Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T16:34:15.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Looking beyond challenging student behaviour: Utilising the teacher relationship interview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2022

Jantine L. Spilt Open the ORCID record for Jantine L. Spilt [Opens in a new window]  and
Helma M. Y. Koomen
Jantine L. Spilt*
Affiliation:
KU Leuven Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven Child and Youth Institute, Belgium
Helma M. Y. Koomen
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr Jantine Spilt, Division School Psychology and Development in Context, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102 - bus 3717, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Intervention is considered the ultimate goal of the diagnostic process. However, when diagnostic assessment is largely focused on student (mal)adjustment and when the role and perspective of the teacher is not systematically evaluated, the assessment may fail to generate useful recommendations for intervention or teacher consultation. Based on a descriptive case report, the potential contribution of the Teacher Relationship Interview in making the assessment phase more relevant to intervention is outlined and illustrated.

Keywords

Teacher-student interactionstudent behaviour problemsneeds-based assessmentteacher consultation
Type
Practitioner Paper
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , June 2023 , pp. 124 - 132
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T.M., & Rescorla, L.A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.).Google Scholar
Bosman, R.J., Zee, M., de Jong, P.F., & Koomen, H.M.Y. (2021). Using relationship-focused reflection to improve teacher-child relationships and teachers’ student-specific self-efficacy. Journal of School Psychology, 87, 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.06.001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brophy, J., & McCaslin, M. (1992). Teachers’ reports of how they perceive and cope with problem students. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 3–68. https://doi.org/10.1086/461712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Button, S., Pianta, R.C., & Marvin, R.S. (2001). Mothers’ representations of relationships with their children: Relations with parenting behavior, mother characteristics, and child disability status. Social Development, 10, 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86, 643–680. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lander, I. (2009). Repairing discordant student-teacher relationships: A case study using emotion-focused therapy. Children & Schools, 31, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/31.4.229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebeer, J., Birta-Székely, N., Demeter, K., Bohács, K., Candeias, A.A., Sønnesyn, G., Partanen, P., & Dawson, L. (2012). Re-assessing the current assessment practice of children with special education needs in Europe. School Psychology International, 33, 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034311409975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 66–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, K.F., & Van Bergen, P. (2015). Who, when, why and to what end? Students at risk of negative student–teacher relationships and their outcomes. Educational Research Review, 14, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, S.J. & O’Neal, C. (2000). Tips for teaching high functioning people with autism. MAAP Services, Inc.Google Scholar
Pameijer, N. (2017). Assessment and intervention: Bridging the gap with a practice-based model. Educational and Child Psychology, 34, 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pianta, R.C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10314-000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pianta, R.C. (2001). Student-Teacher Relationship Scale: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Pianta, R.C., Hamre, B.K., & Stuhlman, M. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. In Reynolds, W. & Miller, G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 199–234). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0710 Google Scholar
Schutz, P., Hong, J., Cross, D., & Osbon, J. (2006). Reflections on investigating emotion in educational activity settings. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9030-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slade, A. (2007). Reflective parenting programs: Theory and development. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 26, 640–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690701310698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilt, J.L., & Koomen, H.M.Y. (2009). Widening the view on teacher-child relationships: Teachers’ narratives concerning disruptive versus non-disruptive children. School Psychology Review, 38, 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2009.12087851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilt, J.L., Koomen, H.M.Y., Thijs, J.T., & van der Leij, A. (2012). Supporting teachers’ relationships with disruptive children: The potential of relationship-focused reflection. Attachment & Human Development, 14, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672286 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuhlman, M.W., & Pianta, R.C. (2002). Teachers’ narratives about their relationships with children: Associations with behavior in classrooms. School Psychology Review, 31, 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, K.S., & Oswald, D.P. (2005). The relationship between teacher and student behavior in classrooms for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Transactional processes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-005-1106-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, K. (2015). Middle childhood teacher–child relationships: Insights from an attachment perspective and remaining challenges. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 148, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Spilt and Koomen supplementary material

Spilt and Koomen supplementary material

Download Spilt and Koomen supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 127.5 KB