., Collins, T., Baldwin, D., & Daubman, K. (2014). Clean Thoughts Lead to Less Severe Moral Judgment. http://psychfiledrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTc3.Google Scholar
Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Morales, A. C. (2006). Consumer contamination: How consumers react to products touched by others. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.2.81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Morales, A. C. (2008). Positive consumer contagion: Responses to attractive others in a retail context. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 690–701. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.6.690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(2), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashenburg, K. (2007). The dirt on clean: An unsanitized history. North Point Press.Google Scholar
Atasoy, O., & Morewedge, C. K. (2017). Digital goods are valued less than physical goods. Journal of Consumer Research. 44(6), 1343–1357. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38(11), 1145–1160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1975). The structure of magic: A book about language and therapy. Science and Behavior Books. https://books.google.ca/books?id=hvvaAAAAMAAJ.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F. (Ed.). (1999). The self in social psychology. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, L. (1990). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychologist, 45(4), 494–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Besman, M., Dubensky, C., Dunsmore, L., & Daubman, K. (2013). Cleanliness Primes Less Severe Moral Judgments. http://psychfiledrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTQ5.Google Scholar
Blackman, A. M. (1918). Some notes on the ancient Egyptian practice of washing the dead. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 5(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.2307/3853730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Mental construal and the emergence of assimilation and contrast effects: The inclusion/exclusion model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 319–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. (2010). How pleasure works: The new science of why we like what we like (1st ed.). W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Bloom, P., & Gelman, S. A. (2008). Psychological essentialism in selecting the 14th Dalai Lama. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(7), 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, J. M., & Pittet, D. (2002). Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 23(Suppl. 12), S3–S40. https://doi.org/10.1086/503164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2014). Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(3), 384–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briñol, P., Gascó, M., Petty, R. E., & Horcajo, J. (2013a). Treating thoughts as material objects can increase or decrease their impact on evaluation. Psychological Science, 24(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Santos, D., & Mello, J. (2017b). Meaning moderates the persuasive effect of physical actions: Buying, selling, touching, carrying, and cleaning thoughts as if they were commercial products. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(4), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1086/693561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Wagner, B. C. (2011). Embodied attitude change: A self-validation perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(12), 1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00402.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calder, B. J., & Staw, B. M. (1975). Self-perception of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 599–605. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T. H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., … Wu, H. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in nature and science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behavior, 2(9), 637–644. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, H. A., & Anderson, A. K. (2013). Things rank and gross in nature: A review and synthesis of moral disgust. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 300–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science (New York, N.Y.), 323(5918), 1222–1226. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, A., Shepherd, K., Shammas, B., & Itkowitz, C. (2020). Trump comments prompt doctors, and Lysol, to warn against injecting disinfectants. Washington Post, April 24. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/04/24/disinfectant-injection-coronavirus-trump/.Google Scholar
Clore, G. L., & Parrott, W. G. (1994). Cognitive feelings and metacognitive judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clore, G. L., & Schnall, S. (2005). The influence of affect on attitude. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 437–489). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. B., Siegel, J. I., & Rozin, P. (2003). Faith versus practice: Different bases for religiosity judgments by Jews and Protestants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(2), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dai, Z. (2018). 年初三城隍廟送發財金 摸財神爺鬍鬚旺整年. 蘋果日報., February 18. https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20180218/1300167/.Google Scholar
Dai, H., Milkman, K. L., & Riis, J. (2014). The fresh start effect: Temporal landmarks motivate aspirational behavior. Management Science, 60(10), 2563–2582. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danovitch, J., & Bloom, P. (2009). Children's extension of disgust to physical and moral events. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 9(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Los Reyes, A., Aldao, A., Kundey, S. M. A., Lee, B. G., & Molina, S. (2012). Compromised decision making and the effects of manipulating physical states on human judgments. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denke, C., Rotte, M., Heinze, H.-J., & Schaefer, M. (2014). Lying and the subsequent desire for toothpaste: Activity in the somatosensory Cortex predicts embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor. Cerebral Cortex, 26(2), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu170.Google ScholarPubMed
Dewey, J. (1968). Studies in logical theory: Essays. Basil Blackwell with the cooperation of the University of Pittsburgh (original work published in 1903).Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concept of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duschinsky, R., Schnall, S., & Weiss, D. (Eds.). (2017). Purity and danger now: New perspectives. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315529738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000a). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905.Google Scholar
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000b). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earp, B. D., Everett, J. A. C., Madva, E. N., & Hamlin, J. K. (2014). Out, damned spot: Can the “Macbeth effect” be replicated? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48(4), 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.4.384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P., & Rosenberg, E. L. (Eds.). (1997). What the face reveals: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the facial action coding system (FACS). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eliade, M. (1996). Patterns in comparative religion. University of Nebraska Press (original work published in 1958).Google Scholar
Fayard, J. V., Bassi, A. K., Bernstein, D. M., & Roberts, B. W. (2009). Is cleanliness next to godliness? Dispelling old wives’ tales: Failure to replicate Zhong and Liljenquist (2006). Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 6(2), 21–29.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1977). Dissonance and self-perception: An integrative view of each theory's proper domain of application. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(5), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90031-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiedler, K. (2004). Tools, toys, truisms, and theories: Some thoughts on the creative cycle of theory formation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0802_5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiedler, K. (2018). The creative cycle and the growth of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617745651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firestone, E., & Lyne, R. (2017). Purity and disgust in Shakespeare's problem plays. In Duschinsky, R., Schnall, S., & Weiss, D. (Eds.), Purity and danger now, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315529738-21.Google Scholar
Florack, A., Kleber, J., Busch, R., & Stöhr, D. (2014). Detaching the ties of ownership: The effects of hand washing on the exchange of endowed products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24, 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fong, M. (2000). “Luck talk” in celebrating the Chinese new year. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00048-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, J. G. (1990). The golden bough. In Frazer, J. G. (Ed.), The golden bough (pp. 701–711). UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00400-3_68 (original work published in 1890).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. (1920). A general introduction to psychoanalysis. Horace Liveright. https://doi.org/10.1037/10667-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gámez, E., Díaz, J. M., & Marrero, H. (2011). The uncertain universality of the Macbeth effect with a Spanish sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gattis, M. (2003). Spatial schemas and abstract thought. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gattis, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.231.Google ScholarPubMed
Gelman, S. (2004). Psychological essentialism in children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97470012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gmelch, G. (1971). Baseball magic. Society, 8(8), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory. In Devine, P. & Plant, A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gu, Y., Botti, S., & Faro, D. (2013). Turning the page: The impact of choice closure on satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1086/670252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzfeld, M. (2017). Purity and punning: Political fundamentalism and semantic pollution. In Duschinsky, R., Schnall, S., & Weiss, D. (Eds.), Purity and danger now, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315529738-8.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). Guilford.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoy, S. M. (1995). Chasing dirt the American pursuit of cleanliness. Oxford University Press. http://www.ebrary.com.Google Scholar
Huang, J. L. (2014). Does cleanliness influence moral judgments? Response effort moderates the effect of cleanliness priming on moral judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, J. Y., Ackerman, J. M., & Newman, G. E. (2017). Catching (up with) magical contagion: A review of contagion effects in consumer contexts. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(4), 430–443. https://doi.org/10.1086/693533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2014). The selfish goal: Autonomously operating motivational structures as the proximate cause of human judgment and behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13000290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some Old ways of thinking: Popular lectures on philosophy. Longmans, Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1909). The meaning of truth: A sequel to “pragmatism.” Longmans, Green, and Company.Google Scholar
Janiszewski, C., & Wyer, R. S. (2014). Content and process priming: A review. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. J., Cheung, F., & Donnellan, M. B. (2014a). Cleanliness primes do not influence moral judgment. http://psychfiledrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTcy.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. J., Cheung, F., & Donnellan, M. B. (2014b). Does cleanliness influence moral judgments?: A direct replication of Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008). Social Psychology, 45(3), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampf, G., & Kramer, A. (2004). Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 17(4), 863–893. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaspar, K. (2012). Washing one's hands after failure enhances optimism but hampers future performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(1), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612443267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaspar, K., & Cames, S. (2016). Cognitions about bodily purity attenuate stress perception. Scientific Reports, 6, 38829. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, L. R., & Kim, N. S. (2011). A proximity effect in adults’ contamination intuitions. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(3), 8.Google Scholar
Kolers, P. A., & Roediger, H. L. (1984). Procedures of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(4), 425–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90282-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körner, A., & Strack, F. (2019). Conditions for the clean slate effect after success or failure. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1454881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, T., & Block, L. G. (2014). Like Mike: Ability contagion through touched objects increases confidence and improves performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(2), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kross, E., Ayduk, O., & Mischel, W. (2005). When asking “why” does not hurt distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychological Science, 16(9), 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01600.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Köpetz, C., Bélanger, J. J., Chun, W. Y., Orehek, E., & Fishbach, A. (2013). Features of multifinality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312453087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331–378). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakens, D., Schneider, I. K., Jostmann, N. B., & Schubert, T. W. (2011). Telling things apart: The distance between response keys influences categorization times. Psychological Science, 22(7), 887–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611412391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. https://books.google.com.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J. (2017). Conceptual metaphor in social psychology: The poetics of everyday life (1st ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045–1067. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landau, M. J., Oyserman, D., Keefer, L. A., & Smith, G. C. (2014). The college journey and academic engagement: How metaphor use enhances identity-based motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(5), 679–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, A., & Ji, L.-J. (2015). Physical cleansing moderates the link between investment of labor and feelings of ownership [Poster]. Annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Long Beach, CA.Google Scholar
Lee, C., Linkenauger, S. A., Bakdash, J. Z., Joy-Gaba, J. A., & Profitt, D. R. (2011). Putting like a pro: The role of positive contagion in golf performance and perception. PLoS One, 6(10), e26016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. W. S., Chen, K., Ma, C., & Hoang, J. (2020a). Psychological antecedents and consequences of physical cleansing: A meta-analytic review [manuscript in preparation].Google Scholar
Lee, S. W. S., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2013). Maggots and morals: Physical disgust is to fear as moral disgust is to anger. In Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Soriano, C. (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 271–280). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. W. S., Millet, K., Grinstein, A., Pauwels, K., Johnston, P. R., Volkov, A. E., & van der Wal, A. (2020b). Threat and cleaning [Manuscript in preparation].Google Scholar
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010a). Washing away postdecisional dissonance. Science (New York, N.Y.), 328, 709. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010b). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1423–1425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610382788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 737–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Clean-moral effects and clean-slate effects: Physical cleansing as an embodied procedure of psychological separation. In Duschinsky, R., Schnall, S., & Weiss, D. H. (Eds.), Purity and danger now: New perspectives (pp. 136–161). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2018). Methodological deviation from the original experiment. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0403-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings. Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15(5), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00679.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, X., Wei, L., & Soman, D. (2010). Sealing the emotions genie: The effects of physical enclosure on psychological closure. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1047–1050. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, S. (2018). 嘉邑城隍廟摸財神爺鬍鬚 加持好財運. 中時電子報, April 18. http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20180418002408-260405.Google Scholar
Libby, L. K., & Eibach, R. P. (2011). Visual perspective in mental imagery. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 185–245). Elsevier. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780123855220000044.Google Scholar
Life.Church. (n.d.). Soul Detox. Retrieved February 15, 2019, from https://www.bible.com/reading-plans/257-soul-detox.Google Scholar
Marotta, M., & Bohner, G. (2013). Dissonanz abwaschen, Dissonanz reinreiben: Symbolische Abschwächung vs. Verstärkung von Dissonanz nach Entscheidungen. Tagung der Fachgruppe Sozialpsychologie, Hagen, Germany.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (2001). A general theory of magic. Routledge (original work published in 1902).Google Scholar
McCarthy, C. (2014). My House Is Messy – And I Don't Care. HuffPost, February 25. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/my-house-is-messy-and-i-dont-care_b_4853787.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (Ed.). (2000). Language and gesture. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (2008). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Medin, D., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179–196). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesquita, B., Barrett, L. F., & Smith, E. R. (Eds.). (2010). The mind in context. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Michael, A. (1979). Radhakrishnan on Hindu moral life and action. Concept.Google Scholar
Mishra, A., & Mishra, H. (2010). Border bias: The belief that state borders can protect against disasters. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1582–1586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610385950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mishra, A., Mishra, H., & Nayakankuppam, D. (2009). The group-contagion effect: The influence of spatial groupings on perceived contagion and preferences. Psychological Science, 20(7), 867–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02371.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, D. (2011). India Stems Tide of Pollution into Ganges River. National Geographic News, November 23. https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/11/111123-india-ganges-river-pollution/.Google Scholar
Moscatiello, T., & Nagel, E. (2014, May 2). The effects of cleansing on risk taking [Poster]. Celebration, Gettysburg, PA. http://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1592&context=celebration.Google Scholar
Mowrer, O. H. (1960). Learning theory and behavior. John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/10802-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2016). The behavioral immune system: Implications for social cognition, social interaction, and social influence. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 53, pp. 75–129). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mussweiler, T. (2006). Doing is for thinking!. Stereotype activation by stereotypic movements. Psychological Science, 17(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01659.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natanzon, M., & Ferguson, M. J. (2012). Goal pursuit is grounded: The link between forward movement and achievement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 379–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). The contagion concept in adult thinking in the United States: Transmission of germs and of interpersonal influence. Ethos (Berkeley, Calif. ), 22(2), 158–186. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1994.22.2.02a00020.Google Scholar
Newman, G. E., & Bloom, P. (2014). Physical contact influences how much people pay at celebrity auctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(10), 3705–3708. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313637111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, G. E., & Smith, R. K. (2016). The need to belong motivates demand for authentic objects. Cognition, 156, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, G. E., Diesendruck, G., & Bloom, P. (2011). Celebrity contagion and the value of objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1086/658999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 184–211. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oaten, M., Stevenson, R. J., & Case, T. I. (2009). Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, J. M., & Stone, J. (2005). The influence of behavior on attitudes. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 223–271). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Peck, J., Barger, V. A., & Webb, A. (2013). In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1086/598614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286–302.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (2017). The fixation of belief. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (original work published in 1877).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. Viking.Google Scholar
Pittet, D., Allegranzi, B., & Boyce, J., & World Health Organization World Alliance for Patient Safety First Global Patient Safety Challenge Core Group of Experts. (2009). The World Health Organization guidelines on hand hygiene in health care and their consensus recommendations. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 30(7), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1086/600379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference. Science (New York, N.Y.), 146(3642), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3642.347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poon, K.-T. (2019). Do you reap what you sow? The effect of cyberostracism on moral impurity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 41(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2019.1585353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994627 (original work published in 1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, L. L., Coulter, R. A., Strizhakova, Y., & Schultz, A. (2017). The fresh start mindset: Transforming consumers’ lives. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priester, J. R., Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The influence of motor processes on attitudes toward novel versus familiar semantic stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(5), 442–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296225002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00008.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radford, M., & Radford, E. (2013). Encyclopaedia of superstitions – A history of superstition. Read Books Limited.Google Scholar
Reicher, S. D., Templeton, A., Neville, F., Ferrari, L., & Drury, J. (2016). Core disgust is attenuated by ingroup relations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(10), 2631–2635. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517027113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinck, M., & Bower, G. H. (2003). Goal-based accessibility of entities within situation models. In Ross, B. H. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 1–33). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(03)44001-2.Google Scholar
Ritter, R. S., & Preston, J. L. (2011). Gross gods and icky atheism: Disgust responses to rejected religious beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, M. S. (2005). The file-drawer problem revisited: A general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution, 59(2), 464–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01004.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P., & Fallon, A. E. (1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (2008). Disgust. In Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 757–776). Guilford.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Millman, L., & Nemeroff, C. (1986). Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, P. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2013). Bodily moral disgust: What it is, how it is different from anger, and why it is an unreasoned emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savani, K., Kumar, S., Naidu, N. V. R., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Beliefs about emotional residue: The idea that emotions leave a trace in the physical environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 684–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaefer, M., Denke, C., Heinze, H.-J., & Rotte, M. (2013). Rough primes and rough conversations: Evidence for a modality-specific basis to mental metaphors. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(11), 1653–1659. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaefer, M., Rotte, M., Heinze, H.-J., & Denke, C. (2015). Dirty deeds and dirty bodies: Embodiment of the Macbeth effect is mapped topographically onto the somatosensory cortex. Scientific Reports, 5, 18051. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaller, M., & Park, J. H. (2011). The behavioral immune system (and why it matters). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1219–1222. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, I. K., Stapels, J., Koole, S. L., & Schwarz, N. (2020). Too close to call: Spatial distance between options influences choice difficulty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, 103939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N. (2010). Meaning in context: Metacognitive experiences. In Mesquita, B., Barrett, L. F., & Smith, E. R. (Eds.), The mind in context (pp. 105–125). Guilford.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–308). Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In Martin, L. L. & Tesser, A. (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 217–245). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Lee, S. W. S. (2018). Embodied cognition and the construction of attitudes. In Albarracín, D. & Johnson, B. T. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes, volume 1: Basic principles (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 450–479). Routledge.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does merely going through the same moves make for a “direct” replication? Concepts, contexts, and operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306.Google Scholar
Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (2008). Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L. A. (2011). Embodied cognition. Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 53–117). Elsevier. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065260104360028.Google Scholar
Strack, F. (2012, January). From wow to how. Embodiment preconference for the annual meeting of Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Tassinary, L. G., Cacioppo, J. T., & Vanman, E. J. (2007). The skeletomotor system: Surface electromyography. In Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 267–300). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546396.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1935). The psychology of wants, interests and attitudes. D. Appleton-Century Company, Incorporated.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (2010). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20(4), 410–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x (original work published in 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TOPick. (2016). 驚螫打小人 打工仔最愛打上司？. TOPick, March 4. https://topick.hket.com/article/1382516/驚螫打小人%20%20%20%20%20打工仔最愛打上司？.Google Scholar
Topolinski, S. (2017). Articulation patterns in names: A hidden route to consumer preference. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(4), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1086/692820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topolinski, S., Maschmann, I. T., Pecher, D., & Winkielman, P. (2014). Oral approach–avoidance: Affective consequences of muscular articulation dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 57(4), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013). Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). American Time Use Survey. https://www.bls.gov/tus/home.htm.Google Scholar
Villain hitting. (2018). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Villain_hitting&oldid=868210243.Google Scholar
Vrana, S. R. (1993). The psychophysiology of disgust: Differentiating negative emotional contexts with facial EMG. Psychophysiology, 30(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03354.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vyse, S. A. (2013). Believing in magic: The psychology of superstition. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.ca/books?id=fWMGAQAAQBAJ.Google Scholar
Wang, H. (2018). 嘉義城隍廟五路財神好神威 摸財神爺鬍鬚助財氣. 聯合新聞網. April 18. https://udn.com/news/story/7322/3093501.Google Scholar
Watkins, M. J. (1981). Human memory and the information-processing metaphor. Cognition, 10(1–3), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(81)90065-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, M. (1919). Politik als Beruf (politics as a profession) (1st ed.). Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Wells, G. L., & Petty, R. E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0103_2 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesley, J. (1778). Cleanliness is indeed next to godliness.Google Scholar
West, C., & Zhong, C.-B. (2015). Moral cleansing. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. E., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1257–1267. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, R. (2017). There's power in the dirt: Impurity, utopianism and radical politics. In Duschinsky, R., Schnall, S., & Weiss, D. (Eds.), Purity and danger now, January 12. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315529738-10.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychometric Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wullenkord, R., Fraune, M. R., Eyssel, F., & Šabanović, S. (2016). Getting in Touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots. 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 980–985. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyer, R. S., Xu, A. J., & Shen, H. (2012). The effects of past behavior on future goal-directed activity. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 46, pp. 237–283). Academic. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780123942814000143.Google Scholar
Xu, A. J., Schwarz, N., & Wyer, R. S. (2015). Hunger promotes acquisition of nonfood objects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(9), 2688–2692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417712112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, A. J., Zwick, R., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Washing away your (good or bad) luck: Physical cleansing affects risk-taking behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, H., Bègue, L., & Bushman, B. J. (2014). Washing the guilt away: Effects of personal versus vicarious cleansing on guilty feelings and prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zerkel, E. (2013). World's Most Polluted Rivers. The Weather Channel, July 1. https://weather.com/news/news/worlds-most-polluted-rivers-20130627.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Risen, J. L., & Hosey, C. (2014). Reversing one's fortune by pushing away bad luck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1171–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, M., Lee, L., & Soman, D. (2012). Crossing the virtual boundary: The effect of task-irrelevant environmental cues on task implementation. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1200–1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612441608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science (New York, N.Y.), 313(5792), 1451–1452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed