Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:44:03.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The inherence heuristic is inherent in humans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2014

James A. Hampton
James A. Hampton*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, City University London, London EC1V OHB, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.staff.city.ac.uk/hampton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The inherence heuristic is too broad as a theoretical notion. The authors are at risk of applying their own heuristic in supporting itself. Nonetheless the article provides useful insight into the ways in which people overestimate the coherence and completeness of their understanding of the world.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , October 2014 , pp. 490 - 491
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyd, R. (1999) Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In: Species: New interdisciplinary essays, ed. Wilson, R. A., pp. 141–85. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heussen, D. & Hampton, J. A. (2008) Ways of explaining properties. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. Love, B. C., McRae, K. & Sloutsky, V. M., pp. 143–48. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
O'Connor, P. T. & Kellerman, S. (2009) Origins of the specious: Myths and misconceptions of the English language. Random House.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1960) Word and object. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rozenblit, L. R. & Keil, F. C. (2002) The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science 26:521–62.Google Scholar