Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:07:27.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a quantum-like cognitive architecture for decision-making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Catarina Moreira Open the ORCID record for Catarina Moreira [Opens in a new window] ,
Lauren Fell ,
Shahram Dehdashti Open the ORCID record for Shahram Dehdashti [Opens in a new window] ,
Peter Bruza Open the ORCID record for Peter Bruza [Opens in a new window]  and
Andreas Wichert Open the ORCID record for Andreas Wichert [Opens in a new window]
Catarina Moreira
Affiliation:
School of Information Systems, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane City QLD 4000, [email protected]@[email protected]@qut.edu.auhttps://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/catarina.pintomoreirahttps://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/l3.fellhttps://qutvirtual4.qut.edu.au/web/qut/person-details?id=01783299&roleCode=EMPhttps://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/p.bruza
Lauren Fell
Affiliation:
School of Information Systems, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane City QLD 4000, [email protected]@[email protected]@qut.edu.auhttps://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/catarina.pintomoreirahttps://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/l3.fellhttps://qutvirtual4.qut.edu.au/web/qut/person-details?id=01783299&roleCode=EMPhttps://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/p.bruza
Shahram Dehdashti
Affiliation:
School of Information Systems, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane City QLD 4000, [email protected]@[email protected]@qut.edu.auhttps://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/catarina.pintomoreirahttps://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/l3.fellhttps://qutvirtual4.qut.edu.au/web/qut/person-details?id=01783299&roleCode=EMPhttps://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/p.bruza
Peter Bruza
Affiliation:
School of Information Systems, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane City QLD 4000, [email protected]@[email protected]@qut.edu.auhttps://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/catarina.pintomoreirahttps://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/l3.fellhttps://qutvirtual4.qut.edu.au/web/qut/person-details?id=01783299&roleCode=EMPhttps://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/p.bruza
Andreas Wichert
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon/INESC-ID, 2744-016Porto Salvo, Portugal. [email protected]://web.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/~andreas.wichert/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We propose an alternative and unifying framework for decision-making that, by using quantum mechanics, provides more generalised cognitive and decision models with the ability to represent more information compared to classical models. This framework can accommodate and predict several cognitive biases reported in Lieder & Griffiths without heavy reliance on heuristics or on assumptions of the computational resources of the mind.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e17
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basieva, I., Cervantes, V. H., Dzhafarov, E. N. & Khrennikov, A. (2019) True contextuality beats direct influences in human decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Online April 25, 2019. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fxge0000585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busemeyer, J. & Bruza, P. (2012) Quantum models for cognition and decision. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cervantes, V. H. & Dzhafarov, E. N. (2018) Snow Queen is evil and beautiful: Experimental evidence for probabilistic contextuality in human choices. Decision 5:193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cubitt, T. S., Perez-Garcia, D. & Wolf, M. (2015) Undecidability of the spectral gap. Nature 528:207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Barros, J. A. & Oas, G. (2015) Some examples of contextuality in physics: Implications to quantum cognition. arXiv 1512.00033.Google Scholar
de Barros, J. A. & Oas, G. (2016) Some examples of contextuality in physics: Implications to quantum cognition. In: Contextuality from quantum physics to psychology, ed. Dzhafarov, E., Jordan, J., Zhang, R. & Cervantes, V., pp. 153–84. World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Barros, J. A. & Suppes, P. (2009) Quantum mechanics, interference and the brain. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 53:306–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzhafarov, E. N. & Kujala, J. V. (2014) Contextuality is about identity of random variables. Physica Scripta T163:014009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzhafarov, E. N. & Kujala, J. V. (2016) Context-content systems of random variables: The contextuality-by-default theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 74:11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. S. B. (2003) In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(10):454–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frauchiger, D. & Renner, R. (2018) Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Nature Communications 9:Article 3711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machina, M. (2009) Risk, ambiguity, and the rank-dependence axioms. Journal of Economic Review 99(1):385–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreira, C., Haven, E., Sozzo, S. & Wichert, A. (2018) Process mining with real world financial loan applications: Improving inference on incomplete event logs. PLoS One 13(12):e0207806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pothos, E. M. & Busemeyer, J. R. (2009) A quantum probability model explanation for violations of “rational” decision theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276(1665):2171–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pothos, E. M. & Busemeyer, J. R. (2013) Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(3):255–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vourdas, A. (2019) Probabilistic inequalities and measurements in bipartite systems. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 52:085301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar