Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:32:37.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Think local, act global: How do fragmented representations of space allow seamless navigation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2013

Paul A. Dudchenko ,
Emma R. Wood  and
Roderick M. Grieves
Paul A. Dudchenko
Affiliation:
School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LAUnited Kingdom. [email protected]@stir.ac.uk Centre for Cognitive and Neural Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom. [email protected]
Emma R. Wood
Affiliation:
Centre for Cognitive and Neural Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom. [email protected]
Roderick M. Grieves
Affiliation:
School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LAUnited Kingdom. [email protected]@stir.ac.uk Centre for Cognitive and Neural Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this commentary, we highlight a difficulty for metric navigation arising from recent data with grid and place cells: the integration of piecemeal representations of space in environments with repeated boundaries. Put simply, it is unclear how place and grid cells might provide a global representation of distance when their fields appear to represent repeated boundaries within an environment. One implication of this is that the capacity for spatial inferences may be limited.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , October 2013 , pp. 548 - 549
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, C., Lever, C., Hayman, R., Hartley, T., Burton, S., O'Keefe, J., Jeffery, K. J. & Burgess, N. (2006) The boundary vector cell model of place cell firing and spatial memory. Reviews in the Neurosciences 17(1–2):71–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derdikman, D., Whitlock, J. R., Tsao, A., Fyhn, M., Hafting, T., Moser, M. & Moser, E. I. (2009) Fragmentation of grid cell maps in a multicompartment environment. Nature Neuroscience 12(10):1325–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudchenko, P. A. & Zinyuk, L. E. (2005) The formation of cognitive maps of adjacent environments: Evidence from the head direction cell system. Behavioral Neuroscience 119(6):1511–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuhs, M. C., VanRhoads, S. R., Casale, A. E., McNaughton, B. L. & Touretzky, D. S. (2005) Influence of path integration versus environmental orientation on place cell remapping between visually identical environments. Journal of Neurophysiology 94:2603–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grieves, R. M. & Dudchenko, P. A. (2013) Cognitive maps and spatial inference in animals: Rats fail to take a novel shortcut, but can take a previously experienced one. Learning and Motivation 44:81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, T., Burgess, N., Lever, C., Cacucci, F. & O'Keefe, J. (2000) Modelling place fields in terms of the cortical inputs to the hippocampus. Hippocampus 10:369–79.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayman, R., Verriotis, M. A., Jovalekic, A., Fenton, A. A. & Jeffery, K. J. (2011) Anisotropic encoding of three-dimensional space by place cells and grid cells. Nature Neuroscience 14(9):1182–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Keefe, J. & Burgess, N. (1996) Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons. Nature 381:425–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skaggs, W. E. & McNaughton, B. L. (1998) Spatial firing properties of hippocampal CA1 populations in an environment containing two visually identical regions. Journal of Neuroscience 18:8455–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiers, H. J., Jovalekic, A. & Jeffery, K. J. (2009) The hippocampal place code – Multiple fragments or one big map? Society of Neuroscience Abstracts, No. 101.28. [Society of Neuroscience Meeting Planner 2009, Chicago, IL, Program No. 101.28.] (Online).Google Scholar
Stackman, R. W., Golob, E. J., Bassett, J. P. & Taube, J. S. (2003) Passive transport disrupts directional path integration by rat head direction cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 90:2862–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taube, J. S. & Burton, H. L. (1995) Head direction cell activity monitored in a novel environment and during a cue conflict situation. Journal of Neurophysiology 74(5):1953–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitlock, J. R. & Derdikman, D. (2012) Head direction maps remain stable despite grid map fragmentation. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 6, article 9. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2012.00009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed