Article contents
An unsettled debate: Key empirical and theoretical questions are still open
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2017
Abstract
Debates about neonatal imitation remain more open than Keven & Akins (K&A) imply. K&A do not recognize the primacy of the question concerning differential imitation and the links between experimental designs and more or less plausible theoretical assumptions. Moreover, they do not acknowledge previous theorizing on spontaneous behavior, the explanatory power of entrainment, and subtle connections with social cognition.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
A correction has been issued for this article:
- 7
- Cited by
Linked content
Please note a has been issued for this article.
Target article
Neonatal imitation in context: Sensorimotor development in the perinatal period
Related commentaries (21)
A major blow to primate neonatal imitation and mirror neuron theory
An unsettled debate: Key empirical and theoretical questions are still open
Animal studies help clarify misunderstandings about neonatal imitation
Beyond aerodigestion: Exaptation of feeding-related mouth movements for social communication in human and nonhuman primates
Beyond sensorimotor imitation in the neonate: Mentalization psychotherapy in adulthood
Do innate stereotypies serve as a basis for swallowing and learned speech movements?
Does early motor development contribute to speech perception?
Ecological validity, embodiment, and killjoy explanations in developmental psychology
Elements of a comprehensive theory of infant imitation
Infant orofacial movements: Inputs, if not outputs, of early imitative ability?
Mommy or me? Who is the agent in a sense of agency in infant orofacial stereotypies?
Multisensory control of ingestive movements and the myth of food addiction in obesity
Philosopher's disease and its antidote: Perspectives from prenatal behavior and contagious yawning and laughing
Spontaneous communication and infant imitation
The case against newborn imitation grows stronger
The functional and developmental role of imitation in the (a)typical brain
There is no compelling evidence that human neonates imitate
Turning the tide: A plea for cognitively lean interpretations of infant behaviour
When dyadic interaction is the context: Mimicry behaviors on the origin of imitation
“It takes two to know one” – Tongue protrusion-retraction is only one small facet of early intersubjectivity
“What” matters more than “Why” – Neonatal behaviors initiate social responses
Author response
Beyond neonatal imitation: Aerodigestive stereotypies, speech development, and social interaction in the extended perinatal period