Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:01:51.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The contribution of fish studies to the “number sense” debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2017

Christian Agrillo  and
Angelo Bisazza
Christian Agrillo
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, [email protected]@unipd.ithttp://www.dpg.unipd.it/en/christian-agrillohttp://www.dpg.unipd.it/en/angelo-bisazza
Angelo Bisazza
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, [email protected]@unipd.ithttp://www.dpg.unipd.it/en/christian-agrillohttp://www.dpg.unipd.it/en/angelo-bisazza
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Leibovich et al. propose that number sense is not innate but gradually emergent during ontogeny following experience. We argue that this hypothesis cannot be reasonably tested in humans, in which the contribution of neural maturation and experience cannot be experimentally manipulated. Studies on animals, especially fish, can more effectively provide critical insights into the innate nature of numerical abilities.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e165
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrillo, C., Dadda, M., Serena, G. & Bisazza, A. (2008) Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish. Animal Cognition 11(3):495–503. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0140-9.Google Scholar
Agrillo, C., Dadda, M., Serena, G. & Bisazza, A. (2009) Use of number by fish. PLoS ONE 4(3):e4786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004786.Google Scholar
Agrillo, C., Piffer, L. & Bisazza, A. (2011) Number versus continuous quantity in numerosity judgments by fish. Cognition 119:281–87.Google Scholar
Bisazza, A., Serena, G., Piffer, L. & Agrillo, C. (2010) Ontogeny of numerical abilities in guppies. PLoS ONE 5(11):e15516.Google Scholar
Davis, H. & Perusse, R. (1988) Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence and a new research agenda. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:561–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVay, S., Wiesel, T. N. & Hubel, D. H. (1980) The development of ocular dominance columns in normal and visually deprived monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology 191:1–51.Google Scholar
Lucon-Xiccato, T., Dadda, M., Gatto, E. & Bisazza, A. (2017) Development and testing of a rapid method for measuring shoal size discrimination. Animal Cognition. 20(2):149–57. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1050-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meck, W. H. & Church, R. M. (1983) A mode control model of counting and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 9:320–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Piffer, L., Miletto Petrazzini, M. E. & Agrillo, C. (2013) Large number discrimination in newborn fish. PLoS ONE 8(4):e62466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridley, R. M. & Baker, H. F. (1982) Stereotypy in monkeys and humans. Psychological Medicine 12:61–72.Google Scholar