The standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR) is the metric for reporting antimicrobial use that hospitals will be mandated to use in 2024. We highlight limitations of the SAAR and caution against efforts to use it for public reporting and financial reimbursement. Before the SAAR is ready for public reporting, it needs to include patient-level risk adjustment and antimicrobial resistance data as well as improved hospital location options and revised antimicrobial agent groupings to appropriately reflect and incentivize important stewardship work.

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) often recurs in patients aged ≥65 years and those with comorbidities. Clinical trials often exclude patients with history of immunosuppression, malignancy, renal insufficiency, or other comorbidities. In a phase 3 trial (ECOSPOR III), SER-109 was superior to placebo in reducing recurrent CDI (rCDI) risk at week 8 and was well tolerated. We report integrated safety data for SER-109 in a broad patient population through week 24 from phase 3 studies: ECOSPOR III and ECOSPOR IV. Methods: ECOSPOR III was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in participants with ≥2 CDI recurrences randomized 1:1 to placebo or SER-109. ECOSPOR IV was an open-label, single-arm study conducted in 263 patients with rCDI enrolled in 2 cohorts: (1) rollover participants from ECOSPOR III with on-study recurrence and (2) participants with ≥1 CDI recurrence, inclusive of the current episode. In both studies, the investigational product was administered as 4 oral capsules over 3 days. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected through week 8; serious TEAEs and TEAEs of special interest (ie, bacteremia, abscess, meningitis) were collected through week 24. Results: In total, 349 participants received SER-109 in ECOSPOR III and/or ECOSPOR IV (mean age 64.2; 68.8% female). Chronic diseases included cardiac disease (31.2%), immunocompromised or immunosuppressed (21.2%), diabetes (18.9% ), and renal impairment or failure (13.2%). Overall, 221 (63.3%) of 349 participants who received SER-109 experienced TEAEs through week 24. Most were mild to moderate and gastrointestinal. The most common (>5% of participants) treatment related TEAEs were flatulence, abdominal pain and distension, decreased appetite, constipation, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. No participants experienced a treatment-related TEAE leading to study withdrawal. Invasive infections were observed in 28 participants (8%); those with identified pathogens were unrelated to SER-109 species, and all were deemed unrelated to treatment by the investigators. There were 11 deaths (3.2%) and 48 participants (13.8%) with serious TEAEs, none of which were deemed treatment related. There were no clinically important differences in the safety profile across subgroups of sex, race, prior antibiotic regimen, or number of CDI recurrences. No safety signals were observed in participants with renal impairment or failure, diabetes, cardiac disease, or immunocompromised or immunosuppressed individuals. Conclusions: In this integrated analysis of phase 3 trials, SER-109, an investigational microbiome therapeutic, was well tolerated in this vulnerable patient population with prevalent comorbidities. No infections, nor those with identified pathogens, were attributed to SER-109 or product species. This safety profile might be expected because this purified product is composed of spore-forming Firmicutes normally abundant in the healthy microbiome.

Financial support: This study was funded by Seres Therapeutics.

Disclosures: None

Objectives: In this study, we compared the performance of a rapid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method in detecting carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) and its impact on infection prevention and control (IPC) measures compared with a culture PCR method. Methods: All patients requiring CPO screening were included. Rectal swabs were collected with double rayon swabs (Copan 139C). They were simultaneously analyzed for the presence of CPOs using rapid PCR assay (Xpert Carba-R assay, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) and a culture–PCR method (ChromID CARBA-SMART, bioMerieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France). For CARBA-SMART, only colored colonies (ie, Enterobacterales) were evaluated for CPOs according to the prevailing institutional protocol. We tracked time to CPO detection. Using CPO positivity from either the rapid PCR or the culture PCR method as the gold standard, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of both tests. We calculated the number of epidemiologically linked contacts generated when the first test results were known. We prospectively followed the ward census to identify the putative additional number of contacts generated by the later known result. Contacts were patients who shared the same ward (with overlapping time) as the CPO patients. Results: Between April 2019 and June 2020, culture PCR method detected CPOs in 316 (1.3%) of 24,514 samples (blaOXA48, N = 211; blaNDM, N = 51; blaIMI, N = 21; blaIMP, N = 10; blaKPC, N = 9; mixed genotypes, N = 14). The rapid PCR test detected CPOs in 605(2.5%) of 24,514 samples (blaOXA48, N = 266; blaNDM, N = 161; blaIMP, N = 99; blaVIM, N = 29; blaKPC, N = 15; mixed genotypes, N = 35). The sensitivity of direct PCR and culture PCR methods were 94.2% (95% CI, 92.1%–95.8%) and 43.5% (95% CI, 39.6%–47.4%), respectively. Both tests had 100% specificity. The median times to detection for the rapid PCR and culture PCR methods were 3–4 hours and 4 days, respectively. Compared with rapid PCR, the culture PCR method generated additional 7,415 contacts when it also tested positive for CPOs and an additional 23,135 contacts when it tested negative for CPOs. Conclusions: In our study, the rapid PCR test was more sensitive, identified CPO faster, and generated fewer epidemiologically linked contacts than the culture PCR method.

Background: Pediatric patients often require central venous catheters (CVCs) for a variety of clinical indications, including medication administration, parenteral nutrition, and venous blood sampling. Patients with CVCs are at risk for central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). These hospital-acquired infections are often preventable and may lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Clinicians at a 477-bed, freestanding pediatric academic hospital completed a quality improvement project to identify factors that place pediatric patients at increased risk for CLABSI and to outline strategies aimed at CLABSI reduction for our highest-risk patients. Methods: Project leaders completed a literature review to evaluate current research on the topic and then assembled a project team. The team completed a retrospective analysis and categorization of CLABSI cases and reviewed internal CLABSI root-cause analysis data. The group then completed a case–control analysis to identify risk factors in patients with CVCs who developed CLABSIs, compared to patients with CVCs who did not develop CLABSI. Following this analysis, the team created a CLABSI risk-factor tool for use by bedside nurses. This tool described patients with CLABSI risk factors and outlined best practices for CLABSI prevention. Results: Based upon literature review, root-cause analysis data, and retrospective CLABSI case review over the period from 2017 to 2021, an initial list of 9 potential CLABSI risk factors was compiled. A case–control analysis was performed comparing 97 CLABSI cases with 103 matched controls. Univariate, multivariate, and additional covariate analyses were employed to identify 3 factors placing pediatric patients at increased risk for CLABSI. These included (1) multiple enteral devices (ie, 2 or more devices, including gastrostomy tube, jejunostomy tube, gastrostomy or jejunostomy tube, ostomy, and peritoneal drain); (2) multiple CVC entries (ie, CVC used for medications and venous sampling); and (3) long-term CVC plus parenteral nutrition (CVC in place for >21 days and receiving parenteral nutrition and/or intralipids). Conclusions: Pediatric patients with central venous access are vulnerable to CLABSI, and certain patients may be at increased risk. Frontline clinicians may be able to identify these patients and adopt best practices to prevent infection. A tool for use by bedside nurses can be a useful adjunct to existing CLABSI prevention practices.

Disclosures: None

Background: Information regarding catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) among patients on hemodialysis in the Philippines is lacking. Objective: In this study, we described the clinical profile, CRBSI incidence density, and outcomes of patients in a single-center hemodialysis unit. Methods: A retrospective review of patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) through a central venous catheter (CVC) from January 2016 to December 2020 in a tertiary-care, private hospital was performed. Baseline demographic data were recorded, and CRBSI incidence density rates (no. of CRBSIs per 1,000 catheter days) were calculated. Results: Of 868 hemodialysis patients (57%), 499 used a CVC and were followed for 182,135 catheter days. Half were male (248 of 499, 49.7%) with a median age of 62 years (range, 24–90). Only 48 (9.6%) of 499 developed CRBSI, with an overall CRBSI incidence of 2.63 per 1,000 catheter days. Of those with CRBSI, 31 (64.6%) of 48 were female. The median age was 74.5 years (range, 30–90). Hypertension (40 of 48, 83.3%) and diabetes mellitus (26 of 48, 54.2%) were frequent comorbidities. Fever with chills was the most common symptom, occurring in 30 (62.5%) of 48 patients. Both gram-positive (n = 24) and gram-negative (n = 25) organisms were isolated. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common gram-positive isolate (14 of 25, 56%); isolates from the order Enterobacterales (12 of 24, 50%) were the most common gram-negative organisms. More CRBSIs occurred among those with a nontunneled versus tunneled CVCs (28 vs 20). The median time to CRBSI occurrence was 7 weeks (range, 0.43–280) from CVC insertion. The most common empiric treatment was either vancomycin (n = 28) or piperacillin-tazobactam (n = 26), which were also used in combination (11 of 28, 39.3%). Treatment involved CVC removal in most patients (34 of 48, 70.8%), either alone (n = 1), or with systemic antibiotic therapy (SAT; n = 16), or SAT plus antibiotic lock therapy (ALT; n = 17). The remainder (14 of 48, 29.2%) retained their CVCs because of difficult access, and received both SAT and ALT. Attributable mortality (6 of 9, 33%) and overall mortality (9 of 48, 18.5%) were high. Mortality of those whose CVC was retained was lower compared to those whose line was removed: (3 of 9, 33%) versus (6 of 9, 66%). Conclusions: The overall CRBSI rate in our hemodialysis unit was low and occurred more commonly in the older age group with a nontunneled CVC. Both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens were common. CRBSI was associated with high attributable mortality. Successful treatment often required CVC, SAT, and ALT. However, CVC retention was a viable option in some patients with specific limiting factors such as difficult access.

Disclosures: None

Objectives: Rapid and accurate screening for carbapenemase-producing organism (CPOs) in hospitalized patients is critical for infection control and prevention. The Xpert Carba-R assay is designed for rapid detection of CPOs, but 1 assay is usually conducted for only 1 sample. We evaluated a pooling strategy for CPO screening using the Xpert Carba-R assay. Methods: Swab sets containing 2 swabs were collected from 415 unique patients at Peking University People’s Hospital. One swab was used for the pooling test, in which 5 swabs from different patients were mixed in 1 sample treatment solution. The prevalence of CPOs in the hospital (5.3%) predicted that 5:1 pooling was most economical. As the reference method, the other swab was tested by culture using sequencing. Results: Of 415 samples, 383 were CPO negative using the pooling test strategy and 31 were positive. All samples that were negative by pooling were negative by culture and sequencing. Among the 31 positive samples identified by the pooling strategy, 26 were positive by culture and sequencing (including 24 samples with 1 targeted gene and 2 samples with double targeted genes, 1 NDM+/IMP+ and 1 VIM+/IMP+), and 5 were negative. Overall, 198 tests were conducted in the study, and 217 were saved compared with testing individually. The efficiency of the pooling strategy was 215%. The overall sensitivity was 1 (95% CI, 0.840–1), the specificity was 0.987 (95% CI, 0.968–0.995), the accuracy was 0.987 (95% CI, 0.970–0.996), positive predictive value was 0.838 (95% CI, 0.655–0.939), and the negative predictive value was 1 (95% CI, 0.988–1). Conclusions: The pooling strategy using the Xpert Carba-R assay showed good potential in screening CPO with good sensitivity and a significantly lower cost.

Background: Central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates increased nationally during COVID-19, the drivers of which are still being characterized in the literature. CLABSI rates doubled during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant surge at our rural academic medical center. We sought to identify potential drivers of CLABSIs by comparing period- and patient-specific characteristics of this COVID-19 surge to a historical control period. Methods: We defined the study period as the time of highest COVID-19 burden at our hospital (July 2021–June 2022) and the control period as the previous 2 years (July 2019–June 2021). We compared NHSN CLABSI standardized infection ratios (SIRs), central-line standardized utilization ratios (SURs), completion of practice evaluation tools (PETs) for monitoring of central-line bundle compliance, and proportions of traveling nurses. We performed chart reviews to determine patient-specific characteristics of NHSN CLABSIs during these periods, including demographics, comorbidities, central-line characteristics and care, and microbiology. Results: The CLABSI SIR was significantly higher during the study period than the control period (0.89 vs 0.52; P = .03); the SUR was significantly higher during the study period (1.08 vs 1.02; P < .01); the PET completion per 100 central-line days was significantly lower during the study period (23.0 vs 31.5; P < .01); and the proportion of traveling nurses was significantly higher during the study period (0.20 vs 0.08; P < .01) (Fig. 1). Patients with NHSN CLABSIs during the study period were more likely to have a history of COVID-19 (27% vs 3%; P = .01) and were more likely to receive a higher level of care (60% vs 27%; P = .02). During the study period, more patients had multilumen catheters (87% vs 61%; P = .04). The type of catheter, catheter care (ie, dressing changes and chlorhexidine bathing), catheter duration before CLABSI, and associated microbiology were similar between the study and control periods (Table 1). Conclusions: During the SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant surge, the increase in CLABSIs at our hospital was significantly associated with increased central-line utilization, decreased PET completion, and increased proportion of traveling nurses. Critical illness and multilumen catheters were significant patient-specific factors that differed between CLABSIs from the study and control periods. We did not observe differences in catheter type, duration, or catheter care. Our study highlights key modifiable risk factors for CLABSI reduction. These findings may be surrogates for other difficult-to-measure challenges related to the culture of safety during a global pandemic, such as staff education related to infection prevention and daily review of central-line necessity.

Disclosures: None

Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance is a serious threat to health and economic well-being worldwide. The impact of antibiotic-resistant infections is reflected by higher mortality, increased lengths of hospital stay (LOS), and increased healthcare costs. We analyzed the direct healthcare costs attributable to treating patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in a tertiary-care referral hospital in Vietnam. Methods: A retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in an intensive care unit (ICU) in the University Medical Center in Ho Chi Minh City from June 2018 to September 2019. Participants were ICU patients diagnosed with either MRSA or CRE infection, and patients infected with non–multidrug-resistant organisms (non-MDROs) were used as the comparison group. Medical records were obtained to collect data on medical services expenditures such as medications, diagnostic testing, medical procedures, and hospital rooms. Statistical significance was determined using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests for comparing the average costs and the χ2 test for comparing the proportions. Results: In total, 227 patients, including 37 MRSA-infected patients, 97 CRE-infected patients, and 93 non–MDRO-infected patients, were included in the study. The additional average healthcare costs for a treatment episode of a CRE infection case (367.7 million VND or ~US $16,000) and of a MRSA infection case (139.1 million VND or ~US $6,043) were 3.8 times higher (P < .001) and 1.5 times higher (P < .001), respectively, than the average cost for a non-MDRO case (94.8 million VND or ~US $4,121). Resource use for a CRE infection was higher than that for MRSA infection, with longer antibiotic treatment (13.4 additional days), greater LOS (15.8 additional days), and higher costs (additional 228.6 million VND or ~US $9,939). Conclusions: Multidrug-resistant infections create a heavy economic burden in a low- to middle-income country like Vietnam. The elevated cost was mainly due to longer antibiotic treatment and increased LOS.

Background: Central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are an important public health issue. Recent data from the CDC have shown an increase in healthcare-associated infections (including CLABSI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the main aim of this project was to analyze the epidemiology of central-line–associated bloodstream infection during different periods at the Baystate Medical Center (Springfield, MA) before, during, and after COVID-19 peaks of infection. Methods: Two specific periods were considered during the year (quarter January–March and quarter July–September) to consider potential seasonal variations, and the incidence of CLABSI during those 2 quarters was analyzed for 4 different years: 2019 (prepandemic), 2020–2021 (intrapandemic), and 2022 (postpandemic). An analysis of the microbial pathogens causing line infections was also performed to investigate differences described by other authors. Results: In total, 97 CLABSI (all from different patients) were reported into the NHSN website during the 8 periods considered. The average age of the patients was 55 years, with a male:female ratio of 57%:43%, and 14 renal patients were on dialysis. The CLABSI rates ranged from a minimum of 1.11 in Q1 of 2020 (start of COVID) to a maximum of 2 in Q3 of 2021 (SARS-CoV-2 delta variant) (Table 1). A statistical comparison of the pre–COVID-19 period with the respective quarters during the pandemic years (2020, 2021, and 2022) did not show any significant differences (Table 2). In term of microbiological data, of the 97 patients with CLABSIs, most of the patients (n = 70) had only 1 pathogen isolated, 14 patients had 2 pathogens, and 3 patients had 3 pathogens, bringing the total number of bacteria cultured to 117. Candida spp and Enterococcus spp were the most frequently isolated pathogens at 19% and 13%, respectively (Fig. 1). There was no statistically significant difference between the pre–COVID-19 and intra–COVID-19 periods for Candida spp (rate ratio, 1.391; 95% CI, 0.5477–3.533; P = .48) or Enterococcus spp (rate ratio, 2.385; 95% CI, 0.8365–6.798; P = .09). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic did not seem to have an impact on the local epidemiology at Baystate Medical Center in terms of CLABSI rates or type of pathogens causing infections, but the sample size taken into consideration may not have been powerful enough to detect statistical significance.

Note. This project was carried out as part of Dr Satta’s MPH requirements at UMass.

Disclosures: None

Objectives: The identification and classification of carbapenemases are meaningful in clinical treatment, epidemiology, and multidrug-resistant bacteria control. We sought to identify the proportion of carbapenemase-producing and carbapenemase classifications in gram-negative bacilli in our hospital. Methods: Isolates of gram-negative bacilli were extracted from sputum, blood, and urine samples in a medical center in Ho Chi Minh City. The identification of gram-negative bacilli was performed using the Phoenix M50 automated system (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). An antibiogram was conducted using the disk-diffusion method to detect meropenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Carbapenemase confirmation and classification of isolates resistant or intermediately resistant to meropenem were performed using the NMIC500 CPO kit on the Phoenix M50 system. Results: Among 599 isolates of gram-negative bacilli, 108 isolates were resistant or intermediately resistant to carbapenem (meropenem). Of these108 isolates, 107 (99.1%) were resistant due to the carbapenemase-producing mechanism. The proportions of resistant or intermediately resistant isolates to carbapenem were as follows: 73.8% for Acinetobacter baumannii, 26.4% for Klebsiella pneumoniae, 25.9% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 2.8% for Escherichia coli. Class D carbapenemase accounted for the highest proportion, with 53 (49.5%) of 107 isolates, followed by class B with 31 isolates (29%), and class A with the lowest proportion of 2 isolates (1.9%). Also, 44.4% of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates and 74.4% of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates produced class D carbapenemase. Conclusions: Gram-negative bacilli are resistant to carbapenem primarily due to the carbapenemase-secreting mechanism. D-class carbapenemase accounted for the highest percentage, followed by B-class type, and A-class carbapenemase in gram-negative bacilli.

The national influenza pandemic response plan includes short-term school closures as an infection mitigation measure, based on modeling data regarding the role of pediatric populations and schools as drivers of disease spread. Modeled estimates regarding the role of children and their in-school contacts as drivers of community transmission of endemic respiratory viruses were used in part to justify prolonged school closures throughout the United States. However, disease transmission models extrapolated from endemic pathogens to novel ones may underestimate the degree to which spread is driven by population immunity and overestimate the impact of school closures as a means of reducing child contacts, particularly in the longer-term. These errors, in turn, may have caused incorrect estimations about the potential benefits of closing schools on a society level while simultaneously failing to account for the significant harms of long-term educational disruption.

Pandemic response plans need to be updated to include nuances regarding drivers of transmission such as pathogen type, population immunity, and contact patterns, and disease severity in different groups. Expected duration of impact also needs to be considered, recognizing that effectiveness of different interventions, particularly those focused on limiting social interactions, are short-lived. Additionally, future iterations should include risk–benefit assessments. Interventions that are particularly harmful to certain groups, such as school closures are on children, should be de-emphasized and time limited. Finally, pandemic responses should include ongoing and continuous policy re-evaluation and should include a clear plan for de-implementation and de-escalation.

Background: Central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) significantly burden the US population and healthcare system. Reporting facilities in Tennessee consistently omit race and ethnicity data in the NHSN despite having the option to enter. Racial and ethnic disparities are well documented across many health outcomes, including patient safety. CLABSIs were compared among 3 racial groups to better understand the impact of race on CLABSI incidence in Tennessee. Methods: CLABSI data from NHSN were linked with records from the TN Hospital Discharge Data System (HDDS) for 2018–2021. A multivariable linear regression model was used to determine relative risk (RR) between racial groups for contracting a CLABSI after controlling for confounding variables including Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and social vulnerability index (SVI) scores. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Data linkage and statistical analyses were performed in SAS version 9.4 software. Results: In Tennessee between 2018 and 2021, 342 (17.2%) of the 1,980 CLABSI events had race documented, and no ethnicity variables exist in the NHSN. The data linkage process yielded a 72% match (1,426 CLABSIs). The remaining 28% were excluded from the analysis. Per 1,000 central-line days (CL days) for all races, white patients had the highest CLABSI rate (17.5), followed by Black patients (1.36), and Native American or Alaskan Native patients (0.68). Per 1,000 admissions by race, Black patients had a higher CLABSI rate (1.26) than Native American/Alaskan Native patients (0.85) and white patients (0.75). The risk of contracting a CLABSI was 79% higher in Black patients than in white patients (RR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.55–2.07; P < .0001) when controlling for CCI, age group, and SVI. Conclusions: These results suggest that racial disparities between Black and white patients are present in Tennessee hospitals regarding CLABSIs. Although most CLABSI events were linked to HDDS patients, there were limitations in the ability to match all cases and calculate CL days by race. This study highlights the need for complete race and ethnicity data in the NHSN. Further studies should examine infection types at the regional and facility levels to target interventions for reducing HAI inequities in Tennessee.

Disclosures: None

Objectives: Carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CP-CRE) are nosocomial pathogens, and control of CP-CRE transmission is one of the most important infection control issues healthcare organizations face today. Increasing colonization acquisition and clinical infections of CP-CRE occurred in our institution in 2019. In this observational study, we monitored CP-CRE acquisition following implementation of multimodal control measures, and we describe the impact of this intervention on clinical infections. Methods: Increased hospital-acquired CP-CRE colonization and clinical infections were observed in early 2019. Increased CP-CRE surveillance was implemented to include CP-CRE contacts, patients with lengths of stay >7 days, patients with a recent history of hospitalization in other hospitals, and renal dialysis patients. The following interventions were also implemented: (1) isolation or placing CP-CRE patients in cohorts in a designated multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) ward; (2) emphasis on hand hygiene and contact precautions; (3) mandatory use of gown and gloves for predefined ‘high-risk’ nursing activities, including diaper changing, toilet assistance, wound dressing, and handling urine or stool; (4) enhanced environmental and equipment cleaning; (5) regular audit and feedback regarding compliance; and (6) weekly feedback on ward-level CP-CRE acquisition. CP-CRE colonization cases and clinical infections were tracked by infection prevention and control nurses. Results: The hospital-acquired CP-CRE colonization rate was 4.39 per 10,000 patient days in 2019; it decreased slightly to 3.61 in 2020 and remained steady at 3.77 in 2021. The predominant CP-CRE genes were NDM, OXA-48–like, and KPC. There were 12 hospital-acquired CP-CRE infections in 2019, a rate of 0.37 per 10,000 patient days. This incidence decreased to 6 infections in 2020 and 3 infections in 2021, with corresponding infection rates of 0.19 and 0.09 per 10,000 patient days, respectively. Conclusions: Control of CP-CRE remains extremely challenging in hospitals with multibed open wards. A bundle approach to infection control showed a gradual reduction in CP-CRE cases, with a significant impact on the prevention of clinical infections.

Background: The Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP) observed increased mortality among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients with central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) starting in 2017. In this study, we compared NICU patients with CLABSIs before and after 2017, and quantified the impact of epidemiological factors on 30-day survival. Methods: We included 1,276 NICU patients from 8–16 participating CNISP hospitals from the pre-2017 period (2009–2016) and the post-2017 period (2017–2022) using standardized definitions and questionnaires. We used Cox regression modeling to assess the impact of age at date of positive culture, sex, birthweight, CLABSI microorganism, region of the country, and surveillance period (before 2017 vs after 2017) on time to 30-day all-cause mortality from date of positive culture. Gestational age was not available for this analysis. We reported model outputs as hazard ratios with 95% CIs. Results: In total, 769 (60%) NICU CLABSIs were reported in the pre-2017 period and 507 (40%) in the post-2017 period. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 8% (n = 100 of 1,276) overall, and significantly higher after 2017 (12%, n = 61 of 507) than before 2017 (5%, n = 39 of 769) (P < .001).

During the post-2017 period, cases were significantly younger: 16 days (IQR, 9–33) versus 21 days (IQR, 11–49) (P = .002). Median days from ICU admission to infection were shorter: 14 (IQR, 8–31) versus 19 (IQR, 10–41) (P < .001). More gram-negative CLABSIs were identified (29% vs 24%; P = .040) and fewer gram-positive CLABSIs were identified (64% vs 72%; P = .006) compared to the pre-2017 period. Mortality was higher in CLABSIs caused by gram-negative bacteria (15%, n = 50 of 328) than gram-positive bacteria (4.4%, n = 39 of 877) (P < .001), and mortality was higher in neonates with birthweight <1,000 g (11%, n = 71 of 673) compared to those weighing ≥1,000 g (5%, n = 28 of 560) (P < .001).

Adjusting for all other factors, survival modeling indicated that NICU CLABSIs identified in the post-2017 period had 2.12 (95% CI, 1.23–3.66) times the hazard ratio of 30-day all-cause mortality compared to those before 2017 (P < .006). Those identified with a gram-positive bacterium had a 0.28 hazard ratio (95% CI, 0.12–0.65) of 30-day mortality compared to those with a gram-negative bacterium or fungus (P = .003). In the fully adjusted model, age, sex, and birthweight were not significantly associated with NICU CLABSI survival. Conclusions: NICU patients with CLABSIs had significantly higher all-cause mortality between 2017–2022 compared to 2009–2016, and those who acquired gram-positive–associated CLABSIs had improved survival compared to other organisms. Further work is needed to identify and understand factors driving the increased mortality among NICU CLABSI patients from 2017–2022.

Disclosures: None

Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a major concern in Vietnam, mainly due to the inappropriate use of antibiotics. Appropriate antibiotic management enables us to minimize the likelihood of antibiotic resistance and the spread of resistant bacteria. We evaluated vancomycin and colistin resistance and related factors in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Hue Central Hospital, a national hospital in central Vietnam. Methods: Using a cross-sectional descriptive study, we enrolled 362 patients who were prescribed antibiotics and were admitted to the ICU in 2019. Pathogens isolated from 473 routine clinical samples were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing following the recommendations in the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute M100, 28th Edition. Colistin testing was performed using the broth microdilution method. Statistical significance was determined using the Fisher exact test. Results: The most commonly identified microorganisms were Acinetobacter baumannii (31.5%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (31.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12%), and Staphylococcus aureus (8.9%). All isolates of A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa tested with colistin were nonresistant. Moreover, >65% of A. baumannii isolates were resistant to all antibiotics except colistin. S. aureus had the highest resistance rate to erythromycin (80.6%), but no vancomycin-resistant isolates were identified. Factors associated with resistance to at least 1 antibiotic tested included length of stay (OR, 5.32; 95% CI, 1.47–19.17; P = .017), duration of antibiotics therapy (OR, 5.25; 95% CI, 1.46–18.95; P = .017), and the use of tracheal intubation and ventilator (OR, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.09–8.72; P = .038). Conclusions: These data indicated that although the vancomycin and colistin resistance rate is low, patients with longer length of stay, longer time on antibiotics, and invasive ventilation were at higher risk of AMR infection. Decreasing device use and strong antibiotic stewardship program at the hospital would help to reduce AMR infections.

We studied how patient beliefs regarding the need for antibiotics, as measured by expectation scores, and antibiotic prescribing outcome affect patient satisfaction using data from 2,710 urgent-care visits. Satisfaction was affected by antibiotic prescribing among patients with medium–high expectation scores but not among patients with low expectation scores.