No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Inferences from absences
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 January 2025
Abstract
Stibbard-Hawkes shows that cultures using material symbols might well not leave traces of that practice in the archaeological record. The paper thus poses an important challenge: When is absence of evidence evidence of absence? This commentary uses behavioural ecology to make modest progress on this problem.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Alperson-Afil, N., Richter, D., & Goren-Inbar, N. (2007). Phantom hearths and the use of fire at Gesher Benot Ya'Aqov, Israel (2007). PaleoAnthropology, 3, 1–15.Google Scholar
Klein, R. G. (2009). The human career: Human biological and cultural origins. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, S. (2014). Signaling theory and technologies of communication in the Paleolithic. Biological Theory, 9, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, S. and Stiner, M. C. (2007). Body ornamentation as information technology: Towards an understanding of the significance of early beads. In Mellars, P., Boyle, K., Bar-Yosef, O. and Stringer, C. (eds), Rethinking the human revolution. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 45–54.Google Scholar
Marean, C. (2011). Coastal South Africa and the coevolution of the modern human lineage and the coastal adaptation. In Bicho, N., Haws, J. and Daviis, L. (eds), Trekking the shore. Springer, pp. 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marean, C. (2016). The transition to foraging for dense and predictable resources and its impact on the evolution of modern humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B, 371, 20150239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, J., & Harper, S. (2016). Identity signalling in shields: How coastal hunter-gatherers use rock art and material culture in arid and temperate Australia. Australian Archaeology, 82, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Reconsidering the link between past material culture and cognition in light of contemporary hunter–gatherer material use
Related commentaries (21)
Advancing paleoanthropology beyond default nulls
All that glitters is not gold: The false-symbol problem in archaeology
Animal artefacts challenge archaeological standards for tracing human symbolic cognition
Archaeology retains a central role for studying the behavioral and cognitive evolution of our species and genus
Are we jingling modern hunter-gatherers and early Homo sapiens?
Behavioural modernity is dead: Long live behavioural modernity
Beyond the binary: Inferential challenges and solutions in cognitive archaeology
Cultural innovation is not only a product of cognition but also of cultural context
Don't ignore cognitive evolution during the three million years that preceded the archaeological record of material culture!
Inferences from absences
Material culture both reflects and causes human cognitive evolution
Negative priors and inferences from absence of evidence in cognitive and linguistic archaeology: Epistemically sound and scientifically strategic
Not just symbolism: Technologies may also have a less than direct connection with cognition
Perishable material choice indicates symbolic and representational capacities
Proposing the DN(C)-model of material evidence for well-calibrated claims about past cultures
Revising the null model in language evolution research
Shared intentionality may have been favored by persistence hunting in Homo erectus
Sports, team games, and physical skill competitions as an important source of symbolic material culture with low preservation probability
The cognitive and evolutionary science of behavioural modernity goes beyond material chronology
The Mbuti people still reproduce a 75,000 years old recursive pattern
What would be pre-modern human cognition?
Author response
Hominin cognition: The null hypothesis