Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T21:12:37.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negative priors and inferences from absence of evidence in cognitive and linguistic archaeology: Epistemically sound and scientifically strategic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2025

Aritz Irurtzun Open the ORCID record for Aritz Irurtzun [Opens in a new window]
Aritz Irurtzun*
Affiliation:
CNRS-IKER (UMR 5478), Bayonne, France. [email protected] https://iker.cnrs.fr/z-aritz-irurtzun/
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article provides an important warning but its general conclusions should be nuanced: (i) When there is no evidence for it, we should depart from the hypothesis that a species lacks a particular cognitive capacity, and (ii) inferences from absence of evidence can be epistemically sound and scientifically strategic in cognitive and linguistic archaeology.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e11
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beckers, G. J. L, Bolhuis, J. J., Okanoya, K., & Berwick, R. C. (2012). Birdsong neurolinguistics: Songbird context-free grammar claim is premature. NeuroReport, 23(3), 139–145. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834f1765CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyno, G., & Demir, S. (2022). Plant-mycorrhiza communication and mycorrhizae in inter-plant communication. Symbiosis, 86, 155–168. doi: 10.1007/s13199-022-00837-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camps, M., & Uriagereka, J. (2006). The Gordian knot of linguistic fossils. In Rosselló, J. & Martín, J. (Eds.), The biolinguistic turn. Issues on language and biology (pp. 34–65). PPU.Google Scholar
Fitch, W. T., & Hauser, M. D. (2004). Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science, 303, 377–380. doi: 10.1126/science.108940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallistel, C. R. (1998). Symbolic processes in the brain: The case of insect navigation. In Scarborough, D. & Sternberg, S. (Eds.), Invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 4, pp. 1–51). MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/3967.003.0004Google Scholar
Gallistel, C. R. (2011). Prelinguistic thought. Language Learning and Development, 7(4), 253–262. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2011.578548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M. D. (1996). The evolution of communication. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569–1579. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (1989). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach. Open Court.Google Scholar
Oaksford, M., & Hahn, U. (2004). A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 75–85. doi: 10.1037/h0085798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, C. (2011). A Bayesian approach to absent evidence reasoning. Informal Logic, 31(1), 56–65. doi: 10.22329/il.v31i1.2967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R., & Darvill, T. (2022). What haven't we found? Recognising the value of negative evidence in archaeology. Antiquity, 96(388), 955–967. doi: 10.15184/aqy.2022.69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallach, E. (2019). Inference from absence: The case of archaeology. Palgrave Communications, 5, 94. doi: 10.1057/s41599-019-0307-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar