Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T23:25:42.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Completions of PA: Models and enumerations of representable sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Alex M. McAllister*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We generalize a result on True Arithmetic (ℐA) by Lachlan and Soare to certain other completions of Peano Arithmetic (PA). If ℐ is a completion of PA, then Rep(ℐ) denotes the family of sets X ⊆ ω for which there exists a formula φ(x) such that for all n ∈ ω, if nX, then ℐ ⊢ φ(S(n) (0)) and if nX, then ℐ ⊢ ┐φ(S(n)(O)). We show that if S, JP(ω) such that S is a Scott set, J is a jump ideal, SJ and for all XJ, there exists CS such that C is a “coding” set for the family of subtrees of 2 computable in X, and if ℐ is a completion of PA Such that Rep(ℐ) = S, then there exists a model A of ℐ such that J is the Scott set of A and no enumeration of Rep(ℐ) is computable in A. The model A of ℐ is obtained via a new notion of forcing.

Before proving our main result, we demonstrate the existence of uncountably many different pairs (S, J) satisfying the conditions of our theorem. This involves a new characterization of 1-generic sets as coding sets for the computable subtrees of 2. In particular, C C ⊆ ω is a coding set for the family of subtrees of 2 computable in X if and only if for all trees T ⊆ 2 computable in X, if χc is a path through T, then there exists σ ∈ T such that σ ⊂ χc and every extension of σ is in T. Jockusch noted a connection between 1-generic sets and coding sets for computable subtrees of 2. We show they are identical.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Ash, Chris J. and Knight, Julia F., Computable structures and the hyperarithmetical hierarchy, unpublished manuscript, 1996.Google Scholar
[2]Jockusch, Carl G., Degrees of generic sets, Drake and Wainer, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Kaye, Richard, Models of Peano arithmetic, Oxford Logic Guides, no. 15, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Knight, Julia F., Degrees of models with a prescribed Scott set, Proceedings of the U.S.-Israel binational workshop in model theory in mathematical logic: Classification theory, Chicago, 1987, pp. 182191.Google Scholar
[5]Kumabe, Masahiro, Degrees of generic sets, Computability, enumerability, unsolvability, directions in recursion theory, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, no. 224, 1996, pp. 167183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Lachlan, Alistair H. and Soare, Robert I., Models of arithmetic and upper bounds of arithmetic sets, this Journal, vol. 59 (1994), no. 3, pp. 977983.Google Scholar
[7]Lerman, Manuel, Degrees of unsolvability, local and global theory, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Omega Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo, 1980.Google Scholar
[8]Lerman, Manuel, Upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 29 (1985), pp. 225254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]MacIntyre, Angus and Marker, David, Degrees of recursively saturated models, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 282 (1984), no. 2, pp. 539554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Scott, Dana, Algebras of sets binumerable in complete extensions of arithmetic, Recursive function theory, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, no. 5, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1962, pp. 117122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Scott, Dana and Tennenbaum, Stanley, On the degrees of complete extensions of arithmetic, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 7 (1960), pp. 242243, abstract 568-3.Google Scholar
[12]Selman, Alan L., Applications of forcing to the degree-theory of the arithmetical hierarchy, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 25 (1972), pp. 586602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Soare, Robert I., Recursively enumerable sets and degrees, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Omega Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Solovay, Robert M., Degrees of models of true arithmetic, unpublished manuscript, 1982.Google Scholar