No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The (virtual) conceptual necessity of quantum probabilities in cognitive psychology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 May 2013
Abstract
We propose a way in which Pothos & Busemeyer (P&B) could strengthen their position. Taking a dynamic stance, we consider cognitive tests as functions that transfer a given input state into the state after testing. Under very general conditions, it can be shown that testable properties in cognition form an orthomodular lattice. Gleason's theorem then yields the conceptual necessity of quantum probabilities (QP).
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
Atmanspacher, H., Römer, H. & Walach, H. (2002) Weak quantum theory: Complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Foundations of Physics
32:379–406.Google Scholar
Baltag, A. & Smets, S. (2005) Complete axiomatization for quantum action. International Journal of Theoretical Physics
44(12):2267–81.Google Scholar
beim Graben, P. & Atmanspacher, H. (2009) Extending the philosophical significance of the idea of complementarity. In: Recasting reality. Wolfgang Pauli's philosophical ideas and contemporary science, ed. Atmanspacher, H. & Primas, H., pp. 99–113. Springer.Google Scholar
Blutner, R. (2012) Questions and answers in an orthoalgebraic approach. Journal of Logic, Language and Information
21(3):237–77.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, J. R. & Bruza, P. D. (2012) Quantum models of cognition and decision. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (1997) Bounded rationality models of fast and frugal inference. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics
133:201–18.Google Scholar
Gleason, A. M. (1957) Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics
6:885–94.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. J., Haubl, G. & Keinan, A. (2007) Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
33(3):461–73.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richman, F. & Bridges, D. S. (1999) A constructive proof of Gleason's theorem. Journal of Functional Analysis
162(2):287–312
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trueblood, J. S. & Busemeyer, J. R. (2011) A comparison of the belief-adjustment model and the quantum inference model as explanations of order effects in human inference. Cognitive Science
35(8):1518–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Benthem, J. (2011) Logical dynamics of information and interaction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?
Related commentaries (34)
A quantum of truth? Querying the alternative benchmark for human cognition
At home in the quantum world
Beyond quantum probability: Another formalism shared by quantum physics and psychology
Can quantum probability help analyze the behavior of functional brain networks?
Cognition in Hilbert space
Cognitive architectures combine formal and heuristic approaches
Cold and hot cognition: Quantum probability theory and realistic psychological modeling
Disentangling the order effect from the context effect: Analogies, homologies, and quantum probability
Does quantum uncertainty have a place in everyday applied statistics?
Grounding quantum probability in psychological mechanism
If quantum probability = classical probability + bounded cognition; is this good, bad, or unnecessary?
Is quantum probability rational?
Limitations of the Dirac formalism as a descriptive framework for cognition
On the quantum principles of cognitive learning
Physics envy: Trying to fit a square peg into a round hole
Processes models, environmental analyses, and cognitive architectures: Quo vadis quantum probability theory?
Quantum mathematical cognition requires quantum brain biology: The “Orch OR” theory
Quantum modeling of common sense
Quantum models of cognition as Orwellian newspeak
Quantum probability and cognitive modeling: Some cautions and a promising direction in modeling physics learning
Quantum probability and comparative cognition
Quantum probability and conceptual combination in conjunctions
Quantum probability, choice in large worlds, and the statistical structure of reality
Quantum probability, intuition, and human rationality
Quantum structure and human thought
Realistic neurons can compute the operations needed by quantum probability theory and other vector symbolic architectures
Signal detection theory in Hilbert space
The (virtual) conceptual necessity of quantum probabilities in cognitive psychology
The cognitive economy: The probabilistic turn in psychology and human cognition
The implicit possibility of dualism in quantum probabilistic cognitive modeling
Uncertainty about the value of quantum probability for cognitive modeling
What are the mechanics of quantum cognition?
What's the predicted outcome? Explanatory and predictive properties of the quantum probability framework
Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy
Author response
Quantum principles in psychology: The debate, the evidence, and the future