Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:30:14.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partner choice, fairness, and the extension of morality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Nicolas Baumard ,
Jean-Baptiste André  and
Dan Sperber
Nicolas Baumard
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PN, United Kingdom; and Philosophy, Politics and Economics Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104. [email protected]://sites.google.com/site/nicolasbaumard/
Jean-Baptiste André
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Ecologie et Evolution, UMR 7625, CNRS – Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France; and Institut Jean Nicod, ENS, EHESS, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France. [email protected]://jb.homepage.free.fr/HomepageJB/welcome.html
Dan Sperber
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science and Department of Philosophy, Central European University, 1051 Budapest, Hungary. [email protected]://www.dan.sperber.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our discussion of the commentaries begins, at the evolutionary level, with issues raised by our account of the evolution of morality in terms of partner-choice mutualism. We then turn to the cognitive level and the characterization and workings of fairness. In a final section, we discuss the degree to which our fairness-based approach to morality extends to norms that are commonly considered moral even though they are distinct from fairness.

Type
Authors' Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 102 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, L. (1986) Veiled sentiments: Honor and poetry in a Bedouin society. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Aktipis, C. (2004) Know when to walk away: Contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 231(2):249–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aktipis, C. (2011) Is cooperation viable in mobile organisms? Simple walk away rule favors the evolution of cooperation in groups. Evolution and Human Behavior 32(4):263–76.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. (1987) The biology of moral systems (Foundations of human behavior). Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
André, J. B. & Baumard, N. (2011a) Social opportunities and the evolution of fairness. Journal of Theoretical Biology 289:128–35.Google Scholar
André, J. B. & Baumard, N. (2011b) The evolution of fairness in a biological market. Evolution 65(5):1447–56. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.07.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atran, S. (2010) Talking to the enemy: Violent extremism, sacred values, and what it means to be human. Penguin.Google Scholar
Atran, S. & Henrich, J. (2010) The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory 5(1):18–30.Google Scholar
Aumann, R. J. & Shapley, L. S. (1974) Values of non-atomic games. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, J. (1994) Nonconsequentialist decisions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17:1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J. & Ritov, I. (1993) Intuitions about penalties and compensation in the context of tort law. Making Decisions about Liability and Insurance 7(1):7–33.Google Scholar
Baumard, N. (2010a) Comment nous sommes devenus moraux : Une histoire naturel du bien et du mal. Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Baumard, N. (2010b) Has punishment played a role in the evolution of cooperation? A critical review. Mind and Society 9(2):171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumard, N. (2011) Punishment is not a group adaptation: Humans punish to restore fairness rather than to support group cooperation. Mind and Society 10(1):1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumard, N., Mascaro, O. & Chevallier, C. (2012) Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods. Developmental Psychology 48(2):492–98. doi:10.1037/a0026598CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumard, N. & Sperber, D. (2012) Evolutionary and cognitive anthropology. In: A companion to moral anthropology, ed. Fassin, D., pp. 611–27. Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumard, N., Xu, J., Adachi, K., Sebesteny, A., Mascaro, O., van der Henst, J. B. & Chevallier, C. (submitted) The development of merit in Asian societies. Child Development.Google Scholar
Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U. & Fehr, E. (2006) Parochial altruism in humans. Nature 442(7105):912–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J. & Henrich, J. (2011) Rapid cultural adaptation can facilitate the evolution of large-scale cooperation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65(3):431–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bshary, R. & Schäffer, D. (2002) Choosy reef fish select cleaner fish that provide high-quality service. Animal Behaviour 63(3):557–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkart, J. M., Hrdy, S. B. & van Schaik, C. P. (2009) Cooperative breeding and human cognitive evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 18(5):175–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsmith, K., Darley, J. & Robinson, P. (2002) Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(2):284–99.Google Scholar
Choi, J. & Bowles, S. (2007) The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science 318(5850):636–40.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S. & Jordan, S. (2002) Adherence to communal norms: What it means, when it occurs, and some thoughts on how it develops. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 95:3–25.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. & Parker, G. (1995) Punishment in animal societies. Nature 373(6511):209–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, G. A. (2009) Why not socialism? Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Connor, R. C. (2007) Dolphin social intelligence: Complex alliance relationships in bottlenose dolphins and a consideration of selective environments for extreme brain size evolution in mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 362(1480):587–602.Google Scholar
Connor, R. C. & Norris, K. S. (1982) Are dolphins reciprocal altruists? American Naturalist 119(3):358–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, F., Young, L. & Greene, J. (2010) Our multi-system moral psychology: Towards a consensus view. In: The Oxford handbook of moral psychology, ed. Doris, J. M., Harman, G., Nichols, S., Prinz, J., Sinnott-Armstrong, W. & Stich, S., pp. 47–69. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damon, W. (1975) Early conceptions of positive justice as related to the development of logical operations. Child Development 46(2):301–12.Google Scholar
Danziger, S., Levav, J. & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011) Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108(17):6889–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Soto, H. (2000) The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1975) Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues 31(3):137–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fessler, D. & Haley, K. (2003) The strategy of affect: Emotions in human cooperation. In: Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation: Dahlem Workshop Report 90, ed. Hammerstein, P., pp. 7–36. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review (New York) 99:689–89.Google ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, D. (1986) Morals by agreement. Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geraci, A. & Surian, L. (2011) The developmental roots of fairness: Infants' reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources. Developmental Science 14(5):1012–20.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982) In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108:814–34.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., Koller, S. & Dias, M. (1993) Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65:613–28.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. (1964a) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1–16.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. (1964b) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:17–52.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F., Tracer, D. & Ziker, J. (2010) Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science 327(5972):1480–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. & Thaler, R. (1986a) Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business 59(4, Pt 2):S285–300. [The Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiers, E. T., Duhamel, M., Beesetty, Y., Mensah, J. A., Franken, O., Verbruggen, E., Fellbaum, C. R., Kowalchuk, G. A., Hart, M. M., Bago, A., Palmer, T. M., West, S. A., Vandenkoornhuyse, P., Jansa, J. & Bücking, H. (2011) Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 333(6044):880–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohlberg, L. (1981) Essays on moral development, vol. 1. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., Dukes, A. & Weeden, J. (2010) Sex, drugs and moral goals: Reproductive strategies and views about recreational drugs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 277(1699):3501–508.Google Scholar
Liénard, P., Chevallier, C., Mascaro, O., Kiura, P. & Baumard, N. (submitted) Early development of fairness in a tribal society.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 98(2):224–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascaro, O. & Csibra, G. (2012) Representation of stable social dominance relations by human infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109(18):6862–67.Google Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Kurzban, R., Tabak, B. A., Shaver, I. P. R. & Mikulincer, M. (2010) Evolved mechanisms for revenge and forgiveness. In: Understanding and reducing aggression, violence, and their consequences, ed. Shaver, P. R. & Mikulincer, M., pp. 221–39. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
McNamara, J. M., Barta, Z., Fromhage, L. & Houston, A. I. (2008) The coevolution of choosiness and cooperation. Nature 451(7175):189–92.Google Scholar
McNamara, J. M. & Leimar, O. (2010) Variation and the response to variation as a basis for successful cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 365(1553):2627–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikhail, J. (2007) Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(4):143–52.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P. E., Mellers, B. A. & Ordóñez, L. D. (1993) Judgments of social justice: Compromises between equality and efficiency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65:629–39.Google Scholar
Muller, M. N. & Mitani, J. C. (2005) Conflict and cooperation in wild chimpanzees. In: Advances in the study of behavior, ed. Slater, P. J. B., Rosenblatt, J., Snowdon, C., Roper, T. & Naguib, M., pp. 275–331. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Neff, K. (1997) Reasoning about rights and duties in the context of Indian family life. University of California.Google Scholar
Neff, K. (2003) Understanding how universal goals of independence and interdependence are manifested within particular cultural contexts. Human Development 46(5):312–18.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. (Political economy of institutions and decisions). Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/cam024/90001673.html and http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/cam025/90001673.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Page, K. M. & Sigmund, K. (2000) Fairness versus reason in the Ultimatum Game. Science 289(5485):1773–75.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1932) Le jugement moral chez l'enfant [The moral judgment of the child]. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (1999) Attitudes toward income inequality in France: Do people really disagree? CEPREMAP Working Paper 9918.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, G. (1998) Competitive altruism: From reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 265(1394):427–31.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, A. (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 50(1):97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheel, D. & Packer, C. (1991) Group hunting behaviour of lions: A search for cooperation. Animal Behaviour 41(4):697–709.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. & Sommerville, J. (2011) Fairness expectations and altruistic sharing in 15-month-old human infants. PLoS ONE 6(10):e23223. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023223e23223.Google Scholar
Sell, A., Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2009) Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106(35):15073–78.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M. & Miller, J. G. (1987) Culture and moral development. In: The emergence of moral concepts in young children, ed. Kagan, J. & Lamb, S., pp. 1–83. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, R., Much, N., Mahapatra, M. & Park, L. (1997) Divinity and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In: Morality and health, ed. Brandt, A.M. & Rozin, P., pp. 119–69. Routledge.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1972) Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1(3):229–43.Google Scholar
Sloane, S., Baillargeon, R. & Premack, D. (2012) Do infants have a sense of fairness? Psychological Science 23(2):196–204.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Baumard, N. (2012) Moral and reputation in an evolutionary perspective. Mind and Language 27(5):495–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearns, S. C. (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2005) Moral heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28:531–73.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., Schkade, D. & Kahneman, D. (2000) Do people want optimal deterrence? Journal of Legal Studies 29(1):237–53.Google Scholar
Tangney, J. P. & Dearing, R. L. (2002) Shame and guilt. Emotions and Social Behavior. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Moll, H. (2010) The gap is social: Human shared intentionality and culture. Mind the Gap 331–49.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2010) Groups in mind: The coalitional roots of war and morality. In: Human morality and sociality: Evolutionary and comparative perspective, ed. Høgh-Olesen, H., pp. 191–234. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1989) Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 37:41–133.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1971) Evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46:35–57.Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (2002) The culture of morality: Social development and social opposition. Cambridge University Press. Available at http://www.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam033/2001037820.html, http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/cam022/2001037820.html, and http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/cam025/2001037820.html.Google Scholar
Unger, P. K. (1996) Living high and letting die: Our illusion of innocence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weeden, J., Cohen, A. B. & Kenrick, D. T. (2008) Religious attendance as reproductive support. Evolution and Human Behavior 29(5):327–34.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. L. & Wrangham, R. W. (2003) Intergroup relations in chimpanzees. Annual Review of Anthropology 32:363–92.Google Scholar