Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Eisenbruch, Adar B.
Grillot, Rachel L.
and
Roney, James R.
2019.
Why Be Generous? Tests of the Partner Choice and Threat Premium Models of Resource Division.
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3,
p.
274.
Lobmaier, Janek S.
Probst, Fabian
Fischbacher, Urs
Wirthmüller, Urs
and
Knoch, Daria
2020.
Pleasant body odours, but not genetic similarity, influence trustworthiness in a modified trust game.
Scientific Reports,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
Eisenbruch, Adar
and
Roney, James
2020.
Social Taste Buds: Evidence of Evolved Same-Sex Friend Preferences from a Policy-Capturing Study.
Evolutionary Psychological Science,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 3,
p.
195.
Eisenbruch, Adar B.
Smith, Kristopher M.
Workman, Clifford I.
von Rueden, Christopher
and
Apicella, Coren L.
2024.
US adults accurately assess Hadza and Tsimane men's hunting ability from a single face photograph.
Evolution and Human Behavior,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 4,
p.
106598.
Target article
Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology
Related commentaries (25)
An assessment of the mating motive explanation of the beauty premium in market-based settings
Attention and memory benefits for physical attractiveness may mediate prosocial biases
Attentional and affective biases for attractive females emerge early in development
Attractiveness bias: A cognitive explanation
Attractiveness biases are the tip of the iceberg in biological markets
Context matters for attractiveness bias
Evolutionary explanations for financial and prosocial biases: Beyond mating motivation
Explanations for attractiveness-related positive biases in an evolutionary perspective of life history theory
How should we tackle financial and prosocial biases against unattractive people?
Is there an alternative explanation to the evolutionary account for financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive individuals?
It is not all about mating: Attractiveness predicts partner value across multiple relationship domains
Just My Imagination: Beauty premium and the evolved mental model
Mating motives are neither necessary nor sufficient to create the beauty premium
Omitted evidence undermines sexual motives explanation for attractiveness bias
Oxytocin drives prosocial biases in favor of attractive people
Prosocial behavior as sexual signaling
Strong but flexible: How fundamental social motives support but sometimes also thwart favorable attractiveness biases
The biasing effects of appearances go beyond physical attractiveness and mating motives
The out-of-my-league effect
The type of behavior and the role of relationship length in mate choice for prosociality among physically attractive individuals
The wolf will live with the lamb
There is more: Intrasexual competitiveness, physical dominance, and intrasexual collaboration
Tinbergen's “four questions” provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people
Understanding the physical attractiveness literature: Qualitative reviews versus meta-analysis
What does evolutionary theory add to stereotype theory in the explanation of attractiveness bias?
Author response
Moving forward with interdisciplinary research on attractiveness-related biases