Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:47:35.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A modern materialist approach to abstraction, concreteness, and explanation in cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2020

Richard Shillcock Open the ORCID record for Richard Shillcock [Opens in a new window]
Richard Shillcock*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, EdinburghEH8 9JZ, UK. [email protected] https://sites.google.com/site/rcspplsinf/home
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although endorsing the authors’ concentration on the issue of abstraction, I critique (a) the philosophical nature of their abstract–concrete dimension, (b) their view of the brain–world barrier, and (c) their implicit positivist one-way hierarchy that has abstraction as the goal.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e148
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shillcock, R. (2014) The concrete universal and cognitive science. Axiomathes 24(1):63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shillcock, R., Thomas, J. & Bailes, R. (2019) Mirror neurons, prediction and hemispheric coordination: The prioritizing of intersubjectivity over “intrasubjectivity”. Axiomathes 29(2):139–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar