Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:11:19.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2020

Henry Lovat
Henry Lovat
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Negotiating Civil War
The Politics of International Regime Design
 , pp. 303 - 356
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Abbott, Kenneth. International Relations Theory, International Law, and the Regime Governing Atrocities in Internal Conflicts American Journal of International Law 93, no. 2 (1999): 361–79.Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, Georges. Wars of National Liberation and the Laws of War. Annals of International Studies, Association des Anciens Etudiants de L’Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales, 3 (1972).Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, Georges. Wars of National Liberation and the Development of Humanitarian Law. In van Krieken, Peter J., Akkerman, Robert J and Pannenborg (eds.), Charles O., Declarations on Principles : A Quest for Universal Peace, 143–79. Leyden: Sijthoff, 1977.Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, Georges. Wars of National Liberation in the Geneva Conventions and Protocols. In Recueil Des Cours, 165:353–445. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1979.Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, Georges. Wars of National Liberation and the Laws of War. In Kratochwil, Friedrich V and Mendlovitz, Saul H (eds.), International Law: A Contemporary Perspective, 2:410–37. Boulder: Westview Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, Georges. Non-International Armed Conflicts. In UNESCO International Dimensions of Humanitarian Law, 217–40. Dordecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1988.Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, Georges. The Third World Intellectual in Praxis: Confrontation, Participation, or Operation behind Enemy Lines? Third World Quarterly 37, no. 11 (2016): 1957–71.Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, Rosemary. Droit humanitaire et conflits internes – Origines et évolution de la réglementation internationale. Geneva, Paris: Institut Henry-Dunant, Editions A. Pedone, 1986.Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, Rosemary. Humanitarian Law and Internal Conflicts: The Evolution of Legal Concern. In Delissen, Astrid J. M. and Tanja (eds.), Gerard J.,Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict: Challenges Ahead : Essays in Honour of Frits Kalshoven, 209–23. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1991.Google Scholar
Abplanalp, Philippe. The International Conferences of the Red Cross as a Factor for the Development of International Humanitarian Law and the Cohesion of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. International Review of the Red Cross, no. 308 (1995): 520–49.Google Scholar
Abresch, William. A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya. European Journal of International Law 16, no. 4 (2005): 741–67.Google Scholar
Abtahi, Hirad. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the ICC. Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, no. 3 (2005): 635–48.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates. In Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. 2nd edn., 112–44. London: Sage, 2013.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Haas, Peter. Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization 46, no. 1 (1992): 367–90.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo. Classification of Armed Conflicts: Relevant Legal Concepts. In Wilmshurst, Elizabeth (ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, 32–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias, Kessler, Oliver and Stetter, Stephan. On Order and Conflict: International Relations and the ‘Communicative Turn’. Review of International Studies 34, no. S1 (2008): 43–67.Google Scholar
Alderson, Kai. Making Sense of State Socialization. Review of International Studies 27, no. 3 (2001): 415–33.Google Scholar
Aldrich, George H. New Life for the Laws of War. American Journal of International Law 75, no. 4 (1981): 764–83.Google Scholar
Aldrich, George H. Some Reflections on the Origins of the 1977 Geneva Protocols. In Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et Essais Sur Le Droit International Humanitaire et Sur Les Principes de La Croix-Rouge En lhonneur de Jean Pictet = Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, 129–37. The Hague; Geneva: Martinus Nijhoff; International Committee of the Red Cross, 1984.Google Scholar
Aldrich, George H. Prospects for United States Ratification of Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions. American Journal of International Law 85, no. 1 (1991): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, George H. Notes from the Vietnam Peace Negotiations. (Unpublished).Google Scholar
Alexander, Amanda. A Short History of International Humanitarian Law. European Journal of International Law 26, no. 1 (2015): 109–38.Google Scholar
Alexander, Amanda. International Humanitarian Law, Postcolonialism and the 1977 Geneva Protocol I. Melbourne Journal of International Law 17 (2016): 15.Google Scholar
Allen, Rodney G., Cherniack, Martin, and Andreopoulos, George J.. Refining War: Civil Wars and Humanitarian Controls. Human Rights Quarterly 18 (1996): 747.Google Scholar
Allison, Roy. The Soviet Union and the Strategy of Non-Alignment in the Third World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. The Empire of International Law? American Journal of International Law 113, no. 1 (2019): 183–199.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E. Do Liberal States Behave Better? A Critique of Slaughters Liberal Theory. European Journal of International Law 12, no. 2 (2001): 183–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, José E. What Are International Judges For? The Main Functions of International Adjudication. In Romano, Cesare P. R., Alter, Karen and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, 158–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. The International Criminal Court: Making the Right Choices – Part I. Amnesty International, January 1997, available at: http://iccnow.org/documents/ALMakingRightChoises97PartI.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Anderson, Kenneth. The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-Governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society. European Journal of International Law 11 (2000): 91–120.Google Scholar
Anwar, Raja. The Terrorist Prince: The Life and Death of Murtaza Bhutto. London: Verso, 1997.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Westminster, UK: Christian Classics, 1981.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Politics: Books V and VI. Translated by David Keyt. Clarendon Aristotle Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. Civil Wars: A History in Ideas. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2017.Google Scholar
Arts, Bas. Non-State Actors in Global Governance. Preprints, Bonn: Max-Planck-Projektgruppe Recht Der Gemeinschaftsgueter, 2003, available at: https://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/85112/1/2003-04_online.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Australian Practice in International Law 1974–1975. Australian Year Book of International Law 13 (1975): 325.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert, Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.World Politics, Vol. 38, no. 1 (1985), 226–54.Google Scholar
Axworthy, Lloyd. Navigating a New World: Canadas Global Future. Toronto: Vintage, 2004.Google Scholar
Bacino, Leo J. Reconstructing Russia: U.S. Policy in Revolutionary Russia, 1917–1922. Kent: Kent State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond (eds.), Power in Global Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond. Power in International Politics. International Organization 59, no. 1 (2005): 39–75.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Barrett, Joseph. Chechnyas Last Hope – Enforced Disappearances and the European Court of Human Rights. Harvard Human Rights Journal 22 (2009): 133.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Olivier. Making Humanitarian Law in the Cold: The Cold War, the United State and the Genesis of the Geneva Conventions of 1949. IILJ Emerging Scholars Papers. New York University School of Law, 2008, available at: http://iilj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Barsalou-Making-Humanitarian-Law-in-the-Cold-2008.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Bartels, Rogier. Timelines, Borderlines and Conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross 91, no. 873 (2009): 35–67.Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Bass, Gary. Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bass, Gary. Freedom’s Battle: The Origins of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Knopf, 2008.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. The Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Documentary History. Ardsley: Transnational, 1998.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. Negotiating the Treaty of Rome on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court. Cornell International Law Journal 32 (1999): 443.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. The Legislative History of the International Criminal Court. Vol. 3. 3 vols. Ardsley: Transnational, 2005.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth Stubbins. Sophisticated Constructivism in Human Rights Compliance Theory. European Journal of International Law 25, no. 4 (2014): 1169–82.Google Scholar
Baxter, Hugh. System and Life-World in Habermass Theory of Communicative Action. Theory and Society 16, no. 1 (1987): 39–86.Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard R. The First Modern Codification of the Law of War – Francis Lieber and General Orders No. 100 (II). International Review of the Red Cross 3, no. 26 (1963): 234–50.Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard R. Humanitarian Law or Humanitarian Politics – The 1974 Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law. Harvard International Law Journal 16 (1975): 1–26.Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard R. Modernizing the Law of War. Military Law Review 78 (1977): 165–183.Google Scholar
Beach, Derek. Process-Tracing Methods in Social Science. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 2017, available at https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-176 [accessed 14 September 2019].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. What Is Process-Tracing Actually Tracing? The Three Variants of Process Tracing Methods and Their Uses and Limitations, 2011, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1902082 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. How Do I Know Mechanistic Evidence When I See It? A Four-Step Procedure for Tracing Causal Mechanisms in Case Study Research, 2017, available at: https://researchgate.net/publication/320100548_How_do_I_know_mechanistic_evidence_when_I_see_it_A_four-step_procedure_for_tracing_causal_mechanisms_in_case_study_research [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. Selecting Appropriate Cases When Tracing Causal Mechanisms. Sociological Methods & Research 47, no. 4 (2018): 837–871.Google Scholar
Beck, Robert J. International Law and International Relations: The Prospects for Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Journal of International Legal Studies 1 (1995): 119–50.Google Scholar
Bederman, David J. International Law in Antiquity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bedont, Barbara, and Matas, David. Negotiating for an International Criminal Court. Peace Magazine, Sept.–Oct. 1998: 21.Google Scholar
Behringer, Ronald M. The Human Security Agenda: How Middle Power Leadership Defied U.S. Hegemony. New York: Continuum International, 2012.Google Scholar
Bellinger, John B., III, and Haynes, William J. II. A US Government Response to the International Committee of the Red Cross Study Customary International Humanitarian Law. International Review of the Red Cross 89, no. 866 (2007): 443–71.Google Scholar
Benedetti, Fanny, Bonneau, Karine, and Washburn, John. Negotiating the International Criminal Court: New York to Rome, 1994–1998. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.Google Scholar
Benedetti, Fanny, and Washburn, John L.. Drafting the International Criminal Court Treaty: Two Years to Rome and an Afterword on the Rome Diplomatic Conference. Global Governance 5, no. 1 (1999): 1–37.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew. The Mother of All Isms: Causal Mechanisms and Structured Pluralism in International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (2013): 459–81.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (eds.), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practice. In Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (eds.), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, 3–38. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Elman, Colin. Case Study Methods. In Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, 499–517. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and George, Alexander. Process Tracing in Case Study Research, Paper Presented at the MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods, available at: https://uzh.ch/cmsssl/suz/dam/jcr:00000000-5103-bee3-0000-000059b16b9d/05.19.bennett_george.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, and Lustig, Doreen. Taming Democracy: Codifying the Laws of War to Restore the European Order, 1856–1874. University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 28/2017, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2985781 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Prosper M., Bernard Canada and Human Security: From the Axworthy Doctrine to Middle Power Internationalism. American Review of Canadian Studies 36, no. 2 (2006): 233–61.Google Scholar
Prosper M., Bernard Canada and the International Criminal Court: A Case for Renewed Commitment. Policy Options, April 2011.Google Scholar
Best, Geoffrey. Making the Geneva Conventions of 1949: The View from Whitehall. In Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, 5–15. The Hague; Geneva: Martinus Nijhoff ; International Committee of the Red Cross, 1984.Google Scholar
Best, Geoffrey. War and Law since 1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Beyer, Christian. Edmund Husserl. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2015. Stanford: Stanford University, 2015, available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/husserl/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Björkdahl, Annika. Swedish Norm Entrepreneurship in the UN. International Peacekeeping 14, no. 4 (2007): 538–52.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Alan. Norm Antipreneurs and Theorising Resistance to Normative Change. Review of International Studies 42, no. 2 (2016): 310–33.Google Scholar
Boehme, Franziska. We Chose Africa: South Africa and the Regional Politics of Cooperation with the International Criminal Court. International Journal of Transitional Justice 11, no. 1 (2017): 50–70.Google Scholar
Bohman, James, and Rehg, William. Jürgen Habermas. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2015. Stanford: Stanford University, 2014, available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/habermas/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Boissier, Pierre. From Solferino to Tsushima: History of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute, 1985.Google Scholar
Bonner, Michael. Jihad in Islamic History: Doctrines and Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Bordwell, Percy. The Law of War between Belligerents: A History and Commentary. Chicago: Callaghan & Co., 1908.Google Scholar
Bos, Adriaan. From the International Law Commission to the Rome Conference (1994–1998). In Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola and Jones, John R. W. D. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 35–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Bosco, David. Rough Justice: The International Criminal Court’s Battle to Fix the World, One Prosecution at a Time. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bosco, David. When the Blue Helmets Are to Blame. Foreign Policy, July 22, 2014.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael. The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Additional Protocols of 1977. In Zimmermann, Andreas, Geiß, Robin and Haumer, Stefanie (eds.), Humanizing the Laws of War: The Red Cross and the Development of International Humanitarian Law, 57–80. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Bower, Adam. Norms without the Great Powers: International Law and Changing Social Standards in World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Branche, Raphaëlle. The French Army and the Geneva Conventions during the Algerian War of Independence and After. In Evangelista, Matthew and Tannenwald, Nina (eds.), Do the Geneva Conventions Matter?, New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Bratberg, Øivind. Ideas, Tradition and Norm Entrepreneurs: Retracing Guiding Principles of Foreign Policy in Blair and Chiracs Speeches on Iraq. Review of International Studies 37, no. 1 (2011): 327–48.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G. Dueling Realisms. International Organization 51, no. 3 (1997): 445–77.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wohlforth, William C.. World out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Brown, Bartram S. The Statute of the ICC: Past, Present and Future. In Sewall, Sarah B. and Kaysen, Carl (eds.), The United States and the International Criminal Court: National Security and International Law, 61–84. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta. Challenging International Law: What’s New? (Essay Based on Keynote Presentation at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Council on International Law in Ottawa, on November 2, 2018). Opinio Juris (blog), November 13, 2018, available at: http://opiniojuris.org/2018/11/13/challenging-international-law-whats-new/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an Interactional Theory of International Law.Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 39 (2000): 19–74.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, Michael. A World History of War Crimes: From Antiquity to the Present. London ; New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank. The Play of International Practice. International Studies Quarterly 59, no. 3 (2015): 449–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugnion, François. The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949: From the 1949 Diplomatic Conference to the Dawn of the New Millennium. International Affairs 76, no. 1 (2000): 41–50.Google Scholar
Bugnion, François. Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello and Non-International Armed Conflicts. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 6 (2003): 167–98.Google Scholar
Bugnion, François. The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Protection of War Victims. London: Macmillan Education, 2003.Google Scholar
Bugnion, François. The International Committee of the Red Cross and Nuclear Weapons: From Hiroshima to the Dawn of the 21st Century. International Review of the Red Cross 87, no. 859 (2005): 511–24.Google Scholar
Bugnion, François. Adoption of the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977: A Milestone in the Development of International Humanitarian Law. International Review of the Red Cross 99, no. 905 (2017): 785–96.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael. Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Caesar, Julius. The Civil War. Translated by J. F. Gardner. London: Penguin Books Ltd, 1967.Google Scholar
Cakmak, Cenap. Transnational Activism in World Politics and Effectiveness of a Loosely Organised Principled Global Network: The Case of the NGO Coalition for an International Criminal Court. The International Journal of Human Rights 12, no. 3 (2008): 373–93.Google Scholar
Campbell, Colm, and Aolain, Fionnuala Ni. The Paradox of Transition in Conflicted Democracies. Human Rights Quarterly 27 (2005): 172–213.Google Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni. Critical Junctures. In Fioretos, Orfeo, Falleti, Tulia G. and Sheingate, Adam (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, 89–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Carr, David. Husserls Problematic Concept of the Life-World. American Philosophical Quarterly 7, no. 4 (1970): 331–39.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. The Geneva Protocols of 1977 on the Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict and Customary International Law. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal 3 (1984): 55–118.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. Wars of National Liberation and Humanitarian Law. In Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et Essais Sur Le Droit International Humanitaire et Sur Les Principes de La Croix-Rouge En lhonneur de Jean Pictet / Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, 313–24. The Hague; Geneva: Martinus Nijhoff ; International Committee of the Red Cross, 1984.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. The Martens Clause: Half a Loaf or Simply Pie in the Sky? European Journal of International Law 11, no. 1 (2000): 187–216.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. Review: The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics 50, no. 2 (1998): 324–48.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. ‘Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change’, International Organization 55, no. 3 (2001), 553–88.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. Theoretical Pluralism in IR: Possibilities and Limits. In Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. 2nd edn., 220–41. London: Sage, 2012.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. Transnational Dynamics of Civil War. In Checkel, Jeffrey T. (ed.), Transnational Dynamics of Civil War, 3–30. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. Mechanisms, Process and the Study of International Institutions. In Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (eds.), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, 74–97. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. Methods in Constructivist Approaches. In Gheciu, Alexandra and Wohlforth, William C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Security, 152–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Childress, James F. Francis Lieber’s Interpretation of the Laws of War: General Orders No. 100 in the Context of His Life and Thought. American Journal of Jurisprudence 21 (1976): 34–70.Google Scholar
Chitalkar, Poorvi, and Malone, David M.. India and Global Governance. In Malone, David M., Mohan, C. Raja and Raghavan, Srinath (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Indian Foreign Policy, 581–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Cho, Sungjoon. The Social Foundations of World Trade: Norms, Community, and Constitution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. Pro Milone. Translated by N. H. Watts. 5th edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. The Philippics. Edited and translated by Shackleton-Bailey, David R.. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Ciobanu, Dan. The Attitude of the Socialist Countries. In Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The New Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, 399–444. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 1979.Google Scholar
Cisse, Catherine. The International Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda: Some Elements of Comparison. Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 7 (1997): 103–118.Google Scholar
Clark, Cal. Political Science Research Methods: Exploring America at a Crossroads. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2013.Google Scholar
Clarkson, Stephen, and Mildenberger, Matto. Dependent America? How Canada and Mexico Construct US Power. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Collier, David, Brady, Henry, and Seawright, Jason. Introduction to the Second Edition: A Sea Change in Political Methodology. In Brady, Henry and Collier, David (eds.), Rethinking Social Enquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. 2nd edn., 1–10. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.Google Scholar
Combs, Nancy Amoury. Profile: Judge George H. Aldrich. International Law Forum 7 (2005): 47–53, available at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/35/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Conway-Lanz, Sahr. The Struggle to Fight a Humane War: The United States, the Korean War, and the 1949 Geneva Conventions. In Evangelista, Matthew and Tannenwald, Nina (eds.), Do the Geneva Conventions Matter?, 69–104. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale. A Realist Critique of the English School. Review of International Studies 29, no. 3 (2003): 427–41.Google Scholar
Cornut, Jérémie. Analytic Eclecticism in Practice: A Method for Combining International Relations Theories. International Studies Perspectives 16, no. 1 (2015): 50–66.Google Scholar
Cox, Michaelene, and Shawki, Noha. Negotiating Sovereignty and Human Rights: Actors and Issues in Contemporary Human Rights Politics. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Creveld, Martin Van. The Transformation of War. New York: Free Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Crossland, James. Britain and the International Committee of the Red Cross, 1939–1945. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Crowe, David. War Crimes, Genocide, and Justice: A Global History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2014.Google Scholar
Cryer, Robert, Friman, Håkan, Robinson, Darryl, and Wilmshurst, Elizabeth. An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Cullen, Anthony. The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Dancy, Geoff. Searching for Deterrence at the International Criminal Court. International Criminal Law Review 17, no. 4 (2017): 625–55.Google Scholar
Dancy, Geoff, and Montal, Florencia. From Law versus Politics to Law in Politics: A Pragmatist Assessment of the ICCs Impact. American University International Law Review 32, 3 (2017): 645–706.Google Scholar
Dancy, Geoff, and Eric, Wiebelhaus-Brahm. The Impact of Criminal Prosecutions during Intrastate Conflict. Journal of Peace Research 55, no. 1 (2018): 47–61.Google Scholar
Danner, Allison Marston. When Courts Make Law: How the International Criminal Tribunals Recast the Laws of War. Vanderbilt Law Review 59 (2006): 1–65.Google Scholar
Davenport, David. The New Diplomacy. Policy Review, no. 116 (December 2002): 17–30.Google Scholar
Davis, George, B. Doctor Francis Lieber’s Instructions for the Government of Armies in the Field. American Journal of International Law, 1, no. 1 (1907), 13–25.Google Scholar
Dawson, Doyne, and Dawson, James D.. The Origins of Western Warfare: Militarism and Morality in the Ancient World. Boulder: Westview Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Deighton, Anne. Britain and the Cold War, 1945–1955. In Leffler, Melvyn P. and Westad, Odd Arne (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Cold War: Volume 1: Origins, 112–32. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole. The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case. International Organization 63, no. 1 (2009): 33–65.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Harald, Müller. Theoretical Paradise – Empirically Lost? Arguing with Habermas. Review of International Studies 31, no. 1 (2005): 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detter De Lupis, Ingrid. The Law of War. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar
Devetak, Richard, and True, Jacqui. Diplomatic Divergence in the Antipodes: Globalisation, Foreign Policy and State Identity in Australia and New Zealand. Australian Journal of Political Science 41, no. 2 (2006): 241–56.Google Scholar
Dijk, Boyd van. Human Rights in War: On the Entangled Foundations of the 1949 Geneva Conventions. American Journal of International Law 112, no. 4 (2018): 553–82.Google Scholar
Dijk, Cornelis W. A. J. van. The American Political Intervention in the Conflict in the Dutch East Indies 1945–1949. U.S. Army Command and General Staff College (Masters thesis), 2009, available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a502059.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Dill, Janina. Legitimate Targets?: Social Construction, International Law and US Bombing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram. Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs 12, no. 3 (1983): 205–35.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. American Political Science Review 99, no. 3 (2005): 463–66.Google Scholar
Draper, Gerald I. A. D. Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. Acta Juridica 1979 (1979): 193–206.Google Scholar
Draper, Gerald I. A. D. The Implementation and Enforcement of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and of the Two Additional Protocols of 1978. In Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (1979–III), 164: 1–54. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1980.Google Scholar
Droege, Cordula. The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict. Israel Law Review 40 (2007): 310–355.Google Scholar
Drohan, Brian. Brutality in an Age of Human Rights: Activism and Counterinsurgency at the End of the British Empire. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey, and Pollack, Mark. IL/IR Book Discussion: Beyond the ‘Isms War’? Opinio Juris (blog), September 16, 2013, available at: http://opiniojuris.org/2013/09/16/ilir-book-discussion-beyond-isms-war/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey, and Pollack, Mark A.. International Law and International Relations: Introducing an Interdisciplinary Dialogue. In Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, 3–32. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey, and Trachtman, Joel. The Law and Economics of Humanitarian Law Violations in Internal Conflict. American Journal of International Law 93, no. 2 (1999): 394–409.Google Scholar
Durand, André. From Sarajevo to Hiroshima: History of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute, 1984.Google Scholar
Durand, André. Gustave Moynier and the Peace Societies. International Review of the Red Cross 36, no. 314 (1996): 532–50.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jill. The British Government and the Spanish Civil War, 1936–1939. London: Macmillan, 1979.Google Scholar
Efrat, Asif. Professional Socialization and International Norms: Physicians against Organ Trafficking. European Journal of International Relations 21, no. 3 (2015): 647–71.Google Scholar
Eide, Asbjörn. The New Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflict. In Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The New Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, 277–309. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 1979.Google Scholar
Einsiedel, Sebastian von. Civil War Trends and the Changing Nature of Armed Conflict. United Nations University Centre for Policy Research, March 2017, available at: https://i.unu.edu/media/cpr.unu.edu/attachment/2534/OC_10-CivilWarTrendsandChangingNatureofArmedConflict-05-2017.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Elder, David A. The Historical Background of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention of 1949. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 11 (1979): 37–69.Google Scholar
Elman, Colin. Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Studies of International Politics. International Organization 59, no. 2 (2005): 293–326.Google Scholar
Elman, Colin. Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Analysis. In Byrne, David and Ragin, Charles (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods, 121–31. London: Sage, 2009.Google Scholar
Elman, Colin, Owen, John M., Mahoney, James, Tannenwald, Nina, Bennett, Andrew, and Waldner, David. Symposium on Process Tracing. Security Studies 248, no. 2 (2015): 199–250.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Tore Linné (ed.), Norway and National Liberation in Southern Africa. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute, 2000.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew, and Tannenwald, Nina (eds.), Do the Geneva Conventions Matter? New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Fadl, Khaled Abou, El. Ahkam Al-Bughat: Irregular Warfare and the Law of Rebellion in Islam. In Johnson, James Turner and Kelsay, John (eds.), Cross, Crescent, and Sword: The Justification and Limitation of War in Western and Islamic Tradition, 149–76. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Fadl, Khaled Abou, El. Rebellion and Violence in Islamic Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Faizullaev, Alisher. Diplomatic Interactions and Negotiations. Negotiation Journal 30, no. 3 (July 2014): 275–99.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard A. Introduction. In Falk, Richard A. (ed.), The International Law of Civil War, 1–29. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, A. (ed.), The International Law of Civil War. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Farina, Niccolo. The Attitudes of the Peoples Republic of China. In Cassese, Antonio (ed.),The New Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, 445–457. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 1979.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52, no. 2 (1998): 269–305.Google Scholar
Fearon, James, and Laitin, David. Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War. American Political Science Review 97, no. 1 (2003): 75–90.Google Scholar
Fearon, James, and Wendt, Alexander. Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. In Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, 52–72. London: Sage, 2002.Google Scholar
Feaver, Peter, Hellmann, Gunther, Schweller, Randall, Taliaferro, Jeffrey, Wohlforth, William C., Legro, Jeffrey, and Moravcsik, Andrew. Brother, Can You Spare a Paradigm? (Or Was Anybody Ever a Realist?) International Security 25, no. 1 (2000): 165–93.Google Scholar
Fehl, Caroline. Explaining the International Criminal Court: A ‘Practice Test’ for Rationalist and Constructivist Approaches. European Journal of International Relations 10, no. 3 (2004): 357–94.Google Scholar
Fehl, Caroline. Living with a Reluctant Hegemon: Explaining European Responses to US Unilateralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Feldbrugge, Ferdinand Joseph Maria, Van den Berg, Gerard Pieter, and Simons, William Bradford. Encyclopedia of Soviet Law. Leiden: Brill, 1985.Google Scholar
Ferencz, Benjamin B. An International Criminal Court, a Step toward World Peace: A Documentary History and Analysis. Vol. 1. 2 vols. Dobbs Ferry: Oceana, 1980.Google Scholar
Ferencz, Benjamin B. International Criminal Courts: The Legacy of Nuremberg. Pace International Law Review 10 (1998): 203–35.Google Scholar
Ferraro, Tristan. The ICRCs Legal Position on the Notion of Armed Conflict Involving Foreign Intervention and on Determining the IHL Applicable to This Type of Conflict. International Review of the Red Cross 97, no. 900 (2015): 1227–52.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. An Analysis of Compliant Behavior. In Muzafer Sherif, Milbourne Otto Wilson (eds.), Group Relations at the Crossroads, 232–56. New York: Harper, 1953.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. Are Legal Norms Distinctive? New York University Journal of International Law and Politcs 32 (2000): 699–706.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Cornell Studies in Security Affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 887–917.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 4, no. 1 (2001): 391–416.Google Scholar
Fleck, Dieter. The Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts. In Fleck (ed.), Dieter, The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law. 2nd edn., 605–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Forsythe, David P. The 1974 Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law: Some Observations. American Journal of International Law 69 (1975): 77–91.Google Scholar
Forsythe, David P. Humanitarian Politics: The International Committee of the Red Cross. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Forsythe, David P. Three Sessions of Legislating Humanitarian Law: Forward March, Retreat, or Parade Rest. International Lawyer 11, no. 1 (1977): 131–142.Google Scholar
Forsythe, David P. Legal Management of Internal War: The 1977 Protocol on Non-International Armed Conflicts. American Journal of International Law 72, no. 2 (1978): 272–295.Google Scholar
Forsythe, David P. The Humanitarians: The International Committee of the Red Cross. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Forsythe, David P. Human Rights in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Forsythe, David P., and Magat, Richard. Updating the Rules of War; The Third World Wins Some Symbolic Victories. Washington Post, February 12, 1978, C–3, Col. 1.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Robert A. Great Power Politics and Spains Civil War: The First Phase. Historian 28, no. 1 (1965): 72–92.Google Scholar
Friedner Parrat, Charlotta. Bridging the Divide: What the English School Does, and Why. BISA Annual Conference: Research Paper, Bath, 2018. (Author papers).Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg, and Kratochwil, Friedrich. On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology. International Organization 63, no. 4 (2009): 701–31.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History? The National Interest, no. 16 (Summer, 1989): 3–18.Google Scholar
Gaiduk, Ilya V. Divided Together: The United States and the Soviet Union in the United Nations, 1945–1965. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Alan. Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Garraway, Charles. Written Evidence. House of Commons Defence Select Committee, October 2013, available at: http://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmdfence/931/931we05.htm [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Gentili, Alberico. Three Books on the Law of War. In Scott, J. B. (ed.), Classics of International Law. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1933.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
La Pradelle, Paul de. La conférence diplomatique et les nouvelles Conventions de Genève du 12 août 1949. Paris: Les Éditions Internationales, 1951.Google Scholar
Giladi, Rotem. Humanity in the Service of Order: Intellectual Roots of the Occupation Category, 2011. Unpublished. (Author papers).Google Scholar
Giladi, Rotem. The Enactment of Irony: Reflections on the Origins of the Martens Clause. European Journal of International Law 25, no. 3 (2014): 847–69.Google Scholar
Glasius, Marlies. Expertise in the Cause of Justice: Global Civil Society Influence on the Statute for an International Criminal Court. In Glasius, Marlies, Kaldor, Mary and Anheier, Helmut (eds.), Global Civil Society 2002, 137–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Glasius, Marlies. The International Criminal Court: A Global Civil Society Achievement. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. Brokering Change: Networks and Entrepreneurs in International Politics. International Theory 1, no. 2 (2009): 249–81.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack, and Posner, Eric. The Limits of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack, Eric Posner, John K. Setear, James D. Morrow, Julie Roin, Downs, George W., Jones, Michael A., et al. Rational Choice and International Law (Volume Supplement). The Journal of Legal Studies 31, no. S1 (2002).Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (eds.), Legalization and World Politics. International Organization Readers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher. International Humanitarian Law and the Tadic Case Symposium: The International Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia Comes to Age. European Journal of International Law 7 (1996): 265–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher. A Critique of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions. In Durham, Helen and McCormack, Timothy L. H. (eds.), The Changing Face of Conflict and the Efficacy of International Humanitarian Law, 3–22. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999.Google Scholar
Greig, J. Michael, and Meernik, James D.. To Prosecute or Not to Prosecute: Civil War Mediation and International Criminal Justice. International Negotiation 19, no. 2 (2014): 257–84.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. The Schools of Thought Problem in International Relations. International Studies Review 21, no. 3 (2019): 424–46.Google Scholar
Groenleer, Martijn L. P., and Van Schaik, Louise G.. United We Stand? The European Unions International Actorness in the Cases of the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Common Market Studies 45, no. 5 (2007): 969–98.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace: Including the Law of Nature and of Nations. Translated by Archibald Colin Campbell. London: M. Walter Dunne, 1979.Google Scholar
Guan, Jing. The ICCs Jurisdiction over War Crimes in Internal Armed Conflicts: An Insurmountable Obstacle for Chinas Accession. Penn State International Law Review 28 (2010): 703–754.Google Scholar
Gutteridge, Joyce A. C. The Geneva Conventions of 1949. British Year Book of International Law 26 (1949): 294–326.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew. A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law. California Law Review 90, no. 6 (2002): 1823–87.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46, no. 1 (1992): 1–35.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter, Bennett, Andrew, Ba, Alice, Paul, T. V., Sil, Rudra, and Katzenstein, Peter. Symposium: Beyond Paradigms and Research Programs. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 8, no. 2 (Fall 2012): 5–24.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. The Divided West. Edited and translated by Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. Making Human Rights a Reality. 1st edn. Princeton: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica. Customs Method and Process: Lessons from Humanitarian Law. In Bradley, Curtis A. (ed.), Customs Future: International Law in a Changing World, 148–71. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hall, Christopher Keith. The First Proposal for a Permanent International Criminal Court. International Review of the Red Cross 38, no. 322 (1998): 57–74.Google Scholar
Hall, Christopher Keith. The Third and Fourth Sessions of the UN Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court. American Journal of International Law 92, no. 1 (1998): 124–133.Google Scholar
Halleck, Henry Wager. International Law: Or, Rules Regulating the Intercourse of States in Peace and War. New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1861.Google Scholar
Halleck, Henry Wager. Elements of International Law and Laws of War. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co., 1866.Google Scholar
Halleck, Henry Wager, and Baker, George Sherston. Hallecks International Law: Or, Rules Regulating the Intercourse of States in Peace and War. 3rd edn. Vol. II. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co, 1893.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Scott. A Genealogy of Metatheory in IR: How Ontology Emerged from the Inter-Paradigm Debate. International Theory 9, no. 1 (2017): 136–70.Google Scholar
Hannikainen, Lauri, Hanski, Raija, and Rosas, Allan. Implementing Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts: The Case of Finland. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1992.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona. Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? Yale Law Journal 111 (2001): 1935–2042.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona. The Cost of Commitment. Stanford Law Review 55, no. 5 (2003): 1821–62.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona. Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties? Journal of Conflict Resolution 51, no. 4 (2007): 588–621.Google Scholar
Hayes, Jarrod and James, Patrick, Systemism, Analytic Eclecticism, and the Democratic Peace. In Annette Freyberg-Inan, Ewan Harrison and Patrick James (eds.), Evaluating Progress in International Relations, 109–25. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
H-Diplo, . Roundtable 6–6 on Reconstructing the Cold War: The Early Years, 1945–1958. ISSF, February 7, 2014, available at: https://issforum.org/roundtables/6-6-reconstructing-cold-war [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Hebel, Herman von, and Robinson, Darryl. Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court. In Lee, Roy S. K. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations and Results, 79–126. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999.Google Scholar
Heinsch, Robert. The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Geneva Conventions of 1949. In Zimmermann, Andreas, Geiß, Robin and Haumer, Stefanie (eds.), Humanizing the Laws of War: The Red Cross and the Development of International Humanitarian Law, 27–56. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolf. Blockade. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, 2015, available at: https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e252 [accessed 23 December 2019].Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin Jon. The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Heller, Regina, Kahl, Martin, and Pisoiu, Daniela. The Dark’ Side of Normative Argumentation – The Case of Counterterrorism Policy. Global Constitutionalism 1, no. 2 (2012): 278–312.Google Scholar
Hellmann, Gunther, Rytövuori-Apunen, Helena, Friedrichs, Jörg, Sil, Rudra, Kornprobst, Markus, and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. Pragmatism and International Relations. International Studies Review 11, no. 3 (2009): 638–62.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, and Doswald-Beck, Louise (eds.), Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume I – Rules. 2 vols. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, and Doswald-Beck, Louise (eds.), Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume II – Practice. 2 vols. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. The United Nations and Human Rights. International Organization 19, no. 3 (1965): 504–17.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. 2nd edn. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, Columbia University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Herodotus. The Histories, Revised. Edited by Marincola, John. Translated by Aubery de Selincourt. London: Penguin Classics, 2003.Google Scholar
Higgins, Noelle. The Approach of International Law to Wars of National Liberation. Moscow: Martin Institute, University of Idaho, 2004, available at: http://doras.dcu.ie/2268/1/monograph.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn. International Law and Civil Conflict. In Luard, Evan (ed.), The International Regulation of Civil Wars. London: Thames and Hudson, 1972.Google Scholar
Hill, Gina E. A Case of NGO Participation: International Criminal Court Negotiations. In Walker, James W. St G. and Thompson, Andrew S. (eds.), Critical Mass: The Emergence of Global Civil Society, 129–52. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney. Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney. The Deterrent Effects of the International Criminal Court: Evidence from Libya. International Interactions 42, no. 4 (2016): 616–43.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Moshe, and Lang, Andrew (eds.), Research Handbook on the Sociology of International Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, William I. France Restored: Cold War Diplomacy and the Quest for Leadership in Europe, 1944–1954. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, William I. Human Rights and the Laws of War: The Geneva Conventions of 1949. In Iriye, Akira, Goedde, Petra and Hitchcock, William I. (eds.), The Human Rights Revolution: An International History, 93–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James, and Rosendorff, Bryan. Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention against Torture? Signaling, Domestic Politics and Non-Compliance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6, nos. 3–4 (2011): 275–327.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security 23, no. 1 (1998): 171–200.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted. Reconstructing the Cold War: The Early Years, 1945–1958. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Horovitz, Sigall, Shany, Yuval, and Noam, Gilad. The International Criminal Court. In Shany, Yuval (ed.), Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts, 223–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Huber, Max. The Principles of the Red Cross. Foreign Affairs 26, no. 4 (1948): 723–27.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. HRW Disappointed at India’s Position on International Court. 17 June 1998, available at: http://hrw.org/news/1998/06/16/hrw-disappointed-indias-position-international-court [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. Human Rights Watch Praises German Stand on International Court. 17 June 1998, available at. http://hrw.org/news/1998/06/16/human-rights-watch-praises-german-stand-international-court [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. Human Rights Watch Welcomes New Japanese Position on International Court. 27 June 1998, available at: http://hrw.org/news/1998/06/26/human-rights-watch-welcomes-new-japanese-position-international-court [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. French Stand on International Court ‘Mixed’, Says Rights Group. 9 July 1998, available at: http://hrw.org/news/1998/07/09/french-stand-international-court-mixed-says-rights-group [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. Human Rights Watch Condemns United States Threat to Sabotage International Criminal Court. 9 July 1998, available at: https://hrw.org/news/1998/07/09/human-rights-watch-condemns-united-states-threat-sabotage-international-criminal [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. Human Rights Watch Disappointed by U.K. Stand on International Court. 9 July 1998, available at: http://hrw.org/fr/news/1998/07/09/human-rights-watch-disappointed-uk-stand-international-court [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Humphreys, Adam R. C. The Heuristic Explanation of Explanatory Theories in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 17, no. 2 (2011): 257–77Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. Constructivism. In Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Relations, 298–313. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Die Lebenswelt: Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, John. Champions of Charity: War and the Rise of the Red Cross. Boulder: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Ingebritsen, Christine. Norm Entrepreneurs: Scandinavias Role in World Politics. Cooperation and Conflict 37, no. 1 (2002): 11–23.Google Scholar
Inter-Press Service (IPS). Clamour Rises for Court to Step into Internal Conflicts. Terraviva Daily Newspaper, June 19, 1998, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20081203175209/www.ips.org/icc/tv190601.htm/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Inter-Press Service (IPS). Yes, Size Does Matter. Terraviva Daily Newspaper, June 25, 1998, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/19980624224028/http:/www.ips.org/icc/tv250602.htm [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Inter-Press Service (IPS). Take It or Leave It. Terraviva Daily Newspaper, July 14, 1998, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/19990504085041/http://ips.org/icc/tv140701.htm [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Iqbal, Nasir. Judge Harboured Bias against Bhutto, SC Told. Dawn, May 3, 2011, available at: https://dawn.com/news/625920 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Israel CDDH delegation member. Interview, March 2018. (Author papers).Google Scholar
Jackson, Gabriel. Spanish Republic and the Civil War, 1931–1939. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. London: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. Review. H-Diplo Roundtable 6-6 on Reconstructing the Cold War: The Early Years, 1945–1958. 2014, available at: https://issforum.org/roundtables/6-6-reconstructing-cold-war [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Jacobs, Alan M., Beach, Peter Derek, Runhardt, Rosa W., Waldner, David, and Bennett, Andrew. Symposium: Causal Mechanisms and Process Tracing. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 14, no. 1/2 (Spring/Fall 2016): 13–39.Google Scholar
Jia, Bing Bing. China and the International Criminal Court: The Current Situation. Singapore Year Book of International Law 10 (2006): 87–97.Google Scholar
Jianping, Lu, and Zhixiang, Wang. Chinas Attitude towards the ICC. Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, no. 3 (2005): 608–20.Google Scholar
Hyeran, Jo. Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics. 1st edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hyeran, Jo, and Simmons, Beth A.. Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity? International Organization 70, no. 3 (2016): 443–75.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Jose, Betcy. Not Completely the New Normal: How Human Rights Watch Tried to Suppress the Targeted Killing Norm. Contemporary Security Policy 38, no. 2 (2017): 237–59.Google Scholar
Junod, Dominique-D. The Imperiled Red Cross and the Palestine–Eretz-Yisrael Conflict, 1945–1952: The Influence of Institutional Concerns on a Humanitarian Operation. London: Kegan Paul International, Limited, 1996.Google Scholar
Junod, Sylvie. Additional Protocol II: History and Scope. American University Law Review 33, no. 1 (1983): 29–40.Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits. Protocol II, the CDDH and Colombia. In Frits Kalshoven, Reflections on the Law of War: Collected Essays, 861–92. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007.Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits. The Undertaking to Respect and Ensure Respect in All Circumstances: From Tiny Seed to Ripening Fruit. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2 (1999): 3–61Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits. The Diplomatic Conference on Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva, 1974–1977. In Frits Kalshoven, Reflections on the Law of War: Collected Essays, 181–274. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security. In Katzenstein, Peter (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, 1–32. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, and Okawara, Nobuo. Japan, Asian-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism. International Security 26, no. 3 (2002): 153–85.Google Scholar
Kay, David A. The New Nations in the United Nations, 1960–1967. New York: Columbia University, 1970.Google Scholar
Kay, Hugh. Salazar and Modern Portugal. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1970.Google Scholar
Kaye, David. Some Thoughts on Russia and the International Criminal Court. November 2012, available at: http://councilandcourt.org/files/2012/11/Russia-and-ICC.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. Activists beyond Borders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Keith, Linda Camp. Human Rights Instruments. In Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, 353–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. Of War and Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David M., and Bailey, Thomas. The American Spirit: United States History as Seen by Contemporaries. 12th edn. Vol. 1. 2 vols. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2009.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32, no. 4 (1988): 379–96.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. Observations on the Promise and Pitfalls of Historical Institutionalism in International Relations. In Fioretos, Orfeo (ed.),International Politics and Institutions in Time, 321–336. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, and Martin, Lisa. Institutional Theory as a Research Program. In Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius (eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, 71–108. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, and Milner, Helen. Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Khalaf, Roula. Autocrats of the World Benefit from Donald Trumps Win. Financial Times, November 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Kincaid, Harold. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. The World in Depression, 1929–1939 (Revised). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Philippe. The Development of the Rome Statute. In Lee, Roy S. K. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations and Results, 451–62. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Philippe, and Holmes, John T.. The Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court: The Negotiating Process. American Journal of International Law 93, no. 1 (1999): 2–12.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Philippe, and Robinson, Darryl. Reaching Agreement at the Rome Conference. In Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola and Jones, John R. W. D. (eds.),The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 67–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kitchen, Veronica. From Rhetoric to Reality: Canada, the United States, and the Ottawa Process to Ban Landmines. International Journal 57, no. 1 (Winter/2001–2002): 37–55.Google Scholar
Kittel, Bernhard, Kuehn, David, Blatter, Joachim, Beach, Derek, Rohlfing, Ingo, Hall, Peter A., Leuffen, Dirk, et al. Symposium: Reassessing the Methodology of Process Tracing. European Political Science 12, no. 1 (March 2013): 1–85.Google Scholar
Klose, Fabian. Human Rights in the Shadow of Colonial Violence: The Wars of Independence in Kenya and Algeria. Translated by Dona Geyer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie. Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and US Sanctions against South Africa. International Organization 49, no. 3 (1995): 451–78.Google Scholar
Knight, W. Andy. Soft Power, Moral Suasion, and Establishing the International Criminal Court: Canadian Contributions. In Irwin, Rosalind (ed.), Ethics and Security in Canadian Foreign Policy, 113–37. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Knox, John. The Right of Revolution in Scotland. In Marrin, Albert (ed.), War and the Christian Conscience: From Augustine to Martin Luther King, Jr., 108–11. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1971.Google Scholar
Knox, John. The Debate at the General Assembly, June 1564. In Mason, Roger A. (ed.), On Rebellion, 182–209. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. The 1998 Frankel Lecture: Bringing International Law Home. Houston Law Review 35 (1998): 623–81.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. Internalization through Socialization. Duke Law Journal 54 (2004): 975–82.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55, no. 4 (2001): 761–99.Google Scholar
Korey, William. NGOs and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Curious Grapevine. New York: St. Martins Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. (Reissue) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. State Power and the Structure of International Trade. World Politics 28, no. 3 (1976): 317–47.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. International Organization 36, no. 2 (1982): 185–205.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. The Monologue of ‘Science’. International Studies Review 5, no. 1 (2003): 124–28.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, and Ruggie, John. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. International Organization 40, no. 4 (1986): 753–75.Google Scholar
Krauthammer, Charles. The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs 70, no. 1 (1990): 23–33.Google Scholar
Krebs, Ronald R., and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations 13, no. 1 (2007): 35–66.Google Scholar
Kreβ, Claus, and Mégret, Frédéric. The Regulation of Non-International Armed Conflicts: Can a Privilege of Belligerency Be Envisioned in the Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts? International Review of the Red Cross 96, no. 893 (2014): 29–66.Google Scholar
Krieger, Heike. A Conflict of Norms: The Relationship between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in the ICRC Customary Law Study. Journal of Conflict and Security Law 11, no. 2 (Summer 2006): 265–91.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico. International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order. European Journal of International Law 16, no. 3 (2005): 369–408.Google Scholar
Kristensen, Peter Marcus. International Relations at the End: A Sociological Autopsy. International Studies Quarterly 62, no. 2 (2018): 245–59.Google Scholar
La Haye, Eve. War Crimes in Internal Armed Conflicts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Dilip. Should India Continue to Stay out of ICC? ORF (blog), 24 November 2010, available at: https://orfonline.org/research/should-india-continue-to-stay-out-of-icc/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Lake, David A. Why ‘Isms’ Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress. International Studies Quarterly 55, no. 2 (2011): 465–80.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. Theory Is Dead, Long Live Theory: The End of the Great Debates and the Rise of Eclecticism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (2013): 567–87.Google Scholar
Lantis, Jeffrey S., and Wunderlich, Carmen. Resiliency Dynamics of Norm Clusters: Norm Contestation and International Cooperation. Review of International Studies 44, no. 3 (2018): 570–93.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch. Recognition in International Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Leach, Philip. The Chechen Conflict: Analysing the Oversight of the European Court of Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 6 (2008): 732–61.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism. International Organization 48, no. 2 (1994): 249–77.Google Scholar
Lee, Roy S. K. Introduction. In Lee, Roy S. K. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations and Results, 1–39. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey. Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the ‘Failure’ of Internationalism. International Organization 51, no. 1 (1997): 31–63.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey, and Moravcsik, Andrew. Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security 24, no. 2 (1999): 5–55.Google Scholar
Leitenberg, M. Deaths in Wars and Conflicts between 1945 and 2000, Cornell University Peace Studies Program. Occasional Paper 29 (2006).Google Scholar
Levine, Daniel J., and McCourt, David M.. Why Does Pluralism Matter When We Study Politics? A View from Contemporary International Relations. Perspectives on Politics 16, no. 1 (2018): 92–109.Google Scholar
Linton, Suzannah. India and China before, at, and after Rome. Journal of International Criminal Justice 16, no. 2 (2018): 265–94.Google Scholar
Lippman, Matthew. Prosecutions of Nazi War Criminals before Post-World War II Domestic Tribunals. University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review 8, no. 1 (2000): 1–114.Google Scholar
Li-Sun, Zhu. Traditional Asian Approaches – The Chinese View. Australian Year Book of International Law 9 (1980): 143–50.Google Scholar
Little, Daniel. Exogenous Variable. In Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Bryman, Alan and Liao, Tim Futing (eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, 1: 347. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2004.Google Scholar
Lobell, Steven E., Ripsman, Norrin M., and Taliaferro, Jeffrey W.. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Lowe, Kimberly A. Humanitarianism and National Sovereignty: Red Cross Intervention on Behalf of Political Prisoners in Soviet Russia, 1921–3. Journal of Contemporary History 49, no. 4 (2014): 652–74.Google Scholar
Luard, Evan (ed.), The International Regulation of Civil Wars. London: Thames and Hudson, 1972.Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam. Parallel Application of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law: An Examination of the Debate. Israel Law Review 40, no. 2 (2007): 648–60.Google Scholar
Lui, Andrew. Why Canada Cares: Human Rights and Foreign Policy in Theory and Practice. Kingston: McGill-Queens Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. An Open Letter on the Harsh Book against the Peasants. In Marrin, Albert (ed.), War and the Christian Conscience: From Augustine to Martin Luther King, Jr., 101–7. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1971.Google Scholar
Lüthi, Lorenz M. The Non-Aligned Movement and the Cold War, 1961–1973. Journal of Cold War Studies 18, no. 4 (2017): 98–147.Google Scholar
Lyall, Jason. Process Tracing, Causal Inference, and Civil War. In Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (eds.), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, 186–207. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Lysaght, Charles. The Attitude of Western Countries. In Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The New Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, 350–385. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 1979.Google Scholar
Mack, Michelle, and Pejic, Jelena. Increasing Respect for International Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2008.Google Scholar
Magnarella, Paul J. Expanding the Frontiers of Humanitarian Law: The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Florida Journal of International Law 9 (1994): 421–441.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences. Sociological Methods & Research 41, no. 4 (2012): 570–97.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Qualitative Research. American Political Science Review 98, no. 4 (2004): 653–70.Google Scholar
Makinda, Samuel. Terrorism in International Society: An Eclectic Perspective. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 3, no. 1 (2016): 90–101.Google Scholar
Mamlyuk, Boris N. Decolonization as a Cold War Imperative. In Eslava, Luis, Fakhri, Michael and Nesiah, Vasuki (eds.), Bandung, Global History, and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures, 196–214. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Mansingh, Surjit. Indira Gandhis Foreign Policy: Hard Realism? In Malone, David M., Raja Mohan, C and Raghavan, Srinath (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Indian Foreign Policy, 104–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Mantilla, Giovanni. Under (Social) Pressure: The Historical Regulation of Internal Armed Conflicts through International Law (PhD dissertation). University of Minnesota, 2013, available at: https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/175520 [accessed 19 September 2019].Google Scholar
Mantilla, Giovanni. Conforming Instrumentalists: Why the USA and the United Kingdom Joined the 1949 Geneva Conventions. European Journal of International Law 28, no. 2 (2017): 483–511.Google Scholar
Mantilla, Giovanni. The Origins and Evolution of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and the 1977 Additional Protocols. In Evangelista, Matthew and Tannenwald, Nina (eds.), Do the Geneva Conventions Matter?, 35–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Mantilla, Giovanni. Forum Isolation: Social Opprobrium and the Origins of the International Law of Internal Conflict. International Organization 72, no. 2 (2018): 317–49.Google Scholar
Mantilla, Giovanni. The Protagonism of the USSR and Socialist States in the Revision of International Humanitarian Law. Journal of the History of International Law 21 (2019): 181–211.Google Scholar
Maqungo, Sivu. The Establishment of the International Criminal Court: SADCs Participation in the Negotiations. African Security Review 9, no. 1 (2000): 42–53.Google Scholar
March, James, and Olsen, Johan. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 943–69.Google Scholar
March, James, and Olsen, Johan. The Logic of Appropriateness. In Goodin, Robert E. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, 478–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Marsh, David, Ercan, Selen A., and Furlong, Paul. A Skin Not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science. In Lowndes, Vivien, Marsh, David and Stoker, Gerry (eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science. 4th edn., 177–98. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2017.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa. An Institutionalist View: International Institutions and State Strategies. In Paul, T. V. and Hall, John A. (eds.), International Order and the Future of World Politics, 78–98. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa. The President and International Commitments: Treaties as Signaling Devices. Presidential Studies Quarterly 35, no. 3 (2005): 440–65.Google Scholar
McAllister, Jacqueline, and Meernik, James. Casting a Shadow over War Zones: The International Criminal Courts Impact on Rebel and Government Forces Use of Violence against Civilians. Ljubljana, 2016, available at: http://web.isanet.org/Web/Conferences/CEEISA-ISA-LBJ2016/Archive/a7a5720e-fe27-48a6-8144-b816c183957d.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
McCourt, David M. Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism. International Studies Quarterly 60, no. 3 (2016): 475–85.Google Scholar
McGoldrick, Dominic. Political and Legal Responses to the ICC. In McGoldrick, Dominic, Rowe, Peter J. and Donnelly, Eric (eds.), The Permanent International Criminal Court: Legal and Policy Issues, 389–449. Oxford; Portland: Hart Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
McGoldrick, Dominic, Rowe, Peter J., and Donnelly, Eric (eds.), The Permanent International Criminal Court: Legal and Policy Issues. Oxford; Portland: Hart, 2004.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19, no. 3 (1994): 5–49.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: WW Norton & Company, 2003.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. Structural Realism. In Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 51–67. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Meernik, James. The International Criminal Court and the Deterrence of Human Rights Atrocities. Civil Wars 17, no. 3 (2015): 318–39.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric. From ‘Savages’ to ‘Unlawful Combatants’: A Postcolonial Look at International Humanitarian Laws ‘Other’. In Orford, Anne (ed.), International Law and Its Others, 265–317. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Melander, Erik, Pettersson, Therése and Themnér, Lotta. Organized Violence, 1989–2015. Journal of Peace Research 53, no. 5 (2016): 727–42.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. International Criminalization of Internal Atrocities. American Journal of International Law 89, no. 3 (1995): 554–77.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. The Martens Clause, Principles of Humanity, and Dictates of Public Conscience. American Journal of International Law 94, no. 1 (2000): 78–89.Google Scholar
Mills, Kurt, and Bloomfield, Alan. African Resistance to the International Criminal Court: Halting the Advance of the Anti-Impunity Norm. Review of International Studies 44, no. 1 (2018): 101–27.Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay. The Historical Development of the Application of Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts to 1949. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 47, no. 2 (1998): 337–61.Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay. The Law of Internal Armed Conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Montbrial, Thierry de. For a New World Economic Order. Foreign Affairs 54, no. 1 (1975): 61–78.Google Scholar
Moorehead, Caroline. Dunants Dream: War, Switzerland and the History of the Red Cross. New York: Carroll & Graf, 1999.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. Liberal International Relations Theory: A Scientific Assessment. In Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius (eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, 159–204. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. Liberalism and International Relations Theory. Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, Working Paper No. 92–6, 1992.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51, no. 4 (1997): 513–53.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. The New Liberalism. In Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, 234–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54, no. 2 (2000): 217–52.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. Theory Synthesis in International Relations: Real Not Metaphysical. International Studies Review 5, no. 1 (2003): 131–36.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. Another ‘Great Debate’: The National Interest of the United States. The American Political Science Review 46, no. 4 (1952): 961–88.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 4th edn. New York: Knopf, 1967.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. Order within Anarchy: The Laws of War as an International Institution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. The Laws of War, Common Conjectures, and Legal Systems in International Politics. The Journal of Legal Studies 31, no. S1 (2002): S41–60.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald. Arguing, Bargaining and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 10, no. 3 (2004): 395–435.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald, and Wunderlich, Carmen. Not Lost in Contestation: How Norm Entrepreneurs Frame Norm Development in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. Contemporary Security Policy 39, no. 3 (2018): 341–66.Google Scholar
Murray, Daragh. Practitioners Guide to Human Rights Law in Armed Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Nabulsi, Karma. Traditions of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Neack, Laura (ed.), Forum: Pluralism in IR Theory. International Studies Perspectives 16, no. 1 (2015).Google Scholar
Neff, Stephen C. Justice in Blue and Gray: A Legal History of the Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Neff, Stephen C. War and the Law of Nations: A General History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Neuberg, Paul. Sadat to Meet Tito as Soviet Anger Rises. The Guardian, March 27, 1974.Google Scholar
Neuerbourg, Hanns. Ninety-Seven Nations and Three Liberation Movements Signed a Document Friday Completing Four Years of Work on How to Improve Humanitarian Rules of Welfare. Associated Press, June 10, 1977.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel, Hopf, Ted, Goddard, Stacie, Montgomery, Alexander, Kessler, Oliver, Bueger, Christian, Lynch, Cecelia, Solomon, Ty, Srivastava, Swati, and McCourt., David M. Seizing Constructivist Ground? Practice and Relational Theories: Symposium. 3 April 2017, available at: https://isanet.org/Publications/ISQ/Posts/ID/5473/Seizing-Constructivist-Ground-Practice-and-Relational-Theories [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004.Google Scholar
Öberg, Marko Divac. The Absorption of Grave Breaches into War Crimes Law. International Review of the Red Cross 91, no. 873 (2009): 163–83.Google Scholar
Oberleitner, Gerd. Human Rights in Armed Conflict: Law, Practice, Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Oeter, Stefan. Civil War, Humanitarian Law and the United Nations. In Frowein, Jochen and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 1: 195–229. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997.Google Scholar
Oglesby, Roscoe Ralph. Internal War and the Search for Normative Order. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Roger. The Grave Breaches Regime and Universal Jurisdiction. Journal of International Criminal Justice 7, no. 4 (2009): 811–31.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa. International Law: A Treatise. Vol. II. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1906.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Vernon A. Recognition of Belligerency and the Spanish War. American Journal of International Law 31, no. 3 (1937): 398–413.Google Scholar
Osakwe, C. O. The Participation of the Soviet Union in Universal International Organizations: A Political and Legal Analysis of Soviet Strategies and Aspirations Inside ILO, Unesco and WHO. Leiden: Brill, 1972.Google Scholar
Owen, John M. How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace. International Security 19, no. 2 (1994): 87–125.Google Scholar
Pace, William R., and Schense, Jennifer. The Coalition for the International Criminal Court at the Preparatory Commission. In Lee, Roy S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, 705–34. Ardsley: Transnational, 2001.Google Scholar
Pace, William R., and Thieroff, Mark. Participation of Non-Governmental Organizations. In Lee, Roy S. K. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations and Results, 391–8. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999.Google Scholar
Parsons, Craig. Before Eclecticism: Competing Alternatives in Constructivist Research. International Theory 7, no. 3 (2015): 501–38.Google Scholar
Parsons, Craig. How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V., Larson, Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth, William C. (eds.), Status in World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Pearson, Zoe. Non-Governmental Organizations and the International Criminal Court: Changing Landscapes of International Law. Cornell International Law Journal 39, no. 2 (2006): 243–84.Google Scholar
Peevers, Charlotte. Altering International Law: Nasser, Bandung, and the Suez Crisis. In Eslava, Luis, Fakhri, Makhri and Nesiah, Vasuki (eds.), Bandung, Global History and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures, 574–94. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Perna, Laura. The Formation of the Treaty Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006.Google Scholar
Petrova, Margarita H. Rhetorical Entrapment and Normative Enticement: How the United Kingdom Turned from Spoiler into Champion of the Cluster Munition Ban. International Studies Quarterly 60, no. 3 (2016): 387–99.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Pike, David W. France Divided: The French and the Civil War in Spain. London: Sussex Academic Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Plummer, Joni J. France and Portugal in the Spanish Civil War – Domestic and International Policies (MA thesis). Indiana University at Bloomington, 1988, available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a203120.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Pohl, Benjamin, and van Willigen, Niels. Analytic Eclecticism and EU Foreign Policy (In)Action. Global Society 29, no. 2 (2015): 175–98.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. Diplomats as Permanent Representatives: The Practical Logics of the Multilateral Pecking Order. International Journal 66, no. 3 (2011): 543–61.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO–Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent, and Cornut, Jérémie. Practice Theory and the Study of Diplomacy: A Research Agenda. Cooperation and Conflict 50, no. 3 (2015): 297–315.Google Scholar
Pratt, Simon Frankel. Pragmatism as Ontology, Not (Just) Epistemology: Exploring the Full Horizon of Pragmatism as an Approach to IR Theory. International Studies Review 18, no. 3 (2016): 508–27.Google Scholar
Price, Jonathan J. Thucydides and Internal War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. Emerging Customary Norms and Anti-Personnel Landmines. In Reus-Smit, Christian (ed.), The Politics of International Law, 106–30. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52, no. 3 (1998): 613–44.Google Scholar
Price, Richard, and Christian, Reus-Smit. Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations 4, no. 3 (1998): 259–94.Google Scholar
Prorok, Alyssa K. The (In)Compatibility of Peace and Justice? The International Criminal Court and Civil Conflict Termination International Organization 71, no. 2 (2017): 213–43.Google Scholar
Quénivet, Noëlle. Commentary on the Law of the International Criminal Court: Article 8(2)(c). Edited by Mark Klamberg, 23 March 2017, available at: https://casematrixnetwork.org/cmn-knowledge-hub/icc-commentary-clicc/commentary-rome-statute/commentary-rome-statute-part-2-articles-5-10/#c1938 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Quénivet, Noëlle. Commentary on the Law of the International Criminal Court: Article 8(2)(e). Edited by Mark Klamberg, 23 March 2016, available at: https://casematrixnetwork.org/cmn-knowledge-hub/icc-commentary-clicc/commentary-rome-statute/commentary-rome-statute-part-2-articles-5-10/#c1947 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Quénivet, Noëlle. Commentary on the Law of the International Criminal Court: Article 8(2)(f). Edited by Mark Klamberg, 23 March 2017, available at: https://casematrixnetwork.org/cmn-knowledge-hub/icc-commentary-clicc/commentary-rome-statute/commentary-rome-statute-part-2-articles-5-10/#c1967 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Rajkovic, Nikolas. The Politics of International Law and Compliance: Serbia, Croatia and The Hague Tribunal. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Ramanathan, Usha. India and the ICC. Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, no. 3 (2005): 627–34.Google Scholar
Rao, Raza Mumtaz. Nasim Hasan Shah: A Controversial Judge. Daily Capital. February 4, 2015.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Susan (ed.), Concise Oxford Dictionary of Quotations. 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Raymond, Gregory. Problems and Prospects in the Study of International Norms. Mershon International Studies Review 41, no. 2 (1997): 205–45.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. Beyond Metatheory? European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (2013): 589–608.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. Constructivism. In Burchill, Scott, Linklater, Andrew, Devetak, Richard, Donnelly, Jack, Paterson, Matthew, Reus-Smit, Christian and True, Jacqui (eds.), Theories of International Relations. 3rd edn., 188–212. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 4, no. 3 (2002): 487–509.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. Society, Power and Ethics. In Reus-Smit, Christian (ed.), The Politics of International Law, 272–90. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions. International Organization 51, no. 4 (1997): 555–89.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. The Contours of Analytical Eclecticism. Einaudi Center for International Studies, Cornell University, 2011, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20150613032718/http:/pacs.einaudi.cornell.edu/system/files/ReusSmit-PKFest1.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Reynolds, David. Great Britain. In Reynolds, David (ed.), The Origins of the Cold War in Europe, 77–95. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Rey-Schyrr, Catherine. From Yalta to Dien Bien Phu: The History of the International Committee of the Red Cross 1945 to 1955. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2017.Google Scholar
Ripsman, Norrin M., Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., and Lobell, Steven E.. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. Arguing about Arguing: A Comment. Critical Policy Studies 7, no. 3 (2013): 339–49.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. Global Governance and Communicative Action. Government and Opposition 39, no. 2 (2004): 288–313.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. ‘Lets Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54, no. 1 (2003): 1–39.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, and Ropp, Stephen. International Human Rights Norms and Domestic Change: Conclusions. In Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds.), The Power of Human Rights, 234–78. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds.), The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds.), The Power of Human Rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, and Sikkink, Kathryn. The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction. In Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds.), The Power of Human Rights, 1–38. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War. International Organization 48, no. 2 (1994): 185–214.Google Scholar
Roberge, Marie-Claude. The New International Criminal Court: A Preliminary Assessment. International Review of the Red Cross 38, no. 325 (1998): 671–83.Google Scholar
Roberts, Christopher N. J. The Contentious History of the International Bill of Human Rights. Cambridge Studies in Law and Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Robinson, Arthur N. R. Extemporaneous Statement Made by His Excellency Arthur N.R. Robinson President of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago on April 11, 2002 at the Plenary Session of the Special Treaty Event, April 11, 2002, available at: http://iccnow.org/documents/TrinidadRobinsonPlen11Apr02.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Robinson, Darryl, and von Hebel, Herman. War Crimes in Internal Conflicts: Article 8 of the ICC Statute. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2 (December 1999): 193–209.Google Scholar
Rodley, Nigel. Human Rights in Armed Conflict. New World, April 1975.Google Scholar
Rohlfing, Ingo. Case Studies and Causal Inference. Research Methods Series. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Root, Elihu. Francis Lieber. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting 7 (1913): 8–30.Google Scholar
Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn. International Norms and Domestic Politics in Chile and Guatemala. In Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds.), The Power of Human Rights, 172–204. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rose, Gideon. Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics 51, no. 1 (1998): 144–72.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Alvin Z. Egypts Foreign Policy. Current History 66, no. 390 (1974): 53.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Christopher. Constructing an Atrocities Regime: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. International Organization 55, no. 3 (2001): 655–91.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Christopher. Power and Principle: The Politics of International Criminal Courts. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ruegger, Paul. Radio Address. Zürich, June 1948. Archiv für Zeitgeschichte, ETH Zürich, Nachlass Paul Ruegger dossier 28.3.2.1 Amerikareise Paul Ruegger.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 855–85.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, Layne, Christopher, Spiro, David E., and Doyle, Michael W.. The Democratic Peace. International Security 19, no. 4 (1995): 164–84.Google Scholar
Sadoul, Paul. De la guerre civile en droit des gens: reconnaissance de belligérance. Nancy: P. Scheffer, 1905.Google Scholar
Samaroo, Brinsley. ANR Robinsons Long Road to the International Criminal Court (ICC). The University of Trinidad and Tobago, 6 June 2009, available at: http://acuns.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Long-Road-To-ICC-ANR-Robinson-AM-2009.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Sandoz, Yves. The History of the Grave Breaches Regime. Journal of International Criminal Justice 7, no. 4 (2009): 657–82.Google Scholar
Sandoz, Yves, Swinarski, Christophe, and Zimmermann, Bruno (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Leiden: International Committee of the Red Cross, Martinus Nijhoff, 1987.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, Bouvier, Antoine A., and Quintin, Anne. How Does Law Protect in War? 3rd edn. Vol. I. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2006.Google Scholar
Schabas, William. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schabas, William. The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Schabas, William. The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Schabas, William. Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics, and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Scheffer, David J. All the Missing Souls: A Personal History of the War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Scheffer, David J. The United States and the International Criminal Court. American Journal of International Law 93, no. 1 (1999): 12–22.Google Scholar
Scheipers, Sibylle, and Sicurelli, Daniela. Normative Power Europe: A Credible Utopia? Journal of Common Market Studies 45, no. 2 (2007): 435–57.Google Scholar
Schiff, Benjamin N. Building the International Criminal Court. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55, no. 1 (2001): 47–80.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. The Future of Real-Existing Democracy. Society and Economy 33, no. 2 (2011): 399–428.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Alexander. War Crimes. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, 2014, available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e431 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L., and Priess, David. A Tale of Two Realisms: Expanding the Institutions Debate. Mershon International Studies Review 41, no. 1 (1997): 1–32.Google Scholar
Scobbie, Iain. The Approach to Customary International Law in the Study. In Wilmshurst, Elizabeth and Breau, Susan (eds.), Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law, 15–49. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, and Ginsburg, Tom. The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship. American Journal of International Law 106, no. 1 (2012): 1–46.Google Scholar
Shama, Nael. Egyptian Foreign Policy from Mubarak to Morsi: Against the National Interest. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval. Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval. Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach. American Journal of International Law 106, no. 2 (2012): 225–70.Google Scholar
Shawki, Noha, and Cox, Michaelene. Negotiating Sovereignty and Human Rights: Actors and Issues in Contemporary Human Rights Politics. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Shereshevsky, Yahli. Back in the Game: The Reengagement of States in International Humanitarian Law Making. Berkeley Journal of International Law 37, no. 1 (2019): 1–63.Google Scholar
Schiff, B. N. Universalism Meets Sovereignty at the International Criminal Court. In Shawki, Noha and Cox, Michaelene (eds), Negotiating Sovereignty and Human Rights: Actors and Issues in Contemporary Human Rights Politics, 59–79. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America. International Organization 47, no. 3 (1993): 411–41.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W. W. Norton, 2011.Google Scholar
Sil, Rudra, and Katzenstein, Peter. Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions. Perspectives on Politics 8, no. 2 (2010): 411–31.Google Scholar
Sil, Rudra, and Katzenstein, Peter. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Sil, Rudra, and Katzenstein, Peter. De-Centering, Not Discarding, the ‘Isms’: Some Friendly Amendments. International Studies Quarterly 55, no. 2 (2011): 481–85.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth. International Law and International Relations. In Caldeira, Gregory A., Daniel Kelemen, R and Whittington, Keith E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, 187–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth. Why Commit? Explaining State Acceptance of International Human Rights Obligations. 1 May 2002, available at: https://wcfia.harvard.edu/publications/why-commit-explaining-state-acceptance-international-human-rights-obligations [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth, and Danner, Allison. Credible Commitments and the International Criminal Court. International Organization 64, no. 2 (2010): 225–56.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh. The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. Building Global Democracy. Chicago Journal of International Law 1, no. 2 (2000): 223–29.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. International Law in a World of Liberal States. European Journal of International Law 6, no. 1 (1995): 503–38.Google Scholar
Small, Melvin, and David Singer, J.. The War-Proneness of Democratic Regimes, 1816–1965. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations 1, no. 4 (1976): 50–69.Google Scholar
Smith, Courtney B. The Politics of Global Consensus Building: A Comparative Analysis. Global Governance 5, no. 2 (1999): 173–201.Google Scholar
Smith, Nicholas Ross. Can Neoclassical Realism Become a Genuine Theory of International Relations? The Journal of Politics 80, no. 2 (2018): 742–49.Google Scholar
Soifer, Hillel David. The Causal Logic of Critical Junctures. Comparative Political Studies 45, no. 12 (2012): 1572–97.Google Scholar
Solomon, Ty, and Steele, Brent J.. Micro-Moves in International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations 23, no. 2 (2017): 267–91.Google Scholar
Somin, Ilya. Stillborn Crusade: The Tragic Failure of Western Intervention in the Russian Civil War, 1918–1920. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1996.Google Scholar
Soutou, Georges-Henri. France. In Reynolds, David (ed.), The Origins of the Cold War in Europe, 96–120. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Steel, Daniel. Social Mechanisms and Causal Inference. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34, no. 1 (2004): 55–78.Google Scholar
Steele, Brent J. Book review: Reconstructing the Cold War: The Early Years, 1945–1958. By Ted Hopf. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012; International Practices. Edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 1 (2014): 276–78.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur A. Neoliberal Institutionalism. In Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, 201–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Steinacher, Gerald. Humanitarians at War: The Red Cross in the Shadow of the Holocaust. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. Wanted – Dead or Alive. In Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, 146–72. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Steinke, Ronen. Politics of International Criminal Justice: German Perspectives from Nuremberg to The Hague. Oxford; Portland: Hart, 2012.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. The Conditions of Fruitfulness of Theorizing about Mechanisms in Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21, no. 3 (1991): 367–88.Google Scholar
Struett, Michael J. The Politics of Constructing the International Criminal Court: NGOs, Discourse, and Agency. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
Subotic, Jelena. Constructivism as Professional Practice in the US Academy. PS: Political Science & Politics 50, no. 1 (2017): 84–8.Google Scholar
Sunderland, Luke. Rebel Barons: Resisting Royal Power in Medieval Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Suter, Keith. An International Law of Guerrilla Warfare: The Global Politics of Law-Making. London: F. Pinter, 1984.Google Scholar
Taylor, Hannis. Treatise on International Public Law. Chicago: Callaghan & Co., 1901.Google Scholar
Tenove, Chris. Canada and the ICC. Part One: The Backstory. Liu Institute – Reports from the Field (blog), May 31, 2010, available at: https://blogs.ubc.ca/ligi/2010/05/31/canada-and-the-icc-part-one-the-backstory/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Thies, Cameron. A Pragmatic Guide to Qualitative Historical Analysis in the Study of International Relations. International Studies Perspectives 3, no. 4 (2002): 351–72.Google Scholar
Thomas, Daniel C. Rejecting the US Challenge to the International Criminal Court: Normative Entrapment and Compromise in EU Policy-Making. International Politics 46, no. 4 (2009): 376–94.Google Scholar
Ticehurst, Rupert. The Martens Clause and the Laws of Armed Conflict. International Review of the Red Cross 37, no. 317 (1997): 125–34.Google Scholar
Tolley, Howard B. The International Commission of Jurists: Global Advocates for Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Tostensen, Arne. Norways Africa Policy. In Wohlgemuth, Lennart (ed.), The Nordic Countries and Africa: Old and New Relations, 34–41. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute, 2002.Google Scholar
Trampusch, Christine, and Palier, Bruno. Between X and Y: How Process Tracing Contributes to Opening the Black Box of Causality. New Political Economy 21, no. 5 (2016): 437–54.Google Scholar
Transcript, The New Court: Civil Society’s Victory. Common Ground, October 6, 1998, available at: http://commongroundradio.org/shows/98/9840.html [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Triggs, G. Traditional Asian Approaches to the Protection of Victims of Armed Conflict and Their Relationship to Modern International Humanitarian Law – The Chinese View: Commentary, Australian Year Book of International Law 9 (1980): 151–7.Google Scholar
Tuchman, Barbara. The Proud Tower: A Portrait of the World before the War, 1890–1914. London: Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar
Tuininga, Matthew. Calvins Political Theology and the Public Engagement of the Church: Christs Two Kingdoms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
UK Rome Conference delegation member. Interview, August 2014. (Author papers).Google Scholar
Ulbert, Cornelia, and Risse, Thomas. Deliberately Changing the Discourse: What Does Make Arguing Effective? Acta Politica 40, no. 3 (2005): 351–67.Google Scholar
Ulbert, Cornelia, Risse, Thomas, and Müller, Harald. Arguing and Bargaining in Multilateral Negotiations. Paper presented to Conference on ‘Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics’, European University Institute, Swiss Chair Firenze, 21–22 May 2004, available at: http://polsoz.fu-berlin.de/polwiss/forschung/international/atasp/publikationen/4_artikel_papiere/26/ulbert_risse_mueller_2004.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Vattel, Emerich de. The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns. Edited by Scott, J. B.. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1916.Google Scholar
Verrijn Stuart, Heikelina, and Marlise Simons. The Judge: Interview with Antonio Cassese. In Heikelina Verrijn Stuart and Marlise Simons, The Prosecutor and the Judge: Benjamin Ferencz and Antonio Cassese, Interviews and Writings, 47–92. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, Amsterdam University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Vetter, Charles. Sherman: Merchant of Terror, Advocate of Peace. Gretna: Pelican Publishing Co., 1992.Google Scholar
Vieira, Sérgio. The Nordic countries and Mozambique: From national liberation to economic liberation’ in ‘Nordic Solidarity with the Liberation Struggles in Southern Africa, and Challenges for Democratic Partnerships into the 21st Century’, Robben Island 11–14 February 1999, Conference Report, 54–65, available at: http://diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:287783/FULLTEXT01 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. The Bad Ass Theory of Why Dictators Sign the Convention against Torture. The Monkey Cage (blog), February 4, 2010, available at: http://themonkeycage.org/2010/02/the_bad_ass_theory_of_why_dict/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Vreeland, James. Dictatorships, Torture, and Human Rights Treaties: The Bad Ass Theory. 12 February 2010, available at: http://vreelander.blogspot.com/2010/02/dictatorships-torture-and-human-rights.html [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Vucetic, Srdjan. Genealogy as a Research Tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies 37, no. 3 (2011): 1295–1312.Google Scholar
Wæver, Ole. The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate. In Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, 149–85. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Walter, Timo. The Road (Not) Taken? How the Indexicality of Practice Could Make or Break the New Constructivism’. European Journal of International Relations 25, no. 2 (2019): 538–61.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth Neal. Man, the State and War. 2001 edn. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth Neal. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.Google Scholar
Warner, Geoffrey. France and Non-Intervention in Spain, July–August 1936. International Affairs 38, no. 2 (1962): 203–20.Google Scholar
Washburn, John. The Negotiation of the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court and International Lawmaking in the 21st Century. Pace International Law Review 11 (1999): 361–77.Google Scholar
Watkin, Kenneth, and Norris, Andrew J. (eds.), Non-International Armed Conflict in the Twenty-First Century. Vol. 88. International Law Studies. Newport: US Naval War College, 2012.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ruth. Fiddling in Rome: America and the International Criminal Court. Foreign Affairs 77, no. 6 (1998): 20–24.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization 41, no. 3 (1987): 335–70.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46, no. 2 (1992): 391–425.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Steven. The Democratic Legitimacy of International Law. Oxford: Bloomsbury, 2010.Google Scholar
Widmaier, Wesley W., Blyth, Mark, and Seabrooke, Leonard. Exogenous Shocks or Endogenous Constructions? The Meanings of Wars and Crises. International Studies Quarterly 51, no. 4 (2007): 747–59.Google Scholar
Wight, Colin, Dunne, Tim, and Hansen, Lene (eds.), Special Issue: The End of International Relations Theory? European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (2013).Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, Elizabeth. Report on the Conference for the Establishment of an International Criminal Court 15 June–17 July 1998. September 23, 1998. (Author papers).Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, Elizabeth, and Breau, Susan (eds.), Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Wilson, Page. The Myth of International Humanitarian Law. International Affairs 93, no. 3 (2017): 563–79.Google Scholar
Witt, John Fabian. Lincolns Code: The Laws of War in American History. New York: Free Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Woetzel, Robert K. The Nuremberg Trials in International Law. London: Stevens, 1960.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions during the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold. ‘National Security as an Ambiguous Symbol. Political Science Quarterly 67, no. 4 (1952): 481–502.Google Scholar
Women’s Caucus (UK branch) member. Interview, December 2014. (Author papers).Google Scholar
Woolsey, Theodore Dwight. Introduction to the Study of International Law. 4th edn. New York: Scribner, Armstrong, 1875.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy. International Law and the American Civil War. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 61 (1967): 50–58.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy. The American Civil War. In Falk, Richard A. (ed.), The International Law of Civil War, 30–109. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Carmen. A ‘Rogue’ Gone Norm Entrepreneurial? Iran within the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. In Wagner, Wolfgang, Werner, Wouter and Onderco, Michal (eds.), Deviance in International Relations: ‘Rogue States’ and International Security, 83–104. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Carmen. Theoretical Approaches in Norm Dynamics. In Wunderlich, Carmen and Müller, Harald (eds.), Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control: Interests, Conflicts, and Justice, 20–47. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Wylie, Lana. Valuing Reputation and Prestige: Canadian Foreign Policy and the International Criminal Court. American Review of Canadian Studies 39, no. 2 (2009): 112–30.Google Scholar
Yingling, Raymund T., and Ginnane, Robert W.. The Geneva Conventions of 1949. American Journal of International Law 46, no. 3 (1952): 393–427.Google Scholar
Young, John W. France, the Cold War and the Western Alliance, 1944–49: French Foreign Policy and Post-War Europe. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society. International Organization 45, no. 3 (1991): 281–308.Google Scholar
Yung, Walter. Le rôle et laction de la Croix-Rouge en temps de guerre civile. Revue internationale de La Croix-Rouge et Bulletin international des Sociétés de la Croix-Rouge 20, no. 230 (1938): 97–113.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs 76, no. 6 (1997): 22–43.Google Scholar
Zamir, Noam. Classification of Conflicts in International Humanitarian Law: The Legal Impact of Foreign Intervention in Civil Wars. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
Zhu, Dan. China and the International Criminal Court. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.Google Scholar
Zhu, Dan. China, the International Criminal Court, and International Adjudication. Netherlands International Law Review 61, no. 1 (2014): 43–67.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Andreas, and Robin, Geiß. Article 8 War Crimes Para. 2 (c) to (f) and Para. 3: War Crimes Committed in an Armed Conflict Not of an International Character. In Triffterer, Otto and Kai Ambos (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 528–79. 3rd edn. Munich, Oxford, Baden-Baden: C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos, 2016.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Diplomatic Conference for the Establishment of International Conventions for the Protection of Victims of War. Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949. Vols. I–IV. Berne: Federal Political Department, 1950, available at https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/RC-Fin-Rec_Dipl-Conf-1949.html [accessed 28 December 2019].Google Scholar
Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva. (1974–1977). Vols. I–XVI. Berne: Federal Political Department, 1978, available at https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/RCdipl-conference-records.html. [accessed 17 September 2019].Google Scholar
United Nations. United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court Rome, 15 June–17 July 1998 Official Records (A/CONF.183/13) Vols. I–III. United Nations, August 2002, available at http://legal.un.org/icc/rome/proceedings/contents.htm [accessed 17 September 2019].Google Scholar
Final Act of the International Conference on Human Rights, Tehran, 13 May 1968 (Doc A/Conf.32/41), available at: http://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/fatchr/Final_Act_of_TehranConf.pdf [accessed 6 December 2018].Google Scholar
International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, Decision Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute on the Charges of the Prosecutor against Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo (ICC-01/05-01/08, 15 June 2009), available at: https://icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2009_04528.PDF [accessed 26 December 2018].Google Scholar
International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v Germain Katanga, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute (ICC-01/04-01/07, 7 March 2014), available at: https://icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2015_04025.PDF [accessed 26 December 2018].Google Scholar
International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute (Public with Annexes I, II, and A to F), ICC- 01/05-01/08 (21 March 2016), available at: https://icc-cpi.int/courtrecords/cr2016_02238.pdf [accessed 26 December 2018].Google Scholar
International Criminal Court. States Parties – Chronological List, available at https://asp.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/states%20parties/Pages/states%20parties%20_%20chronological%20list.aspx [accessed 11 August 2019].Google Scholar
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić aka ‘Dule’, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction (IT-94–1, 2 October 1995), available at: http://icty.org/x/cases/tadic/acdec/en/51002.htm [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Law Commission. Yearbook of the International Law Commission: Report of the Commission to the General Assembly on the Work of Its Forty-Third Session (1994) (A/CN.4/SER.A/1994/Add.l (Part 2)), II(2):38–41, 67–69, available at http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/english/ilc_1994_v2_p2.pdf [accessed 17 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Law Commission. Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Forty-Eighth Session, 6 May–26 July 1996, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-First Session, Supplement No. 10 (UN Doc. A/512/10), available at: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/reports/a_51_10.pdf [accessed 14 December 2018].Google Scholar
Non-Aligned Movement. Final Declaration of the Sixth Conference of Heads of State or Government of Non-Aligned Countries, Held at Havana, Cuba, from 3 to 9 September 1979 (UN General Assembly, UN Doc. A/34/542, 11 October 1979), available at: https://undocs.org/A/34/542 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, Working Group on Definitions of Crime. Working paper submitted by the delegations of New Zealand and Switzerland (UN Doc. A/AC.249/1997/WG.1/ DP.2, 14 February 1997), available at: https://legal-tools.org/doc/7ba0b8/pdf/ [accessed 14 December 2018].Google Scholar
Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, Working Group on Definitions of Crime. Proposal submitted by the United States (UN Doc. A/AC.249/1997/WG.1/DP.1, 14 February 1997), available at: https://legal-tools.org/doc/c5359c/pdf/ [accessed 14 December 2018].Google Scholar
Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, Working Group on Definitions and Elements of Crimes. Reference Paper on War Crimes submitted by Germany (UN Doc. A/AC.249/1997/WG.1/DP.23/ Rev.1, 12 December 1997), available at: https://legal-tools.org/doc/0c9b1a/pdf/ [accessed 14 December 2018].Google Scholar
Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court. Draft Statute for the International Criminal Court, Part 2. Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Applicable Law (UN Doc. A/AC.249/1998/CRP.8, 2 April 1998), available at: https://legal-tools.org/doc/e652fe/pdf/ [accessed 14 December 2018].Google Scholar
Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court (UN Doc. A/50/22, 6 September 1995), available at: https://legal-tools.org/doc/b50da8/pdf/ [accessed 14 December 2018].Google Scholar
Report of the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court: Volume I (Proceedings of the Preparatory Committee during March–April and August 1996) (UN Doc. A/51/22, 13 September 1996), available at: https://legal-tools.org/doc/e75432/pdf/ [accessed 14 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution 177(II) of 21 November 1947 (UN Doc. A/519, 8 January 1948, pp. 111–12), available at: http://undocs.org/a/519 [accessed 2 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution Respect for Human Rights in Armed Conflicts (UN Doc. A/RES/2444 (XXIII), 19 December 1968), available at: https://refworld.org/docid/3b00f1d558.html [accessed 6 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution Respect for Human Rights in Armed Conflicts (UN Doc. A/RES/2597 (XXIV), 16 December 1969), available at: https://refworld.org/docid/3b00f1d34e.html [accessed 6 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (UN Doc. A/RES/25/2625, 24 October 1970), available at: http://undocs.org/A/RES/2625(XXV) [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution Respect for Human Rights in Armed Conflicts (UN Doc. A/RES/2674 (XXV), 9 December 1970), available at: https://refworld.org/docid/3b00f04954.html [accessed 6 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution Respect for Human Rights in Armed Conflicts (UN Doc. A/RES/2852 (XXVI), 20 December 1971), available at: https://refworld.org/docid/3b00f1c010.html [accessed 6 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution 29/3314 (UN Doc. A/RES/29/3314, 14 December 1974), available at: http://un-documents.net/a29r3314.htm [accessed 25 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution 42/151 (UN Doc. A/42/151, 7 December 1987), available at: http://undocs.org/A/RES/42/151 [accessed 12 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution 44/39 (UN Doc. A/RES/44/39, 4 December 1989), available at: http://undocs.org/a/RES/44/39 [accessed 25 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution 47/33 (UN Doc. A/RES/47/33, 25 November 1992), available at: http://un.org/documents/ga/res/47/a47r033.htm [accessed 13 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution 49/53 (UN Doc. A/RES/49/53, 17 February 1995), available at: http://un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/49/53 [accessed 14 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution 50/46 (UN Doc. A/RES/50/46, 11 December 1995), available at: http://un.org/documents/ga/res/50/a50r046.htm [accessed 14 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN Security Council Resolution 780 (UN Doc. S/RES 780, 6 October 1992), available at: http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/doc/780 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
UN Security Council. Letter dated 9 February 1993 from the Secretary-General addressed to the President of the Security Council (UN Doc. S/25274, 10 February 1993), available at: http://undocs.org/S/25274 [accessed 13 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN Security Council Resolution 808 (UN Doc. S/RES/808, 22 February 1993), available at: http://refworld.org/docid/3b00f15d30.html [accessed 18 January 2015].Google Scholar
UN Security Council. Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Security Council Resolution 808 (1993) (UN Doc. S/25704, 3 May 1993), available at: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N93/248/35/IMG/N9324835.pdf?OpenElement [accessed 13 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN Security Council. Provisional Verbatim Record of the Three Thousand Two Hundred and Seventeenth Meeting (UN Doc. S/PV.3217, 25 May 1993), available at: https://undocs.org/en/S/PV.3217 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
UN Security Council Resolution 827 (UN Doc. S/RES/827, 25 May 1993), available at: https://undocs.org/S/RES/827(1993) [accessed 25 December 2018].Google Scholar
UN Security Council Resolution 955 (UN Doc. S/RES/955, 8 November 1994), available at: http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/doc/955 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
UN Security Council. Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to Paragraph 5 of Security Council Resolution 955 (1994) (UN Doc. S/1995/134, 13 February 1995), available at: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N95/043/02/PDF/N9504302.pdf?OpenElement [accessed 25 December 2018].Google Scholar
United Nations. Respect for Human Rights in Armed Conflicts: Report of the Secretary-General (UN Doc. A/7720, 20 November 1969), available at: https://undocs.org/pdf?symbol=en/A/7720 [accessed 6 September 2019].Google Scholar
United Nations. Respect for Human Rights in Armed Conflicts: Report of the Secretary-General (UN Doc. A/8052, 18 September 1970), available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/647214 [accessed 6 September 2019].Google Scholar
United Nations. The Work of the International Law Commission. 8th edn. Vol. I. 2012, available at: http://legal.un.org/avl/ILC/8th_E/Vol_I.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
United Nations Committee on International Criminal Jurisdiction. The American Journal of International Law 46, no. 1 (Supplement: Official Documents) (1952): 1–11.Google Scholar
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (UN Doc. A/Conf.39/27, 23 May 1969; 1155 UNTS 331).Google Scholar
Documentation préliminaire pour la revision et l’établissement de conventions ayant trait à la Croix-Rouge: Mémorandum adressé par le Comité international de la Croix-Rouge aux gouvernements des États parties à la Convention de Genève et aux sociétés nationales de la Croix-Rouge. Revue Internationale de La Croix-Rouge et Bulletin International Des Societes de La Croix-Rouge 27, no. 314 (1945): 85–9.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. Report of the Sixteenth International Red Cross Conference, London, June 1938, available at: https://library.icrc.org/library/docs/CDDH/CI_1938/CI_1938_RAPPORT_ENG.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. Report on the Work of the Preliminary Conference of National Red Cross Societies for the Study of the Conventions and of Various Problems Relative to the Red Cross, Geneva, July 26–August 3, 1946. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1947, available at: https://loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC_report-1946.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. Report on the Work of the Conference of Government Experts for the Study of the Conventions for the Protection of War Victims (Geneva, April 14–26, 1947). Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1947, available at: https://loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC_report-1947.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. Draft Revised or New Conventions for the Protection of War Victims Established by the International Committee of the Red Cross with the Assistance of Government Experts, National Red Cross Societies and Other Humanitarian Associations. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1948, available at: http://loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC_Draft-revised.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. Revised and New Draft Conventions for the Protection of War Victims. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1948, available at: https://loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC_Revisednew-draft.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. Seventeenth International Red Cross Conference, Stockholm, August 1948: Report. Stockholm: 1948, available at: https://loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC_XVIIth-RC-Conference.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. Remarks and Proposals Submitted by the International Committee of the Red Cross: Document for the Consideration of Governments Invited by the Swiss Federal Council to Attend the Diplomatic Conference at Geneva (April 21, 1949). Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1949, available at: https://loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC_Remarks-proposals.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. Reaffirmation and Development of the Laws and Customs Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Report Prepared for the XXIst International Conference of the Red Cross, Istanbul, September 1969, May 1969, available at: http://loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC-Report-reaffirm-development-1969.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts (Geneva, 24 May–12 June 1971): ‘V - Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts’. January 1971, available at: https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC-conference_Vol-5.pdf [accessed 9 March 2020].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts (Geneva, 24 May–12 June 1971): Report on the Work of the Conference. August 1971, available at: http://loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC-Report-conf-of-gov-experts-1971.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts (Second Session: 3 May–3 June 1972) Report on the Work of the Conference (Volume II – Annexes). July 1972, available at: http://loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC-Report-conf-of-gov-experts-1972_V-2.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. Draft Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949: Commentary. October 1973, available at: http://loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC-Draft-additional-protocols.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. War Crimes: Working Paper Prepared by the ICRC for the Preparatory Committee for the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, New York, February 13, 1997, available at: http://iccnow.org/documents/3PretCmtWarCrimesRedCross.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. The Roots of Restraint in War. June 18, 2018, available at: https://icrc.org/en/publication/roots-restraint-war [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. State Parties to the Following International Humanitarian Law and Other Related Treaties as of 4-Sep-2019, available at: http://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/xsp/.ibmmodres/domino/OpenAttachment/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/0AB77CE1BF547803C1258411003C68AE/%24File/IHL_and_other_related_Treaties.pdf?Open [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
ICRC Customary IHL Database, Rule 156. Definition of War Crimes, available at: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule156 [accessed 12 December 2018].Google Scholar
Aldrich, George H. Human Rights in Armed Conflict: Development of the Law. Department of State Bulletin 68 (June 18, 1973): 876–82.Google Scholar
Aldrich, George H. Classified Report of the United States Delegation to the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva, Switzerland, February 20–March 29, 1974, June 10, 1974. http://static.history.state.gov/frus/frus1969-76ve03/pdf/d235.pdf [accessed 8 March 2020].Google Scholar
Aldrich, George H. Report of the United States Delegation to the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Second Session, Geneva, Switzerland, February 3–April 18, 1975, July 18, 1975. TNA: FCO 61/1374 (Doc. 131). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
Aldrich, George H. Report of the U.S. Delegation to the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Third Session, Washington, Geneva, Switzerland, April 21–June 11, 1976, October 15, 1976. http://static.history.state.gov/frus/frus1969-76ve03/pdf/d261.pdf [accessed 8 March 2020].Google Scholar
Best, Geoffrey. Updating the Geneva Conventions (Transcript). BBC Radio 3, January 13, 1978. TNA: FCO 58/1124 (Doc. 100). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
Caffery, Jefferson. The Ambassador in France (Caffery) to the Secretary of State, February 7, 1947, available at: http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1947v02/reference/frus.frus1947v02.i0009.pdf (at pp. 154–5) [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Canadian High Commission. B. M. Mawhinney (First Secretary, Canadian High Commission London) to Michael Arthur (UN Dept., FCO). February 15, 1974. TNA: FCO 61/1231 (Doc. 48). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
Government of Israel. The 2014 Gaza Conflict 7 July–26 August 2014: Factual and Legal Aspects. 2015, available at: https://mfa.gov.il/ProtectiveEdge/Documents/2014GazaConflictFullReport.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
International Commission of Jurists. Niall MacDermot, International Commission of Jurists, to David Ennals, Minister of State. March 19, 1974. TNA: FCO 61/1232 (Doc. W105). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
McCahon, William H. Revision and Extension of the Geneva Conventions. Department of State Bulletin 21, no. 531 (September 5, 1949): 339–40.Google Scholar
McCahon, William H. Toward Revision of the Geneva Convention. Department of State Bulletin 19, no. 484 (October 10, 1948): 464–5.Google Scholar
Ministère des Affaires étrangères. La question de la guerre civile: A. Lamarle, French Head Delegate, to Robert Schuman, Minister of Foreign Affairs in Paris, May 13, 1949. Cote 4–17, Unions Internationales 161, Mai 1949 Correspondances Diverses. Archives Diplomatiques de la Courneuve, France.Google Scholar
Ministère des Affaires étrangères. Note Conventions de Genève en cas de guerre civile Sent by Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Organizations Direction, to French Delegation in Geneva, June 4, 1949. Cote 4–17, Unions Internationales 161, ‘Mai 1949 Correspondances Diverses’. Archives Diplomatiques de la Courneuve, France.Google Scholar
Northern Ireland Office. R C Cox to T K C Ellison (UN Dept., FCO): ‘Draft Protocol to Article 3 to the Geneva Conventions – and the Position of Northern Ireland’. March 14, 1973. TNA: FCO 61/1090 (Doc. 84). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
Office of General Counsel. Department of Defense Law of War Manual. Washington: Department of Defense, 2015, available at: http://jag.navy.mil/distrib/instructions/Law-of-War-Manual-June-2015.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
Quentin-Baxter, Robert Q. Report of the New Zealand Delegation to the First Session of the Diplomatic Conference for the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts. April 10, 1974. TNA: FCO 61/1233 (Doc. 154). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
Reagan, Ronald. Letter of Transmittal from the President to the Senate of the United States, 29 January 1987. In United States: ‘Message from the President Transmitting Protocol II Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, Relating to the Protection of Victims of Noninternational Armed Conflicts, January 29, 1987’, International Legal Materials 26, no. 2 (1987): 562.Google Scholar
Shultz, George P. Letter of Submittal from the Secretary of State, 13 December 1986. In United States: ‘Message from the President Transmitting Protocol II Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, Relating to the Protection of Victims of Noninternational Armed Conflicts, January 29, 1987’, International Legal Materials 26, no. 2 (1987): 563–564.Google Scholar
UK Army Legal Services. David Hughes-Morgan (Brigadier Legal Staff) to UK Ministry of Defence (Various), ‘Humanitarian Law Article 42 of Protocol I – Guerrillas’. March 4, 1977. TNA: FCO 58/1125 (Doc. 46). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Cabinet Office. Memorandum by the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Ministerial Committee for the Revision of the Geneva Conventions on War Victims. November 25, 1949. TNA: CAB 130/46/GEN281. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Mill Irving, Foreign Office Minute: Revision of the Geneva Conventions. March 31, 1949. FO 369/4147, K.3541. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. United Kingdom Delegation Circular No. 10 – Diplomatic Conference on Protection of War Victims (Note on meeting held in the Attorney-General’s Room at the House of Commons on Monday, 11th April, 1949). April 18, 1949. TNA: FO 369/4150, K.4771. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. United Kingdom Delegation Circular No. 11 – Diplomatic Conference on Protection of War Victims (Appending ‘Record of Conversations Held in Paris between the Deputy Leader of the French Delegation and Mr. Strutt and Mr. Alexander’). April 18, 1949. TNA: FO 369/4150, K.4772. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. United Kingdom Delegation Circular No. 15 – Diplomatic Conference on Protection of War Victims (Attaching Official Record of Meeting with the Attorney General of 11 April 1949). April 19, 1949. TNA: FO 369/4150, K.4775. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Civilian Convention – Note of an Interview with the New Zealand Delegate. April 21, 1949. TNA: FO 369/4150, K.4779. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. W E Beckett (Foreign Office) to J A C Gutteridge (Delegation to the Conference on War Victims). April 25, 1949. TNA: FO 369/4149, K.4571. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Notes of 11th Meeting of the United Kingdom Delegation. May 4, 1949. TNA: FO 369/4150, K.4976. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. United Kingdom Delegation Circular No. 24 – Liaison with Other Delegations. May 9, 1949. TNA: FO 369/4150, K.4903. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Letter from R. Craigie to H. A. Caccia, Enc. ‘Memorandum on Developments in the Conference on the Subject of the Application of the Conventions to Civil War’. May 9, 1949. TNA: FO 369/4149, K.4720. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Alexander to Kemball (Excerpt). May 10, 1949. TNA: FO 369/4149/K.4555. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Letter from M. Reed, Law Officers’ Dept., to Kemball, Foreign Office, ‘Question of the Application of the Red Cross Conventions to Civil War’. May 16, 1949. TNA: FO 369/4150, K.4885. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. FO Minute by Mr. Alexander: Geneva Convention-Protection of War Victims. Draft Letter from Mr. Kemball to Mr. W. H. Gardner, War Office, Enclosing Copy of Sir R. Craigie’s Final Report on the Geneva Conference on the Protection of War Victims. November 4, 1949. TNA: FO 369/4164, K.10540. National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Letter from K G MacInnes to Mr Parsons, ‘ICRC Conference on Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva 24 May–12 June’. March 11, 1971. TNA: FCO 61/808 (Doc. 62). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Letter from I K C Ellison to R G Sheridan, ‘Norwegian Representation at the ICRC Conference on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts’. October 25, 1971. TNA: FCO 61/820 (Doc. 18). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. L J Evans (British Consulate General Geneva) to Ian K C Ellison (UN Dept., FCO): ‘ICRC – Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts’. October 11, 1972. TNA: FCO 61/960 (Doc. 4). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Record of a Meeting Held in Sir Vincent Evans’ Office on Wednesday 10 January (1973) at 2.45pm. n.d. TNA: FCO 61/1090 (Doc. 55). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. T W Keeble (UN Dept., FCO) to Mr Goodenough, Mr Parsons: Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts: Preparations for the 1974 Diplomatic Conference’. March 1, 1973. TNA: FCO 61/1090 (Doc. 74). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. M R Eaton to Sir Vincent Evans: ‘Diplomatic Conference on Human Rights in Armed Conflict February/March 1974’. June 5, 1973. TNA: FCO 61/1090 (Doc. 100). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. R G Britten (British Embassy, Oslo) to T W Keeble (UN Dept., FCO): ‘Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict: Liberation Movements’. January 14, 1974. TNA: FCO 61/1231 (Doc. 3). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. R J A Martin (UN Dept., FCO) to R C Cox (Northern Ireland Office): ‘Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict’. February 19, 1974. TNA: FCO 61/1237 (Doc. 26). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. UK Mission in Geneva to Immediate FCO Tel No. 185. March 12, 1974. TNA: FCO 61/1232 (Doc. 89). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. M A Arthur (UK Mission in Geneva) to R Facey (UN Department): ‘Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law’. March 15, 1974. TNA: FCO 61/1232 (Doc.93). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. UK Mission in Geneva to Immediate FCO Tel No. 216. March 19, 1974. TNA: FCO 61/1232 (Doc. 97). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts – Geneva 20 February-29 March 1974: First Session – Delegation Report. June 17, 1974. TNA: FCO 61/1233 (Doc. 165). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Report of Washington Meeting on 13 and 14 January 1975 on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict. n.d. TNA: FCO 61/1376 (Doc. 14). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. P M Maxey (UN Dept.) to Coles (Scored out, Replaced in Manuscript – Illegible), ‘Humanitarian Law: Reception for Delegates to London Meeting of Western Group’ (Appending Briefing Note). January 27, 1975. TNA: FCO 61/1376 (Doc. 34). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, ‘Second Session of the Geneva Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict, 3 February–18 April, 1975: Brief for the United Kingdom Delegation’, 29 January 1975. TNA: FCO 61/1375 (Doc. 17). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. R A Facey (UK Mission in Geneva) to N Jarrold (FCO UN Department): ‘Humanitarian Law: Protocol II’. February 10, 1975. TNA: FCO 61/1372 (Doc. 26). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. M S Weir to Maxey (UN Dept.), ‘Mr Allon’s Meeting with the Secretary of State’. March 3, 1975. TNA: FCO 61/1373 (Doc. 55). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. UK Mission in Geneva to Priority FCO Telno. 35 Saving. March 11, 1975. TNA: FCO 61/1373 (Doc. 54). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. T A H Solesby (UN Dept.) to M S Weir, ‘Conference on Humanitarian Law: NLMs’ (with 14 March Addendum by M S Weir)’. March 12, 1975.TNA: FCO61/1373 (Doc. 55). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. R A Facey (UK Mission, Geneva) to T A H Solesby (UN Dept.), Conference on Humanitarian Law: NLMs’. March 25, 1975. TNA: FCO 61/1373 (Doc. 70). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts – Geneva 3 February–18 April: Second Session – Delegation Report. August 5, 1975. TNA: FCO 61/1374 (Doc. 134). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Report of Washington Meeting 17/18 November 1975 on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict (Undated, Received in Registry 28 November 1975). November 28, 1975. TNA: FCO 61/1376 (Doc. 51). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. J C J Ramsden (UN Dept., FCO) to Mr Freeland. January 22, 1976. TNA: FCO 58/995 (Doc. 13). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. M L Tait (UN Dept., FCO) to Mr Weir, Brief for the UK Delegation to the Third Session of the Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict. April 13, 1976. TNA: FCO 58/995 (Doc. 63). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. M R Eaton to Bowie (UN Dept.), ‘Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts – Delegation Report’ (Attaching Draft Committee III Report), July 19, 1976. TNA: FCO 58/996 (Doc. 65). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. ‘Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts – Geneva 21 April–11 June: Third Session – Delegation Report’. September 21, 1976. TNA: FCO 58/997 (Doc. 76). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. M K O Simpson-Orlebar (UN Dept., FCO) to Mr Mansfield: ‘Brief for the UK Delegation to the Fourth Session of the Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict’. March 11, 1977. TNA: FCO 58/1125 (Doc. 38). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. W. G. Harris (UN Dept.) to E. C. Glover, UK Embassy, Washington, DC: ‘Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict’, April 1, 1977. TNA: FCO 58/1127 (Doc. 75). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. ‘Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict: Inner Core Meeting, 14 March 1977 at the US Mission, Geneva’. April 5, 1977. TNA: FCO 58/1127 (Doc. 76). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. ‘Fourth Session of the Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict: Geneva, 17 March–10 June 1977: Brief for the UK Delegation’. April 7, 1977. TNA: FCO 58/1126 (Doc. 41). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Immediate FCO Telno 277: Our Tels Nos 224 and 225: Article 42 – Guerillas’. May 24, 1977. TNA: FCO 58/1124 (Doc. 131). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Saving Telegram from UKMIS Geneva to FCO (Telno 30). June 10, 1977. TNA: FCO 58/1124 (Doc. 164). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts – Fourth and Final Session: Geneva 17 March–10 June 1977. Interim Delegation Report. July 13, 1977. TNA: FCO 58/1124 (Doc. 174). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. ‘Draft Sections of Report to Ministers on Signature of the Two Additional Protocols of 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 1949’ (Appended to 11 October 1977 Note from M R Eaton to Freeland). October 11, 1977. TNA: FCO 58/1129 (Doc. 104). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. ‘Fourth Session of the Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts: Geneva 17 March–10 June 1977: Annex B’. December 1, 1977. TNA: FCO 58/1128 (Doc. W97). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. International Criminal Court: Statement of Government Policy. February 24, 1998, House of Commons Dep/3 6092 (hard copy only), see: https://parliament.uk/depositedpapers?page=2188&sort=1# [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
UK Ministry of Defence. Joint Service Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict (Ref. JSP 383, 2004 edition). UK, 2004, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/27874/JSP3832004Edition.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar
UK War Office. Army Council Secretariat, Brief for Secretary of State, Cabinet Meeting of Ministers, ‘Revision of Geneva Conventions: Application of Geneva Conventions to Civil War’. March 26, 1949. TNA: WO 321/14041 (Doc. 35B). National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
US Department of State. Albert Clattenburg Jr., Chairman of the American Delegation, to the Secretary of State. August 26, 1947. US National Archives and Records Administration: RG – 59, Central Decimal File, 1945–1949, 514.2A12/1–145 to 514.2 Geneva/8–2347 (File 514.2A16 International Red Cross Diplomatic Conference, Geneva), Box 2386.Google Scholar
US Department of State. Telegram from US Mission in Geneva to Department of State: Laws of War Conference – Current Status. February 22, 1974. US National Archives and Records Administration: NARA AAD doc. 1974GENEVA01188, available at: https://aad.archives.gov/aad/createpdf?rid=28832&dt=2474&dl=1345 [accessed 15 September 2019].Google Scholar
US Department of State. Telegram from US Mission in Geneva to State Department: PRG Question at Laws of War Conference. February 28, 1974. US National Archives and Records Administration: NARA AAD doc. 1974GENEVA01308, available at: https://aad.archives.gov/aad/createpdf?rid=28765&dt=2474&dl=1345 [accessed 15 September 2019].Google Scholar
US Department of State. Telegram from US Mission in Geneva to US Mission in Canberra: Laws of War Conference – Wars of Liberation. March 11, 1974. US National Archives and Records Administration: NARA AAD doc. 1974GENEVA01591, available at: https://aad.archives.gov/aad/createpdf?rid=55820&dt=2474&dl=1345 [accessed 15 September 2019].Google Scholar
US Department of State. Telegram from Department of State to US Embassy Cairo: Geneva Conference on Laws of War. January 17, 1975. US National Archives and Records Administration: NARA AAD doc. 1975STATE011987, available at: https://aad.archives.gov/aad/createpdf?rid=115936&dt=2476&dl=1345 [accessed 15 September 2019].Google Scholar
US Department of State. US Department of State Telegram – PRG Issue at Law of War Conference: Supporting Countries. February 6, 1975. US National Archives and Records Administration: NARA AAD doc. 1975GENEVA00767, available at: https://aad.archives.gov/aad/createpdf?rid=100748&dt=2476&dl=1345 [accessed 15 September 2019].Google Scholar
US Department of State. Telegram from US Mission in Geneva to Department of State: Laws of War Conference – Liberation Movement Problem. February 28, 1975. US National Archives and Records Administration: NARA AAD doc. 1975GENEVA01397, available at: https://aad.archives.gov/aad/createpdf?rid=94380&dt=2476&dl=1345 [accessed 15 September 2019].Google Scholar
US Department of State. U.S. Participation in the UN: Report by the President to the Congress for the Year 1977. December 1978, available at: https://archive.org/stream/usparticipationi1977unit/usparticipationi1977unit_djvu.txt [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Henry Lovat, University of Glasgow
  • Book: Negotiating Civil War
  • Online publication: 17 August 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108667302.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Henry Lovat, University of Glasgow
  • Book: Negotiating Civil War
  • Online publication: 17 August 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108667302.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Henry Lovat, University of Glasgow
  • Book: Negotiating Civil War
  • Online publication: 17 August 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108667302.009
Available formats
×