Article contents
Neonatal imitation in context: Sensorimotor development in the perinatal period
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 July 2016
Abstract
More than 35 years ago, Meltzoff and Moore (1977) published their famous article, “Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates.” Their central conclusion, that neonates can imitate, was and continues to be controversial. Here, we focus on an often-neglected aspect of this debate, namely, neonatal spontaneous behaviors themselves. We present a case study of a paradigmatic orofacial “gesture,” namely tongue protrusion and retraction (TP/R). Against the background of new research on mammalian aerodigestive development, we ask: How does the human aerodigestive system develop, and what role does TP/R play in the neonate's emerging system of aerodigestion? We show that mammalian aerodigestion develops in two phases: (1) from the onset of isolated orofacial movements in utero to the postnatal mastery of suckling at 4 months after birth; and (2) thereafter, from preparation to the mastery of mastication and deglutition of solid foods. Like other orofacial stereotypies, TP/R emerges in the first phase and vanishes prior to the second. Based upon recent advances in activity-driven early neural development, we suggest a sequence of three developmental events in which TP/R might participate: the acquisition of tongue control, the integration of the central pattern generator (CPG) for TP/R with other aerodigestive CPGs, and the formation of connections within the cortical maps of S1 and M1. If correct, orofacial stereotypies are crucial to the maturation of aerodigestion in the neonatal period but also unlikely to co-occur with imitative behavior.
Keywords
- Type
- Target Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
- 38
- Cited by
Target article
Neonatal imitation in context: Sensorimotor development in the perinatal period
Related commentaries (21)
A major blow to primate neonatal imitation and mirror neuron theory
An unsettled debate: Key empirical and theoretical questions are still open
Animal studies help clarify misunderstandings about neonatal imitation
Beyond aerodigestion: Exaptation of feeding-related mouth movements for social communication in human and nonhuman primates
Beyond sensorimotor imitation in the neonate: Mentalization psychotherapy in adulthood
Do innate stereotypies serve as a basis for swallowing and learned speech movements?
Does early motor development contribute to speech perception?
Ecological validity, embodiment, and killjoy explanations in developmental psychology
Elements of a comprehensive theory of infant imitation
Infant orofacial movements: Inputs, if not outputs, of early imitative ability?
Mommy or me? Who is the agent in a sense of agency in infant orofacial stereotypies?
Multisensory control of ingestive movements and the myth of food addiction in obesity
Philosopher's disease and its antidote: Perspectives from prenatal behavior and contagious yawning and laughing
Spontaneous communication and infant imitation
The case against newborn imitation grows stronger
The functional and developmental role of imitation in the (a)typical brain
There is no compelling evidence that human neonates imitate
Turning the tide: A plea for cognitively lean interpretations of infant behaviour
When dyadic interaction is the context: Mimicry behaviors on the origin of imitation
“It takes two to know one” – Tongue protrusion-retraction is only one small facet of early intersubjectivity
“What” matters more than “Why” – Neonatal behaviors initiate social responses
Author response
Beyond neonatal imitation: Aerodigestive stereotypies, speech development, and social interaction in the extended perinatal period