Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:32:34.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making replication prestigious

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2018

Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski ,
Thomas Nichols ,
David N. Kennedy ,
Jean-Baptiste Poline  and
Russell A. Poldrack
Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. [email protected]@stanford.eduhttp://blog.chrisgorgolewski.org/http://www.russpoldrack.org/
Thomas Nichols
Affiliation:
Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford OX3 7FZ, United Kingdom. Welcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOX3 7FZ, United Kingdom. Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom. [email protected]://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/statistics/staff/academic-research/nichols
David N. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655. [email protected]
Jean-Baptiste Poline
Affiliation:
Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada. [email protected] Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Russell A. Poldrack
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. [email protected]@stanford.eduhttp://blog.chrisgorgolewski.org/http://www.russpoldrack.org/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Making replication studies widely conducted and published requires new incentives. Academic awards can provide such incentives by highlighting the best and most important replications. The Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) has led such efforts by recently introducing the OHBM Replication Award. Other communities can adopt this approach to promote replications and reduce career cost for researchers performing them.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e131
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boekel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Belay, L., Verhagen, J., Brown, S. & Forstmann, B. U. (2015) A purely confirmatory replication study of structural brain-behavior correlations. Cortex 66:115–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.11.019.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. C. & Grafton, S. T. (2013) Repeat after me: Replication in clinical neuroimaging is critical. NeuroImage: Clinical 2:247–48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2013.01.007.Google Scholar
Gorgolewski, K., Nichols, T., Kennedy, D. N., Poline, J.-B. & Poldrack, R. A. (2017a) Promoting replications through positive incentives. Figshare. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5278327.v1.Google Scholar
Gorgolewski, K., Nichols, T., Kennedy, D. N., Poline, J.-B. & Poldrack, R. A. (2017b) Replication award creation kit. Figshare. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5567083.v1.Google Scholar
Kanai, R., Bahrami, B., Roylance, R. & Rees, G. (2012) Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 279(1732):1327–34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1959.Google Scholar
Rewarding negative results keeps science on track. Editorial. (n.d.). Nature 551:414. Available at: http://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-07325-2.Google Scholar