Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:11:44.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grounding together: Shared reality and cleansing practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2021

Maya Rossignac-Milon Open the ORCID record for Maya Rossignac-Milon [Opens in a new window]  and
E. Tory Higgins Open the ORCID record for E. Tory Higgins [Opens in a new window]
Maya Rossignac-Milon
Affiliation:
Management Division, Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York, [email protected]
E. Tory Higgins
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Columbia University, New York, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We propose that cleansing behaviors and other acts of separation or connection have more powerful effects when they are grounded in shared practices – in a shared reality. We conceptualize sensorimotor and shared reality effects as synergistic. Most potent should be physical behaviors performed collectively as a shared practice (e.g., communal bathing), grounded both in sensorimotor experience and in shared reality.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 44 , 2021 , e20
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boothby, E. J., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2014). Shared experiences are amplified. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2209–2216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boothby, E. J., Smith, L. K., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2016). Psychological distance moderates the amplification of shared experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(10), 1431–1444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., & Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 496–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In Sorrentino, R. M. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Vol. 3. The interpersonal context (pp. 28–84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (2016). Shared-reality development in childhood. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 466–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, E. T., Nakkawita, E., Rossignac-Milon, M., Pinelli, F., & Jun, Y. (2020). Making the Right decision: Intensifying the worth of a Chosen Option. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(4), 712–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 320–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rossignac-Milon, M., Bolger, N., Zee, K. S., Boothby, E., & Higgins, E. T. (2020). Merged minds: Generalized shared reality in dyadic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance Online Publication.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (2013). Socially situated cognition in perspective. Social Cognition, 31(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar