Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:35:53.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multi-floor buildings and human wayfinding cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2013

Christoph Hölscher ,
Simon Büchner  and
Gerhard Strube
Christoph Hölscher
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Science & SFB/TR8 Spatial Cognition, University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany. [email protected]://portal.uni-freiburg.de/cognition/members/[email protected]://portal.uni-freiburg.de/cognition/members/[email protected]://portal.uni-freiburg.de/cognition/members/strube
Simon Büchner
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Science & SFB/TR8 Spatial Cognition, University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany. [email protected]://portal.uni-freiburg.de/cognition/members/[email protected]://portal.uni-freiburg.de/cognition/members/[email protected]://portal.uni-freiburg.de/cognition/members/strube
Gerhard Strube
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Science & SFB/TR8 Spatial Cognition, University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany. [email protected]://portal.uni-freiburg.de/cognition/members/[email protected]://portal.uni-freiburg.de/cognition/members/[email protected]://portal.uni-freiburg.de/cognition/members/strube
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Multilevel wayfinding research in environmental psychology and architecture exhibits a strong compatibility with Jeffery et al.'s “bicoded” representation of space. We identify a need for capturing verticality in spatial analysis techniques such as space syntax and argue for investigating inter-individual differences in the ability to mentally integrate the cognitive maps of separate floors in buildings.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , October 2013 , pp. 551 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benedikt, M. L. (1979) To take hold of space: Isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 6:47–65.Google Scholar
Büchner, S., Hölscher, C. & Strube, G. (2007) Path choice heuristics for navigation related to mental representations of a building. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European Cognitive Science Conference, Delphi, Greece, 23–27 May, 2007, ed. Vosniadou, S., Kayser, D. & Protopapas, A., pp. 504–509. Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Carlson, L., Hölscher, C., Shipley, T. & Conroy Dalton, R. (2010) Getting lost in buildings. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(5):284–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy Dalton, R. (2003) The secret is to follow your nose: Route path selection an angularity. Environment and Behavior 35(1):107–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy Dalton, R. (2005) Space syntax and spatial cognition. World Architecture 185:41–47, 107–111.Google Scholar
Frankenstein, J., Büchner, S. J., Tenbrink, T. & Hölscher, C. (2010) Influence of geometry and objects on local route choices during wayfinding. In: Spatial Cognition VII: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Spatial Cognition, Mt. Hood/Portland, OR, USA, August 15-19, 2010, ed. Hölscher, C., Shipley, T. F., Belardinelli, M. O., Bateman, J. A. & Newcombe, N. S., pp. 41–53. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillier, B. & Hanson, J., eds. (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hölscher, C., Büchner, S., Brösamle, M., Meilinger, T. & Strube, G. (2007) Signs and maps – Cognitive economy in the use of external aids for indoor navigation. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society, ed. McNamara, D. S. & Trafton, J. G., pp. 377–82. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Hölscher, C., Büchner, S., Meilinger, T. & Strube, G. (2009) Adaptivity of wayfinding strategies in a multi-building ensemble: The effects of spatial structure, task requirements, and metric information. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(2):208–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölscher, C., Brösamle, M. & Vrachliotis, G. (2012) Challenges in multi-level wayfinding: A case-study with space syntax technique. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39:63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölscher, C., Meilinger, T., Vrachliotis, G., Brösamle, M. & Knauff, M. (2006) Up the down staircase: Wayfinding strategies and multi-level buildings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26(4):284–99.Google Scholar
Montello, D. R. (2005) Navigation. In: The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking, ed. Shah, P. & Miyake, A., pp. 257–94. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peponis, J., Zimring, C. & Choi, Y. K. (1990) Finding the building in wayfinding. Environment and Behavior 22(5):555–90.Google Scholar
Soeda, M., Kushiyama, N. & Ohno, R. (1997) Wayfinding in cases with vertical motion. In: Proceedings of MERA 97: International Conference on Environment-Behavior Studies, ed. Takahashi, T. & Nagasawa, Y., pp. 559–64, University of Tokyo and Man-Environment Relations Association.Google Scholar
Tlauka, M., Wilson, P. N., Adams, M., Souter, C. & Young, A. H. (2007) An investigation into vertical bias effects. Spatial Cognition and Computation 7(4):365–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisman, J. (1981) Evaluating architectural legibility: Way-finding in the built environment. Environment and Behavior 13(2):189–204.Google Scholar
Wiener, J. M., Hölscher, C., Büchner, S. & Konieczny, L. (2012) Gaze behaviour during space perception and spatial decision making. Psychological Research 76(6):713–29.Google Scholar