Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:18:30.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Just the tip of the iceberg: The bicoded map is but one instantiation of scalable spatial representation structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2013

Holger Schultheis  and
Thomas Barkowsky
Holger Schultheis
Affiliation:
SFB/TR 8 Spatial Cognition, Universität Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany. [email protected]://cosy.informatik.uni-bremen.de/staff/[email protected]://cosy.informatik.uni-bremen.de/staff/thomas-barkowsky
Thomas Barkowsky
Affiliation:
SFB/TR 8 Spatial Cognition, Universität Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany. [email protected]://cosy.informatik.uni-bremen.de/staff/[email protected]://cosy.informatik.uni-bremen.de/staff/thomas-barkowsky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the bicoded map constitutes an interesting candidate representation, proposing it as the predominant representation for three-dimensional space is too restrictive. We present and argue for scalable spatial representation structures as a more comprehensive alternative account that includes the bicoded map as a special case.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , October 2013 , pp. 565 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collins, A. M. & Quillian, M. R. (1969) Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8:240–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyferth, K., Niessen, C. & Spaeth, O. (2003) A model of air traffic controllers' conflict detection and conflict resolution. Aerospace Science and Technology 7:409–16.Google Scholar
Forbus, K. D. (2011) Qualitative modeling. WIREs Cognitive Science 2:374–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knauff, M., Rauh, R. & Renz, J. (1997) A cognitive assessment of topological spatial relations: Results from an empirical investigation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT'97), ed. Hirtle, S. C. & Frank, A. U., pp. 193–206. Springer.Google Scholar
Krumnack, A., Bucher, L., Nejasmic, J., Nebel, B. & Knauff, M. (2011) A model for relational reasoning as verbal reasoning. Cognitive Systems Research 11:377–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEachren, A. M. (1986) A linear view of the world: Strip maps as a unique form of cartographic representation. American Cartographer 13:7–25.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. P. (1986) Mental representations of spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology 18:87–121.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. P. & Diwadkar, V. (1997) Symmetry and asymmetry of human spatial memory. Cognitive Psychology 34:160–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moar, I. & Bower, G. (1983) Inconsistency in spatial knowledge. Memory and Cognition 11:107–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultheis, H. & Barkowsky, T. (2011) Casimir: An architecture for mental spatial knowledge processing. Topics in Cognitive Science 3:778–95.Google Scholar
Schultheis, H., Bertel, S., Barkowsky, T. & Seifert, I. (2007) The spatial and the visual in mental spatial reasoning: An ill-posed distinction. In: Spatial cognition V: Reasoning, action, interaction (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4387), ed. Barkowsky, T., Knauff, M., Ligozat, G. & Montello, R. D, pp. 191–209. Springer.Google Scholar
Sereno, I. M., Pitzalis, S. & Martinez, A. (2001) Mapping of contralateral space in retinotopic coordinates by a parietal cortical area in humans. Science 294:1350–54.Google Scholar
Stevens, A. & Coupe, P. (1978) Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology 10:422–37.Google Scholar
Tversky, B. (1993) Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models. In: Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS, ed. Frank, A. U. & Campari, I., pp. 14–24. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar