Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:47:13.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are sentiments subject to selection pressures? The case of oxytocin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Chelsea D. Christie  and
Frances S. Chen
Chelsea D. Christie
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. [email protected]@psych.ubc.cahttp://chenlab.psych.ubc.ca
Frances S. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. [email protected]@psych.ubc.cahttp://chenlab.psych.ubc.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that natural selection operates on emotional and cognitive capacities supporting the subjective experience of sentiments, rather than on discrete sentiments themselves. We support this argument by examining the case of oxytocin in relation to the sentiment of love. We also explore future directions for health psychology research that includes “cold” aspects of contempt in conjunction with “hot” aspects.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e231
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bunde, J. & Suls, J. (2006) A quantitative analysis of the relationship between the Cook–Medley Hostility Scale and traditional coronary artery disease risk factors. Health Psychology 25(4):493–500.Google Scholar
Chida, Y. & Steptoe, A. (2009) The association of anger and hostility with future coronary heart disease: A meta-analytic review of prospective evidence. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 53(11):936–46. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.044.Google Scholar
Cosley, B. J., McCoy, S. K., Saslow, L. R. & Epel, E. S. (2010) Is compassion for others stress buffering? Consequences of compassion and social support for physiological reactivity to stress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(5):816–23.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Z. R. & Young, L. J. (2008) Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality. Science 322(5903):900–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Insel, T. R. & Young, L. J. (2001) The neurobiology of attachment. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2(2):129–36.Google Scholar
Miller, T. Q., Smith, T. W., Turner, C. W., Guijarro, M. L. & Hallet, A. J. (1996) Meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychological Bulletin 119(2):322–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, T. W. (1994) Concepts and methods in the study of anger, hostility, and health. In: Anger, hostility and the heart, ed. Siegman, A. W. & Smith, T. W., pp. 23–42. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smith, T. W., Glazer, K., Ruiz, J. M. & Gallo, L. C. (2004) Hostility, anger, aggressiveness, and coronary heart disease: An interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health. Journal of Personality 72(6):1217–70.Google Scholar