Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:16:21.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fluency Amplification Model supports the GANE principle of arousal enhancement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Claus-Christian Carbon  and
Sabine Albrecht
Claus-Christian Carbon
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychology and Methodology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany Forschungsgruppe EPÆG (Ergonomie, Psychologische Æsthetik, Gestalt), Bamberg, Germanyccc@experimental-psychology.comwww.experimental-psychology.com Bamberg Graduate School of Affective and Cognitive Sciences (BaGrACS), Bamberg, [email protected]
Sabine Albrecht
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychology and Methodology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany Forschungsgruppe EPÆG (Ergonomie, Psychologische Æsthetik, Gestalt), Bamberg, Germanyccc@experimental-psychology.comwww.experimental-psychology.com Bamberg Graduate School of Affective and Cognitive Sciences (BaGrACS), Bamberg, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The GANE (glutamate amplifies noradrenergic effects) model described by Mather et al. offers a neurophysiological basis for the arousal mechanism which is essential for empirical aesthetics and Gestalt processing. More generally, the core principle of perception can be interpreted as a continuous processing of competing arousal states, yielding selective amplification and inhibition of percepts to deduce the meaning of a scene.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, S. & Carbon, C. C. (2014) The fluency amplification model: Fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations. Acta Psychologica 148:195–203.Google Scholar
Carbon, C. C. (2014) Understanding human perception by human-made illusions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8(566):1–6.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L. (1970) The intelligent eye. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Muth, C. & Carbon, C. C. (2013) The aesthetic aha: On the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt. Acta Psychologica 144(1):25–30.Google Scholar
Muth, C., Pepperell, R. & Carbon, C. C. (2013) Give me Gestalt! Preference for cubist artworks revealing high detectability of objects. Leonardo 46(5):488–89.Google Scholar
Muth, C., Raab, M. H. & Carbon, C. C. (2015) The stream of experience when watching artistic movies. Dynamic aesthetic effects revealed by the continuous evaluation procedure (CEP). Frontiers in Psychology 6(365):1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storbeck, J. & Clore, G. L. (2008) Affective arousal as information: How affective arousal influences judgments, learning, and memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2(5):1824–43.Google Scholar
Van de Cruys, S. & Wagemans, J. (2011) Putting reward in art: A tentative prediction error account of visual art. i-Perception 2(9):1035–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed