Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:38:53.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Warmth, competence, and closeness may provide more empirically grounded starts for a theory of sentiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Daniel J. Hruschka
Daniel J. Hruschka*
Affiliation:
School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402. [email protected]://shesc.asu.edu/content/daniel-hruschka
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gervais & Fessler dissect the folk concept of “contempt” to argue for a functionally integrated model of attitudes and emotions in the context of social relationships. Existing studies of how evaluations of warmth, competence, and closeness shape people's reactions and behaviors towards others may help in operationalizing and testing the proposed model.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e240
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aron, A., Aron, E. N. & Smollan, D. (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(4):596–612.Google Scholar
Bechler, C., Green, L. & Myerson, J. (2015) Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance. Behavioural Processes 115:149–55.Google Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T. & Glick, P. (2007) The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92(4):631–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., Mashek, D., Li, H. & Brown, L. L. (2002) Defining the brain systems of lust, romantic attraction, and attachment. Archives of Sexual Behavior 31(5):413–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. & Glick, P. (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(2):77–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackman, J., Danvers, A. & Hruschka, D. J. (2015) Closeness is enough for friends, but not mates or kin: Mate and kinship premiums in India and US. Evolution and Human Behavior 36(2):137–45.Google Scholar
Hackman, J., Munira, S., Khaleda, J. & Hruschka, D. (2017) Revisiting psychological mechanisms in the anthropological study of altruism. Human Nature 28(1):76–91.Google Scholar
Hruschka, D. J. (2010) Friendship: Development, ecology, and evolution of a relationship, vol. 5. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Q., Pei, G. & Jin, J. (2015) What makes you generous? The influence of rural and urban rearing on social discounting in China. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0133078.Google Scholar
Rachlin, H. & Jones, B. A. (2008) Altruism among relatives and non-relatives. Behavioural Processes 79(2):120–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J. (1986) A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review 93(2):119–35.Google Scholar