Objectives/Goals: Children with chronic respiratory technology needs (CRTN) are becoming a dominant patient group in pediatric intensive care units (ICUs). However, little is known about patient-level, long-term outcomes in this population. The lack of such knowledge may lead to inadequate ICU therapies, interventions, or follow-up care. Methods/Study Population: This project will deploy a set of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) modules measuring real-time functioning as well as standardized instruments to measure child and family outcomes including health care utilization, physical functioning, and health-related quality of life following pediatric critical illness in children with CRTN. EMA has particular strength in assessing conditions where individual-level characteristics vary over time, as after critical illness. EMA’s recurrent measurements allow for evaluation of the variables’ temporal course and limit the potential for bias associated with recall surveys. Pulmonary function in children with CRTN in this study will be monitored over time using standardized pulmonary metrics and information from home respiratory machines. Results/Anticipated Results: This work tests the central hypothesis that long-term functional outcomes in children with CRTN are predicted by multimodal data obtained during and shortly after critical illness. To date, 17 families (of a planned 70) have been enrolled. Adherence to EMA modules is high, with 80% completion. Following serial data collection at 3, 6, and 9 months after hospital discharge, phenotypes of recovery (including improvement, stability, or deterioration) will be described. This will include 1) describing the patient demographic and clinical features associated with each long-term outcome trajectory and 2) identifying subgroups with similar outcome trajectories using patient demographics, features of the clinical illness, and EMA data using both traditional biostatistical and causal analysis techniques. Discussion/Significance of Impact: This project will provide important insights into the long-term outcomes following critical illness of children with CRTN while utilizing an innovative methodology. This proposal will provide the necessary information to drive future clinical trials assessing potential interventions at a number of different points to improve outcomes.

Objectives/Goals: Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) shift participation outside traditional sites. This poster explores innovative administrative strategies for incorporating decentralized elements, improving flexibility, access, and efficiency in clinical research. Methods/Study Population: Modern administrative approaches are crucial for unlocking DCT potential by streamlining logistics, enhancing participant experience, and ensuring regulatory compliance. Key innovations include expedited IRB Review: using innovative template language; innovative consent strategies – eConsent and remote/virtual and contactless enrollment; telehealth communications – Twilio (voice calls and text messages)/Zoom (virtual video visits); automated participant compensation and rideshare services – Greenphire ClinCard®; flexible data collection – automated recruitment/intake forms and research surveys – REDCap; mobile research unit/self-collection lab kits via mail. Implementing decentralization into your study unlocks the potential to rapidly recruit more diverse populations. Results/Anticipated Results: The integration of decentralized elements into clinical trials holds significant potential for reducing participant burden, thereby improving recruitment, retention, and overall trial efficiency. However, the success of decentralized clinical trials relies heavily on the implementation of modern administrative approaches that streamline operations and maintain regulatory compliance. Together, these administrative advancements not only enhance the operational flexibility of decentralized trials but also support the inclusion of diverse populations by reducing geographical and logistical barriers. Discussion/Significance of Impact: As decentralized clinical trials continue to evolve, the adoption and further innovation of modern administrative solutions will be essential in improving the overall efficiency and inclusivity of clinical research.

Objectives/Goals: The Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway is responsible for faithful DNA damage repair. FA mutations are common in multiple types of cancer, including HPV-negative head and neck cancers. We sought to identify synthetic lethal genes within this pathway to target treatment of FA-mutant tumors through siRNA- and chemical-compound-based screens. Methods/Study Population: First, we completed siRNA-based and chemical compound-based screening assays to identify gene targets that reduce patient derived Fanconi pathway mutant cell (FA-D2) viability compared to Fanconi pathway proficient cells (FA-D2 + FANCD2). Five aurora kinase (AURK) inhibitors from the compound screen were chosen for further evaluation. Cell lines were treated with AURK inhibitors or siRNA-based AURK knockdown to assess viability, proliferation, DNA repair, and cell cycle progression differences. Patient mutational, mRNA expression, and outcome data were accessed through The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) portal and the Caris CODEai portal. We stratified patients by tumor AURKA and AURKB mRNA levels and assessed differences in patient survival, tumor grade, and DNA repair proficiency. Results/Anticipated Results: In both screens, AURKA came up as a target to selectively reduce the growth of FA-D2 cells compared to FA-D2 + FANCD2 cells. All five AURK inhibitors identified showed selective growth inhibition (~50–75%) in FA-D2 cells at low nanomolar doses. We narrowed our selection to hesperadin, an AURKB-specific inhibitor, which showed the highest selectivity. siRNA knockdown of AURKA and AURKB decreased cell viability by 50% and 20%, respectively. Patients with FA-mutated tumors from the TCGA pan-cancer dataset had high AURKA (twofold) and AURKB (threefold) mRNA expression. AURKA and AURKB tumor mRNA expression was significantly associated with poor patient survival. Homologous recombination deficiency scores were increased ~5-fold (p Discussion/Significance of Impact: We hypothesize that in FA-deficient backgrounds, loss of AURKA or AURKB leads to heightened genomic instability due to cell cycle dysregulation and accumulated DNA damage. Our findings warrant investigation of the therapeutic potential for AURK inhibitors, specifically hesperadin, in FA-mutant head and neck cancers.

Objectives/Goals: Failure to achieve recruitment goals results in termination of ~20% of clinical trials and delays >85% of trial timelines. We aim to develop an electronic heath record (EHR)-based recruitment tool to ease identification of participants. We sought to determine whether criteria listed on clinicaltrials.gov could support selection of tool variables. Methods/Study Population: To inform the variables to include in the EHR-based recruitment tool, we data scraped clinicaltrials.gov to identify key inclusion and exclusion criteria common across a variety of diabetes clinical trials. We included actively recruiting or recently active phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of adults aged >18 years of age in the USA. We classified identified variables as clinically relevant or not and compared clinically relevant terms with inclusion and exclusion criteria (~20 variables) that were individually identified by three diabetes clinical trialists and two clinical research coordinators (CRCs). Results/Anticipated Results: We reviewed 203 clinical trials listed on clinicaltrials.gov. We identified 115 terms, 91 of which were clinically relevant. Three of 3 clinical trialists, 1 of 2 CRCs, and all trials listed age as a key variable. Consistent with data scraping, all trialists and CRCs identified glucose-lowering medications and kidney function as important criteria. Gender, ethnicity, and race were less commonly noted on clinicaltrials.gov and listed by 2 of 3 trialists and one CRC. Cardiovascular conditions (e.g., history of myocardial infarction), thyroid function tests, and contraceptive requirements were common criteria on clinicaltrials.gov, but only one trialist and one CRC identified these variables. Active infections (e.g., HIV) and c-peptide were not highlighted by trialists or CRCs but common on clinicaltrials.gov. Discussion/Significance of Impact: An EHR-based recruitment tool may facilitate identification of trial participants, but identifying key variables to include is essential. We found that data scraping for variables on clinicaltrials.gov mostly aligned with expert opinion, suggesting that automating variable selection via extraction from clinicaltrials.gov may be acceptable.

Objectives/Goals: The UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) training programs have been optimized by clinical research experts since 2013. They inculcate an interest in clinical and translational research careers. The acquisition of new skillsets and early exposure to potential career opportunities often influence lifetime decision-making. Methods/Study Population: The first program, in 2013, was the CTSI Research Associates Program (CTSI-RAP), which exposes undergraduate students to clinical research opportunities. RAP students are now mentoring high school students in the Mentoring and Advocacy in Teaching Clinical and Health-Related Research (MATCH) program. The Fiat Lux seminar is a research course designed to allow freshman students to explore diverse interests. The Leveraging Amazing Undergraduates in Clinical Research at UCLA Health (LAUNCH) program continues the workforce development pipeline by recruiting and training recent graduates to enter clinical research study coordinator careers. Each of these programs has their own stellar track records in terms of high interest and satisfaction and are assessed by annual evaluations from stakeholders. Results/Anticipated Results: CTSI-RAP is in its 11th year and a recent 10-year impact survey demonstrated the value of the program to students and their career decision-making especially those who are underserved and/or disadvantaged. The MATCH program arose from the interest of RAP students to mentor STEM high school students from local disadvantaged schools and is now in its 4th year across the state. The Fiat Lux freshman seminar began with a clinical research essentials emphasis, followed by an FDA/regulatory focus, and is now evolving to highlighting specific innovative areas of research with this year’s course spotlighting Cellular & Gene Therapy/Regenerative Medicine. LAUNCH is now in its third year, having been inspired by graduating RAP students wishing to continue in clinical research and feedback from their own focus groups. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The UCLA CTSI has supported these highly successful workforce development pipeline programs, which have had a demonstrated impact on students and the overall institutional clinical research infrastructure. Their stellar reputations generate high interest at UCLA and serve as model programs for implementation at other academic medical centers.

To evaluate the design of I-Corps@NCATS as a translational scientist training program, we mapped specific elements of the program’s content and pedagogy to the characteristics of a translational scientist, as first defined by Gilliland et al. []: systems thinker, process innovator, boundary spanner, team player, and skilled communicator. Using a mixed-methods evaluation, we examined how the I-Corps@NCATS training program, delivered across twenty-two Clinical and Translational Science Award Hubs, impacted the development of these key translational scientist characteristics.

Objectives/Goals: The impact of the program on alumni students was measured in a 2023 survey, which assessed key factors and student perspectives on motivation to apply/remain in the program, their engagement activities, how they used the skills acquired in RAP upon graduating, and if they were currently serving in a health profession and/or clinical research. Methods/Study Population: Survey questions were based upon specific components of CTSI-RAP that make it unique. Covered topics related to motivation for participation, meaningful experiences, program effectiveness, future use of RAP knowledge/training, and current career roles in the health professions and/or clinical research. The survey was built and analyzed in REDCap and deployed May–July 2023. The study received exempt certification from the IRB. The survey was sent to 123 alumni from the 2013 to 2021 cohorts. Bounced e-mails were followed up on and two reminder e-mails were sent to initial non-responders. Identifiable demographic information was separated from program evaluation questions for analysis. A subanalysis was performed to determine program impact on students who identified as underserved or disadvantaged. Results/Anticipated Results: Respondents included 82/123 (66.7%) alumni. The survey took approximately 15 minutes. Most of the students 64/82 (78.0%) had 1 year or less research experience. The top three motivating factors for joining the RAP program were gaining clinical research experience, exposure to healthcare settings, and interest in pursuing a healthcare related career. Most alumni rated the overall effectiveness of the RAP program as very or somewhat valuable and the majority felt that the program ranked high or very high among their undergraduate experiences. The program was very influential or influential in defining their long-term plans and goals. Just under half felt that their career aspirations were changed or influenced by the program, which was especially true for those who identified as underserved/disadvantaged. Discussion/Significance of Impact: CTSI-RAP alumni highly value their experience in the program. They have benefitted professionally and are motivated to keep their connection to the program alive. With a decade of clinical research excellence and programming, CTSI-RAP’s impact is well established as a proven model benefiting both students and the clinical research infrastructure.

Multi-site and multi-organizational teams are increasingly common in epidemiologic research; however, there is a lack of standards or best practices for achieving success in collaborative research networks in epidemiology. We summarize our experiences and lessons learned from the Diabetes Location, Environmental Attributes, and Disparities (LEAD) Network, a collaborative agreement between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and research teams at Drexel University, New York University, Johns Hopkins University and Geisinger, and the University of Alabama at Birmingham. We present a roadmap for success in collaborative epidemiologic research, with recommendations focused on the following areas to maximize efficiency and success in collaborative research agreements: 1) operational and administrative considerations; 2) data access and sharing of sensitive data; 3) aligning network research aims; 4) harmonization of methods and measures; and 5) dissemination of findings. Future collaborations can be informed by our experiences and ultimately dedicate more resources to achieving scientific aims and efficiently disseminating scientific work products.

Objectives/Goals: Highlight the importance of community engagement: Showcase how the involvement of Promotoras de Salud is critical for fostering trust and encouraging participation in clinical trials. Cultural relevance and adaptation: Underline the importance of cultural and contextual relevance in developing and refining clinical research tools. Methods/Study Population: The theater test, an interactive evaluation approach akin to a dress rehearsal in theater, was conducted with approximately 60 Promotoras de Salud at a community center near the US-Mexico border. The Promotoras were divided into four groups, each focusing on one domain of the toolkit and facilitated discussions provided critical feedback on the materials and methods. A community engagement liaison with the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center played a key role in introducing the EXPLORE team to these community leaders, leveraging long-standing relationships that predate this project. Results/Anticipated Results: Post-testing evaluations showed that 97% of the Promotoras were likely to encourage clinical trials in their communities, and 86% saw significant benefits for their community members. The Promotoras provided key insights and recommendations to enhance the toolkit’s cultural and contextual relevance. The community engagement liaison created a bilingual infographic to share these insights, which was presented at a Promotoras meeting, fostering meaningful discussion about clinical trials. Discussion/Significance of Impact: This project underscores the importance of community voices in research, transforming feedback into actionable insights for public health. Engaging Promotoras through theater testing validated the EXPLORE Toolkit and strengthened ties between clinical research and communities impacted by the opioid crisis.

Objectives/Goals: Our research goal is to translate medical guidelines for adolescent-centered contraceptive counseling into improved clinical practice. Here, we describe the process of co-designing a training program for adolescent-serving primary care clinicians with teen, caregiver, and clinician advisory boards. Methods/Study Population: We recruited teens, caregivers, and clinicians residing in North Carolina to participate in three virtual advisory boards separated by role. Eligible teen advisors were assigned female at birth and 15–19 years old; eligible clinicians provided care for teen patients; and all groups were purposively sampled to reflect diverse identities and experiences. At each advisor meeting, we used human-centered design techniques to elicit participant priorities, generate training content and engagement strategies, and obtain feedback on the final training program. We conducted a focus group at our final meetings and used rapid qualitative analysis to understand our advisors’ experiences participating in program co-development. Results/Anticipated Results: We partnered with 20 advisors with diverse identities across geographic location, race and ethnicity, sexuality, and experiences with disability. During 15 meetings from January to May 2024 (five with each advisor group), we developed a 3-hour virtual, synchronous training for adolescent-serving primary care providers to improve their contraceptive counseling skills. The curriculum includes five interactive modules and a resource toolkit. Advisors described motivations to participate (e.g., chance to share their perspective, desire to make change), positive experiences with the advisory boards (e.g., opportunities to learn, to connect with others), and opportunities for improvement (e.g., better technology orientation). Discussion/Significance of Impact: We describe developing a successful longitudinal partnership with three community advisory boards and co-creating a training program that incorporates community-led priorities and perspectives, including youth. This approach can be adapted for other clinician training programs seeking to center community voices.

There is a growing trend for studies run by academic and nonprofit organizations to have regulatory submission requirements. As a result, there is greater reliance on REDCap, an electronic data capture (EDC) widely used by researchers in these organizations. This paper discusses the development and implementation of the Rapid Validation Process (RVP) developed by the REDCap Consortium, aimed at enhancing regulatory compliance and operational efficiency in response to the dynamic demands of modern clinical research. The RVP introduces a structured validation approach that categorizes REDCap functionalities, develops targeted validation tests, and applies structured and standardized testing syntax. This approach ensures that REDCap can meet regulatory standards while maintaining flexibility to adapt to new challenges. Results from the application of the RVP on recent successive REDCap software version releases illustrate significant improvements in testing efficiency and process optimization, demonstrating the project’s success in setting new benchmarks for EDC system validation. The project’s community-driven responsibility model fosters collaboration and knowledge sharing and enhances the overall resilience and adaptability of REDCap. As REDCap continues to evolve based on feedback from clinical trialists, the RVP ensures that REDCap remains a reliable and compliant tool, ready to meet regulatory and future operational challenges.

Participant representation, including the Good Participatory Practice guidelines, in the design and execution of clinical research can profoundly affect research structure and process. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, an online registry called the Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes (HERO) Registry, was launched to capture the experiences of healthcare workers (HCWs) on the pandemic frontlines. It evolved into a program that distributed COVID-19-related information and connected participants with COVID-19-related research opportunities. Furthermore, a subcommittee of HCWs was created to inform the COVID-19-related clinical research, engagement, and communication efforts. This paper, coauthored by the HERO HCW subcommittee, describes how it was formed, the impact of community participation on the HERO Registry and Research Program, reflections on lessons learned, and implications for future research. Engagement of the HCW Subcommittee resulted in representing their lived experience and ensured that their perspectives as HCWs were incorporated into the HERO Research. The strategies not only supported recruitment and retention efforts but also influenced the HERO research team in framing research questions and data collection pertinent to the participant community. This experience demonstrated the importance of having participants’ input as expert advisors to an investigative team in their research efforts during a global health emergency.

Objectives/Goals: People experiencing homelessness (PEH) face excess cervical cancer burden and unique barriers to screening. As part of a broader study addressing cervical cancer disparities in homeless populations in Indiana, our goal was to engage unhoused women in a human-centered design process to inform a homeless shelter-based self-sampling intervention. Methods/Study Population: An established community-academic partnership enabled meaningful engagement of homeless communities in Indiana and informed the need to understand and address cervical cancer disparities in this population. Rapid assessment surveys (n = 202) and in-depth interviews (n = 30) were conducted with PEH at two major shelters in Indianapolis and Lafayette to understand cervical cancer screening coverage, knowledge, attitudes, and practices; barriers and facilitators; and acceptability of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling for onsite shelter-based screening. A human-centered design session with (n = 12) unhoused women further explored motivators and concerns regarding self-sampling and informed key messages and informational materials to encourage uptake of screening. Results/Anticipated Results: At least 37% were overdue for screening (last screened >5 years ago; 50% were last screened >3 years ago), far greater than national (22%) or state (24%) averages. Despite common misconceptions regarding indifference toward preventive healthcare among homeless populations, most (87%) wanted to be screened and believed it is important for their health. Competing priorities for daily survival, transportation, cost, provider mistrust, stigma, and related trauma were common barriers to screening. Enthusiasm for HPV self-sampling centered on convenience, privacy, and comfort in taking one’s own sample at the shelter. Notable concerns included lack of confidence regarding ability to self-sample correctly, unhygienic conditions in shelter restrooms, preference to be seen by a doctor, and the need for education. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The unique challenges of PEH require human-centered strategies to improve cervical cancer screening access. Willingness to be screened and acceptability of HPV self-sampling is high. Identified concerns and preferences will guide implementation of HPV self-sampling delivered by trusted community health workers in homeless shelters in Indiana.

Objectives/Goals: 1. Examine structural, interpersonal, and health system factors that impact postpartum well-being for people who are racialized Black. 2. Differentiate components of postpartum well-being. 3. Design a model of postpartum care that addresses comprehensive well-being. Methods/Study Population: We conducted eight focus groups with participants in the Washington, D.C. area including four with Black birthing people who had given birth in the past two years (n = 23), and four with staff and providers from Community of Hope, a federally qualified health center, who provide care to birthing people (n = 19). We used an action-oriented qualitative approach informed by Black feminist theory. Our analysis was grounded in the 5D Cycle for Health Equity (reDefine, Discover, Dream, Design, and Deliver) and appreciative inquiry, which guide researchers to focus on strengths, be open to possibility, and engage radical imagination. Results/Anticipated Results: Participants reDefined postpartum health and wellness as physical, mental and social well-being, and material stability. Participants discovered that Black birthing people felt deeply unsupported navigating postpartum including difficulties with feeding, sleep, and mood and strongly believed that “postpartum” is at least a year, with different needs at different phases. Participants dreamed that postpartum care could be more accessible and trustworthy, have opportunities for social connection and creating a village, and have their basic needs (food, housing, clothing, and rest) met. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The participants’ conveyed that postpartum care must be designed and delivered to ensure that it is accessible, creates opportunities for connection, and promotes health, well-being, and joy. Postpartum care that can generate trust and engagement with healthcare, reduce morbidity and mortality, and increase thriving.

Electronic health records and patient portals are increasingly utilized to enhance research recruitment efficiency, yet response patterns across patient groups remain unclear. We examined 10 studies at Emory Healthcare that used these tools to identify and recruit 24,000 patients over 1 year. Response rates were lower among males and Black individuals, though study interest was higher among respondents. Interest was also greater among those with frequent healthcare interactions and lower comorbidity. In a large academic health system, portal-based recruitment offered a streamlined approach to research recruitment and patient engagement, with minor variations across patient characteristics warranting continued study.