Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:47:58.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ideals over ω and cardinal invariants of the continuum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

P. Matet
Affiliation:
Mathematiques, Universite de Caen, 14032 Caen Cedex, France E-mail: [email protected]
J. Pawlikowski
Affiliation:
Instytut Matematyczny, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Pl. Grunwaldzki 2/4, 50-384 Wrocław, Poland E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Let P be any one of the following combinatorial properties: weak P-pointness, weak (semi-) Q-pointness, weak (semi-)selectivity, ω-closedness. We deal with the following two questions: (1) What is the least cardinal k such that there exists an ideal with k many generators that does not have the property P? (2) Can one extend every ideal with the property P to a prime ideal with the property P?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bartoszyński, T., Combinatorial aspects of measure and category, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 127 (1987), pp. 225239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bartoszyński, T. and Ihoda, J. I., On the cofinality of the smallest covering of the real line by meager sets, this Journal, vol. 54 (1989), pp. 828832.Google Scholar
[3]Bartoszyński, T. and Judah, H., Measure and category—filters on ω, Set theory of the continuum (Judah, H., Just, W., and Woodin, H., editors), Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol. 26, Springer, New York, 1992, pp. 175201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bartoszyński, T. and Judah, H., Set theory: On the structure of the real line, AK Peters, Wellesley, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Canjar, R. M., On the generic existence of special ultrafilters, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 110 (1990), pp. 233241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Galvin, F., Mycielski, J., and Solovay, R. M., Strong measure zero sets, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 26 (1979), pp. A280.Google Scholar
[7]Goldstern, M., Judah, H., and Shelah, S., Strong measure zero sets without Cohen reals, this Journal, vol. 58 (1993), pp. 13231341.Google Scholar
[8]Grigorieff, S., Combinatorics on ideals and forcing, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 3 (1971), pp. 363394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Ketonen, J., On the existence of P-points in the Stone-Čech compactification of integers, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 92 (1976), pp. 9194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Miller, A. W., Some properties of measure and category, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 266 (1981), pp. 93114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Miller, A. W., Additivity of measure implies dominating reals, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 91 (1984), pp. 111117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Pawlikowski, J., Powers of transitive bases of measure and category, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 93 (1985), pp. 719729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Rosłanowski, A. and Shelah, S., Norms on possibilities I: a missing chapter of [Sh.f], preprint.Google Scholar
[14]Shelah, S., Vive la difference I: non isomorphism of ultrapowers of countable models, Set theory of the continuum (Judah, H., Just, W., and Woodin, H., editors), Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol. 26, Springer, New York, 1992, pp. 357405.Google Scholar
[15]Vaughan, J. E., Small uncountable cardinals and topology, Open problems in topology (van Mill, J. and Reed, G., editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990, pp. 195218.Google Scholar