Objectives/Goals: Micro-credentialing programs provide a rapid solution to the growing shortage of clinical research professionals (CRPs) by expanding the applicant pool and improving training efficiency. This study evaluates the impact of a micro-credential course on CRP education and its potential to reduce staffing shortages. Methods/Study Population: To address the CRP staffing shortage, new and existing clinical research staff at the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (CINJ) participated in a micro-credential badging course developed by NJ ACTS and Rutgers’ Master’s in Clinical Research Management Program. The course focused on key clinical research topics designed to equip participants with foundational knowledge. Post-completion, surveys were administered to both participants and CINJ management to assess the program’s effectiveness. The survey measured perceived knowledge gains, interest in further opportunities, and the program’s potential to alleviate staffing shortages. Survey results were analyzed to determine the program’s overall impact on CRP education and staffing challenges. Results/Anticipated Results: Survey results demonstrated significant knowledge gains among participants, with 85% reporting increased confidence in clinical research topics after completing the micro-credential course. Additionally, 70% of participants expressed interest in pursuing further opportunities in the field. CINJ management reported smoother onboarding processes and noted an improvement in job readiness among new hires. The CRC Badge has since been integrated into CINJ’s formal onboarding process. Overall, the micro-credential program contributed to expanding the CRP applicant pool, improving training efficiency, and offering a short-term solution to alleviate staffing shortages. Discussion/Significance of Impact: This research demonstrates the effectiveness of micro-credentialing in addressing the critical shortage of CRPs. By rapidly equipping staff with essential knowledge, the program broadens the applicant pool, enhances onboarding, and offers an immediate solution to workforce gaps.

Objectives/Goals: The Competency-Based All-Level Training (COBALT) curriculum standardizes learning for clinical research coordinators (CRCs) across multiple institutions within Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho (WWAMI), with flexible, topic-specific training at all experience levels, in both academic and industry-sponsored research. Methods/Study Population: The COBALT curriculum was developed in collaboration with subject matter experts, managers of CRCs, and other clinical research professionals from institutions across the WWAMI region. A thorough assessment of existing training programs within the region helped identify gaps and unmet needs. The curriculum was designed within a user-friendly learning management system that can be accessed across institutions. It has been piloted with diverse groups and committees of CRCs, professionals, and institutional leaders in clinical and translational science. Ongoing evaluation is being conducted qualitatively using built-in assessment surveys, demonstrations, and interviews. Results/Anticipated Results: The anticipated outcome is the creation of a highly standardized and efficient training program for clinical research professionals across multiple institutions in the WWAMI region. This program will be carefully tailored to each professional’s level of experience, ensuring personalized skill development. By aligning training with diverse expertise levels, the initiative aims to significantly elevate the quality, consistency, and overall performance of clinical research efforts across the regional research community. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The COBALT curriculum provides a vetted learning curriculum for CRCs, with a tailorable training plan that helps them collaborate with their supervisors to tailor training to their career goals. This ensures that the curriculum is not only comprehensive but also adaptable to individual needs.

Objectives/Goals: Trainees in clinical and translational science (CTS) take courses in biostatistics, epidemiology, and other quantitative areas. To be most successful, trainees require competency in algebra. We developed a quantitative assessment and study guide to assess trainee’s quantitative skills and provide review material to address weaknesses. Methods/Study Population: The Tufts CTS Graduate Program is the training core of the Tufts CTSI and its associated pre- and post-doctoral T32 awards. Approximately 10 trainees with a range of backgrounds (e.g., physicians, medical students, master’s-level researchers, and basic science PhDs) and varying math education experiences matriculate each year. We wanted to address the resulting range of quantitative skills to help students succeed in our program. In Spring 2023, we met with faculty teaching quantitative courses to identify core algebra concepts needed to succeed in their classes. A graduate student in computational mathematics with extensive tutoring experience then drafted assessment questions, a comprehensive study guide, and brief cheat sheet. The material was reviewed and revised with input from quantitative faculty. Results/Anticipated Results: We developed a 20-item quantitative assessment covering properties of operators; identity elements and inverses; simplification of arithmetic and algebraic expressions; solving algebraic equations; functions; equations of a line; and exponents/logarithms. A cheat sheet provided trainees with a brief refresher for these topics. A study guide provided more detailed instruction, example exercises and solutions, and referenced publicly available, online resources (e.g., Khan Academy). During the introductory summer course for the Tufts CTS Program, trainees were allowed to use the cheat sheet and were given 1 hour to complete the assessment. Trainees who got questions incorrect were directed to relevant sections in the study guide. We anticipate collecting formal feedback to evaluate the material. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Trainees must have adequate foundational algebra skills to succeed in CTS graduate programs and as future researchers. Developing a quantitative assessment allowed us to identify areas of weakness resulting from educational disparities or reflecting other aspects of their backgrounds and to provide material to reinforce their preparation.

Objectives/Goals: Trainees in clinical and translational science (CTS) must learn to effectively communicate their research ideas and findings to a range of audiences. As part of our science communication curriculum, we developed ORAL and WRITTEN science communication rubrics for our trainees to use across their courses and research activities. Methods/Study Population: The Tufts CTS Graduate Program is the training core of the Tufts CTSI and its associated pre- and post-doctoral T32 awards. Approximately 10 trainees with a range of backgrounds (e.g., physicians, medical students, master’s-level researchers, and basic science PhDs) matriculate each year. Faculty members and staff with expertise in science communication and pedagogy formed a committee to develop the rubrics. Because oral and written communication require different skills, we developed separate rubrics for each. We reviewed our current science communication curriculum, reviewed existing communication rubrics, and identified common mistakes students make. Following pilot testing by students and faculty pilot for one semester, we modified the rubrics based on informal feedback. Results/Anticipated Results: Both rubrics include a section to identify the target audience and specific items organized by theme. Oral rubric themes include presentation content, slides, verbal communication, nonverbal communication, and following instructions. Written rubric themes include overall, manuscript/proposal sections, and following instructions. The rubrics serve as feedback tools for faculty and students to evaluate work others produce and as self-evaluation tools. Feedback elements include a 4-point rating for each rubric item, open text feedback for each theme, and an open text holistic assessment. We now use the rubrics in our study design course, which features student presentations of planned research, and in our writing course. We anticipate collecting formal student feedback to further evaluate the rubrics. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Our rubrics can supplement existing science communication training and can be integrated into all CTS coursework and research activities. For future clinical and translational scientists to have the greatest impact, they must learn to effectively communicate findings to multiple audiences, ranging from experts in their field to the general public.

Objectives/Goals: The clinical research professional (CRP) workforce suffers from high turnover. Stay interviews have led to increased satisfaction and reduced turnover in other industries. We describe a multi-institutional project to develop, disseminate, and evaluate a CRP-tailored Stay Interview tool reimagined as the Individual Retention Conversation (IRC) toolkit. Methods/Study Population: In August 2022, following on the heels of a series of un-meeting conversations focused on CRP workforce development, the CRP taskforce initiated a working group to tackle issues related to CRP workforce retention. As a first initiative, this multi-institutional working group set out to develop, disseminate, and evaluate a Stay Interview tool tailored for a CRP audience and reimagined as the IRC toolkit. A 2-phase pilot study was initiated across six academic medical centers (AMCs: ASU, Duke, MUSC, UAB, UPenn, VCU) to: 1) optimize the toolkit for the CRP audience and 2) evaluate the impact of the toolkit using a standardized CRP satisfaction survey. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected via surveys using the REDCap platform. Results/Anticipated Results: The optimization phase of the pilot included 69 participants (16 managers and 53 of their CRP team members) from 6 AMCs. Respondents identified most and least useful questions for stimulating meaningful conversations regarding job satisfaction and retention issues with additional feedback on the IRC experience and tools. CRPs and managers represented a variety of roles, with 77% patient facing. The majority were satisfied with the IRC experience (82%) and found the experience personally beneficial (76%). Managers were satisfied with the manager’s guide (90%). Quantitative and qualitative feedback was used to optimize the toolkit prior to launch of phase 2 in September 2024, which includes a longitudinal survey-based assessment of CRP job satisfaction and IRC-consequent work environment changes. Discussion/Significance of Impact: CRP retention is impacted by complex factors, many related to job satisfaction, supervisor /employee relationships, and beneficial work environments. Initial evaluation of the IRC suggests that this intervention fosters positive supervisor/employee relationships and beneficial work environment changes, which may lead to improved retention.

Objectives/Goals: We designed a forum to educate participants about bioethical issues in the application of big data (BD) and artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical and translational research (CTR) in underrepresented populations. We sought to determine changes in participants’ interests in ethics, bias, and trustworthiness of AI and BD. Methods/Study Population: 141 individuals registered for the forum, which was advertised to our partner institutions, minority-serving institutions, and community organizations. Registrants received email instructions to complete an AI Trustworthiness (AI-Trust) survey, a questionnaire with integrated qualitative and quantitative measures designed to better understand learners who engaged with the institution-specific AI/Data Science curriculum. Respondents completed the survey using personal devices via a link and QR code, with anonymized responses and enhanced privacy features. 82 people attended; 22 responded to the survey pre-forum and 22 post-forum. Pre- and post-forum responses were qualitatively compared to assess shifts in attitudes toward AI and BD and related interests in ethics, bias, and trustworthiness. Results/Anticipated Results: We found increased interests post- vs. pre-forum in the use of AI for CTR, AI bias and its effects on underrepresented populations, and ethical risk assessment and mitigation strategies for the use of BD to empower research participants. In contrast, trust in AI was lower post- vs. pre-forum. Moreover, respondents also indicated that the current application of AI in healthcare practice would result in increased racial, economic, and gender bias. In comparison, interest in ethical challenges, bioethical considerations, and trustworthiness regarding use of BD and AI in health research and practice did not differ pre- vs. post-forum. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Interest in the application of BD/AI in CTR increased post-forum, but AI distrust and bias expectations also increased, suggesting that learners become more skeptical and discerning as they become more knowledgeable about the complexity of the ethics of AI and BD use in healthcare, especially its application to underrepresented populations.

Objectives/Goals: To design and implement programming that better prepares graduate students for diverse roles in a variety of workforce environments, our study models the training landscape and programming needs of graduate students in behavioral, clinical, and biomedical graduate programs at a large Midwestern school of medicine and public health. Methods/Study Population: We conducted six focus groups (two graduate program manager focus groups and four graduate student focus groups), to assess the programming, career development, and training needs of graduate students. Using a grounded theory approach, we first engaged in open coding of a sample of transcripts. After developing a codebook, we continued with an iterative coding process interspersed with coder meetings to discuss emerging and changing codes. Using the framework of landscape analysis allowed our coding and modeling to go beyond graduate student needs and study the varying relationships and contexts that impact graduate students throughout their training, such as relationship to supervisor or institutional policies. Results/Anticipated Results: Preliminary results indicate that students wrestle with their status as both students and workers. Specifically, conflict arises between graduate and supervisor expectations around time spent in class, lab, and other career development activities based on these divergent roles. Students and program managers also note the disparities that arise from the university’s lack of standard, formalized policy on labor issues, such as paid leave. Data also suggest that students on training grants note the difference in access to career development resources compared to colleagues. In many cases, students themselves coordinate ad hoc programming to better suit their career and professional development needs, although this work is not a required aspect of their training. Discussion/Significance of Impact: We characterize current graduate training landscapes, which continue to shift as graduate student bodies diversify, unionize, and express interest in increasingly varied biomedical careers. Data from multiple perspectives facilitate creating, implementing, and evaluating supportive training programs that meet identified student needs.

Objectives/Goals: In this project, we set out to supplement our existing grant writing workshops with targeted, learner-centered, multimodal training. This method will assist us in moving toward a more equitable training landscape, reaching a wider variety of learners, by freely disseminating these resources. Methods/Study Population: To increase access and impact of training materials for our career development grant writing workshops, we restructured our pre-workshop training videos. We culled expert advice from lengthy recorded lectures into brief (less than 5 minute) how-to videos that target instruction to writing specific sections of an NIH K grant. We then coupled these how-to videos with easy-to-navigate, open access online courses that further illustrate best practices for writing key sections of NIH K grants. These resources were given to registered workshop attendees and made available through a public Canvas course, the Diamond portal, MICHR website, and U-M Innovation Partnerships to disseminate the materials through multiple channels. Results/Anticipated Results: Four online courses and complementary videos were developed over six months, each focusing on a specific section of the NIH K grant proposal. These resources provide targeted instruction for writing the Specific Aims, Candidate Background, Career Development Plan, Career Goals and Objectives, and Mentor Letter. Learners accessed all four of the online courses. Released in January 2024, we continue to gather data on whether learners believe their knowledge about writing successful K grants has increased after using the resources, if they believe the courses have prepared them to write the section of the grant covered, and whether learners would recommend the courses. We will analyze these results to better understand how learners are using and responding to these new resources. Discussion/Significance of Impact: These how-to videos and online courses provide targeted, learner-centered training and fill an important gap by meeting learners where they are and extending the impact of our training beyond our institution. Widely disseminating online interactive training resources is a model we are applying beyond grant writing to other projects.

Objectives/Goals: REDCap is a popular electronic data capture tool. However, training users in how to best utilize REDCap can be a challenge for many institutions. The Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) strives to setup a self-service training program that takes the day to day roles of users into account. Methods/Study Population: Our new training curriculum is a collaboration with our Workforce Development team and our REDCap Support Team. The REDCap team functions as the subject matter experts and generate a training outline based on a certain feature or topic. The Workforce Development team transform that outline into an LMS style course that’s available online. In order to organize the courses for maximum relevance to user, we engaged with various REDCap training and regulatory experts around the globe. Based on their input, we organized the various training courses into a role-based schema. The training courses are freely available online and contain an optional test and completion certification in order to comply with regulatory standards like 21 CRF part 11 or GDPR. Results/Anticipated Results: We released the first 17 training courses in July 2024 with another 20 courses planned in the near future. Responses to the courses have been overwhelmingly positive from users and the greater REDCap community. Our collection of training courses won the best website award at the yearly REDCap conference in 2024. To date we have had 137 people go through a training course with the optional test and completion certificate. While the majority have been from the USA, a significant portion hails from other countries. We believed these people only represent a small subset of users due to the optional nature of the test and accreditation section. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Our new role-based training curriculum is crucial in giving REDCap users the training tools they need for their particular role. The certification option fills a niche for professionals to demonstrate their REDCap proficiency to further their careers. Overall, this user training should increase the utilization of REDCap in all research endeavors.

Objectives/Goals: This proposal outlines the successful deployment of a research training initiative to support the formation of a Learning Healthcare System. Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) rural providers were offered the opportunity to the fundamentals of clinical research via Clinical and Translational Science Awards core curriculum, mentorship, and an online seminar series. Methods/Study Population: MCHS funded 4 key introductory research courses: 1) Manuscript Writing, 2) Grant Writing, 3) Basic Biostatistics, and 4) Essentials of Clinical and Translations Science Program. In addition to course offerings, a Research Interest Group was formed to guide novice rural researchers on topic selection and study design. This cultivated interest to create a 16-month clinical research webinar series offering CME credits. Subsequently, an internal MCHS RFA was launched seeking early-stage investigator pilot proposals focused on rural health. Results/Anticipated Results: In 2023, over 140 MCHS providers enrolled in 324 CCaTS research courses. This training led to the submission of 53 proposals to the inaugural MCHS 2023 RFA, of which 15 were awarded. Additionally, 14 MCHS extramural grants were submitted in 2023. Training efforts expanded in 2024 to include an online research seminar series covering various study topics and providing CME credit, with an approximate attendance up to 196 attendees per session. The second annual MCHS RFA resulted in 4 internal awards, with an additional 22 extramural grant submissions. These collective efforts have increased the number of MCHS first and last author publications and the number of MCHS providers with academic rank. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Leadership’s commitment of resources to educate, mentor, and engage clinicians was crucial to our success and demonstrated a strong return on investment. To maximize impact in community-based practice, continued commitment is needed in the form of protected research time, funding, and research administration support of projects of interest

Objectives/Goals: Collaborations between translational science programs and academic health sciences libraries can enhance research impact by improving efficiency, leveraging diverse professional expertise, and expanding opportunities for collaboration between librarians and translational science programs. Methods/Study Population: A team science approach was utilized, integrating findings from a literature review, practical experiences of health sciences librarians, and collaborative writing. An analysis of case studies from institutions with successful partnerships explored the roles of libraries in partnering with translational science programs. The data collected were mapped to the Clinical and Translational Science Award Program’s five functional areas outlined in the Notice of Funding Opportunity PAR-24–272. Librarians from 21 institutions engaged in discussions and collaborative writing to share insights and identify key factors driving successful partnerships. Results/Anticipated Results: Academic health sciences libraries play a crucial role in enhancing translational science programs through expert knowledge management, facilitation of research dissemination, and support for interdisciplinary collaboration. Results from this project include a table outlining 16 specific opportunities mapped across five functional areas and six topical categories for translational science programs and libraries to collaborate effectively.Successful partnerships demonstrate improved research workflows, increased interactions between researchers and libraries, and accelerated translation of discoveries into clinical settings. These collaborations illustrate opportunities for other institutions to adopt as they consider best practices in supporting translational science. Discussion/Significance of Impact: By combining resources and expertise between libraries and translational science programs, these partnerships enhance the ability to transform scientific discoveries into real-world clinical applications, drive innovation, and amplify the contributions of both libraries and translational science programs.

Objectives/Goals: To assess the impact of the MATCH Program on mentees and mentors over the years, we have surveyed both groups on the effectiveness of the mentorship process, how the MATCH program influenced mentees’ future career plans, and their ongoing interest in clinical research. Methods/Study Population: To evaluate impact on mentees and mentors in the most recent cycle, we fielded two program evaluation surveys, for mentors and mentees. The surveys were distributed and collected using Qualtrics in May 2024. The mentee survey collected data on relationship with mentors, quality of mentorship, future career/education plans, and self-assessment of the program impact. The mentor survey collected data on relationship with mentees, mentees’ engagement, and a self-assessment of the program impact. Qualitative analysis was conducted to determine key themes expressed by participants. The responses were compared to assess the effectiveness of the mentoring relationship from both parties. Results/Anticipated Results: Respondents included 15/20 (75%) mentees and 15/20 (75%) mentors. All mentees (100%) and mentors (100%) stated they would like to continue their relationship outside of the program. The majority of mentees 13/15 (87%) and mentors 13/25 (87%) also viewed their mentee/mentor relationship to be excellent or good. Most mentors 10/15 (67%) stated it was their first time serving as a mentor for the program. Mentees also found their experience in the program very beneficial with 6/15 (40%) stating that MATCH changed their career plans. In addition, most mentees 14/15 (93%) indicated that they are community college or four-year college/university bound. Most mentees 11/15 (73%) indicated an interest in pursuing a health or medical career. Also, 10/15 (67%) mentees stated an interest in pursuing a career in research. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Both mentees and mentors have benefited from the program’s daisy chain mentoring and the program has helped facilitate a potential lifelong mentorship between mentees and mentors. The program also demonstrates promise of developing a pre-health pathway for historically underrepresented students in STEM.

Objectives/Goals: The University of Minnesota’s two-year TL1 program provides flexible and individualized education and training for a diverse cohort of scholars committed to pursuing impactful careers in clinical and translational science (CTS). The program aims to strengthen the nation’s biomedical workforce by developing scientists skilled in clinical and translational research. Methods/Study Population: The TL1 program recruits PhD candidates and postdoctoral fellows from a wide variety of graduate programs in colleges and departments across the University. To date, we have trained 26 predoctoral and 9 postdoctoral Scholars in 3 cohorts. Scholars represent dozens of disciplines and the full translational spectrum. These interdisciplinary cohorts are in a unique position to realize the fundamental characteristics of a translational scientist. Entrance/exit surveys and exit interviews provide program leadership with information for quality improvement and areas scholars believe contribute the most to their education and training in CTS. Results/Anticipated Results: Entrance/exit surveys indicated Scholar-perceived benefits of training in an interdisciplinary program, including growth in translational scientist characteristics (e.g., Boundary Crosser, Team Player). Exit interviews showed Scholars appreciated the cohort model bringing together trainees from many different research areas. They valued exposure to varied perspectives, talking through challenges and solutions with each other, and learning others shared similar issues. They valued the Scholar community they developed. Several felt siloed in their careers before the program and reported that TL1 participation connected them to others outside their own area of focus, expanded their knowledge about different research methods and revealed more pathways for translation. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Recruiting and training a diverse interdisciplinary cohort of pre- and postdoctoral TL1 Scholars promoted synergy in translational research, science skills and competencies, and transformed the perspectives of Scholars’ views on the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to accelerate science.

Objectives/Goals: The SC CTSI’s Online Educational Library (OEL) is a robust clearinghouse for educational content, containing approximately 250 videos. We outline the motivation, method, process, and outcomes for undertaking a massive recategorization of our OEL to better align the videos with applied skills necessary for clinical research professionals. Methods/Study Population: Our hub’s robust workforce development and educational cores produce seminars, classes, lectures, and symposia that are recorded and repackaged for the OEL. The audience for our OEL includes research professionals from all stages of their career, such as research coordinators, research administrators, regulatory experts, biostatisticians, students, academics, investigators, community members, and others at our institution and globally. The content in the OEL was not efficiently organized and thus difficult for researchers to use. We employed qualitative content analysis to organize the videos in alignment with the eight competencies created by the Association for Clinical Research Professionals (ACRP), augmenting the competencies to best capture the content of and skills being taught in our videos. Results/Anticipated Results: We refined the ACRP categories to best fit our needs and applied the categorization mechanism to approximately 250 videos. Our categories included communication, dissemination, and teamwork (45 videos), data management and informatics (27), ethics and participant safety (13), leadership and professionalism (24), regulatory and quality sciences (48), research and study conduct (44), research and study design (49), study and site management (54), and other (27). Some videos appear in multiple categories. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Detailing our approach and process will help other CTSAs harmonize their educational offerings to move toward a more unified method and process for organizing trainings and education in the CTR space and will better serve learners.

Objectives/Goals: To strengthen postdocs’ skills in developing and reviewing competitive proposals, advancing translational research by leveraging core facilities at Indiana University, Purdue University, and the University of Notre Dame, fostering collaboration, and preparing participants of the program for future funding success. Methods/Study Population: The Postdoc Challenge is a state-wide program for postdoctoral scholars across Indiana to gain hands-on experience in developing and reviewing competitive grant proposals. Participants compete for a $5,000 award to use any of the Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI)-approved core facilities. Through workshops and following NIH guidelines for the review process, participants refine their proposal-writing skills and serve as reviewers for peers’ proposals. The program is designed to support translational research, utilizing the core facilities at Indiana University, Purdue University, and the University of Notre Dame. Participants are trained in grant proposal writing, reviewing using NIH criteria, and engaging in peer discussions, developing critical skills necessary for future funding success. Results/Anticipated Results: Since its launch in 2014, the Indiana CTSI Postdoc Challenge has funded 54 postdoctoral researchers, with 276 applications reviewed. The program has strengthened participants’ grant proposal writing skills and peer review capabilities. Career outcomes include several postdocs securing assistant professor positions and other prestigious roles, such as an Associate Principal Investigator at the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, and a Toxicologist at the CDC. Participants also report enhanced collaboration, greater access to core facilities, and significant career advancement, including support for international postdocs seeking permanent residency. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The Postdoc Challenge has significantly improved postdoctoral researchers’ grant proposal writing and peer review skills, helping them secure faculty and research positions. By fostering collaboration across Indiana’s top universities and utilizing core facilities, the program accelerates translational research and career success.

Objectives/Goals: To assess the attitudes toward social justice of residents and faculty following the didactic series and evaluate the impact of the longitudinal curriculum on resident engagement in social justice activities through community engagements. Methods/Study Population: Data were gathered through questionnaires collected from participating residents and faculty. The session topics were chosen based on “Precepting Toward Social Justice” curriculum from the University of Minnesota Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, including sessions on advocacy, diversity, and implicit bias, among others. The self-assessment questionnaires were specific to the topics of the lecture, assessing knowledge, skills, and attitudes before and after the education sessions. Participants were asked to rate these aptitudes of each topic from “none” to “expert.” Results/Anticipated Results: Out of 22 total participants, 16 returned surveys. Overall, there was a substantial improvement in aptitudes after the lecture. There was an increase in reported above average knowledge of topics: Agency (12.5% to 56.25%), Humility (18.75% to 62.5%), Dignity (12.5% to 62.5%), Partner (18.75% to 50%), Awaken (37.5% to 75%), Place (12.5% to 43.75%), Asset (0% to 37.5%), Sanctuary (6.25% to 50%), Belonging (0% to 37.5%), Whole (0% to 43.75%), Liberation (12.5% to 68.75%), and Heal (37.5% to 75%). 31% reported that the lectures alone had an above average influence on pursuing more social justice activities through community engagement. 44% reported that the lectures had an above average impact on their subsequent patient encounters. 69% stated that this series helped develop their overall social justice skills. Discussion/Significance of Impact: All patients deserve equitable care. Family physicians have a unique role in addressing social justice concerns to eliminate inequalities and drive for better health outcomes. By enforcing social justice in education and implementing it into practice, satisfaction, trust, and well-being of patient and provider will be improved.

Objectives/Goals: Undergraduate Medical Education (UME) may apply Just-in-Time training (JITT) to provide medical students with learning experiences closely aligned with real-time clinical needs. The purpose of this scoping review is to offer an overview of the implementation of JITT training in UME. Methods/Study Population: Following the five-stage framework by Arksey and O’Malley to methodically collect and analyze studies on JITT in UME, five electronic databases were searched, and a supplemental search for grey literature was conducted. Studies exploring the integration of JITT principles into UME clinical training and their time to follow-up after training were included. Bloom’s Taxonomy was used to assess educational goals of JITT interventions. Results/Anticipated Results: The review yielded 21 studies across 4 countries. The majority were cohort studies (13) and randomized control trials (5). Assessment definitions and use of JITT varied widely. Most studies focused on short-term outcomes, defined by being measured immediately after JITT session (15) or at the end of JITT-based rotation or clerkship (3). Three studies evaluated outcomes at a period longer than 2 weeks after completion of session or clerkship. Attitudes (9), followed by skills (8) were the most common educational goals of intervention. The efficacy and utility of JITT in improving educational goal acquisition was demonstrated in 90% (17/19) of the studies with reported outcomes. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The introduction of JITT in UME has been shown to meet the immediate needs of healthcare environments; however, evidence is limited in the evaluation of longer-term outcomes. Further research to determine the impact of JITT on long-term learning retention and education goal acquisition in UME is merited.

Objectives/Goals: Develop trauma-informed, victim-centered care skills. Foster student-led, translational research on trauma and victim services engage students in public policy and public health engagement support professional growth through research presentation and publication. Methods/Study Population: A review of the 2018–2021 mentorship program that engaged ten graduate students from diverse institutions (seven from San Juan Bautista School of Medicine, one from Interamerican University, one from UPR-Medical Sciences Campus, and one from Ponce Health Sciences University). Students participated in trauma-informed and victim-centered research projects focusing on sexual violence, child abuse, and victim services. They were mentored by Dr. Linda Laras and Dr. Linda Pérez at the Puerto Rico Health Justice Center, receiving hands-on experience through case discussions, literature review, research design, data collection, and presentations at the Start By Believing Symposium. Results/Anticipated Results: From 2018 to 2021, students developed trauma-informed care skills and conducted research on topics such as therapy dogs in courtrooms, victim services, and the impact of child sexual abuse. The results of this mentorship program included a publication in Cureus (10.7759/cureus.13644) and presentations at the Start By Believing Symposium, attended by legal and community professionals. The Fundación Intellectus Sexual Violence Research Scholarship was awarded, and the research earned award winning posters at multiple symposiums, including the SJBSM Interdisciplinary Research Symposium. Discussion/Significance of Impact: This mentorship translates trauma-informed research into real-world applications for sexual violence intervention. Medical students gain practical skills to address trauma in residency, while public health students shape policy. These research efforts have resulted in best practices and policy changes in Puerto Rico.

Objectives/Goals: Biomedical researchers must understand disease pathology mechanisms and participate in the translation of laboratory findings, research dissemination, and discovery implementation to improve health outcomes. Also, they need experience engaging diverse stakeholders. This requires intentional training as a translational scientist. Methods/Study Population: Our T32, pre-doctoral Translational Biomedical Sciences (TBS) Training Program addresses the 7 characteristics of a translational scientist: domain expert, boundary crosser, team player, process innovator, skilled communicator, systems thinker, and rigorous researcher. Core curriculum components include a clinical practicum where trainees shadow a clinical researcher; community-engaged research training with community member interactions to apply learned principles; a translational research informatics class with informatics, bioinformatics, and natural language processing training; a research seminar providing practical research dissemination and implementation experience; and a team science course where trainees learn to participate on/lead research teams. Trainees tailor the courses to their research areas. Results/Anticipated Results: Using the 7 characteristics of a translational scientist as a guiding framework, we developed five, one-semester courses (described above) integral to the development of the TBS trainees. The initial cohort of trainees are taking the classes, and they will evaluate the courses using Kirkpatrick’s Model, assessing reaction, learning, behavior, and results. The trainees will complete follow-up surveys annually throughout the doctoral program to evaluate ongoing changes in behavior and results. At semester end, trainees will also participate in focus groups to provide feedback about the courses, their relevance to the characteristics of a translational scientist, and barriers and facilitators to the development of the 7 characteristics. Iterative changes will be made to the courses based on trainees’ feedback. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The TBS Program will provide a comprehensive educational experience that prepares trainees for successful, independent research careers in the broad area of translational science as well as equipping them with the confidence to work across disciplines with diverse stakeholders to design, disseminate, and implement their research.

Objectives/Goals: Micro-credentials (MCs) or digital badges are short programs designed to allow learners to gain knowledge and skills at their own pace to tailor their professional development. This study aims to examine the characteristics of learners completing MCs and explore their motivation for pursuing MCs through the University at Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) program. Methods/Study Population: Currently, the CTSI offers five MCs in Effective Teaching, Good Clinical Practice, Responsible Research, Scientific Communication, and Translational Teamwork. Individuals who completed an MC (2019–2024) were identified by the UB Office of Micro-credentials. An invitation email and two reminders were sent to all individuals who received MCs asking them to complete a short online survey in July-August 2024. The survey included three questions about the type(s) of MCs completed, learners’ motivation for pursuing MCs, and perceived or actual benefits of completing an MC. The questions included multiple choice, select all that apply, and open-ended format, respectively. The survey was sent using Google Forms; data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. We received 25 completed surveys (29% response rate). Results/Anticipated Results: Since 2019, 85 individuals completed MCs at Buffalo CTSI including 21 faculty, 18 trainees, 26 students, and 20 staff. The most popular MC, Responsible Research (65% of completers), is based on the Responsible Conduct of Research series, which consists of modules on authorship ethics, ethical use of animals (IACUC) and human subjects (IRB), conflicts of interest/commitment, and responsible data acquisition and management. We found that 33% of responders were motivated to obtain the MC to advance their career and for professional development, 30% for lifelong learning, and 23% intended to use the badges to showcase their proficiency to potential employers. The greatest benefits reported were to obtain knowledge/skills for their professional career (46%) and improve their ability to receive research funding (14%). Discussion/Significance of Impact: Micro-credentials are valuable learning tools to stay current on changing research requirements, with ability to engage asynchronously. Badges also provide unique professional development opportunities for students and research workforce (staff and community stakeholders) who have limited resources (time and money).