Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:28:29.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selecting target papers for replication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2018

Anton Kuehberger  and
Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck
Anton Kuehberger
Affiliation:
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria. [email protected]://ccns.sbg.ac.at/people/kuehberger/
Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland. [email protected]://www.schulte-mecklenbeck.com Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin 14195, Germany.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Randomness in the selection process of to-be-replicated target papers is critical for replication success or failure. If target papers are chosen because of the ease of doing a replication, or because replicators doubt the reported findings, replications are likely to fail. To date, the selection of replication targets is biased.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M. & Tice, D. M. (1998) Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(5):1252–65.Google Scholar
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Alberts, H., Anggono, C. O., Batailler, C., Birt, A. R., Brand, R., Brandt, M. J., Brewer, G., Bruyneel, S., Calvillo, D. P., Campbell, W. K., Cannon, P. R., Carlucci, M., Carruth, N. P., Cheung, T., Crowell, A., De Ridder, D. T. D., Dewitte, S., Elson, M., Evans, J. R., Fay, B. A., Fennis, B. M, Finley, A., Francis, Z., Heise, E., Hoemann, H., Inzlicht, M., Koole, S. L., Koppel, L., Kroese, F., Lange, F., Lau, K., Lynch, B. P., Martijn, C., Merckelbach, H., Mills, N. V., Michirev, A., Miyake, A., Mosser, A. E., Muise, M., Muller, D., Muzi, M., Nalis, D., Nurwanti, R., Otgaar, H, Philipp, M. C., Primoceri, P., Rentzsch, K., Ringos, L., Schlinkert, C., Schmeichel, B. J., Schoch, S. F., Schrama, M., Schütz, A., Stamos, A., Tinghög, G., Ullrich, J., vanDellen, M., Wimbarti, S., Wolff, W., Yusainy, C., Zerhouni, O. & Zwienenberg, M. (2016) A multilab preregistered replication of the ego-depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science 11(4):546–73.Google Scholar
Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251):aac4716. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.Google Scholar
Sripada, C., Kessler, D. & Jonides, J. (2014) Methylphenidate blocks effort-induced depletion of regulatory control in healthy volunteers. Psychological Science 25:1227–34.Google Scholar