Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:54:38.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Invited commentary in response to PUFA status at birth and allergy-related phenotypes in childhood: a pooled analysis of the Maastricht Essential Fatty Acid Birth and Rhea birth cohorts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2018

Debra J. Palmer*
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Roberts Road, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Invited Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2018 

Regular inclusion of fish in the maternal diet during pregnancy appears to be a beneficial whole food nutritional strategy approach to reducing the growing worldwide burden of allergic disease. Observational cohort studies have found higher maternal fish intakes in pregnancy to be associated with reduced child allergic outcomes, including reduced eczema( Reference Jedrychowski, Perera and Maugeri 1 Reference Willers, Devereux and Craig 4 ), reduced wheeze or asthma( Reference Romieu, Torrent and Garcia-Esteban 2 , Reference Chatzi, Torrent and Romieu 5 , Reference Salam, Li and Langholz 6 ) and reduced allergen sensitisation( Reference Calvani, Alessandri and Sopo 7 ). There has been one randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating maternal oily fish consumption (two portions of salmon per week) during pregnancy, and this trial found that regular fish consumption beneficially modified neonatal immune responses( Reference Noakes, Vlachava and Kremmyda 8 ); however, this small RCT (n 123) was not powered adequately for clinical allergic disease outcomes. Fish is an excellent dietary whole food source of potential anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory nutrients including n-3 PUFA. In accordance, an increase in allergic diseases over recent decades has coincided with a decreased intake of n-3 PUFA in the diet of many communities and a corresponding increase in consumption of n-6 PUFA.

In this issue of the British Journal of Nutrition, Stratakis et al.( Reference Stratakis, Gielen and Margetaki 9 ) present findings from two European birth cohorts, the Maastricht Essential Fatty Acid Birth cohort in the Netherlands and the Rhea (Mother–Child) birth cohort in Crete, Greece. This new analysis combines pooled individual data from these two cohorts from Western and Southern Europe and adds to the evidence base regarding the influence of PUFA status at birth on childhood allergic disease outcomes. Their major findings include an association between a higher ratio of n-3:n-6 fatty acids in cord blood at birth with a lower risk of child wheeze and asthma at 6–7 years of age. In individual fatty acid analyses, this association was found with higher EPA and DHA concentrations in cord blood. There were however no associations with rhinitis and eczema symptoms at 6–7 years of age.

Several RCT have investigated maternal supplementation during pregnancy with n-3 PUFA rich fish oils for effects on offspring allergic disease outcomes. Collectively these RCT have found that n-3 PUFA supplementation during the second and/or third trimester of pregnancy may decrease the risk of allergen sensitisation and allergic disease in the offspring( Reference Dunstan, Mori and Barden 10 Reference Palmer, Sullivan and Gold 13 ). Beneficial immunomodulatory effects in cord blood have also been demonstrated( Reference Dunstan, Mori and Barden 10 , Reference Barden, Mori and Dunstan 14 , Reference Prescott, Barden and Mori 15 ), in particular maternal fish oil supplementation in pregnancy lowers neonatal oxidative stress( Reference Barden, Mori and Dunstan 14 ) and neutrophil production of leukotriene B4, which correlated with reduced Toll-like receptor-4-mediated inflammatory responses( Reference Prescott, Barden and Mori 15 ). The new findings in this issue of the British Journal of Nutrition, by Stratakis et al.( Reference Stratakis, Gielen and Margetaki 9 ) are in accordance with those from two RCT conducted in Denmark by Bisgaard et al. (n 695)( Reference Bisgaard, Stokholm and Chawes 16 ) and Olsen et al. (n 533)( Reference Olsen, Osterdal and Salvig 12 ). Both of these Danish trials found that after maternal supplementation of about 900 mg DHA and 1300 mg EPA per d in pregnancy, child wheeze or asthma at 3–5 years of age( Reference Bisgaard, Stokholm and Chawes 16 ) and asthma at 16 years of age( Reference Olsen, Osterdal and Salvig 12 ) were significantly reduced. Interestingly a RCT conducted in Australia with similar sample size (n 706), but with a different maternal fish oil supplementation of 800 mg DHA and 100 mg EPA per d in pregnancy, found no difference in parent reported asthma at 6 years of age( Reference Best, Sullivan and Palmer 17 ). However this trial did identify beneficial effects earlier in childhood, especially reduced egg sensitisation and atopic eczema at 1 year of age( Reference Palmer, Sullivan and Gold 13 ). This raises the question as to whether the differences in wheeze and asthma outcomes were related to differences between the Danish and Australian studies in EPA supplementation dose and/or other genetic, dietary, environmental and lifestyle factors.

Research in this field is not straightforward and inconsistencies in our evidence base to date are likely to reflect the inherent complexity of each individual’s diet, difficulties with accurate quantification of dietary intakes, and interplay with many other factors. It is important to consider the dietary source of fatty acid intakes and associated other dietary factors. For example, other potential anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory nutrients found in oily fish like Se and vitamin D, may be playing an important role. Our diets are not comprised of just one or two specific foods (or nutrients) and the combined interaction effects, although often difficult to disentangle, need to be a focus of future research. We still require more RCT investigating whole foods (e.g. fish) or dietary patterns (e.g. the Mediterranean Diet) based interventions, with adequate sample sizes and high retention rates. In particular within new studies, we also need the tracking of PUFA status at multiple-time points during pregnancy, at birth, during infancy and at least two-three times within the childhood years to enable an improved understanding of whether there is a critical period or a long-term fatty acid status association with allergic disease development. Finally, it is important to consider the sub-group findings from the recently published Bisgaard et al. RCT( Reference Bisgaard, Stokholm and Chawes 16 ), where the preventive effect of maternal supplementation appeared to be driven primarily by children of mothers who had low blood levels and low dietary intakes of EPA and DHA at randomisation, as well as the children of mothers with a fatty acid desaturase (FADS) genotype associated with low EPA and DHA blood levels. These findings highlight the importance of targeting pregnant women with the FADS genotype, as well as those with a low dietary intake of these fatty acids, as examples of potential future personalised approaches to allergy prevention. It will be essential for future studies to investigate the role of individual genetic polymorphisms and their influence on the interplay between nutritional status in early life and allergic disease outcomes.

Acknowledgements

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

The author (D. J. P. ) solely wrote the manuscript.

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Jedrychowski, W, Perera, F, Maugeri, U, et al. (2011) Effects of prenatal and perinatal exposure to fine air pollutants and maternal fish consumption on the occurrence of infantile eczema. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 155, 275281.Google Scholar
2. Romieu, I, Torrent, M, Garcia-Esteban, R, et al. (2007) Maternal fish intake during pregnancy and atopy and asthma in infancy. Clin Exp Allergy 37, 518525.Google Scholar
3. Sausenthaler, S, Koletzko, S, Schaaf, B, et al. (2007) Maternal diet during pregnancy in relation to eczema and allergic sensitization in the offspring at 2 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 530537.Google Scholar
4. Willers, SM, Devereux, G, Craig, LC, et al. (2007) Maternal food consumption during pregnancy and asthma, respiratory and atopic symptoms in 5-year-old children. Thorax 62, 773779.Google Scholar
5. Chatzi, L, Torrent, M, Romieu, I, et al. (2008) Mediterranean diet in pregnancy is protective for wheeze and atopy in childhood. Thorax 63, 507513.Google Scholar
6. Salam, MT, Li, YF, Langholz, B, et al. (2005) Maternal fish consumption during pregnancy and risk of early childhood asthma. J Asthma 42, 513518.Google Scholar
7. Calvani, M, Alessandri, C, Sopo, SM, et al. (2006) Consumption of fish, butter and margarine during pregnancy and development of allergic sensitizations in the offspring: role of maternal atopy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 17, 94102.Google Scholar
8. Noakes, PS, Vlachava, M, Kremmyda, LS, et al. (2012) Increased intake of oily fish in pregnancy: effects on neonatal immune responses and on clinical outcomes in infants at 6 mo. Am J Clin Nutr 95, 395404.Google Scholar
9. Stratakis, N, Gielen, M, Margetaki, K, et al. (2017) PUFA status at birth and allergy-related phenotypes in childhood: a pooled analysis of the Maastricht Essential Fatty Acid Birth (MEFAB) and RHEA birth cohorts. Br J Nutr (epublication ahead of print version).Google Scholar
10. Dunstan, JA, Mori, TA, Barden, A, et al. (2003) Fish oil supplementation in pregnancy modifies neonatal allergen-specific immune responses and clinical outcomes in infants at high risk of atopy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 112, 11781184.Google Scholar
11. Furuhjelm, C, Warstedt, K, Larsson, J, et al. (2009) Fish oil supplementation in pregnancy and lactation may decrease the risk of infant allergy. Acta Paediatr 98, 14611467.Google Scholar
12. Olsen, SF, Osterdal, ML, Salvig, JD, et al. (2008) Fish oil intake compared with olive oil intake in late pregnancy and asthma in the offspring: 16 y of registry-based follow-up from a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 167175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Palmer, DJ, Sullivan, T, Gold, MS, et al. (2012) Effect of n-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in pregnancy on infants’ allergies in first year of life: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 344, e184.Google Scholar
14. Barden, AE, Mori, TA, Dunstan, JA, et al. (2004) Fish oil supplementation in pregnancy lowers F2-isoprostanes in neonates at high risk of atopy. Free Radic Res 38, 233239.Google Scholar
15. Prescott, SL, Barden, AE, Mori, TA, et al. (2007) Maternal fish oil supplementation in pregnancy modifies neonatal leukotriene production by cord-blood-derived neutrophils. Clin Sci (Lond) 113, 409416.Google Scholar
16. Bisgaard, H, Stokholm, J, Chawes, BL, et al. (2016) Fish oil-derived fatty acids in pregnancy and wheeze and asthma in offspring. N Engl J Med 375, 25302539.Google Scholar
17. Best, KP, Sullivan, T, Palmer, D, et al. (2016) Prenatal fish oil supplementation and allergy: 6-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 137, e20154443.Google Scholar