To identify shortcomings in existing models of patient behaviour change, and present the development and testing of a novel approach using practitioner facilitation and person-focussed conversations that identifies and addresses behaviours at an earlier stage than current models.

Systematic strategies used by health professionals to change patient behaviours began with motivational interviewing and brief intervention approaches for serious addictive behaviours. Practitioners typically presume they should drive the process of patient behaviour change. Attempts to transfer these approaches to primary care, and a broader range of health risk behaviours, have been less successful. The TADS programme (Tobacco, Alcohol and Other Drugs, later Training and Development Services) began teaching motivational interviewing and brief interventions to practitioners in New Zealand in 1996. Formal and informal evaluations showed that practitioners used screening tools that patients rejected and that led to incomplete disclosure, used language that did not engage patients, failed to identify the behaviours patients wished to address and therefore misdirected interventions.

Iterative development of new tools with input from patients and primary care clinicians.

The TADS programme developed a questionnaire whose results remained private to the patient, which enabled the patient to identify personal behaviours that they might choose to change (the TADS Personal Assessment Choice Tool). This was assisted by a brief conversation that facilitated and supported any change prioritised by the patient (the TADS Brief Opportunistic Interaction). The need for this approach, and its effectiveness, appeared to be similar across adults, youth, different ethnic groups and people in different socio-economic circumstances. Behaviours patients identified were often linked to other health risk behaviours or early-stage mental health disorders that were not easily detected by practitioner-driven screening or inquiry. The long-term effectiveness of this approach in different populations in primary health care settings requires further evaluation.

To compare the competencies of primary care physicians (PCPs) with poor and good prescribing performance in frequently encountered indications.

Primary care centers are one of the mostly visited health facilities by the population for different health issues.

In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed 6 125 487 prescriptions generated by 1431 PCPs which were selected by systematic sampling in 2016 in Istanbul. We defined PCPs as poor prescriber (n = 227) or good prescriber (n = 210) in terms of their prescribing performance per WHO/INRUD criteria. We compared solo diagnosis prescriptions of these two groups in ‘percentage of prescriptions in compliance with clinical guidelines’ and also rational prescribing indicators.

Poor prescribers and good prescribers significantly differed in each of the prescribing indicators for their all solo diagnosis prescriptions. Hypertension had the highest difference of the average cost per encounter (Δ = 284.2%) between poor prescribers (US$43.99 ± 63.05) and good prescribers (US$11.45 ± 45.0), whereas headache had the highest difference between the groups in the percentage encounters with an antibiotic (14.9% vs. 1.5%). Detailed analysis of the prescribing performances showed significantly higher values of each WHO/INRUD indicators for all examined diagnoses. We found significantly higher percentages of guideline-compliant drugs in good prescribers compared to that in poor prescribers in hypertension (40.8% vs 34.8%), tonsillopharyngitis (57.9% vs 50.7%), and acute sinusitis (46.4% vs 43.6%).

This study shows that the prescribing performances of PCPs are not rational enough in terms of drug selection and prescription content. Furthermore, even the physicians who have good prescribing practice appear as not satisfactorily rational in compliance with current pharmacotherapy competencies.

Health care systems are changing around the world; family doctors need to adapt and prepare for future challenges.

To consider the present status of family doctors, anticipated changes in health care systems, the challenges these will bring and possible solutions.

Collaborative enquiry amongst members of the International Federation for Primary Care Research Networks (IFPCRN). Six strategic questions were addressed by 37 contributors from 23 countries. Responses were collated and contributors invited to further comment on the interim report.

Present status: Despite wide variability, common problems relate to delivery systems, funding and policy, lack of evidence-based medical practice, education and research. Role of family doctors: There is wide variability in roles and often poor interaction with other caregivers. Anticipated changes: An expansion of the family physician model is anticipated, alongside shortages of family doctors in the face of increased health care needs, increased complexity of problems and the shift to ambulatory care. Advances in information technology may be useful. Anticipated challenges and proposed actions: Address quality issues. This requires audit and quality assurance, promoting adaptability, promoting group practices and teamwork, coordinating care, incorporating information technology and ensuring ethical relationships with industry. Improve education and continuing professional development: Improved education and continuing professional development are needed, as are measures to prevent burnout and retain the workforce. Develop a robust research enterprise: Research in primary care is needed to develop relevant guidelines. Improve support for family doctors: Providing excellent patient care is essential for improved status and support. Achieving this requires engagement with policy makers, academic institutions and the public.

While there is great variability across different countries, common themes relate to present status, anticipated changes in health systems and the responses needed from family medicine.

To assess the regulation of the Chinese healthcare system in assisting a nationwide implementation of general practitioner (GP) services.

Along with the perennial problems of unaffordable and inequitable healthcare, a rapidly ageing population and the increasing burden of non-communicable diseases pose challenges to the Chinese healthcare system. Recognising these challenges and to satisfy people’s demands for more and better healthcare, China has initiated a plan, named ‘Healthy China 2030’, based on the findings from a two-year joint study by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank Group (WBG) in collaboration with Chinese agencies. The Chinese healthcare plan, officially approved in 2016, is an attempt to use the people-centred, integrated care (PCIC) model recommended by the WHO and WBG to shape the Chinese healthcare system. In accordance with PCIC, China began the implementation of gatekeeping primary care by introducing GP services to local communities.

A comparative analysis was employed to point out the importance of introducing GP services. A systematic assessment was carried out to evaluate the regulatory sector of the Chinese healthcare system, including a critical review of related legal norms and a theoretical exploration of external impediments (eg, cultural attitudes, government capacity and interest groups).

Results demonstrate that the current regulatory sector of the Chinese healthcare system needs to be improved in order to assist the nationwide implementation of GP services and to strengthen its gatekeeping role. Major deficiencies include the problematic relationship between legal norms and health policies, the lack of effective and consistent new legislation, the low rate of social acceptance, and lack of support from agencies. To address those challenges, this paper recommends that preliminary efforts be devoted, in part, to two changes in the legal structure: enacting a specific law, and creating an independent regulatory oversight body.

To collaboratively explore the cultural acceptance of the Pepi-Pod® program as an alternate safe sleep space and to explore the process of implementing the Pepi-Pod® program in a mainstream health service for Aboriginal families living in urban South Australia.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander infants continue to die from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) at rates three to four times greater than other infants born in Australia despite Council of Australian Governments commitment to halve the gap in the Indigenous infant mortality rate by 2018. The Pepi-Pod® program is evidenced in New Zealand and Queensland to provide a culturally appropriate safe sleep alternative that contributes to the reduction of SIDS and SUDI. We have no evidence of acceptability or feasibility when offered through mainstream services in metropolitan South Australia.

With a focus on decolonizing the research process through a two-way process for mutual learning between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal team members and community, a novel qualitative design was employed including photo elicited yarning sessions (n = 7), focus groups (n = 2), and field notes (n = 15).

Four themes emerged: ‘you don’t have to worry’; ‘a way of sharing knowledge’; ‘it looks like a bread box?’ and ‘need for consistent safe sleep messages’. The findings suggest that participants believe the Pepi-Pod® program may enrich Aboriginal families’ lives evoking feelings of comfort and safety; however, the design could be improved to make them more culturally appropriate. There was confusion around safe sleep processes and education with a call for streamlining safe sleep messaging.

Primary care patients are commonly worried about their complaints when consulting their doctor. Knowing the reasons behind patients’ worries would enhance consultation practices. The aim of this study was to find out the reasons patients themselves give for their worries before a consultation and for possible relief or persistent worry after the consultation.

Our previous study using quantitative methods suggested that worried patients were uncertain about what was wrong with them and they perceived their complaints as serious. These results left some aspects unanswered; for instance, why did the patients consider their complaints severe.

We conducted semi-structured interviews of patients, aged 18–39 years, with somatic complaints other than a common cold (n = 40), both before and after a consultation, and the patients described their reasons for worry in their own words. These qualitative data were analysed using thematic content analysis.

The patients gave as reasons for their worries uncertainty, consequences of their complaints (eg, inability to work), insufficient control (eg, inadequate treatment) and prognosis. The patients were relieved when their uncertainty was diminished by getting an explanation for their complaint or when they achieved more control by getting treatment for their complaint. After a consultation, their reasons for worry, except for concern about the ability to function, tended to be replaced by other reasons. Psychological consequences and mistrust in health care also played a role in persistent worry. Our findings offer support to the patient-centred clinical method in primary care. To address the patients’ worries properly, the GP should bring them up for discussion. Special attention should be given to worries about the ability to function, as they tend to persist even after a consultation.

In early 2010, Liverpool Primary Care Trust (PCT) undertook a project to establish whether a care profiles methodology could be used to commission end-of-life (EoL) services. The Department of Health (DH) originally used them for a variety of services in the 1990s. The project sought to adapt the original care profiles structure for commissioning purposes, and produce a series of care profiles that would cover the full EoL care pathway.

The DH required PCTs in England to undertake local reviews of EoL services ahead of its publication of the National EoL Strategy in 2008. Related cross-sector work in Liverpool highlighted the need for a means of specifically commissioning EoL services. It was contended that care profiles offered the opportunity to set service requirements in respect of skill mix, delivery, quality and outcomes for each stage of the EoL pathway, which could be costed subsequently.

An iterative approach was adopted involving workshops and consensus, based on action learning events, which incorporated and adapted past approaches for developing care profiles. Four half-day workshops were held, each targeting one EoL stage, with the outputs evaluated by an external reference group. A full cross-section of commissioning, provider and service user interests were involved.

The project was successful, with its recommendations subsequently used to commission EoL services across Liverpool. It was concluded that the basic service requirements for EoL care are the same, irrespective of the related disease. The strength of care profiles is their simplicity and flexibility. They complement and augment integrated care pathways, and by requiring the recording of outcomes throughout the care process, they aid quality and audit processes. They should be transferable to other conditions, with benchmarking enabling improved efficiency. They represent the type of clinically relevant and detailed vehicle essential for clinical commissioning groups.

To assess current primary care childhood obesity prevention activity and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses in delivering the ‘Mealtime Magic’ brief intervention. To determine the acceptability of the brief intervention and reported impact upon confidence and behaviour of parents.

A gap persists in the evidence base regarding brief childhood obesity prevention interventions in primary care, where good opportunities for primary prevention work lie.

A quantitative and qualitative evaluation design, without control group, with post-intervention evaluation of parental outcomes and ‘before and after’ evaluation of healthcare professional perspectives was employed, using questionnaires. Five primary care practices in Worcestershire, England took part: six GPs, seven practice nurses (11 females and two males). 110 of 223 parents receiving the intervention completed follow-up measures (107 females, two males and one gender unknown; 106 White British). The intervention involved providing the ‘Mealtime Magic’ leaflet regarding childhood healthy eating behaviours, with verbal reinforcement of three main messages, to all parents with children aged five years and younger presenting to primary care over a six-week period. Staff received a 30-minute training session.

Twelve of 13 health professionals ranked childhood obesity of importance relative to other priorities. Secondary prevention activities were undertaken more frequently than primary prevention. All professionals found the intervention easy to deliver; 12 of 13 stated they would use the leaflet in the future. Reported professional confidence in knowledge of evidence-based healthy eating behaviour messages increased following intervention delivery. Resource barriers and perceived parental sensitivity with subject were reported. Ninety two percent (100/109) of parents stated the leaflet was helpful. Up to 52% (57/110) of parents reported more confidence regarding leaflet suggestions and up to 47% (49/105) reported positive behaviour changes. Evaluation of brief intervention approaches may help address perceived barriers to undertaking childhood obesity prevention work in primary care in the UK.

To investigate the informed consent experiences of women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and childhood trauma involved in a neurocognitive and neuroimaging study.

There is no previous research on the consent process for people with both HIV and childhood trauma, conditions that are syndemic in South Africa. Research on the consent process for each individual condition has shown that individuals with either of these conditions may be vulnerable research participants. This study aimed to investigate the opinions of the women involved in order to refine future consent processes and ensure that they are appropriate for this population.

A qualitative semi-structured interview was conducted with women from Khayelitsha township in South Africa involved in a cohort study on neurocognitive and neuroimaging outcomes in HIV and childhood trauma, who agreed to participate in an interview immediately following their final study appointment.

Aspects most frequently commented upon by participants during the interview were community recruitment, incentives for participation, quality of information provided, and misunderstandings and unexpected events. The overarching finding was that of therapeutic misconception; participants expected, and highlighted as incentives for participation, health benefits that were not part of the study. A minority of participants reported discomfort from questions concerning their traumatic experiences. Despite this, the consent process was well received and there was good understanding of confidentiality issues and the voluntariness of participation.

Full disclosure of true benefits from participation must be emphasised throughout the recruitment process. This is particularly important for participants with HIV who appear to participate because of perceived health incentives. Providing prior notification that questions about traumatic experiences will be asked may improve the experiences of participants. A generic but thoroughly conducted consent process is suitable in this population.

To undertake a service evaluation of the NHS East of England Supporting Self-Care in General Practice programme.

The number of people purported to live with long-term conditions continues to rise generating increasing policy emphasis on the importance of self-care. Previous work has highlighted barriers to implementing self-care interventions in general practice, including a lack of organisational approaches to providing self-care and limited engagement and training of healthcare professionals. In response to these barriers and policy drivers, NHS East of England Strategic Health Authority developed and commenced the Supporting Self-care in General Practice (SSCiGP) programme, which seeks to transform the relationships between people with long-term conditions and primary care practitioners.

This was a mixed methods study, carried out over two phases, which included interviews, survey work and practice-based case studies.

This paper focuses on findings related to clinician and practice level change. Clinicians reported changes in their perceptions and in consultation practices following attendance on the SSCiGP programme. These changes were linked to empathy and patient-centredness that mirrored what patients valued in interactions with clinicians. There were qualitative and descriptive differences, but no statistically significant differences between clinicians who had and had not attended the SSCiGP programme. Time was recognised as a significant barrier to implementing, and sustaining skills learnt from the SSCiGP programme.

Greater impact at practice level could be achieved when there was whole practice commitment to values that underpinned the SSCiGP programme. There was evidence that such approaches are being incorporated to change practice systems and structures to better facilitate self-care, particularly in practices who were early programme adopters.

This evaluation demonstrates that training around clinician change can be effective in shifting service delivery when sat within a cultural framework that genuinely situates patients at the centre of consultations and practice activity.

Physical activity has become a major public health concern even in early childhood. This article exemplifies physical activity promotion in practice as described by public health nurses from Finnish primary health care.

We gathered the data by purposive sampling in five regional focus groups with 24 informants working in child health clinics provided for all families with children below school age. Statements associated with physical activity promotion were extracted out of verbatim transcripts. Frequency counting complemented qualitative analysis of the content of statements.

Child-centred evaluation provided by public health nurses focused on motor development, basic sporting skills and amount of activities outdoors and play and exercising habits of the child. Family-centred evaluation focused on the general activity level of the family or a member of the family and resources for physical activity. Activation and support included nearly the same issues brought up for discussion during check-ups, as a basis for counselling, or as points of reinforcement. Contradictory to a family approach in health care, most of the statements (78% out of 223 statements) were child centred. Forcefulness of statements revealed that assessment of physical abilities, including motor development, was the only topic applied with every child. Other topics were more selectively targeted for children and families with mild special needs: for example overweight, clumsy, insomniac, or restless children and sedentary families.

Even though special needs should receive specific attention in health care, we suggest more concern on physical activity of every child and the whole family in practice in order to meet modern health promotional challenges. Although the Finnish child health clinic system is unique due to its vast coverage and frequent contacts with every child and the family, the findings from this explorative research might inspire other community practitioners to start analysing their own work in view of this research.

By 2040, the predicted global cancer burden is expected to be more than 27 million new cancer cases per year. Understanding primary health care workers’ (HCWs) perception on cancer can highlight new ways in which cancer advocacy can be increased. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of primary HCWs in Lautoka, Fiji, towards common cancers with focus on knowledge, risk perceptions, barriers and preventive approaches.

The study used a qualitative method approach. The study was conducted among primary HCWs at four purposively selected health centres in Lautoka Subdivision, Fiji, from 1 March 2021 to 1 April 2021. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with primary HCWs. A semi-structured open-ended questionnaire was used to collect data, and the FGDs were audio-recorded. These audio recordings were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.

The responses from the four FGDs with six primary HCWs in each group emerged four major themes. These themes were cancer knowledge, health professional training, barriers and challenges and awareness strategies. Primary HCWs were not fully aware about common cancers and were not confident to discuss about cancer with their patients which is an important role of primary HCWs in cancer management. This lack of knowledge was attributed to less training received in primary care setting. Barriers to accessing cancer screening included misconceptions about cancer, negative attitudes from patients, stigmatization, lack of resources at health facility and less informed health staff. Community outreach programmes, opportunistic screening, community HCWs and the concept of a cancer hub centre were awareness strategies highlighted by primary HCWs.

Lack of knowledge about common cancers among primary HCWs is a concern that is depicted well in this study. This low knowledge was attributed to lack of training on cancers received by primary HCWs. Guidelines on cancer screening and diagnosis can be developed by the health ministry to assist primary HCWs in detecting patients at pre-cancerous stage.

Health systems that have strong primary health care at their core have overall better patient outcomes. Primary health care is key to achieving Universal Health Coverage and the broader health-related Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. In 2018, at the launch of the Declaration of Astana, the World Health Organization formed the inaugural Primary Health Care Young Leaders’ Network.

This paper aims to demonstrate the scope for young professional-led communities of practice in fostering support systems for young leaders and strengthening the delivery of primary health care at multiple levels.

A description of the Young Leaders' Network community of practice model is presented, with examples of the work the members are doing, individually and collectively, to advance the science and practice of primary health care.

This initiative brought together 21 individuals from across the world, working across disciplines and within an array of socioeconomic contexts to improve primary health care in their respective countries.

This youth-led community of practice is able to share knowledge, evidence and resources to inform clinical and public health activities, policy initiatives, advocacy and research to improve primary health care delivery and health outcomes for communities across the globe.

Primary health care provision in terms of quality, equity, and costs are different by countries. The Quality and Costs of Primary Care (QUALICOPC) study evaluated these domains and parameters in 35 countries, using uniformized method with validated questionnaires filled out by family physicians/general practitioners (GPs).

This paper aims to provide data of the Hungarian-arm of the QUALICOPC study and to give an overview about the recent Hungarian primary care (PC) system.

The questionnaires were completed in 222 Hungarian GP practices, delivered by fieldworkers, in a geographically representative distribution. Descriptive analysis was performed on the data.

Financing is based mostly on capitation, with additional compensatory elements and minor financial incentives. The gate-keeping function is weak. The communication between GPs and specialists is often insufficient. The number of available devices and equipment are appropriate. Single-handed practices are predominant. Appointment instead of queuing is a new option and is becoming more popular, mainly among better-educated and urban patients. GPs are involved in the management of almost all chronic condition of all generations. Despite the burden of administrative tasks, half of the GPs estimate their job as still interesting, burn-out symptoms were rarely found. Among the evaluated process indicators, access, continuity, comprehensiveness, and coordination were rated as satisfactory, together with equity among health outcome indicators. Financing is insufficient; therefore, many GPs are involved in additional income-generating activities. The old age of the GPs and the lack of the younger GPs generation contributes to a shortage in manpower. Cooperation and communication between different levels of health care provision should be improved, focusing better on community orientation and on preventive services. Financing needs continuous improvement and appropriate incentives should be implemented. There is a need for specific PC-oriented guidelines to define properly the tasks and competences of GPs.

Decentralised clinical training (DCT) in optometry is an emerging concept in South Africa. In 2016, the University of KwaZulu Natal (UKZN) implemented this adaptive model of clinical training for undergraduate health professions. The initiative, which emanated through an agreement between UKZN’s College of Health Sciences and the KwaZulu Natal Department of Health, centres on the placement of undergraduate optometry students within public health facilities for clinical training purposes. Optometry services in South Africa have, however, had a historical bias towards a private sector model of training and a curative practice approach resulting in access barriers for the rural poor and high levels of unmet need. It has further contributed to a general state of underdevelopment of eye health services within the public sector.

DCT challenges historical undergraduate programme structures and modes of teaching and learning in optometry. It is largely underpinned by a need to strengthen health service delivery through a primary health care-centred, community-based training approach and produce ‘fit-for-purpose’ graduates who have contextually appropriate competencies for effective, local health service delivery. The historical absence of optometry services within the public sector has, however, contributed to limited planning for, and development of eye health services in this sector. This has inadvertently contributed to the burden of avoidable vision impairment in the country. The public health system in South Africa, therefore, faces various developmental challenges which impact eye health services and student clinical training.

While the model is still in a developmental state and resourcing challenges potentially affecting DCT are noted, early experiences of the Discipline of Optometry at the UKZN are that DCT shows promise in terms of its potential contribution towards the development of eye health services within the public health sector from graduate readiness, resource strengthening, access improvement and health service development perspectives.