No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2017
Mather and colleagues' arguments require rethinking at the mechanistic level. The arguments on the physiological effects of norepinephrine at the cortical level are inconsistent with large parts of the literature. There is no evidence that norepinephrine induces local “hotspots”: Norepinephrine mainly decreases evoked responses; facilitating effects are rare and not localized. More generally, the idea that perception benefits from “local hotspots” is hardly compatible with the fact that neural representations involve largely distributed activation of cortical and subcortical networks.
Target article
Norepinephrine ignites local hotspots of neuronal excitation: How arousal amplifies selectivity in perception and memory
Related commentaries (27)
Adaptive memory systems for remembering the salient and the seemingly mundane
Amplified selectivity in cognitive processing implements the neural gain model of norepinephrine function
Are there “local hotspots?” When concepts of cognitive psychology do not fit with physiological results
Arousal-biased preferences for sensory input: An agent-centered and multisource perspective
Bidirectional synaptic plasticity can explain bidirectional retrograde effects of emotion on memory
Bodily arousal differentially impacts stimulus processing and memory: Norepinephrine in interoception
Cognitive control, dynamic salience, and the imperative toward computational accounts of neuromodulatory function
Competition elicits arousal and affect
Contemplating the GANE model using an extreme case paradigm
Dentate gyrus and hilar region revisited
Does arousal enhance apical amplification and disamplification?
Effect of arousal on perception as studied through the lens of the motor correlates of sexual arousal
Emotional memory: From affective relevance to arousal
Emotionally arousing context modulates the ERP correlates of neutral picture processing: An ERP test of the GANE model
For better or worse, or for a change?
GANEing on emotion and emotion regulation
Glutamate and norepinephrine interaction: Relevance to higher cognitive operations and psychopathology
Importance of amygdala noradrenergic activity and large-scale neural networks in regulating emotional arousal effects on perception and memory1
Interactions of noradrenaline and cortisol and the induction of indelible memories
Locus coeruleus reports changes in environmental contingencies
Once more with feeling: On the explanatory limits of the GANE model and the missing role of subjective experience
The Fluency Amplification Model supports the GANE principle of arousal enhancement
The role of arousal in predictive coding
What BANE can offer GANE: Individual differences in function of hotspot mechanisms
What do we GANE with age?
Why we forget our dreams: Acetylcholine and norepinephrine in wakefulness and REM sleep
“What have we GANEd?” A theoretical construct to explain experimental evidence for noradrenergic regulation of sensory signal processing
Author response
GANEing traction: The broad applicability of NE hotspots to diverse cognitive and arousal phenomena