Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Olivera-La Rosa, Antonio
Arango-Tobón, Olber Eduardo
and
Ingram, Gordon P.D.
2019.
Swiping right: face perception in the age of Tinder.
Heliyon,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 12,
p.
e02949.
Freeman, Jonathan B.
Stolier, Ryan M.
and
Brooks, Jeffrey A.
2020.
Vol. 61,
Issue. ,
p.
237.
Bagnis, Arianna
Caffo, Ernesto
Cipolli, Carlo
De Palma, Alessandra
Farina, Gabriele
and
Mattarozzi, Katia
2020.
Judging health care priority in emergency situations: Patient facial appearance matters.
Social Science & Medicine,
Vol. 260,
Issue. ,
p.
113180.
Pandeirada, Josefa N. S.
Fernandes, Natália Lisandra
and
Vasconcelos, Marco
2020.
Attractiveness of Human Faces: Norms by Sex, Sexual Orientation, Age, Relationship Stability, and Own Attractiveness Judgements.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 11,
Issue. ,
Bringsén, Åsa
Sjöbeck, Johanna
and
Petersson, Pia
2021.
Nursing staff’s experience of appearance issues in various nursing situations.
BMC Nursing,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
Sollerhed, Ann-Christin
and
Bringsén, Åsa
2023.
Appearance between professionalism and work-related stress among marketing employees.
Work,
Vol. 75,
Issue. 4,
p.
1231.
Oh, DongWon
Wedel, Nicole
Labbree, Brandon
and
Todorov, Alexander
2023.
Trustworthiness judgments without the halo effect: A data-driven computational modeling approach.
Perception,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 8,
p.
590.
Rosa, Antonio Olivera-La
Villacampa, Javier
Corradi, Guido
and
Ingram, Gordon P. D.
2023.
The creepy, the bad and the ugly: exploring perceptions of moral character and social desirability in uncanny faces.
Current Psychology,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 2,
p.
1146.
Gruszczynski, Mike
Brown, Danielle K.
Pierce, Haley
and
Grabe, Maria E.
2023.
Facing the Competition: Gender Differences in Facial Emotion and Prominence in Visual News Coverage of Democratic Presidential Primary Candidates.
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,
Vol. 100,
Issue. 3,
p.
498.
Heim, Maria
2023.
The Workings of Contempt in Classical Indian Texts.
Emotion Review,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 3,
p.
216.
Olivera-La Rosa, Antonio
Aristizábal, Eliana
and
Tapias Medina, Yesid Felipe
2024.
¿Por qué somos tan susceptibles a los sesgos derivados de la percepción del rostro?.
Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
p.
13.
Olivera-La Rosa, Antonio
Ayala, Luis D.
and
Tamayo, Ricardo M.
2024.
When being unattractive is an advantage: effects of face perception on intuitive culpability judgments.
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,
p.
1.
Target article
Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology
Related commentaries (25)
An assessment of the mating motive explanation of the beauty premium in market-based settings
Attention and memory benefits for physical attractiveness may mediate prosocial biases
Attentional and affective biases for attractive females emerge early in development
Attractiveness bias: A cognitive explanation
Attractiveness biases are the tip of the iceberg in biological markets
Context matters for attractiveness bias
Evolutionary explanations for financial and prosocial biases: Beyond mating motivation
Explanations for attractiveness-related positive biases in an evolutionary perspective of life history theory
How should we tackle financial and prosocial biases against unattractive people?
Is there an alternative explanation to the evolutionary account for financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive individuals?
It is not all about mating: Attractiveness predicts partner value across multiple relationship domains
Just My Imagination: Beauty premium and the evolved mental model
Mating motives are neither necessary nor sufficient to create the beauty premium
Omitted evidence undermines sexual motives explanation for attractiveness bias
Oxytocin drives prosocial biases in favor of attractive people
Prosocial behavior as sexual signaling
Strong but flexible: How fundamental social motives support but sometimes also thwart favorable attractiveness biases
The biasing effects of appearances go beyond physical attractiveness and mating motives
The out-of-my-league effect
The type of behavior and the role of relationship length in mate choice for prosociality among physically attractive individuals
The wolf will live with the lamb
There is more: Intrasexual competitiveness, physical dominance, and intrasexual collaboration
Tinbergen's “four questions” provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people
Understanding the physical attractiveness literature: Qualitative reviews versus meta-analysis
What does evolutionary theory add to stereotype theory in the explanation of attractiveness bias?
Author response
Moving forward with interdisciplinary research on attractiveness-related biases