Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:30:57.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democratic Consolidation in East Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

CHONG-MIN PARK
CHONG-MIN PARK*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Administration, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we attempt to describe how ordinary people in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan view democracy and its authoritarian alternatives and how they experience institutional practices of their democracies to determine the extent of cultural and institutional democratization. The analysis of the 2006 AsiaBarometer Survey data shows that although the citizens of East Asian democracies unequivocally reject military authoritarian rule, they are ambivalent toward civilian authoritarian rule, and are not yet fully committed to democracy. The analysis also shows that they are not satisfied with the provision of civil rights and institutions of horizontal accountability, but remain highly satisfied with voting rights, which suggests that East Asian democracies are not adequately liberal, though unmistakably electoral, in the eyes of ordinary people. On the basis of this finding, we conclude that East Asian democracies fail to achieve a high-level equilibrium between the popular demand for democracy and the institutional supply of democracy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , December 2007 , pp. 305 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, Daniel A. (1995), ‘Democracy in Confucian Societies: The Challenge of Justification’, in Bell, Daniel A., Brown, David, Jayasuriya, Kanishka, and Jones, David Martin (eds), Toward Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia, New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael, Mattes, Robert, and Gyimah-Boadi, E. (2005), Public Opinion, Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas (2002), ‘The End of the Transition Paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, 13 (1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for International Development and Conflict Management (2006), Polity IV, available online at: www.cidcm.umd.edu/polity. (accessed on 2 November 2006).Google Scholar
Chu, Yun-han, Diamond, Larry, and Shin, Doh Chull (2001), ‘Halting Progress in Korea and Taiwan’, Journal of Democracy, 12 (1): 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins (1999), Paths toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croissant, Aurel (2004), ‘From Transition to Defective Democracy: Mapping Asian Democratization’, Democratization, 11 (5): 156–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1971), Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. (2004), Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry (1999), Developing Democracy toward Consolidation, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry (2002), ‘Thinking about Hybrid Regimes’, Journal of Democracy, 13 (2): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry and Morlino, Leonardo (2004), ‘The Quality of Democracy: An Overview’, Journal of Democracy, 15 (4): 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, David (1965), A Systems Analysis of Political Life, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Economist (2006), The World in 2007, available online at: www.economist.com/theworldin. (accessed on 22 November 2006).Google Scholar
Freedom House (2006), Freedom in the World, available online at: www.freedomhouse.org. (accessed on 4 November 2006).Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1991), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan A. (2002), ‘The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism’, Journal of Democracy, 13 (2): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan and Stepan, Alfred (1996), Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa (ed.) (1999), Critical Citizens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Chong-Min and Shin, Doh Chull (2006), ‘Do Asian Values Deter Popular Support for Democracy in South Korea?’, Asian Survey, 46 (3): 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pharr, Susan J. and Putnam, Robert D. (eds) (2000), Disaffected Democracies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam (1986), ‘Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy’, in O'Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe C., and Whitehead, Laurence (eds), Transition from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspective, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, Mishler, William, and Haerpfer, Christian (1998), Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull (2007), ‘Democratization: Perspectives from Global Citizenries’, in Dalton, Russell J. and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull and Wells, Jason (2005), ‘Is Democracy the Only Game in Town’, Journal of Democracy, 16 (2): 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel (2006), ‘How Did Europe Democratize?’ World Politics, 58 (2): 311–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar