Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:49:54.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Well, that's one way”: Interactivity in parsing and production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2013

Christine Howes ,
Patrick G. T. Healey ,
Arash Eshghi  and
Julian Hough
Christine Howes
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London, Cognitive Science Research Group, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~chrizba/[email protected]@[email protected]
Patrick G. T. Healey
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London, Cognitive Science Research Group, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~chrizba/[email protected]@[email protected]
Arash Eshghi
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London, Cognitive Science Research Group, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~chrizba/[email protected]@[email protected]
Julian Hough
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London, Cognitive Science Research Group, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~chrizba/[email protected]@[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present empirical evidence from dialogue that challenges some of the key assumptions in the Pickering & Garrod (P&G) model of speaker-hearer coordination in dialogue. The P&G model also invokes an unnecessarily complex set of mechanisms. We show that a computational implementation, currently in development and based on a simpler model, can account for more of this type of dialogue data.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , August 2013 , pp. 359
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goodwin, C. (1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In: Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, ed. Psathas, G., 97–121. Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Healey, P. G. T., Purver, M. & Howes, C. (2010) Structural divergence in dialogue. Proceedings of 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse.Google Scholar
Hough, J. (2011) Incremental semantics driven natural language generation with self-repairing capability. Proceedings of RANLP 2011 Student Conference, September 2011, Hissar, Bulgaria, 79–84.Google Scholar
Howes, C., Healey, P. G. T., Purver, M. & Eshghi, A. (2012) Finishing each other's… Responding to incomplete contributions in dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. August 2012, Sapporo, Japan, 479–85.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. (1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20(3):441–58.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2):169–226.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2007) Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(3): 105–10.Google Scholar
Purver, M., Cann, R. & Kempson, R. (2006) Grammars as parsers: The dialogue challenge. Research in Language and Computation 4:289–326.Google Scholar
Purver, M., Eshghi, A. & Hough, J. (2011) Incremental semantic construction in a dialogue system. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS). January 2011, Oxford, UK, 365–69.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97(5): 1295–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skantze, G. & Hjalmarsson, A. (2010) Towards incremental speech generation in dialogue systems. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, 1–8.Google Scholar