Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
She, Lulu
Han, Shilian
and
Liu, Xinwang
2021.
Application of quantum-like Bayesian network and belief entropy for interference effect in multi-attribute decision making problem.
Computers & Industrial Engineering,
Vol. 157,
Issue. ,
p.
107307.
Han, Shilian
and
Liu, Xinwang
2022.
An Extension of Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making Method Based on Quantum-Like Bayesian Network Considering the Interference of Beliefs.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Khrennikova, Polina
2022.
Credible Asset Allocation, Optimal Transport Methods, and Related Topics.
Vol. 429,
Issue. ,
p.
107.
Khrennikova, Polina
2023.
The Quantum-Like Revolution.
p.
327.
Han, Shilian
and
Liu, Xinwang
2023.
An extension of multi-attribute group decision making method based on quantum-like Bayesian network considering the interference of beliefs.
Information Fusion,
Vol. 95,
Issue. ,
p.
143.
de Barros, J. Acacio
Montemayor, Carlos
De Assis, Leonardo P. G.
Skokowsi, Paul
and
Perry, John
2024.
Constraining Meanings With Contextuality.
Foundations of Science,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 2,
p.
521.
Target article
Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources
Related commentaries (25)
Another claim for cognitive history
Beginning with biology: “Aspects of cognition” exist in the service of the brain's overall function as a resource-regulator
Can resources save rationality? “Anti-Bayesian” updating in cognition and perception
Cognitively bounded rational analyses and the crucial role of theories of subjective utility
Computational limits don't fully explain human cognitive limitations
Generalization of the resource-rationality principle to neural control of goal-directed movements
Heuristics and the naturalistic fallacy
Holistic resource-rational analysis
Multiple conceptions of resource rationality
Opportunities and challenges integrating resource-rational analysis with developmental perspectives
Opportunities for emotion and mental health research in the resource-rationality framework
Optimal, resource-rational or sub-optimal? Insights from cognitive development
Representing utility and deploying the body
Resource-rational analysis versus resource-rational humans
Resource-rationality and dynamic coupling of brains and social environments
Resource-rationality as a normative standard of human rationality
Resource-rationality beyond individual minds: the case of interactive language use
Sampling as a resource-rational constraint
The biology of emotion is missing
The evolutionary foundations of resource-rational analysis
The importance of constraints on constraints
Towards a quantum-like cognitive architecture for decision-making
Uncovering cognitive constraints is the bottleneck in resource-rational analysis
What are the appropriate axioms of rationality for reasoning under uncertainty with resource-constrained systems?
What is the purpose of cognition?
Author response
Advancing rational analysis to the algorithmic level