Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:30:14.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A strange(r) analysis of morality: A consideration of relational context and the broader literature is needed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Margaret S. Clark  and
Erica Boothby
Margaret S. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511. [email protected]://psychology.yale.edu/faculty/[email protected]://clarklab.sites.yale.edu/
Erica Boothby
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511. [email protected]://psychology.yale.edu/faculty/[email protected]://clarklab.sites.yale.edu/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Baumard et al.'s definition of morality is narrow and their review of empirical work on human cooperation is limited, focusing only on economic games, almost always involving strangers. We suggest that theorizing about mutualisms will benefit from considering extant empirical behavioral research far more broadly and especially from taking relational context into account.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 85 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, L. A. & Clark, M. S. (2009) Offering more support than we seek. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45:267–70.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1999) The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist 54:260–66.Google Scholar
Bugental, D. B. (2000) Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: A domain based approach. Psychological Bulletin 126:187–219.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S. & Beck, L. A. (2011) Initiating and evaluating close relationships: A task central to emerging adults. In: Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood, ed. Fincham, F. D. & Cui, M., pp. 190–212. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S. & Lemay, E. P. (2010) Close relationships. In: Handbook of social psychology, vol. 2, 5th edition, ed. Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G., pp. 898–940. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S. & Mills, J. (1979) Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(1):12–24. (Featured article).Google Scholar
Clark, M. S. & Mills, J. (1993) The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19:684–91.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S. & Mills, J. (2012) Communal (and exchange) relationships. In: Handbook of theories of social psychology, ed. Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W. & Higgins, E. T., pp. 232–50. Sage.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S., Mills, J. & Corcoran, D. (1989) Keeping track of needs and inputs of friends and strangers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15:533–42.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S., Mills, J. & Powell, M. C. (1986) Keeping track of needs in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(2):333–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronk, L. (2007) The influence of cultural framing on play in the trust game: A Massai example. Evolution and Human Behavior 28(5):352–58.Google Scholar
Cronk, L. & Wasielewski, H. (2008) An unfamiliar social norm rapidly produces framing effects in an economic game. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 6(4):283–308.Google Scholar
Mills, J., Clark, M. S., Ford, T. & Johnson, M. (2004) Measuring communal strength. Personal Relationships 11:213–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G. & Collins, N. L. (2006) Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin 132:641–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A. & Berscheid, E. (2000) The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin 126:844–72.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (2010) Why people cooperate: The role of social motivations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar