Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:52:36.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From partner choice to equity – and beyond?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Felix Warneken
Felix Warneken*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138. [email protected]://software.rc.fas.harvard.edu/lds/research/warneken/warneken
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Baumard et al. provide an intriguing model where morality emerges from the dynamics of partner choice in mutualistic interactions. I discuss evidence from human and nonhuman primates that supports the overall approach, but highlights a gap in explaining the human specificity of moral cognition. I suggest that an essential characteristic of human fairness is to override concerns about merit in favor of promoting the welfare in others who are needy.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Damon, W. (1977) The social world of the child. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1975) Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues 31(3):137–49.Google Scholar
Dunfield, K. A. & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2010) Intention-mediated selective helping in infancy. Psychological Science 21(4):523–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. (2007) Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 450(7169):557–59.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, P. (2003) Why is reciprocity so rare in social animals? A protestant appeal. In: Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation, ed. Hammerstein, P., pp. 83–93. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L. (2000) Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhlmeier, V. A., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. (2003) Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science 14(5):402–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melis, A. P., Hare, B. & Tomasello, M. (2006) Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science 311:1297–300.Google Scholar
Melis, A. P., Hare, B. & Tomasello, M. (2008) Do chimpanzees reciprocate received favours? Animal Behaviour 76(3):951–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schino, G. & Aureli, F. (2010) Primate reciprocity and its cognitive requirements. Evolutionary Anthropology 19:130–35.Google Scholar
Warneken, F. & Tomasello, M. (2009a) Reciprocal helping and sharing in young children. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver, CO, April 2–4, 2009.Google Scholar