This paper concerns the theory of morasses. In the early 1970s Jensen defined (k, α)-morasses for uncountable regular cardinals k and ordinals α < k. In the early 1980s Velleman defined (k, 1)-simplified morasses for all regular cardinals k. He showed that there is a (k, 1)-simplified morass if and only if there is (k, 1)-morass. More recently he defined (k, 2)-simplified morasses and Jensen was able to show that if there is a (k, 2)-morass then there is a (k, 2)-simplified morass.

In this paper we prove the converse of Jensen's result, i.e., that if there is a (k, 2)-simplified morass then there is a (k, 2)-morass.

We continue the study of simple theories begun in [3] and [5]. We first find the right analogue of definability of types. We then develop the theory of generic types and stabilizers for groups definable in simple theories. The general ideology is that the role of formulas (or definability) in stable theories is replaced by partial types (or ∞-definability) in simple theories.

The study of recursion theory on models of fragments of Peano arithmetic has hitherto been concentrated on recursively enumerable (r.e.) sets and their degrees (with a few exceptions, such as that in [2] on minimal degrees). The reason for such a concerted effort is clear: priority arguments have occupied a central position in post Friedberg-Muchnik recursion theory, and after almost forty years of intensive development in the subject, they are still the essential tools on which investigations of r.e. sets and their degrees depend. There are two possible approaches to the study within fragments of arithmetic: To give a general analysis of strategies, and identify their proof-theoretic strengths (for example in [6] on infinite injury priority methods), or to consider specific theorems in recursion theory, and, if possible, pinpoint the exact levels of induction provably equivalent to the theorems. The work reported in this paper belongs to the second approach. More precisely, we single out two infinitary injury type constructions of r.e. sets—one concerning maximal sets and the other based on the notion of the jump operator—to be the topics of study.

Section 1 is devoted to the study of countable recursively saturated models with an automorphism moving every non-algebraic point. We show that every countable theory has such a model and exhibit necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of automorphisms moving all non-algebraic points. Furthermore we show that there are many complete theories with the property that every countable recursively saturated model has such an automorphism.

In Section 2 we apply our main theorem from Section 1 to models of Quine's set theory New Foundations (NF) to answer an old consistency question. If NF is consistent, then it has a model in which the standard natural numbers are a definable subclass ℕ of the model's set of internal natural numbers Nn. In addition, in this model the class of wellfounded sets is exactly .

We show that the elimination rule for the multiplicative (or intensional) conjunction Λ is admissible in many important multiplicative substructural logics. These include LLm (the multiplicative fragment of Linear Logic) and RMIm (the system obtained from LLm by adding the contraction axiom and its converse, the mingle axiom.) An exception is Rm (the intensional fragment of the relevance logic R, which is LLm together with the contraction axiom). Let SLLm and SRm be, respectively, the systems which are obtained from LLm and Rm by adding this rule as a new rule of inference. The set of theorems of SRm is a proper extension of that of Rm, but a proper subset of the set of theorems of RMIm. Hence it still has the variable-sharing property. SRm has also the interesting property that classical logic has a strong translation into it. We next introduce general algebraic structures, called strong multiplicative structures, and prove strong soundness and completeness of SLLm relative to them. We show that in the framework of these structures, the addition of the weakening axiom to SLLm corresponds to the condition that there will be exactly one designated element, while the addition of the contraction axiom corresponds to the condition that there will be exactly one nondesignated element (in the first case we get the system BCKm, in the second - the system SRm). Various other systems in which multiplicative conjunction functions as a true conjunction are studied, together with their algebraic counterparts.

Forcing method on Bounded Arithmetic was first introduced by J. B. Paris and A. Wilkie in [10]. Then in [1], [2] and [3], M. Ajtai used the method to get excellent results on the pigeon hole principle and the modulo p counting principle. The forcing method on Bounded arithmetic was further developed by P. Beame, J. Krajíček and S. Riis in [4], [7], [6], [8], [5], [12], [11], [13]. It should be noted that J. Krajíček and P. Pudlák used an idea of Boolean valued in [9] and also Boolean valued notion is efficiently used for model theoretic constructions in [7], [6], [8], [5].

In our previous paper [14], we developed a Boolean valued version of forcing on Bounded Arithmetic using Boolean algebra which is generated by polynomial size circuits from Boolean variables and discussed its relation with NP = co-NP problem and P = NP problem. Especially we proved the following theorem and related theorems as Theorems 2, 3 and 4 in Section 2.

Theorem. If M[G] is not a model of S2, then NP ≠ co-NP and therefore P ≠ NP.

However in the proof of the Theorem, we used a consequence of P = NP. More precisely we used the following as a consequence of NP = co-NP, though it is a consequence of P = NP but not a consequence of NP = co-NP.

Suppose that NP = co-NP holds. Then there exists an NP-complete predicate ∃x ≤ t(a) A(x,a) with sharply bounded A(x, a) and a sharply bounded B(y, a) such that ∃x ≤ t(a) A(x,a) ↔ ∀y ≤ s(a)B(y, a). Then there exists polynomial time computable functions f and g such that the following two sequents hold.

Illative combinatory logic consists of the theory of combinators or lambda calculus extended by extra constants (and corresponding axioms and rules) intended to capture inference. In a preceding paper, [2], we considered 4 systems of illative combinatory logic that are sound for first order intuitionistic propositional and predicate logic. The interpretation from ordinary logic into the illative systems can be done in two ways: following the propositions-as-types paradigm, in which derivations become combinators, or in a more direct way, in which derivations are not translated. Both translations are closely related in a canonical way. In the cited paper we proved completeness of the two direct translations. In the present paper we prove that also the two indirect translations are complete. These proofs are direct whereas in another version, [3], we proved completeness by showing that the two corresponding illative systems are conservative over the two systems for the direct translations. Moreover we shall prove that one of the systems is also complete for predicate calculus with higher type functions.

Strengthening a theorem of D. W. Kueker, this paper completely charaterizes which countable structures do not admit uncountable Lω1ω-elementarily equivalent models. In particular, it is shown that if the automorphism group of a countable structure M is abelian, or even just solvable, then there is no uncountable model of the Scott sentence of M. These results arise as part of a study of Polish groups with compatible left-invariant complete metrics.

Weiermann [18] introduces a new method to generate fast growing functions in order to get an elegant and perspicuous proof of a bounding theorem for provably total recursive functions in a formal theory, e.g., in PA. His fast growing function θαη is described as follows. For each ordinal a and natural number n let denote a finitely branching, primitive recursive tree of ordinals, i.e., an ordinal as a label is attached to each node in the tree so that the labelling is compatible with the tree ordering. Then the tree is well founded and hence finite by König's lemma. Define θαηn =the depth of the tree =the length of the longest branch in .

We introduce new fast and slow growing functions in this mode of definitions and show that each of these majorizes provably total recursive functions in PA.

Let T be a countable, small simple theory. In this paper, we prove that for such T, the notion of Lascar strong type coincides with the notion of strong type, over an arbitrary set.

Before one can construct scales of minimal complexity in the Real Core Model, K(ℝ), one needs to develop the fine-structure theory of K (ℝ). In this paper, the fine structure theory of mice, first introduced by Dodd and Jensen, is generalized to that of real mice. A relative criterion for mouse iterability is presented together with two theorems concerning the definability of this criterion. The proof of the first theorem requires only fine structure; whereas, the second theorem applies to real mice satisfying AD and follows from a general definability result obtained by abstracting work of John Steel on L(ℝ). In conclusion, we discuss several consequences of the work presented in this paper relevant to two issues: the complexity of scales in K(ℝ)and the strength of the theory ZF + AD + ┐DCℝ.

An infinite field with only countably many pure types is algebraically closed.

In this paper we will present a simple condition for an ideal to be nowhere precipitous. Through this condition we show nowhere precipitousness of fundamental ideals on Pkλ, in particular the non-stationary ideal NSkλ under cardinal arithmetic assumptions.

In this section I denotes a non-principal ideal on an infinite set A. Let I+ = PA / I (ordered by inclusion as a forcing notion) and I∣X = {Y ⊂ A: Y ⋂ X ∈ I}, which is also an ideal on A for X ∈ I+. We refer the reader to [8, Section 35] for the general theory of generic ultrapowers associated with an ideal. We recall I is said to be precipitous if ⊨I+ “Ult(V, Ġ) is well-founded” [9].

The central notion of this paper is a strong negation of precipitousness [1]:

Definition. I is nowhere precipitous if I∣X is not precipitous for every X ∈ I+ i.e., ⊨I+ “Ult(V, Ġ) is ill-founded.”

It is useful to characterize nowhere precipitousness in terms of infinite games (see [11, Section 27]). Consider the following game G(I) between two players, Nonempty and Empty [5]. Nonempty and Empty alternately choose Xn ∈ I+ and Yn ∈ I+ respectively so that Xn ⊃ Yn ⊃n+1. After ω moves, Empty wins the game if⋂n<ωXn=⋂n<ωYn = Ø.

See [5, Theorem 2] for a proof of the following characterization.

Proposition. I is nowhere precipitous if and only if Empty has a winning strategy in G(I).

The paper describes and proves completeness theorems for a series of proof systems formalizing common sense reasoning about uncertain knowledge in the case where this consists of sets of linear constraints on a probability function.

Let P be any one of the following combinatorial properties: weak P-pointness, weak (semi-) Q-pointness, weak (semi-)selectivity, ω-closedness. We deal with the following two questions: (1) What is the least cardinal k such that there exists an ideal with k many generators that does not have the property P? (2) Can one extend every ideal with the property P to a prime ideal with the property P?

(Xα: α < ω2) ⊂ ℘(ω1) is a strong chain in ℘(ω1)/Fin if and only if Xβ – Xα is finite and Xα – Xβ is uncountable for each β < α < ω1. We show that it is consistent that a strong chain in ℘(ω1) exists. On the other hand we show that it is consistent that there is a strongly almost-disjoint family in ℘(ω1) but no strong chain exists: is used to construct a c.c.c forcing that adds a strong chain and Chang's Conjecture to prove that there is no strong chain.

We generalize a result on True Arithmetic (ℐA) by Lachlan and Soare to certain other completions of Peano Arithmetic (PA). If ℐ is a completion of PA, then Rep(ℐ) denotes the family of sets X ⊆ ω for which there exists a formula φ(x) such that for all n ∈ ω, if n ∈ X, then ℐ ⊢ φ(S(n) (0)) and if n ∉ X, then ℐ ⊢ ┐φ(S(n)(O)). We show that if S, J ⊆ P(ω) such that S is a Scott set, J is a jump ideal, S ⊂ J and for all X ∈ J, there exists C ∈ S such that C is a “coding” set for the family of subtrees of 2<ω computable in X, and if ℐ is a completion of PA Such that Rep(ℐ) = S, then there exists a model A of ℐ such that J is the Scott set of A and no enumeration of Rep(ℐ) is computable in A. The model A of ℐ is obtained via a new notion of forcing.

Before proving our main result, we demonstrate the existence of uncountably many different pairs (S, J) satisfying the conditions of our theorem. This involves a new characterization of 1-generic sets as coding sets for the computable subtrees of 2<ω. In particular, C C ⊆ ω is a coding set for the family of subtrees of 2<ω computable in X if and only if for all trees T ⊆ 2<ω computable in X, if χc is a path through T, then there exists σ ∈ T such that σ ⊂ χc and every extension of σ is in T. Jockusch noted a connection between 1-generic sets and coding sets for computable subtrees of 2<ω. We show they are identical.

We study partitions of Fraïssé limits of classes of finite relational structures where the partitions are encoded by infinite binary strings which are random in the sense of Kolmogorov-Chaitin.

We investigate the possibility to characterize (multi)functions that are -definable with small i (i = 1, 2, 3) in fragments of bounded arithmetic T2 in terms of natural search problems defined over polynomial-time structures. We obtain the following results:

(1) A reformulation of known characterizations of (multi)functions that are and -definable in the theories and .

(2) New characterizations of (multi)functions that are and -definable in the theory .

(3) A new non-conservation result: the theory is not -conservative over the theory .

To prove that the theory is not -conservative over the theory , we present two examples of a -principle separating the two theories:

(a) the weak pigeonhole principle WPHP(a2, f, g) formalizing that no function f is a bijection between a2 and a with the inverse g,

(b) the iteration principle Iter(a, R, f) formalizing that no function f defined on a strict partial order ({0,…, a}, R) can have increasing iterates.

Large cardinals arising from the existence of arbitrarily long end elementary extension chains over models of set theory are studied here. In particular, we show that the large cardinals obtained in this fashion (‘unfoldable cardinals’) lie in the boundary of the propositions consistent with ‘V = L’ and the existence of 0#. We also provide an ‘embedding characterisation’ of the unfoldable cardinals and study their preservation and destruction by various forcing constructions.