Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:19:24.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is there an alternative explanation to the evolutionary account for financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive individuals?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2017

Junhua Dang
Junhua Dang*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Lund University, 22350 Lund, Sweden. [email protected]://www.psy.lu.se/en/junhua-dang
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

All three critical points of the evolutionary explanation proposed by Maestripieri et al. may not withstand close scrutiny. Instead, there should be an alternative explanation that has nothing to do with genetic continuity, but stresses the rewarding property of attractiveness that results mainly from sociocultural value assignment and sexual experience pursuit.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e25
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buss, D. M. (2003) The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating, 4th edition. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dakanalis, A. & Riva, G. (2013) Mass media, body image and eating disturbances: The underlying mechanism through the lens of the objectification theory. In: Body image: Gender differences, sociocultural influences and health implications, ed. Sams, L. B. & Keels, J. A., pp. 217–36. Nova Science.Google Scholar
Enquist, M. & Arak, A. (1994) Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature 372:169–72.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W. & Scheyd, G. J. (2005) The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology 34:523–48.Google Scholar
Gray, A. W. & Boothroyd, L. G. (2012) Female facial appearance and health. Evolutionary Psychology 10:66–77.Google Scholar
Hunt, J., Bussiere, L. F., Jennions, M. D. & Brooks, R. (2004) What is genetic quality? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:329–33.Google Scholar
Ishai, A. (2007) Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex. International Journal of Psychophysiology 63(2):181–85.Google Scholar
Kalick, S. M., Zebrowitz, L. A., Langlois, J. H. & Johnson, R. M. (1998) Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal data on an evolutionary question. Psychological Science 9:8–13.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T. & Gutierres, S. E. (1980) Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38:131–40.Google Scholar
Little, A. C. (2014) Facial attractiveness. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 5:621–34.Google Scholar
O'Doherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., Perrett, D., Burt, D. M. & Dolan, R. J. (2003) Beauty in a smile: The role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia 41:147–55.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. (2006) The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 57:199–266.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K. & Larsen, R. J. (1999) Facial attractiveness and physical health. Evolution and Human Behavior 20:71–76.Google Scholar
Shanks, D. R., Vadillo, M. A., Riedel, B., Clymo, A., Govind, S., Hickin, N., Tamman, A. J. F. & Puhlmann, L. M. C. (2015) Romance, risk, and replication: Can consumer choices and risk taking be primed by mating motives? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144:e142–58.Google Scholar
Weeden, J. & Sabini, J. (2005) Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: A review. Psychological Bulletin 131:635–53.Google Scholar
Winston, J. S., O'Doherty, J., Kilner, J. M., Perrett, D. I. & Dolan, R. J. (2007) Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia 45:195–206.Google Scholar
Yu, D. W. & Shepard, G. H. Jr. (1998) Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature 396:321–22.Google Scholar